PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Current Procedural Terminology”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 469 records · Page 26Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

EPSDT & billing.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

ED crisis presents a new set of quality challenges.

Emergency department (ED) coverage crisis may affect not only specialist care but basic emergency services. Finances and lifestyle issues keep many specialists from covering the ED. Fee-for-service programs and stipends for physicians can provide a coverage incentive.

Current Procedural Terminology↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Cardiac telemetry coding.

In summary, documentation of the procedure performed and individual insurance payor guidelines will determine the procedure code billed for telemetry services. Because codes accepted for these services and reimbursement guidelines may vary, it may be necessary to obtain specific guidance before claim submission.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed2004

Estimating angina prevalence in a managed care population.

Estimations of angina prevalence were calculated using managed care administrative data and applying 3 angina-related definitions. The definitions comprised angina pectoris diagnosis codes, diagnosis and procedure codes signifying the broader condition of coronary artery disease (CAD), including angina pectoris, and diagnosis codes for the symptom of chest pain. Prevalence rates were calculated in 2000, 2001, and the combined period of 2000 and 2001 for each definition based on the number of members with at least 1 day of eligibility in each period. Results were compared with published estimates and projected to the US population. The prevalence rates per 1000 people for angina pectoris in 2000, 2001, and 2000--2001 were 12.3, 14.0, and 17.5, respectively. The prevalence rate is higher in the combined 2-year period primarily because there is little duplication in patients with angina who appear in both years, but there is significant overlap in the overall (denominator) population eligible in both years. For CAD the rates were 52.2, 59.9, and 65.4, respectively, and for chest pain they were 63.4, 75.8, and 93.4, respectively. Rates were higher in men versus women and in each successive age group. These gender and age results were observed in the projections to the US population. By comparison, the American Heart Association (AHA) estimates angina pectoris prevalence to be 35 per 1000 in 2001. The lower managed care rate for angina pectoris may reflect differences in data capture (ie, self-reported data for AHA vs claims submitted for reimbursement for managed care). AHA estimates are higher for women versus men while the managed care estimates show the opposite trend. Prevalence of angina in the United States is substantial. With the aging of the US population, numbers of patients with angina presenting to the healthcare system can be expected to increase, further adding to the cost burdens facing managed care.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Coding: what's new?

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Current Procedural Terminology↗