PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Electrocoagulation”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 469 records · Page 26Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Prospective randomized comparative study of bipolar electrocoagulation versus heater probe for treatment of chronically bleeding internal hemorrhoids.

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to compare the efficacy, complications, failure rates, and crossovers of heater and bipolar probe treatments of chronically bleeding internal hemorrhoids. METHODS: Eighty-one patients (31 female, 50 male) with mean age of 53 years had large (grade 2 to 3) internal hemorrhoids with bleeding for a mean of 12 years, had failed medical management, and were randomized in a prospective study of anoscopic treatments to heater versus bipolar probes. Failure was defined as a major complication or failure to reduce the size of all internal hemorrhoids with three or more treatments. RESULTS: With similar background variables and no difference in treatment times, rectal bleeding and other symptoms were controlled in a shorter time with the heater probe than with the bipolar probe (77 versus 121 days). Five complications (fissures, bleeding, or rectal spasm) occurred with the bipolar probe, and two occurred with the heater probe. The heater probe caused more pain during treatments but had significantly fewer failures and crossovers. CONCLUSIONS: For patients who had failed medical management of chronically bleeding internal hemorrhoids, the techniques and complications of heater and bipolar probes were similar, but pain was more common, failures and crossovers were less frequent, and the time to symptom relief was shorter with the heater probe than with the bipolar probe.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMed1997

A randomized prospective study of endoscopic bipolar electrocoagulation and heater probe treatment of chronic rectal bleeding from radiation telangiectasia.

BACKGROUND: Our purposes were to (1) evaluate efficacy and safety of bipolar or heater probe endoscopic coagulation compared to prior medical therapy for bleeding radiation telangiectasia, and (2) consider the impact of treatments on patients' impression of their overall health and activity. METHODS: Twelve months of medical management had failed in 18 men and 3 women with chronic, recurrent hematochezia and anemia after radiation treatment of pelvic malignancies. Patients had multiple rectal telangiectasias coagulated with bipolar or heater probes in a randomized, prospective study. RESULTS: Rectal bleeding stopped within four treatment sessions. During 12 months of endoscopic versus medical therapy, severe bleeding episodes diminished significantly for bipolar probe versus 12 months of prior medical therapy (75% vs 33%) and heater probe (67% vs 11%); mean hematocrits rose significantly for patients undergoing bipolar (38.2 vs 31.9) and heater probe (37.6 vs 28.4) treatments, and their impression of overall health improved. During long-term follow-up, new telangiectasias or rectal bleeding were easily controlled. No major complications resulted. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Bipolar or heater probes were safe and effective relative to medical therapy for palliation of patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding from radiation telangiectasias, and (2) all patients improved in ability to travel and exercise and in their overall impression of their health.

Aged↗