PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Genetic testing”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 469 records · Page 26Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Uptake of genetic testing and pre-test levels of mental distress in Norwegian families with known BRCA1 mutations.

232 family members from 27 Norwegian families with BRCA1 mutations were offered genetic testing. 180/232 (78%) chose to be tested, 14/232 (6%) have not yet decided and 38/232 (16%) declined. All 232 persons were invited to fill in the following questionnaires when offered testing: Impact of Event Scale (IES), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) and Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS). 207/232 (89%) responded to the questionnaires. Of those declining to be tested 23/38 (61%) answered the questionnaires compared to 170/180 (94%) of those wanting the test (p < 0.0001). A higher proportion of females with a history of cancer than females without such a history had abnormal scores on the IES-intrusion and GHQ questionnaires (p < 0.001). Healthy females who were deciding on predictive testing had the same or lower prevalence of mental distress compared to the general population, between 4.3% and 18.0% as measured by the different questionnaires. Males did not differ from healthy females on any of the measures. According to their HADS scores, women without a history of cancer deciding on predictive testing for breast-ovarian cancer had lower or equal levels of mental distress compared to the general population. The high uptake of genetic testing combined with the lower than normal prevalence of mental distress indicates that the activity may continue as practised, awaiting longitudinal data concerning the levels of mental distress after genetic testing.

Anxiety↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Commentary on genetic testing of children: maintaining an open future.

Pediatric nurses have the opportunity to facilitate genetic testing decisions made by parents on behalf og their children. When facilitating and evaluating the genetic testing decision, the pediatric nurse should consider whether the decision is in the best interest of the child and protects the child's right to an open future. Pediatric nurses should take advantage of the various formal and informal educational genetic and ethics resources available.

Child↗
PubMed2006

Acceptance of genetic testing for hereditary breast ovarian cancer among study enrollees from an African American kindred.

Clinical availability of genetic testing for cancer predisposition genes is generating a major challenge for U.S. health care systems to provide relevant genetic services to underserved populations. Here we present rates of study enrollment and utilization of genetic testing in a research study on BRCA1 testing acceptance in one large kindred. We also present data on baseline access to genetic information as well as enabling and obstructing factors to study enrollment. The study population included female and male members of an African American kindred based in the rural southern United States with an identified BRCA1 mutation. A combination of quantitative and qualitative data were collected and analyzed. Of the 161 living, eligible, and locatable kindred members, 105 (65%) enrolled in the study. Family, personal, and educational motivations were the most commonly endorsed reasons for study participation. The most commonly cited reasons for refusal to participate in the study were: lack of interest, time constraints, and negative experiences with prior participation in genetic research. Eighty three percent of the participants underwent BRCA1 testing. In multiple logistic regression analysis, age 40-49 (odds ratio (OR) = 6.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-39.5), increased perceived risk of being a BRCA1 mutation carrier (OR = 4.1; 95% CI = 1.1-14.6), and high cancer genetics knowledge levels (OR = 1.5; 95% CI = 1.1-2.3) were associated with BRCA1 testing acceptance. The results of this study indicate that cognitive and demographic factors may influence genetic research participation and genetic testing decisions among African Americans who are at increased risk of carrying a deleterious BRCA1 mutation.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): Comparison of a new molecular genetic test kit (GenoType MRSA) with standard diagnostic methods.

Results obtained from 188 isolates of staphylococci using standard diagnostic methods for identifying MRSA were compared with those achieved with a newly available molecular genetic test kit, the GenoType, Version 1, MRSA (Hain Lifescience GmbH, Nehren, Germany). The GenoType MRSA detects the mecA gene and, in addition, a highly specific sequence for Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse hybridization. There was a 100% overall correlation between the results of conventional and molecular genetic testing. 143 isolates were tested positive for MRSA, 10 isolates were identified as oxacillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus strains (MSSA), and 35 isolates were coagulase-negative staphylococci of various species. However, five of the 143 MRSA strains yielded ambiguous results with the first line standard tests and therefore required additional testing leading to delay of definitive diagnosis. As expected, mecA could not only be detected in MRSA strains, but also in coagulase-negative staphylococci. The reliable identification as S. aureus from the same isolate is therefore an essential prerequisite for MRSA diagnosis. The GenoType MRSA fulfills this requirement by parallel detection of a S. aureus-specific sequence and the mecA gene. Molecular genetic testing with the GenoType MRSA kit needs much less time than conventional microbiological methods. Therefore genetic testing provides not only a considerable advantage with respect to reliability but also to speed.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed2002

Utilization of BRCA1/2 genetic testing in the clinical setting: report from a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Clinical testing for BRCA1/2 has been available since 1996. Interest in testing in the research and hypothetical situations has been consistently high, but there have been limited reports on its clinical utilization. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of BRCA1/2 test utilization by high-risk patients who were seen at the Johns Hopkins Breast and Ovarian Surveillance Service. RESULTS: Between February 1996 and December 1999, 258 families who had at least a 10% chance of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation were offered genetic testing. Of these, 26 families seen between February 1996 and October 1996 had access to free testing. Overall, 68 of 258 (26%) underwent genetic testing. Educational level, number of children or daughters, breast carcinoma screening behavior, smoking and drinking behavior, perceived risk of breast carcinoma, and family history was not associated with test utilization. Eligibility for free testing, prior history of breast or ovarian carcinoma, Ashkenazi Jewish versus non-Ashkenazi Jewish heritage, genetic risk category, and age category were associated with test utilization, and in multivariate analysis, the first three remained statistically significant factors associated with genetic testing. Only 26% of the 50 patients who did not have access to free testing sought insurance reimbursement, of which greater than 50% (7 of 13) had a prior diagnosis of breast or ovarian carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: The actual utilization of BRCA1/2 genetic testing in a clinical setting is lower than in the research and hypothetical settings. Potential obstacles include cost, fear of insurance discrimination, and need to involve an affected family member in the testing process.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Psychologic distress after disclosure of genetic test results regarding hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, there have been few studies of the psychologic distress after disclosure of genetic test results for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC). The objectives of this study were to identify the prevalence rates and predictors of psychologic distress and to evaluate the feelings of guilt after disclosure of the test results in Japanese probands and unaffected relatives. METHODS: Probands and unaffected relatives were interviewed immediately after the first genetic counseling session for HNPCC and again 1 month after disclosure of the genetic test results. The prevalence of major and minor depression, acute stress disorder (ASD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) were assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edition revised (DSM-III-R) or the DSM-IV; feelings of guilt were investigated using a numeric scale and a semistructured interview. RESULTS: Among 47 participants who completed the baseline interview, 42 participants (89%) completed the 1-month follow-up interview. Although none of the participants met the criteria for major depression, ASD, or PTSD at the follow-up interview, 3 of 42 participants (7%) met the criteria for minor depression and 2 participants (5%) had PTSS. The only predictor of psychologic distress found was the presence of a history of major or minor depression (odds ratio, 19.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-264.95; P < 0.05). Five of 42 participants (12%) had feelings of guilt. CONCLUSIONS: Disclosure of genetic test results for HNPCC may not cause significant psychologic distress in Japanese probands or relatives. However, healthcare providers should not neglect to assess these individuals for psychologic responses, such as minor depression and PTSS.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Medical evaluation of pediatric hearing loss. Laboratory, radiographic, and genetic testing.

Specific investigations of pediatric hearing loss are based on the history, physical examination, and age of the patient. The radiographic investigation of choice is high-resolution CT of the temporal bone. Patients with a dilated vestibular aqueduct need to be investigated further for Pendred syndrome. Screening for mutations in connexin 26 has become increasingly available in many centers and should be performed in all cases of nonsyndromic hearing loss. It is important to understand the implications and pitfalls of genetic testing. Genetic counseling is necessary.

Child↗
PubMed2006

Medical students' attitudes toward genetic testing of minors.

The purpose of this study was to examine attitudes of medical students at a single university toward genetic testing in minors, defining attitudes as willingness to offer testing, and reasons for offering or not offering testing. A survey was distributed to all University of Arizona medical students (n = 428) during the 2003-2004 academic year. The survey consisted of three clinical vignettes concerning genetic testing for Huntington's disease (HD), BRCA1 breast cancer predisposition mutation, and cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier status. For each vignette, students responded to whether they would provide testing for a 7-year-old, a 17-year-old, and their reasons for each age and condition. One hundred thirty-five students (31.5%) responded to the survey. Medical students were significantly more likely to test a 7-year-old for CF carrier status (57%), than they were for a BRCA1 mutation (47%), and an HD mutation (40%). Students were significantly more likely to test a 17-year-old than a 7-year-old in each clinical scenario. Students who had completed a genetics course in medical school were significantly less likely to test a 7-year-old for a BRCA1 mutation than those who had not completed a formal course. Medical students' willingness to perform genetic testing in a minor is influenced by the type of condition, the age of the minor being tested, and the amount of genetics education received in medical school.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Research issues in genetic testing of adolescents for obesity.

Obesity is often established in adolescence, and advances are being made in identifying its genetic underpinnings. We examine issues related to the eventual likelihood of genetic tests for obesity targeted to adolescents: family involvement; comprehension of the test's meaning; how knowledge of genetic status may affect psychological adaptation; minors' ability to control events; parental/child autonomy; ability to make informed medical decisions; self-esteem; unclear distinctions between early/late onset for this condition; and social stigmatization. The public health arena will be important in educating families about possible future genetic tests for obesity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

What you don't know can hurt you: adverse psychologic effects in members of BRCA1-linked and BRCA2-linked families who decline genetic testing.

PURPOSE: To identify members of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families who are at risk for adverse psychologic effects of genetic testing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study with baseline (preeducation) assessments of predictor variables (ie, sociodemographic factors, cancer history, and cancer-related stress symptoms) was performed. The primary outcome variable (presence of depressive symptoms) was assessed at baseline and at 1- and 6-month follow-up evaluations. Participants were 327 adult male and female members of BRCA1- and BRCA2-linked hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families, who were identified as carriers, noncarriers, or decliners of genetic testing. RESULTS: The presence of cancer-related stress symptoms at baseline was strongly predictive of the onset of depressive symptoms in family members who were invited but declined testing. Among persons who reported high baseline levels of stress, depression rates in decliners increased from 26% at baseline to 47% at 1-month follow-up; depression rates in noncarriers decreased and in carriers showed no change (odds ratio [OR] for decliners v noncarriers=8.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9 to 33.5; P=.0004). These significant differences in depression rates were still evident at the 6-month follow-up evaluation (P=.04). CONCLUSION: In BRCA1/2-linked families, persons with high levels of cancer-related stress who decline genetic testing may be at risk for depression. These family members may benefit from education and counseling, even if they ultimately elect not to be tested, and should be monitored for potential adverse effects.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Effects of individual and family functioning on interest in genetic testing.

OBJECTIVE: The present study reports on the important issue of how family communication and support regarding breast cancer risk affects interest in genetic testing and mental health. METHODS: Participants (n = 221) were women aged 18-74 who had at least one relative of Ashkenazi Jewish descent, no personal history of breast or ovarian cancer, and lived within 60 miles of Seattle, Wash. RESULTS: Communication about breast cancer risk was reported with very low frequency across all types of relatives. Women talked with their mothers and sisters more often than their fathers, brothers, or children. The only significant predictor of interest in genetic testing was the individual level variable of seeking social support. CONCLUSION: Social support needs might be a part of the genetic testing process.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed2001

Antenatal genetic testing and the right to remain in ignorance.

As knowledge increases about the human genome, prenatal genetic testing will become cheaper, safer and more comprehensive. It is likely that there will be a great deal of support for making prenatal testing for a wide range of genetic disorders a routine part of antenatal care. Such routine testing is necessarily coercive in nature and does not involve the same standard of consent as is required in other health care settings. This paper asks whether this level of coercion is ethically justifiable in this case, or whether pregnant women have a right to remain in ignorance of the genetic make-up of the fetus they are carrying. While information gained by genetic testing may be useful for pregnant women when making decisions about their pregnancy, it does not prevent harm to future children. It is argued that as this kind of testing provides information in the interests of the pregnant women and not in the interests of any future child, the same standards of consent that are normally required for genetic testing should be required in this instance.

Coercion↗
PubMed1996

Parents' responses to predictive genetic testing in their children: report of a single case study.

There is a widely held view among health professionals that predictive genetic testing of children for late onset diseases is not desirable clinical practice. Yet, little is known about the views of parents, or their responses, to predictive genetic testing in their children. Since such testing is being carried out in some genetic centres, the opportunity was taken to conduct a single case study of the parents of 2 and 4 year old sisters who were tested for the gene for familial adenomatous polyposis. Interviews before testing, after, and 15 months later showed a stable attitude, that parental responsibility included making decisions about such testing, and that the role of health professionals should be one of information giving rather than decision making. These parents had no regrets about having their children tested and reported no changes in their behaviour towards either the child who tested positively or the child who tested negatively. Using standardised scales, mood was found to be within the normal range both before and after testing in the mother and father. This case study is a first step towards systematic empirical studies determining the consequences of acquiescing to parents' requests for genetic testing in their children.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed2005

Attitudes toward genetic testing for thrombophilia in asymptomatic members of a large family with heritable protein C deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Little research has been performed regarding the psychological consequences of knowing that one is at an increased risk for venous thrombosis. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore attitudes toward genetic testing for protein C deficiency. METHODS: Questionnaires about genetic testing attitudes, dispositional anxiety, risk perception, and thrombosis-related worry were completed by 168 asymptomatic members of a North-American kindred with a high incidence of heritable protein C deficiency conferring a high lifetime risk of venous thrombosis. A total of 76 subjects (45%) had not been tested for protein C deficiency before participating in our study whereas the other 92 subjects (55%) had been tested prior to filling in the questionnaire, of whom 34 people had protein C deficiency, while 58 did not. RESULTS: Family members with protein C deficiency perceived a higher risk of suffering venous thrombosis and scored higher on thrombosis-related worry than family members without protein C deficiency. Participants who had not been tested did not report excessive thrombosis-related worry. Participants with protein C deficiency reported a belief in the psychological and health benefits of testing, and felt that they experienced low psychological distress following the genetic test. High psychological distress following the test was related to dispositional anxiety and thrombosis-related worry. Participants without protein C deficiency were relieved after finding out that they did not have the deficiency. CONCLUSION: There seem to be few negative psychological consequences of knowing that one is at an increased risk for venous thrombosis, except in vulnerable individuals.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Genetic counseling for hereditary pancreatitis--the role of molecular genetics testing for the cationic trypsinogen gene, cystic fibrosis and serine protease inhibitor Kazal type 1.

The importance of pretest information, using an accredited DNA laboratory and interpreting the genotype on behalf of the patient and their physicians is emphasized. Care with predictive testing and the strong encouragement to involve a specialist genetic counseling service is made. A similar approach to genetic testing should be used when children are involved. Because of the incomplete pickup of PRSS1 mutations, particularly of a limited mutation panel of R122H and N291 (perhaps with A16V), a diagnosis of HP cannot be ruled out by molecular genetic testing alone. The A16V mutation has a reduced penetrance, and its contribution to pancreatitis remains unclear. The advice to patients with genetic forms of pancreatitis is a strong encouragement to avoid smoking, to avoid alcohol, and to remain in contact with clinical and research groups for their follow-up and screening trials for early pancreatic cancer. The remaining issues are of how wide to cast the net of investigation in patients with unexplained pancreatitis, particularly looking for mutations in the CFTR and lower penetrance genes such as PSTI/SPINK1.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1993

Reproductive genetic testing and eugenics.

The situation concerning reproductive genetic testing in Switzerland is briefly described. Growing awareness of eugenic implications especially by women is reported. This is also true for all the other German-speaking countries in Europe to a higher extent than in the other European countries. Better professional education and public information are required.

Attitude↗
PubMed2002

Motivations and concerns of women considering genetic testing for breast cancer: a comparison between affected and at-risk probands.

Since the discovery of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, there has been an increasing demand for breast cancer risk assessment programs. In an effort to understand and serve the population such programs target better, several studies have identified factors influencing high-risk women to pursue breast cancer risk assessment and genetic testing services; none, however, has focused on how the motivations and concerns of at-risk women may differ from their previously affected counterparts, who are typically the initial members of their families to undergo genetic testing. The majority of both previously affected and unaffected women felt that preventative surgery decisions, surveillance practices, the assessment of children's risks, and increased breast cancer anxiety were "more important" or "very important" issues regarding their thoughts about genetic testing. Significantly more affected women deemed family members' opinions "more" or "very important" (p < 0.01). Opinions concerning insurance and employment discrimination did not vary significantly between groups; however, a larger percentage of affected women felt this issue was of importance. Although all issues above should be addressed with women seeking cancer risk assessment and genetic testing, this research may help health care providers to gain a greater understanding of how the motivators and concerns of high-risk women can differ with personal cancer status so that referral, counseling, and education can be executed optimally.

Breast Neoplasms↗