[SURGICAL TREATMENT OF PEPTIC ULCER PERFORATION].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk and the results of surgical treatment for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU), to compare them through time, and to determine the current optimal surgical treatment. In a retrospective study, the charts of all the patients admitted for PPU between January 1976 and October 1991 were reviewed. The features believed to be of importance in the outcome were assessed for statistical analysis. A comparison was made between three periods of the study (1976-1980, 1981-1985, 1986-1991). 247 patients were included. Mortality was 11.7% (29/247). Factors associated with an increased mortality were: shock on admission (p = 0.01), age (p < 0.001), severe associated medical illnesses (p < 0.001) and the form of treatment (p < 0.01). After multivariate analysis, only shock on admission and associated disease remained significant. Chronic peptic ulcer disease occurred in 76% of the patients. Comparing the periods showed that age, associated illnesses, percentage of acute or subacute ulcers, mortality, as well as the number of patients, are increasing. The main determinant of surgical treatment for PPU is the patient and his/her general state. Because of the high frequency of chronic peptic ulcer disease, we believe that the gold standard in the treatment for PPU remains definitive surgery. However, in the presence of more than one risk factor, suture and patch are probably safer.
Throughout last decades there was a noticeable change in the incidence and number of complications of peptic ulcer disease observed. The aim of our study was to determine the character of changes within the course of last 41 years in perforated peptic ulcer's incidence, localization together with patients' age and gender. To achieve that aim we analyzed the group of 784 patients admitted to 2nd Chair of Surgery of Jagiellonian University due to perforated duodenal and gastric ulcers from 1962 to 2002. To allow statistical analysis the collected material was subsequently divided into 4 periods: 1962-1971, 1972-1981, 1982-1991 and 1992-2002. There was no change in overall incidence of perforated peptic ulcers observed within analyzed period. We observed however marked rise in female percentage in the perforated duodenal ulcers group. Perforated gastric ulcers patients--regardless of gender--and females suffering from perforated duodenal ulcers were on average about 10 years older than males with perforated duodenal ulcers. Rise in age observed in the male and female groups treated due to perforated duodenal ulcers proved to be statistically insignificant.
In a consecutive series of 284 patients with a perforated peptic ulcer (229 pyloroduodenal, 55 gastric) there was a 26 per cent hospital mortality rate, and patients aged greater than or equal to 70 years (n = 176) had a significantly higher mortality rate (34 per cent) than patients aged less than 70 years (14 per cent, P less than 0.001). Multiple clinical variables were significantly more common in the elderly group of patients (65 per cent), in those having non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or steroid therapy (56 per cent), in patients where there is an absence of a previous dyspeptic history (69 per cent), and when risk factors such as delayed presentation (33 per cent) and the presence of shock on admission to hospital (27 per cent) are present. Definitive operations (vagotomy or gastrectomy) had an increased mortality rate in the elderly (P = 0.018). Risk scores based upon the presence of shock, delayed presentation or concurrent medical illness could have predicted 87 per cent of postoperative deaths in elderly subjects, and it is suggested that risk stratification and greater caution in the use of definitive operations for perforated ulcer may result in a reduction in the high mortality rate in elderly subjects.
Peritonitis due to viscus perforation in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients can be catastrophic. We describe the first reported case of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) in a PD patient. This 78-year-old man presented with a 1-day history of mild abdominal pain. He had been receiving nocturnal intermittent PD for 2 years and had ischemic heart disease and cirrhosis of the liver. Pneumoperitoneum and peritonitis were documented, but the symptoms were mild. The "board-like abdomen" sign was not noted. Air inflation and contrast radiography indicated a perforation in the upper gastrointestinal tract, and laparotomy disclosed a perforation in the prepyloric great curvature. Unfortunately, the patient died during surgery. This case illustrates that the "board-like abdomen" sign may be absent in PD patients with PPU because of dilution of gastric acid by the dialysate. Free air in the abdomen, although suggestive of PPU, is also not uncommon in PD patients without viscus perforation. Because PD has to be discontinued after laparotomy and exploratory laparotomy may be fatal in high-risk patients, other diagnostic methods should be used to confirm viscus perforation before surgery. PPU, which can be proved by air inflation and contrast radiography, should be suspected in PD patients with pneumoperitoneum and peritonitis.
Abdominal sonography was performed in 283 patients with acute abdominal pain. Of these patients, 10 were diagnosed as having an acute perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) and 2 were diagnosed as having a sealed-off PPU. Sonographic findings of acute PPU are summarized. The presence of an interference echo with the shifting phenomenon is a very strong indication of the presence of free air in the abdominal cavity. Using these sonographic criteria, intraperitoneal free air was diagnosed as 9/10 patients with PPU in comparison to 8/10 by abdominal and chest radiographs. Two patients with sonographic evidence of free air, but negative X-ray studies, were later found to have free air in the subsequent radiographic studies. These findings suggest that sonography is highly sensitive in the small number of patients in whom air is found. Sonographic studies also have the advantage of detecting other changes associated with PPU, such as fluid accumulation, inflammatory mass, and thickening of the gallbladder.
The aim of the study was to assess the differences in postoperative outcome in two well-matched groups of patients undergoing suture of a perforated peptic ulcer. The first 10 patients were treated laparoscopically, and the second group of 10 in a traditional manner through a midline xipho-umbilical incision. Operative technique was the same, only via a different access. Variables influencing outcome were matched for comparison of the influence of the technique. All patients underwent operation within 24 hours from onset of symptoms. Analysis of pre-, intra- and postoperative factors was done for the two groups. A significant difference was found only in the percentage of wound infections (0% vs 40%) in favour of the laparoscopic group. Surgical time, postoperative pain, resumption of feeding and discharge from hospital were similar in the two groups. As in other larger studies, our findings confirm the indication for laparoscopy in acute abdomen. The suture technique is feasible and safe and is to be considered as the gold standard when used with the same indications as in open surgery.
Since 1944 there has been a dramatic change in the pattern of admissions for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) to the Royal Newcastle Hospital, the main teaching hospital of the Hunter Region, Australia. Between 1944 and 1950, females accounted for 6% of all perforations; since then the proportion of females admitted with this complication has risen to 32%. Simultaneously, the modal age for PPU has shifted from the fifth to the seventh decade and the ratio of gastric to pyloroduodenal perforations has fallen from 1.1:1 to 0.6:1. No good explanation for this change in the natural history of PPU, also noted elsewhere, is evident.
Sonography is not the method of choice for the evaluation of suspected peptic ulcer perforation (PUP). However, indirect sonographic signs and direct visualization of PUP have been reported by several authors in recent years. We report a case of an elderly woman who presented with severe abdominal pain and positive rebound sign, in whom abdominal sonography demonstrated indirect signs of PUP, the site of perforation, and active air fluid leakage through the perforated anterior prepyloric antral wall.
Peptic ulcer in pregnancy and its complications, though rare, can be life-threatening to mother and fetus. Perforated peptic ulcer in pregnancy is extremely rare; when this occurs survival of both mother and child is unusual. Only five cases of maternal survival following perforation of a peptic ulcer have previously been recorded and, of these, only three were associated with survival of both mother and infant. The authors report an additional case of perforated ulcer in pregnancy with survival of mother and infant, and review the relevant literature. Early surgical diagnosis and treatment followed by vaginal delivery of the fetus offers the best hope for survival of mother and child.
A review of 174 consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of perforated peptic ulcer to eight Hunter Region hospitals during 1979-86 is presented. Among the female admissions, the proportion of patients greater than 70 years of age was twice that in males. One-third of all perforations were in females who accounted for two-thirds of all perforated gastric ulcers. Multivariate analysis revealed that perforations located in the stomach and older age were both significant independent variables adversely affecting outcome following surgery. In contrast, shock at presentation and delay in operating were not statistically significant independent risk factors.
The aim of this study was to evaluate of logical program for the management of patients with perforated peptic ulcers. The case records of 75 consecutive patients were reviewed. The average age of the patients was 52 years. Ten patients were older than 80. The logical program was based on preoperative risk factors (concurrent medical illness, preoperative shock, and longstanding perforation more than 48 hours), history of chronic ulcer symptoms, and in selected cases, spontaneous seal on X-Ray gastroduodenogram with a water soluble contrast medium. The program was applied in 75% of cases and not applied in 25%. Out of 9 post-operative deaths (12%), 3 had a surgical cause: leakage of the suture with dehiscence in two cases. The mortality increased progressively with increasing of number of risk factors: 0%, 10% and 55% in patients with no, one, and two or three risk factors respectively. These findings constitute a validation of the predictive factors of death proposed by Boey et al. A logical program for the management of patients based on results of such multifactorial studies on risk factors, and on results of randomized prospective controlled studies may be applied in almost all patients. Our results also suggest that the quality of the perforation suture, and of the abdominal closure, especially in old and obese patients, are the most important factors to decrease the mortality.
Sixty-two cases of peritonitis due to peptic ulcer perforation were diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2000. Of these 62 cases, 23 isolates of Candida in 23 cases (CP) were cultured from peritoneal fluid. Cultures of peritoneal fluid of 10 (BP) of the remaining 39 cases was positive for bacteria only. Cultures of peritoneal fluid of the remaining 29 cases was negative. Comparison of CP, BP and culture-negative cases did not reveal any significant risk factor. Of the 23 Candida isolates, the Candida species and 48-h MICs of fluconazole and amphotericin B (mean, range ug/ml) were C. albicans 18 (0.688, 0.125-1.0; 0.297, 0.031-0.5), C. glabrata 3 (0.542, 0.125-1.0; 0.25, 0.125-0.5), C. tropicalis 1 (0.25; 0.5), C. intermedia 1 (1.0; 0.125) respectively. Mortality rates of CP, BP and culture-negative peritonitis due to infection were 5/23(21.7%), 0/10 and 1/29(3.4%) respectively. Without effective antifungal therapy, the mortality rate of CP was not low.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the possibility, safety and advantages of laparoscopic approach in the diagnosis and therapy of perforated peptic ulcer. METHODS: This is a retrospective study including 69 cases of gastroduodenal perforation initially treated laparoscopically. The safety (morbidity and mortality) was estimated according to the two mortality rates fixed for laparotomies, APACHE II and Mannheimer Peritonitis Index (MPI). Sixty-nine patients (average age: 52 years), 23% of whom being over 70 years old, suffering from gastroduodenal perforation, were initially treated with laparoscopy. RESULTS: The laparoscopic diagnosis was done in 91% of cases. When the perforation was localized, the laparoscopic treatment was possible in 94% of cases. In 93% of cases a simple closure of the ulcerated perforation was performed. The conversion ratio was of 16%. One-hundred minutes (55-180) was the average operating. The morbidity was of 13%. One septic shock was reported in a patient with general purulent peritonitis diagnosed with laparoscopy and, after having converted, it was treated with laparotomy. No malignant iperCO2 was relieved. The reported mortality was of 4.3%, the theoretical mortality estimated was of 6% (MPI) and of 14% (Score APACHE II). The 3 deceased (87, 87 and 93 years old) had ASA index superior to 3. The remarkable advantage of laparoscopic approach is, in addition to diagnostic contribution, the absence of wall complications when the operation is not converted. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic approach is suggested in gastroduodenal perforation, since it allows an etiological diagnosis and a treatment without conversion in 84% of cases.
The incidence of ulcer perforation in 1480 patients treated in the Bergen area of Norway between 1935 and 1990 was analyzed for daily (circadian), weekly (circaseptan), and yearly (circannual) time effects. A circadian rhythm was found overall that was reproducible and fairly stable across seasons, decades, and days of the week. After subgrouping, a circadian rhythm was found in younger patients, males, and duodenal perforations, while a 12 h (circasemidian) rhythm characterized ulcer perforation for women and for gastric ulcers. Duodenal perforations showed highest incidence in the afternoon, while gastric perforations showed a major peak around noon and a secondary peak near midnight. For duodenal ulcer perforation, the circannual pattern was characterized by a 6-month rhythm, with significantly higher incidence in May-June-July and in November-December in most subgroups. A circaseptan rhythm was not found, but there was a significantly higher incidence on Thursday-Friday as compared to Sunday-Monday. The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the perforation of an ulcer thus seemed to show pronounced circadian and 6-month rhythmic variations, much less so circaseptan or circannual rhythms. While it is likely that exogenous environmental and/or societal factors play a significant role, variations in ulcer perforation may be related to endogenous biological rhythms in pathophysiological factors since the circadian pattern of duodenal perforation follows that for gastric acidity. Knowledge of the temporal patterns in peptic ulcer perforation and associated pathophysiologic factors should prove useful in optimizing the chronotherapeutic management of ulcer disease.
The results of simple closure were compared with those of partial resection in the treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. The investigation was carried out 7-13 years after the primary operation on 126 patients who had been allotted to one of the two treatment methods on the basis of an almost randomized schedule. Better late results were obtained with partial resection than with simple closure in patients in the age range 50-59 years at operation, with short duration of perforation and with a long history of symptoms before perforation. None of the patients treated with partial resection later underwent surgical treatment for recurrence of symptoms. In the simple closure group 27.3 per cent needed further surgery at 3 months to 10 years after perforation.
This study examined the associations of individual coexisting illnesses, septicaemia, intra-abdominal abscess, marital status, smoking and alcohol use, with mortality following perforation of peptic ulcer without pre-operative evidence of haemorrhage. Patients who died in hospital following ulcer perforation (cases; n = 300) were compared with patients who survived following ulcer perforation (controls; n = 276). The controls were frequency-matched to the cases on age, sex and perforation site. Data were analysed by logistic regression. Cardiac, respiratory, cerebrovascular, renal, liver and malignant diseases, and septicaemia and intra-abdominal abscess were associated with mortality and the coexisting illnesses were significantly increased in cases compared to controls both on admission and at the end of hospital stay. During hospitalization, the odds of pneumonia decreased in cases, otherwise there was little change in strengths of associations over this period. Being widowed or never married was positively associated with mortality, and moderate alcohol use was negatively associated. In conclusion, this study identifies several coexisting illnesses, septicaemia and intra-abdominal abscess as risk factors for mortality following ulcer perforation. The results suggest that, with little exception, the same level of mortality risk is associated with coexisting illnesses whether the beginning or end of hospital stay is used as the index time point.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.