SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Aortic Dissection”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 487 records · Page 27Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

Deployment of endograft in the ascending aorta to reverse type A aortic dissection.

Current surgery to treat acute type A aortic dissection involving an intimal tear in the ascending aorta consists of resection and replacement, but mortality is high. We report the case of a 46-year-old female patient with Marfan syndrome who presented with excruciating retrosternal pain and breathing distress after a bowel movement with stress. Magnetic resonance imaging and multicolour sonography showed type A aortic dissection extending from the aortic root to the right iliac artery, with intimal tears in the ascending aorta above the sinotubular junction, the distal arch beyond the left subclavian artery and the isthmic region. We adapted the endoluminal stenting technique to this case of type A aortic dissection by sealing the intimal tears in the ascending aorta using endovascular introduction of one endoluminal graft, as confirmed on angiography. The patient was discharged after 10 days. Follow-up examination by computed tomography after more than 1 year revealed no sign of dissection at any level of the aorta.

Aortic Dissection↗

PubMed2006

Correction of symptomatic cerebral malperfusion due to acute type I aortic dissection by transcarotid stenting of the innominate and carotid arteries.

INTRODUCTION: Acute proximal aortic dissection may be complicated by stroke due to malperfusion of the arch vessels. We report a novel case of successful endovascular treatment of acute cerebral malperfusion due to a dissection involving the aortic arch. CASE REPORT: A 66 year old man was transferred from another hospital with an acute type I aortic dissection and underwent emergent repair of the aortic valve and ascending aorta with a composite graft. Left hemiplegia and altered cognitive function were noted on postoperative day 1. A carotid duplex scan showed partial thrombosis of the right carotid artery with very slow flow and reversal of flow in the right vertebral artery. A head CT was normal, while a head MRI and MR angiogram showed intraluminal defects in the inominate and right carotid arteries and perfusion abnormality of the entire right middle cerebral artery territory, but only small infarcts of watershed areas. The patient underwent stenting of the right carotid and inominate arteries through the right carotid artery with complete resolution of a large pressure gradient that was noted prior to stenting. The patient's left hemiplegia and cognitive impairment subsequently resolved during his inpatient hospitalization. On follow up five months later, he had a normal neurologic exam and MRI showed old watershed infarcts but no perfusion abnormality. On most recent follow-up 2.5 years after treatment, he remains well and a CT angiogram shows that his stented vessels remain patent. CONCLUSION: Endovascular techniques may be safely applied to correct cerebral malperfusion that results from type I aortic dissection.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2004

Determinants of in-hospital mortality after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Acute type A aortic dissection presents a formidable challenge for the cardiac surgeon, although remarkable improvements have been achieved in diagnosis, surgical techniques and perioperative management. The aim of this study was to identify the most important variables associated with in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing surgery for this condition. METHODS: Between July 1998 and June 2002, 80 patients underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the variables independently correlated with in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 20% (16/80 patients). Univariate analysis revealed 24 preoperative and operative variables, including type of surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, aortic cross-clamp time, diabetes mellitus, and postoperative (postoperative 24 hours) bleeding > or = 1500 mL, as factors associated with in-hospital death. Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed the factors independently associated with in-hospital death were CPB time, diabetes mellitus, and postoperative bleeding > or = 1500 mL (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple factors affect in-hospital mortality after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. This study suggests that CPB time, diabetes mellitus and postoperative bleeding > or = 1500 mL are the main determinants of in-hospital death.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

[Clinical case of the month. Type A aortic dissection after valve replacement].

The risk for aortic dissection or further dilation of the ascending aorta exists after aortic valve replacement. We present a case of acute aortic dissection following replacement of the aortic valve. The management and treatment of dilated ascending aorta associated with aortic valve disease are reviewed and discussed.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2001

[Clinical diagnosis of acute aortic dissection].

Despite the availability of modern imaging technology, 35% of aortic dissections remain undiagnosed in vivo because clinical criteria for aortic dissection are not available to date. The present study analyzed 250 patients with acute chest and/or back pain, absence of an established differential diagnosis of the pain syndrome and clinical suspicion of acute aortic dissection for presence of 26 clinical variables. Multivariate analysis identified an aortic pain syndrome with immediate onset and/or tearing or ripping character (P < 0.0001), mediastinal and/or aortic widening on chest radiography (P < 0.0002) and pulse- and/or blood pressure differentials (P < 0.0001) as predictors of acute aortic dissection. Probability of dissection was low (7%) with absence of all three variables, intermediate (31 and 39%, respectively) with isolated findings of "aortic pain" or "mediastinal widening", and high (> 83%) with either isolated "pulse- and/or blood pressure differentials" or any combination of the three variables. This model appears useful to improve selection of patients for emergency imaging of the thoracic aorta.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2003

Risk factors for descending aortic aneurysm formation in medium-term follow-up of patients with type A aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: After surgery to repair a type A aortic dissection, most late complications and mortality result from descending aorta-related problems. This study was performed to determine the risk factors leading to descending aortic aneurysm formation and late mortality in patients undergoing the type A aortic dissection operation. METHODS: The medical records of patients who survived the operation for type A aortic dissection between 1984 and 1998 were reviewed. There were 144 patients (95 men and 49 women), ranging in age from 24 to 78 years (mean age, 52 years). Most patients were acutely ill, 15 patients were in shock, and 54 patients had cardiac tamponade at the time of the surgical procedure. One hundred thirty-seven patients had ascending aortic replacement only, and of the other 6 patients 2 had hemiarch and 4 had total arch replacement using the elephant trunk technique. The aortic valve was replaced in 23 patients, resuspended in 100, and untouched in 21. Twenty-four risk factors were evaluated in statistical analyses for the prediction of descending aortic aneurysm formation and 3-year mortality. Risk factors were investigated using univariate and multiple logistic regression and survival analyses. RESULTS: The 3-year, 5-year, and 8-year cumulative survival rates were 96.2%, 89.1%, and 80.0%, respectively. The 3-year, 5-year, and 8-year cumulative survival rates, free from descending aortic aneurysm formation or descending aorta operation, were 74.7%, 58.6%, and 43.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed that patent false lumen and initial descending aortic diameter were statistically significant risk factors for descending aortic aneurysm formation. CONCLUSIONS: The medium-term survival rate of patients who received operations for type A aortic dissection was satisfactory, despite the high incidence of descending aortic aneurysm formation. The intimal entry site over the aortic arch that was resected during the first operation could decrease the patency rate of a false lumen over the descending aorta. In the absence of a patent false lumen over the descending aorta, the chance of descending aortic aneurysm formation or operation is lessened, and the late survival rate is increased.

Aged↗

PubMed1976

Chronic calcified aortic dissection.

Two cases of chronic aortic dissection are presented. In both, plain chest roentgenograms revealed calcification in the outermost aspect of the dilated aorta. It is clear that this represented calcification of the dissection rather than of the true intima. These cases indicate that apparent aortic intimal calcification with dilatation of the aorta is not completely diagnostic of an arteriosclerotic aneurysm and that a chronic calcified aortic dissection must also be considered in the differential diagnosis.

Aortic Aneurysm↗

PubMed1991

Aortic dissection manifested as fever of unknown origin.

Aortic dissection is accompanied by fever in about one third of the patients. However, fever of unknown origin as the predominant manifestation of aortic dissection seems to be extremely rare. A review of the English literature revealed only 3 patients characterized by fever as the principal sign of aortic dissection. Herein an additional patient is reported. All 4 patients presented with pain or discomfort in the chest, back or abdomen, followed by persistent fever, lasting 5-11 weeks and associated with anemia and a high sedimentation rate. The outcome was favorable in all cases regardless of the location of the dissection or the type of treatment.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

[Aortic root redissection associated with the use of gelatin-resorcin-formalin glue following surgical treatment for acute type A aortic dissection; report of a case].

A late redissection case of the aortic root after total arch replacement for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection was reported. A 55-year-old male was treated with total arch replacement for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection. The aortic valve was bicuspid valve, and the right coronary leaflet was prolapsed because of the dissection of right and non coronary cusp. Resuspension of the commissure and the fixation of the dissected aortic wall with gelatin-resorcin-formalin (GRF) glue was performed during the operation. The initial postoperative course was uneventful and the patient discharged 52 days after the operation. Redissection of aortic root was pointed out on the computed tomography (CT) 3.5 years after the operation. As the second operation, the aortic root replacement was performed. Coronary artery bypass for right coronary artery was simultaneously performed with right internal thoracic artery because the right coronary ostium was stenotic and showed ischemic change on electrocardiogram monitor during the operation. The redissection was seen on the right coronary sinus, which was fixed by the GRF glue during the first operation. The pathological study showed the migration of macrophages and the tear of the fibrous tissue. These findings was thought to be associated with the use of the GRF glue. Careful use of the GRF glue for the fixation of the dissected aorta during the surgical treatment for the Stanford type A aortic dissection was thought to be important.

Aortic Dissection↗

PubMed1998

Aortopulmonary artery fistula. Presenting with congestive heart failure in a patient with aortic dissection.

Although it is a rare occurrence, aortic dissections can rupture into the cardiac chambers or great vessels. A review of the English literature revealed only 3 cases of fistula between an aortic false lumen and the main pulmonary artery that were repaired successfully. In this article, we report the case of a chronic type I aortic dissection with an aortopulmonary artery fistula. The patient presented with congestive heart failure. One year earlier he had undergone aortic valve replacement. To our knowledge, this is the 4th case of a successfully repaired type I aortic dissection with rupture into the pulmonary artery and the 1st such case involving a patient who had undergone a previous cardiac operation.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Endovascular stent-graft repair of acute thoracic aortic dissection--early clinical experiences.

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment of acute thoracic aortic dissection type B is the medical therapy used for most patients, according to Stanford. Surgical therapy involves a high mortality rate and is reserved for patients with complicated dissections. We report from four patients with acute thoracic aortic dissection, treated endoluminally by stent-graft implantation. METHODS: Four patients with complicated acute thoracic aortic dissections type B were treated endoluminally by transfemoral stent-graft implantation. Preoperative evaluation was performed with spiral-computed tomography and calibrated aortography. The Talent stent-graft system (Metronic) was used in all patients. RESULTS: The primary entry tear could be sealed successfully and complete thrombosis of the false thoracic aortic lumen was obtained in all cases. In one patient, transposition of the left subclavian artery was performed, in two patients the stent-grafts had to be placed across the origin of the left subclavian artery. No severe intra- or postoperative complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Endoluminal treatment of acute thoracic aortic dissection seems to be a less invasive and effective therapy. Long-term results for this method are necessary.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2001

Aortic stenting on a type B aortic dissection with visceral and limb ischemia.

Aortic dissection complicated with limb and visceral ischemia is a clinical dilemma since surgical intervention carries high risk of morbidity and mortality. The management is further complicated when renal perfusion is impaired and thus associated with severe renovascular hypertension. As catheterization techniques advanced over the past decade, percutaneous endovascular intervention provides a less invasive alternative for management of such cases. We report a case of chronic Stanford type B aortic dissection complicated with visceral and limb ischemia presenting with marked renovascular hypertension, which was successfully treated with percutaneous endovascular aortic stenting.

Abdomen↗

PubMed1992

[Imaging of aortic dissection: a retrospective study of 27 patients].

Aortic dissection can be a life threatening condition which requires an early diagnosis. As initial signs and symptoms may be nonspecific and confusing, reliable imaging techniques are requested for immediate and accurate diagnosis. This retrospective study of 27 patients with proven aortic dissection assesses the relative value of angiography, CT, and MR imaging. Contribution of these imaging modalities is discussed and illustrated. Aortic dissection was correctly identified by angiography and CT respectively in 100% and 83% of the cases. MRI was diagnostic in all six examined cases. Both angiography and CT proved to be reliable imaging modalities; in addition, they can be easily performed in the critically ill patient. We consider MRI useful in the evaluation of suspected dissection in stable patients and follow-up of medical or surgical therapy.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Marfan syndrome with aortic dissection and triple-barrel aorta.

A case of Marfan syndrome with spontaneously and subsequently developed dissections of the aorta, one in the form of triple-barrel aorta, three times corrected by grafts is described. The autopsy revealed "healed" and acute dissections in almost the entire aorta outside the grafts. "Healed" thoracoabdominal dissection had true lumen (with entry and re-entry intimal tears), and old false lumen and in addition in its distal portion of a triple-barrel aorta was formed (dissection of healed aortic dissection). Lethal adventitial rupture occurred in the portion with an old false lumen. Dissection of the left subclavian artery, the right common carotid artery, resulting in saccular aneurysm, and avulsion of the right renal artery were also found.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic dissection and its variants.

The acute aortic syndrome (AAS) is described. Its pathophysiology is discussed for each of the three entities (penetrating aortic ulcer, intramural hematoma and aortic dissection). The natural history of these three pathologies is reviewed. Diagnostic features and investigation imaging techniques are summarized. The technique of stentgraft-placement is described in detail. The authors report their clinical experience with 127 patients, presenting acute type B aortic dissection or its variants, and treated with an endovascular stent-graft-device. These results are in part compared with a group of control patients with acute type B dissection, submitted to medical non-invasive therapy.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1999

Interval or permanent nonoperative management of acute type A aortic dissection.

HYPOTHESIS: Selected patients with acute type A (ascending) aortic dissection who are treated with delayed operation or nonoperative therapy may have better early and short-term outcomes than was previously expected. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective cohort at a university hospital. SUBJECTS: Data on 75 patients with acute or chronic type A aortic dissection treated at one institution from January 1, 1985, to November 30, 1997, were analyzed. Of these 75 patients, 34 (21 male and 13 female, with a mean age of 65.5 years) did not undergo initial operative treatment, and 15 (10 male and 5 female, with a mean age of 72.6 years) never underwent surgery. For the 19 patients who underwent delayed surgery, the mean period between aortic dissection and intervention was 11.4+/-4.83 days. The follow-up period ranged from 0.27 to 149 months, with a mean of 20.2 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Vascular complications, hospital mortality, and early survival. RESULTS: Reasons for interval delay in surgical treatment included initial misdiagnosis or delay in diagnosis (13 [68%] of 19), need to address significant comorbidity (4 [21%] of 19), and initial refusal of operative intervention (2 [11%] of 19). For the 15 patients treated entirely by medical therapy, reasons for electing nonoperative management included extensive comorbidity (5 [33%] of 15), refusal of surgical intervention (6 [40%] of 15), and misdiagnosis or long delay in diagnosis (4 [27%] of 15). Of the 34 patients, 15 (44%) presented with moderate or severe aortic insufficiency, 5 (14%) had evidence of pericardial effusion, 6 (21%) had evidence of concomitant coronary ischemia on electrocardiogram, and 8 (24%) had extension of the dissection into the descending aorta. Four patients (11.8%) died while in the hospital. Of the 34 patients, 30 (88%) who underwent either delayed or no surgery received aggressive medical treatment (beta-adrenergic blocking agents and afterload-reducing agents) and were discharged from the hospital. All patients who were operative candidates in the interval treatment group survived to reach definitive operation. There was no statistically significant difference in short-term survival between the group of patients undergoing delayed surgery or medical treatment only and the group of 41 patients undergoing early operation (P = .42). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate surgical therapy is still recommended for acceptable operative candidates with acute type A aortic dissection who seek immediate treatment. However, this study permits the following 2 conclusions: (1) patients with type A aortic dissection who are referred or whose conditions are diagnosed several days after presentation have survived the early dangerous period and can safely undergo surgery semielectively (rather than emergently); and (2) selected patients who are not considered operative candidates and who survive the initial type A aortic dissection without complication may be treated with aggressive medical therapy and achieve acceptable early and short-term outcomes, which is better than previously expected.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1999

Evaluation of acute aortic dissection by cine-MRI.

UNLABELLED: We investigated operative indication of acute aortic dissection by analyzing the movement of the intimal flap using cine-MRI. METHODS: Ten consecutive cases of acute aortic dissection diagnosed between December 1997 and September 1998 participated in this study. Six of these patients had in Stanford type A and four Stanford type B aortic dissection. The diagnosis of aortic dissection was based on demonstration of two aortic channels with each cardiac cycle. After obtaining SE(spin-echo) images, gradient echo sequences (FFE) were obtained such that the false lumen was maximally imaged and the intimal flap was depicted perpendicularly. During one RR-interval of ECG, 12 to 16 measurements were recorded and combined in a cineloop mode. We defined the intimal flap, the site of the entry and thrombosis in the false lumen, and evaluated the movement of the intimal flap as the flap movement index (FMI). Maximum and minimum aortic diameters (ADmax, ADmin), as well as maximum and minimum false lumen diameters (FDmax, FDmin) were measured. FMI was defined as[(FDmax/ADmax) - (FDmin/ADmin)]/(FDmin/ADmin) x 100(%). RESULTS: Total thrombosis was noted in four cases, partial thrombosis in 3, and in the remaining 3 no thrombosis of the false lumen was noted. The FMI ranged between 4% and 87% (mean 26.3 +/- 8.6%). Among the 4 cases with the large FMI of greater than 30%, 3 underwent emergency surgery and were confirmed to have no thrombosis in the false lumen. The fourth case, who had partial thrombosis, underwent medical therapy, but since complete thrombosis in the false lumen never did occur in this case, surgery became absolutely necessary. The other 6 cases with a FMI of less than 30% showed a tendency toward gradual reduction of the false lumen. CONCLUSION: FMI is a potentially useful parameter in cases with acute aortic dissection to determine whether or not emergency surgery is indicated.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2003

New classification of aortic dissection with reference to a case report.

The authors present a case report of a patient who was diagnosed with aortic dissection during a hemodynamic exam following acute myocardial infarction. With reference to this case, the European Society of Cardiology's latest classification of aortic dissection, published in 2001, is also presented. The patient had the usual risk factors described for aortic dissection, which are simultaneously those for coronary disease. The patient reported an isolated episode in the past of retrosternal pain, radiating to the back, which may have been caused by the aortic dissection. Since then he had been asymptomatic. Four years later, the patient was admitted to hospital following an anteroseptal acute myocardial infarction; fibrinolysis was contraindicated due to recent episodes of rectal bleeding and the patient underwent hemodynamic study (coronary angiography). Due to difficulties in manipulating the guide wire during this exam, aortography was performed, which showed aneurysm and Stanford type B aortic dissection of the thoracic aorta. During hospitalization, a thoracic-abdominal CT scan was performed, which confirmed chronic type B aortic dissection (with intraluminal thrombi). The authors present their reasons for considering this case to be Class 4 according to the new sub-types/classes of aortic dissection of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC): Class 1--Classical aortic dissection Class 2--Intramural hematoma/hemorrhage Class 3--Subtle/discrete aortic dissection Class 4--Plaque rupture/ulceration Class 5--Iatrogenic/traumatic aortic dissection. The authors consider this case to be of interest because of its rarity, the risk that fibrinolysis could have represented, and its categorization according to the latest classification of aortic dissection by the ESC.

Aortic Dissection↗