SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 487 records · Page 27Linked to original sources

PubMed1985

Color and luminance share a common motion pathway.

Following exposure to a moving grating of bars differing only in luminance, a motion aftereffect (MAE) is observed on a stationary grating of bars differing only in chrominance. This suggests that the motion of equiluminous chromatic stimuli is sensed by a channel that responds to both luminance and chrominance and not by a separate channel specialized for the motion of colored stimuli. However, adding color to a low contrast luminance stimulus actually reduces its effectiveness at creating or nulling a MAE, indicating that the response of the motion pathway to color is qualitively different from its response to luminance. In addition, a chromatic stimulus demonstrates a dissociation between perceived speed, MAE speed and speed required to null the MAE that is absent for a luminance stimulus.

Adaptation, Ocular↗

PubMed2001

Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects.

We used high-level configural aftereffects induced by adaptation to realistic faces to investigate visual representations underlying complex pattern perception. We found that exposure to an individual face for a few seconds generated a significant and precise bias in the subsequent perception of face identity. In the context of a computationally derived 'face space,' adaptation specifically shifted perception along a trajectory passing through the adapting and average faces, selectively facilitating recognition of a test face lying on this trajectory and impairing recognition of other faces. The results suggest that the encoding of faces and other complex patterns draws upon contrastive neural mechanisms that reference the central tendency of the stimulus category.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMed1976

On interocular transfer of the movement aftereffect in indivuals with and without normal binocular vision.

The duration of the movement aftereffect was measured in twenty-four normally binocular subjects and in eighteen subjects who lacked steropsis as a consequence of childhood strabismus. Aftereffects were generated monocularly and binocularly, and compared to those which occurred after adaption of one eye and testing with the other. Normal subjects were categorized on two indices of eye dominance, which involved sighting and rivalry tests. The monocular-aftereffect durations were slightly longer when the dominant eye was use, and interocular transfer from the dominant eye to the nondominant eye was greater than the transfer in the reverse direction; however, these differences were not statistically significant. The results from the strabismic subjects suggested that they fell into two distinct groups: one group (seven of the eighteen subjects) experienced no interocular transfer in either direction; the group did yield some interocular transfer, and it was generally greater after adaptation of the dominant eye and testing the nondominant eye than in the reverse direction. Six of the seven subjects who failed to show any transfer still had misalignment of the visual axes, but this was not the case in any of the subjects exhibiting transfer.

Figural Aftereffect↗

PubMed1987

Incidence and characteristics of McCollough aftereffects following video display terminal use.

After using video display terminals (VDT), some persons notice that achromatic patterns appear faintly colored hours after terminal use. We investigated the incidence of this effect, the McCollough effect (ME), among 125 VDT users. Subjects completed a questionnaire regarding work habits and certain life-style aspects. They were shown photographs of varying spatial frequencies to identify the adapting stimulus responsible for the ME. The incidence of ME after routine use of VDTs was 19.1%. The adapting stimulus was the repeating character lines of the VDT. No aspect of life-style investigated appeared to predispose an individual to develop the ME. Those subjects who developed the ME did not differ from those who did not in age, sleep, caffeine consumption, use of medication, refractive errors, or computer usage, nor did they have a higher incidence of ocular defects or eye strain.

Computer Systems↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Motion aftereffect transfer in the monofixation syndrome.

If one adapts to a moving repetitive stimulus of stripes that is suddenly stopped, the stripes will appear to move backward. This apparent backward motion is the motion aftereffect (MAE), and its duration is a measure of its magnitude. If one eye adapts to the moving stimulus and the other eye experiences the aftereffect to the stationary stimulus, the aftereffect has been transferred from one eye to the other and is termed the interocular transfer of the MAE. Experimental evidence indicates that the degree of MAE transfer correlates with clinical binocularity. This study compares the MAE transfer in six subjects with the monofixation syndrome to five normal subjects. The stimuli used are sinusoidal stripes generated on two cathode-ray tubes, subtending either 8 degrees or 2 degrees of visual angle with a periodicity of either 0.5 or 3 cycles/degree presented haploscopically. Subjects with the monofixation syndrome differed significantly from normal subjects in the amount of MAE transferred, implying a lack of central neuronal connections in addition to those mediating conscious central fusion in clinical sensory testing.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMed2003

Tilt aftereffects generated by symmetrical dot patterns with two or four axes of symmetry.

This paper follows from studies by Joung, van der Zwan and Latimer (2000) in which symmetrical dot patterns with one axis of symmetry were used to produce tilt aftereffects (TAEs). The present paper investigates TAE functions produced by symmetrical dot patterns with multiple axes of symmetry. In Experiments 1 and 2, TAE functions produced by dot patterns with two axes of symmetry were compared with TAE functions produced by line stimuli arranged in the same orientation and location as the axes of symmetry in the dot patterns. Similar functions were found. In Experiments 3 and 4, functions produced by dot patterns with four axes of symmetry were compared with functions produced by line stimuli arranged in the same orientation and location as the four axes of symmetry. Again, similar functions were found. These experiments demonstrate that line stimuli and dot stimuli produce similar TAE functions. The implications of these results are discussed.

Adaptation, Ocular↗

PubMed1980

Influence of the spatial periodicity of moving gratings on motion response.

The present experiments examine the suprathreshold response of the motion or direction-selective portion of the human visual system by means of the motion aftereffect (MAE). The MAE was measured as a function of the contrast and spatial frequency of moving sinusoidal gratings. For spatial frequencies less than 1 cy/deg, the MAE speed was found to increase linearly with log contrast up to 80%. For spatial frequencies greater than 1 cy/deg, the rate of increase of the MAE speed with log contrast was not found to be linear over the entire range of contrast. The nonlinearity was greatest for the 8 and 10 cy/deg gratings, which showed very little increase in MAE speed with contrast above 25%. We conclude that the direction-specific mechanisms in human vision show a more limited contrast response to the high spatial frequencies than does the visual system as a whole.

Figural Aftereffect↗

PubMed1985

Invariant tuning of motion aftereffect.

Motion aftereffects (MAE) to drifting gratings were measured with a cancellation technique. For a constant adapting grating, MAE cancellation velocity increased linearly with visual field eccentricity. The slope of the function was dependent upon adapting temporal frequency. MAE velocity was independent of spatial frequency (2-16 c/deg) and approximately constant when expressed as an M-scaled velocity. The MAE was broadly tuned to temporal frequency and temporal tuning was independent of spatial frequency and eccentricity. Reducing contrast over the range 1.0-0.1 reduced the magnitude of the MAE at high temporal frequencies but had no influence at low and moderate temporal frequencies. The results support a ratio model of velocity coding whose spatial reference varies with eccentricity in approximate accordance with the human cortical magnification factor.

Adaptation, Ocular↗

PubMed1993

Motion perception during saccades.

Although the retinal image is displaced by each saccade performed we do not perceive the visual environment moving concordant with the saccades. In this study experiments were designed in which additional movement of most of the visual scene was applied during saccades. The subjects perceived the intrasaccadic movement after the saccade. The perceived speed of this movement was decreased and the threshold amplitude was increased compared to perception during fixation. The intrasaccadic movement perception was based on a novel aftereffect of motion perception. The velocity of retinal slip did not affect the threshold. If the retinal slip speed during saccades was temporally reduced by an intrasaccadic movement parallel to the saccade, the threshold amplitude was identical to the threshold amplitude obtained by intrasaccadic movement opposite to the saccade increasing retinal slip speed. Horizontal intrasaccadic movements were detected at lower thresholds than vertical movements independent of saccade direction. In addition, the thresholds were not effected by the saccade amplitude suggesting that neither speed, duration, nor direction of eye movement related retinal slip affects the amount of suppression. Our results suggest that saccadic suppression is related to delayed central processing of retinal information during saccades. This processing does not involve saccade parameters such as direction and amplitude.

Adult↗

PubMed1989

Duration, time constant, and decay of the linear motion aftereffect as a function of inspection duration.

Subjects rated the strength of the motion aftereffect (MAE) produced by the upward motion of a horizontal grating in two experiments. Inspection periods ranged from 30 to 900 sec in Experiment 1 and from 20 to 120 sec in Experiment 2. A minimum of 22 h elapsed between trials. The decay time constant increased as the square root of the inspection duration for values between 1 min and 15 min of inspection. The ratings suggested that the MAEs consisted of three phases: an initial maximum-strength phase, a decay phase, and a tail. The duration of all three phases increased and the decay rate decreased with increasing inspection duration over the entire range. The results indicate that duration, time constant, and decay rate are not fixed properties of the motion-processing channels in the visual system.

Adult↗

PubMed1987

Motion aftereffects associated with pursuit eye movements.

Contrary to an earlier report [Anstis and Gregory, Q. Jl exp. Psychol. 17, 173-174 (1965)], we find that the sustained retinal motion caused by tracking a moving target over a stationary grating does not result in a motion aftereffect (MAE) which is equivalent to that resulting from comparable retinal motion caused by actual motion of a grating. The MAE associated with tracking generally occurs in elements falling on areas not previously exposed to retinal motion. It is in the same direction as the previous retinal motion in the display and is apparently an induced MAE caused by a weak, below threshold MAE in the elements stimulating areas that were previously exposed to retinal motion. Based on an analysis of eye movement records, we do not believe that the weakness of the tracking MAE is primarily a function of the poor quality of the tracking eye movements. Other possible reasons for the weakness of the MAE are suggested.

Adaptation, Ocular↗

PubMed2005

Tilt aftereffect and adaptation-induced changes in orientation tuning in visual cortex.

The tilt aftereffect (TAE) is a visual illusion in which prolonged adaptation to an oriented stimulus causes shifts in subsequent perceived orientations. Historically, neural models of the TAE have explained it as the outcome of response suppression of neurons tuned to the adapting orientation. Recent physiological studies of neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) have confirmed that such response suppression exists. However, it was also found that the preferred orientations of neurons shift away from the adapting orientation. Here we show that adding this second factor to a population coding model of V1 improves the correspondence between neurophysiological data and TAE measurements. According to our model, the shifts in preferred orientation have the opposite effect as response suppression, reducing the magnitude of the TAE.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMed1988

The different mechanisms of the direct and indirect tilt illusions.

Both the tilt illusion and aftereffect exhibit indirect effects under certain conditions: these are negative (assimilation) effects which occur with large (70-90 deg) angular separations between test and inducing gratings. They are opposite in direction to the positive, and much larger, contrast effects which occur at smaller (10-15 deg) separations. Evidence from six experiments shows that stimulus manipulations which reduce direct effects have little or no effect on indirect effects and vice versa, suggesting that the two effects have different determinants. It is proposed that direct effects arise from lateral inhibitory interactions between populations of neurones in striate cortex and that indirect effects occur at a higher level, possibly in areas concerned with stimulus-specific interactions beyond the classic receptive field. The implications of the data for theories of the tilt illusion are considered.

Figural Aftereffect↗

PubMed2000

Tilt aftereffects generated by bilaterally symmetrical patterns.

Tilt aftereffects were generated by bilaterally symmetrical dot patterns. Both expansion and contraction effects, similar in size and magnitude to effects usually reported with luminance contours, were observed after adaptation to symmetrical patterns tilted 15 deg or 75 deg respectively from a vertically oriented test. Large effects were found when both adapting and test stimuli were symmetrical patterns while smaller effects were found when the adapting stimulus was symmetrical and test stimulus was a grating. A third experiment, which manipulated the number of dots near the axis line, confirmed the above findings; expansion and contraction effects were observed again. The results of these experiments suggest that the neural mechanism underlying the perception of luminance contours may be linked to the mechanism for the detection of symmetry.

Adaptation, Ocular↗

PubMed1987

Global factors generate the McCollough effect.

It has recently been demonstrated that certain globally orthogonal pattern pairs derived from Hoffman's Lie Transformation Group Model of Neuropsychology (LTG/NP) are sufficient to generate McCollough effects (pattern-contingent colour aftereffects: PCCAES). We now provide evidence that the global factors postulated to generate these particular PCCAEs are also necessary. In Experiment 1 observers made controlled eye movements over the induction patterns and subsequently showed PCCAEs which were as strong as those obtained under central fixation. The induction process therefore did not depend on selectively adapting local oriented and colour-specific edge detectors. The global structure of the inducing patterns appears to be a necessary component of the generation of such aftereffects. In Experiment 2, a number of pattern pairs having various degrees of global organization were used as induction patterns, but in every case there was an equal degree of local orthogonality. Local orthogonality was shown not to be sufficient to induce PCCAEs, but global orthogonality was. These results lend strong support to the notion that McCollough-type PCCAEs are generated in a structure of the visual system somewhat above the level of strictly local operations, whether defined as edge and bar detectors or, equivalently, as units selectively tuned to different spatial frequencies and orientations. The global nature of the effects, and the particular pattern structures involved, lead us to suggest that Hoffman's LTG/NP provides a sound basis for explaining our findings.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Motion aftereffects specific to surface depth order: beyond binocular disparity.

Despite evidence for concurrent processing of motion and stereopsis from psychophysics and neurophysiology, the detailed relationship between depth and motion processing is not yet clear. Using the contingent aftereffect paradigm, we investigated how the order of surfaces presented across depth influenced motion perception. After having observers adapt to two superimposed populations of dots moving in opposite directions at different binocular disparities, we assessed how much of the motion aftereffect (MAE) was specific to absolute disparity and how much was specific to the depth order of the surfaces. The test contained two planes of moving dots at several different pairs of disparities and asked observers to report the MAE direction at one of the planes (the target). In addition to the disparity-contingent MAE (Verstraten, Verlinde, Fredericksen, & van de Grind, 1994), we found MAEs dependent on surface order. When the target surface was in front of another surface, observers more often reported the MAE in the direction opposite to the front adapting surface than the back. This effect was observed despite differences in absolute and relative disparity between the adapted and test surfaces. The results suggest that some motion information is represented in terms of surface depth order.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

On the ancient history of the direction of the motion aftereffect.

Scientists agree that Aristotle in his Parva Naturalia was the first to report a visual illusion known as the motion aftereffect (MAE). But there is less consensus as to who was the first to report the direction of the MAE. According to some, Aristotle only described the phenomenon without saying anything about its direction. Others have defended the position that Aristotle did report a direction, but the wrong one. Therefore, it has been suggested that Lucretius in his poem De Rerum Natura was the first to report the correct direction of the MAE. In this paper it is shown why and how it can be inferred that Aristotle did not write about the direction of the MAE, only about its occurrence. It is also argued that it is indeed likely that Lucretius was the first person to report the direction of the MAE. However, this is not as obvious as it might appear at first sight.

Figural Aftereffect↗

PubMed2002

Evidence for spatio-temporal selectivity in attentional modulation of the motion aftereffect.

An ignored region of the visual field might be monitored by an intermittent full visual analysis or by a more continuous but restricted analysis. We investigated which type of process is more likely in early vision by studying the effects of diverting attention on adaptation to a range of spatial (0.5, 2, 4. and 6 c/deg) and temporal (1.5 and 10 Hz) frequencies. During adaptation, subjects either fixated an unchanging digit (normal attention). or named the sequence of changing digits which formed the fixation point (diverted). The test field was always a static version of the adapting field, and the strength of adaptation was measured through the velocity and duration of subsequent Motion Aftereffects (MAEs). When attention during adaptation was normal MAE durations rose with spatial frequency for the 1.5 Hz stimuli, and declined with spatial frequency for the 10 Hz stimuli. When attention was diverted from the 10 Hz stimuli, MAE durations and velocities fell by a similar amount at all spatial frequencies. However, for the 1.5 Hz stimuli, the effects of diversion were very small at 0.5 c/deg, and rose progressively with spatial frequency, so that MAE reductions were largest at 6 c/deg. It appears that diversion hardly affects the encoding of coarse, slow stimuli, but attenuates the encoding of finer and/or faster stimuli. This is consistent with the idea that during diversion the visual system monitors the scene continuously, but over a restricted range of spatial and temporal scales.

Adaptation, Ocular↗