SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Manipulation, Spinal”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 487 records · Page 27Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

The passive straight leg raising test in the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a survey of United kingdom osteopathic opinion and clinical practice.

STUDY DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey. OBJECTIVES: To carry out a confidential postal survey of United Kingdom osteopaths in order to record and assess their use of the passive straight leg raising test in the diagnosis of, and choice of, manipulation for lumbar disc herniation. The study also sought to determine whether an association existed between osteopaths' manipulation of suspected lumbar disc herniation and their use of the straight leg raising test, the length of their working hours, and their use of manipulation for the treatment of other lumbar conditions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The literature is not agreed on important aspects of the straight leg raising test, or on the use of spinal manipulation for suspected lumbar disc herniation. This is thought to be the first study to investigate opinion and practice in a large group of spinal manipulators, in this case United Kingdom osteopaths. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all 1030 United Kingdom osteopaths registered with the General Osteopathic Council in January 2000. It comprised four sections: personal characteristics, professional characteristics, background to low back pain cases, details of straight leg raising test understanding and use within the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation. RESULTS: A response rate of 44% was achieved. United Kingdom osteopaths' opinions of low back pain and lumbar disc herniation clinical presentations, details of straight leg raising test mode of action, procedure, and interpretation were in keeping with the literature. Fifty-four percent of respondents sometimes employed manipulation in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation, but most of the others described the practice as "dangerous." The literature is similarly divided on the practice. Chi-square and Cramer V analysis implied that respondents were not influenced in choosing manipulation for lumbar disc herniation by their use of the straight leg raising test (chi2 = 4.002, df = 3, Cramer V = 0.0959, P = 0.261, alpha 0.05, n = 435). A moderate association implied that the frequency of use of such manipulation for all lumbar conditions influenced the choice of that treatment for lumbar disc herniation (chi2 = 81.808, df = 4, Cramer V = 0.4302, P < 0.001, alpha = 0.05, n = 442). There was also a weak association suggesting that hours worked per week influenced the choice of manipulation for lumbar disc herniation (chi2 = 9.840, df = 3, Cramer V = 0.1499, P = 0.020, alpha = 0.05, n = 438). CONCLUSIONS: Respondents to this survey frequently treated low back pain and often employed the straight leg raising test in its diagnosis. Their recognition of the clinical presentation of lumbar disc herniation and their use and understanding of the straight leg raising test were in keeping with the literature. Respondents were divided nearly equally between those who would expect patient benefit from the use of manipulation for lumbar disc herniation and those who criticized the practice. There is a need for further research into the clinical reasoning employed for the manipulative treatment of lumbar disc herniation.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed1992

Twenty years of randomized clinical trials of manipulative therapy for back pain: a review.

Manipulative therapy has been one of the most intensively studied approaches to back pain management. This paper reviews 20 years of randomized clinical trials of manipulative therapy, and addresses the following issues: for what condition were these patients treated? What was the population studied, and were workers included? Was a specific technique, spinal manipulation, or a more global approach the object of the trial? Finally, were there long-term outcome measures? The 21 randomized clinical trials reviewed here provide some indication that manipulative therapy offers some positive short-term results; it is not clear at this point whether long-term effects of the treatment have been adequately evaluated. Lack of specificity in the description of samples makes it impossible to conclude on the benefit of spinal manipulation for workers. Whether manipulation is solely responsible for the changes mentioned in these studies, independently of the global approach put forth by its practitioners, is also an open question that awaits further study.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Successful management of hamstring injuries in Australian Rules footballers: two case reports.

Hamstring injuries are the most prevalent injury in Australian Rules football. There is a lack of evidence based literature on the treatment, prevention and management of hamstring injuries, although it is agreed that the etiology is complicated and multi-factorial. We present two cases of hamstring injury that had full resolution after spinal manipulation and correction of lumbar-pelvic biomechanics. There was no recurrence through preventative treatment over a twelve and sixteen week period. The use of spinal manipulation for treatment or prevention of hamstring injury has not been documented in sports medicine literature and should be further investigated in prospective randomized controlled trials.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1985

Chiropractic and the clinical art.

Chiropractic is the largest 'unorthodox' health profession in the U.S.A. It is licensed in all 50 states and its services are covered by governmental and private health insurance. Yet chiropractic remains, in the opinion of medical commentators, an unscientific healing cult. Chiropractic holds that much illness is caused, directly or indirectly, by derangements in homeostasis that result from subtle vertebral malalignments called 'subluxations'. Only a minority of 'straight' chiropractors continue to provide spinal manipulation as their only modality, while the majority 'mixers' have embraced physical therapy, vitamin supplements and a wide variety of drugless treatments. Clinical trials suggest that spinal manipulation itself has short-term benefit in back pain, but the success of chiropractic is not fully explained by that effect. The clinical art, though, as manifested in the chiropractor-patient interaction contributes greatly to chiropractic healing. This process promotes patient acceptance and validation, fulfills expectations, provides explanations and engages the patient's commitment. The same process lies at the core of the 'art of medicine'. Seeing the clinical art as it functions in chiropractic can help us to understand its independent power in medicine.

Back Pain↗

PubMed1985

Adjustment, the hands and healing.

Chiropractic is the largest "unorthodox" health profession in the United States. It is licensed in all 50 states and its services covered by governmental and private health insurance. Yet chiropractic remains, in the opinion of medical commentators, an unscientific healing cult. Chiropractic holds that much illness is caused, directly or indirectly, by derangements in homeostasis that result from subtle vertebral malalignments called "subluxations". Only a minority of "straight" chiropracters continue to provide spinal manipulation as their only treatment, while the majority "mixers" have embraced physical therapy, vitamin supplements and a wide variety of drugless symptomatic treatments. Clinical trials suggest that spinal manipulation has short-term benefit in back pain, but the success of chiropractic is not fully explained by that effect. The clinical art, though, as manifested in the chiropractor-patient interaction contributes greatly to chiropractic healing. This process promotes patient acceptance and validation, fulfills expectations, provides explanations and engages the patient's commitment. The same process lies at the core of the "art of medicine". Seeing the clinical art as it functions in chiropractic can help us to understand its independent power in medicine.

Back Pain↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Herniated disc with radiculopathy following cervical manipulation: nonsurgical management.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Spinal manipulation applied to the cervical spine is a relatively safe and effective treatment for neck pain and headache. However, complications of this form of treatment have been reported and these can at times be disabling and on rare occasions can be devastating. A postmanipulation complication being treated with a different form of manipulation has not previously been reported. PURPOSE: To report a case of a patient who was treated with manipulation and who developed neck, scapular, and arm pain and arm numbness after the sixth visit, which was later attributed to three herniated discs. The patient was subsequently treated with a nonsurgical approach that included, but was not limited to, a different form of manipulation with apparent resolution of the problem. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: The patient was a 38-year-old banker who began seeing a chiropractic physician for treatment that included cervical manipulation. On the sixth visit, he developed pain immediately after treatment which became severe and was accompanied by numbness in his arm. He saw a neurosurgeon who recommended surgery, but was subsequently seen by a different chiropractic physician and was treated nonsurgically. METHODS: The patient was found to have clinical signs of radiculopathy, including motor loss. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed disc herniations at C3-C4, C4-C5, and C5-C6. RESULTS: The patient was treated by the author with an alternate approach that included non-high-velocity, low-amplitude manipulation and exercise with resolution of the problem. CONCLUSION: This paper reports a case of a patient with radiculopathy secondary to multilevel disc herniations that appeared to be precipitated by cervical manipulation and who was treated nonsurgically with resolution of the problem. It is doubtful that the manipulation actually caused the disc herniations, but it is possible that it caused preexisting asymptomatic disc herniations to become symptomatic. Consideration should be given to nonsurgical referral of patients who have postmanipulative complications but do not need immediate surgery.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Somatovisceral response following osteopathic HVLAT: a pilot study on the effect of unilateral lumbosacral high-velocity low-amplitude thrust technique on the cutaneous blood flow in the lower limb.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal manipulative treatment is widely used among manual therapists, although knowledge regarding the absolute physiological effects has not been clearly established. In this study, 20 healthy male subjects underwent a unilateral high-velocity low-amplitude thrust (HVLAT) to the lumbosacral junction, while the cutaneous blood flow in the corresponding dermatome of the lower limb was monitored. METHODS: Subjects underwent a sham manipulation before the actual manipulation and acted as their own control. Laser Doppler flowmetry was used to measure relative changes in the cutaneous blood flow over the L5 dermatome for 5 minutes before the sham manipulation, for 5 minutes between the sham and the actual manipulation, and for 5 minutes after the spinal adjustment. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post hoc analysis was used in the interpretation of the data. RESULTS: Twelve nonsmoking subjects, who received a successful HVLAT manipulation, showed a significant increase (P <.001) in blood perfusion, both ipsilaterally and contralaterally. Six smokers responded with a significant decrease in blood flow ipsilaterally (P <.01) and contralaterally (P <.001) after HVLAT manipulation. CONCLUSION: The results from this study support previous published hypotheses that spinal adjustments outside the region of the sympathetic outflow result in an increase in cutaneous blood flow. Further studies will be needed to confirm the outcome of this study, and more knowledge is needed regarding the specific neurophysiological effects of spinal manipulation.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Neurological complications of cervical spine manipulation.

To obtain preliminary data on neurological complications of spinal manipulation in the UK all members of the Association of British Neurologists were asked to report cases referred to them of neurological complications occurring within 24 hours of cervical spine manipulation over a 12-month period. The response rate was 74%. 24 respondents reported at least one case each, contributing to a total of about 35 cases. These included 7 cases of stroke in brainstem territory (4 with confirmation of vertebral artery dissection), 2 cases of stroke in carotid territory and 1 case of acute subdural haematoma. There were 3 cases of myelopathy and 3 of cervical radiculopathy. Concern about neurological complications following cervical spine manipulation appears to be justified. A large long-term prospective study is required to determine the scale of the hazard.

Adult↗

PubMed1982

Roentgenographic measurement of atlas laterality and rotation: a retrospective pre- and post-manipulation study.

Case records (523) were chosen at random from the files of J.F. Grostic, D.C. (deceased) for retrospective determination of the effects of chiropractic adjustments on atlas positioning relative to the occiput and axis. For each patient the recorded degrees of (1) atlas rotation and (2) laterality, both before and soon after spinal manipulative therapy, were extracted from the x-ray reports. Frequency histograms were made of pre- and post-adjustment degrees of laterality and rotation and the relative change of values analyzed statistically. Before manipulation, nine patients had zero atlas rotation and none were zero with respect to laterality. The mean deviation from zero degrees of "misalignment," was 2.75 and 2.63 respectively for rotation and laterality. After manipulation the corresponding values were 1.43 and 140, which is a statistically significant change. The numbers of patients who had zero rotations and laterality after adjustment were 156 and 151 respectively. In 63 patients the post-adjustment values were zero for both parameters. Under the circumstances presented in this retrospective study, these data tend to show that spinal manipulative therapy altered the position of atlas in the postulated direction.

Atlanto-Occipital Joint↗

PubMed2003

Neurofibromatosis type I: clinical and imaging features of Von Recklinghausen's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the case of a 45-year-old woman, with a prior diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1), complaining of low back and cervical spine pain with bilateral upper extremity paresthesias. CLINICAL FEATURES: The patient had a dull, achy, constant low-back pain of 4 months' duration, with mild headaches and upper extremity paresthesias. Multiple skin lesions and spinopelvic postural imbalances were present. Diagnostic radiography, along with advanced imaging, demonstrated multilevel dysplastic osseous changes, with dural ectasia, scoliosis, and tumor extension. In addition to the previous diagnosis of NF-1, our clinical diagnosis included segmental dysfunction with resultant cervicalgia, lumbalgia, and myospasm. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: Treatment consisted of a course of spinal manipulation of the lumbopelvic region, with adjunctive therapy consisting of interferential therapy, heat, and rehabilitative exercise. Marked reduction in pain and paresthesia with improved function were achieved. CONCLUSIONS: NF-1 is a multisystem disease with neoplasia of the skin and nervous system. Patients experience a lifetime of morbidity and increased risk of mortality, depending on the extent of the disease. A multitude of therapeutic regimens may be engaged to improve NF-1-associated symptomatology and morbidity. Chiropractic spinal manipulation may have a positive effect in pain reduction and improved function in patients who have NF-1 without spinal instability.

Female↗

PubMed1999

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM): a review for the primary care physician.

It is difficult to find a satisfactory title for this review, because both the word "complementary" and "alternative"-are not very politically correct currently. It is probable that there is no fully politically correct word, except for "non-allopathic," which is unfamiliar to many MDs. Accurately used, the term "allopathic" is as opposed to "homeopathic," so from its origins, "allopathic medicine" should include herbal medicine. However, in practice, herbal and many other non-homeopathic treatments are called "non-allopathic," whereas conventional medicine is called "allopathic." "Complementary" usually would include practices that are used with conventional western medical treatments, and "alternative" would include those practices that are used instead of western medical treatments. For most of this review, the terms "non-allopathic," "alternative," and "complementary" could be used interchangeably. This topic has gained interest, and received some allopathic legitimacy, in part because of an article that David Eisenberg, M.D., published in the New England Journal.' In 1990, he performed a telephone survey of about 1,500 adults in the U.S. and asked them about the use of treatments and practices that were "alternative," which he defined as not generally being taught in the U.S. medical schools and not being readily available in U.S. hospitals. From his sample, he extrapolated that in 1990, about 60 million Americans used alternative medical treatments, at an estimated cost of $13.7 billion. There were more visits to alternative healers than to primary care MDs that year, and over two-thirds of people who did use alternative medical treatments did not tell their doctors about it. Now that third party figures are becoming interested in paying for alternative medical practices (especially naturopathic, chiropractic, and acupuncture services), allopathic physicians will be increasing in the position of being able to refer people to alternative providers, and insurers will pay for services that MDs approve. Therefore, it will become increasingly important for physicians to have a degree of familiarity with alternative treatments (including efficacy and risks). So far, to date, there have been no cases of malpractice for giving advice about the use of alternative medical treatments, but liability will certainly exist to anyone who delivers treatments, such as acupuncture or spinal manipulation, in the event of an adverse effect. This review will briefly introduce some of the most common alternative practices likely to be seen in Hawaii communities: Homeopathy, Herbs, Naturopathy, Chinese Medicine and Acupuncture, and Chiropractic and spinal manipulation, and a brief discussion of Dr. Eisenberg's recent position paper on advising patients about alternative practices.

Acupuncture Therapy↗

PubMed2004

Routine screening for abuse: opening Pandora's box?

OBJECTIVE: To review the case of a patient who had been physically abused by a previous partner and to discuss the importance of routine screening for abuse. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 33-year-old female had neck pain, right shoulder pain, and low back pain. During the history taking, she disclosed that she had been in an abusive relationship, and her current complaints were thought to be a direct result of one of the violent episodes she suffered. Radiographs of her neck and shoulder were obtained to rule out a traumatic etiology. In the absence of any gross abnormalities, her symptoms were found to be biomechanical in origin. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: Therapy included spinal manipulation and soft tissue techniques to the symptomatic areas. During the treatments, much consideration was given to the fact that she had been a victim of domestic violence and the emotional and physical impact this had on her current situation. Manipulative techniques were adapted so that the patient would not perceive them as threatening, and a considerable amount of time was spent on counseling. After a number of treatments, she reported significant improvement in her overall condition. CONCLUSIONS: For practitioners of spinal manipulative therapy, routine screening for abuse is an essential part of history taking. Awareness of a patient's experiences with domestic violence is required to make appropriate adjustments in the management plan.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Effects of different treatment modalities on gait symmetry and clinical measures for sacroiliac joint patients.

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of two different treatment modalities on the rehabilitation process of chronic sacroiliac joint patients. The treatment modalities included spinal manipulative therapy given by a chiropractor and a program of back school therapy given by a physiotherapist. The rehabilitation process was assessed using clinical and biomechanical measures. It was found that back school therapy was a better treatment modality than the spinal manipulative therapy, according to the clinical measures of rehabilitation. Precisely the opposite result was found for the biomechanical measures.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2006

Chiropractic: history and overview of theories and methods.

Chiropractic is one of the most controversial and poorly defined healthcare professions with recognition and licensure in the United States. Chiropractic was started by D. D. Palmer, a magnetic healer who formulated the vertebral subluxation theory. The profession was developed by his son, B. J. Palmer. Although the definition of chiropractic as a method of correcting vertebral subluxations to restore and maintain health is questionable, spinal manipulation is of value in the treatment of some types of back pain. The chiropractic profession is still based on the vertebral subluxation theory, and has the confusing image of a back specialty capable of treating a broad scope of health problems. Despite opposition to use of spinal manipulation as a method of treating a broad scope of health problems (as opposed to the generally accepted use of manipulation in the treatment of back pain), chiropractors seek support as primary care providers in alternative medicine. It is essential to understand the theories, philosophies, and methods of chiropractic for an objective evaluation.

Chiropractic↗

PubMed1994

The efficacy of cervical extension-compression traction combined with diversified manipulation and drop table adjustments in the rehabilitation of cervical lordosis: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To experimentally investigate the effect of cervical extension-compression traction combined with diversified chiropractic manipulation and drop table adjusting in establishing or increasing cervical lordosis. DESIGN: Blinded, before and after trial with pre- and postlateral cervical radiographic measurement. SETTING: Primary care private chiropractic clinic in Saugus, MA. SUBJECTS: A) Control group--convenience sample who had no health care for 10-14 wk, 30 persons. B) Treatment group 1, nonrandomized control trial, 35 persons, whose pre- and postlateral cervical radiographs were taken 10-14 wk apart and whose radiographs clearly depicted C1 through C7. C) Treatment group 2, nonrandomized control trial, 30 persons, whose pre- and postlateral cervical radiographs were taken 10-14 wk apart and whose radiographs clearly depicted C1 through C7. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment group 1: diversified spinal manipulation, drop table adjustments and cervical extension-compression traction five times per week for 10-14 wk (12 wk +/- 2). Treatment group 2: diversified spinal manipulation and drop table adjustments five times per week for 10-14 wk (12 wk +/- 2). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anterior head translation millimeters, C2 to C7 absolute rotation angle, angle of C1 to horizontal (atlas plane angle), five relative rotation angles (C2-3, C3-4, C4-5, C5-6, C6-7) and qualitative classification of lordotic configuration. RESULTS: No statistically significant changes existed between the pre- and posttests for the control group except in the C6-7 relative rotation angle. In the treatment group 1, statistically significant differences were found in all X-ray markings. Twenty-nine of 35 members have a lordosis after treatment compared to 11 of 35 before treatment. The C2 to C7 angle changed an average 13.2 degrees, C1 to horizontal changed an average 9.8 degrees, the anterior head translation reduced an average of 6.8 mm, the average relative rotation angle changed: C2-3: 3.1, C3-4: 5.5, C4-5: 4.80, C5-6: 2.7 and C6-7: 1.1. In the treatment group 2, no statistically significant changes existed between the pre- and posttests except atlas angulation to horizontal which increased an average of 3.0 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: A transformation to a lordotic configuration or increase in lordotic configuration occurred and was measured in the majority of treatment group 1 subjects, while no change in the control group and essentially no change in treatment group 2 was measured. Extension-compression traction combined with diversified chiropractic manipulation and drop table adjusting procedures may improve or partially reestablish the cervical lordosis in 10-14 wk of daily care.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Areas of capsaicin-induced secondary hyperalgesia and allodynia are reduced by a single chiropractic adjustment: a preliminary study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to investigate the hypoalgesic effects of a single spinal manipulation treatment on acute inflammatory reactions and pain induced by cutaneous application of capsaicin. METHODS: Twenty healthy subjects participated in the experiment, which consisted of 2 sessions. In both sessions, following control measurements, topical capsaicin was applied to the right or left forearm to induce cutaneous inflammatory reactions. The cream was removed after 20 minutes. Then subjects received either spinal manipulation treatment (SMT) or "nonspinal manipulation treatment" (N-SMT), respectively. In control as well as pretreatment and posttreatment intervals, the following tests were performed: measurement of the areas of mechanical hyperalgesia and stroking allodynia, assessment of spontaneous pain, and measurement of blood flow. RESULTS: The results confirmed that topical capsaicin induced inflammatory reactions based on occurrence of hyperalgesia and allodynia, augmented pain perception, and increased blood flow following capsaicin application compared with the control session. When compared with N-SMT, spontaneous pain was rated significantly lower post-SMT (P <.014). In addition, areas of both secondary hyperalgesia and allodynia decreased after SMT (hyperalgesia: P <.007; allodynia: P <.003). However, there was no significant treatment effect for local blood flow. CONCLUSION: These results suggest hypoalgesic effects following a single SMT. As local vascular parameter was not affected by the single SMT, the hypoalgesic effects appear to be due to central mechanisms.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Transcranial sonography and vertebrobasilar insufficiency.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to discuss a case illustrating the role of transcranial Doppler sonography in the screening and treatment of a patient with intermittent vertebral artery brainstem ischemia. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 28-year-old woman had neck pain, arm pain, headaches, and dizziness. Her symptoms occurred intermittently over several years. Past care had provided little relief. De Kleyn's test, transcranial Doppler sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiography helped establish a diagnosis of vertebrobasilar syndrome. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: The patient was referred for neurosurgical evaluation. She subsequently chose to be treated with spinal manipulative therapy. Her neck pain, headaches, and radicular symptoms resolved. The dizzy spells abated to a tolerable level. The neurosurgeon subsequently re-evaluated the patient and recommended that surgery not be performed. CONCLUSIONS: This illustrates a case of extra-arterial mechanical compression of the vertebral arteries documented by transcranial Doppler sonography procedures. Brainstem symptoms were correlated with a documented perfusion deficit during cervical positional testing. This case also demonstrated that spinal manipulative therapy may be safely used on patients with vertebrobasilar insufficiency when the biomechanics and related flow studies are elucidated.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Are manual therapies effective in reducing pain from tension-type headache?: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: A systematic review was performed to establish whether manual therapies have specific efficacy in reducing pain from tension-type headache (TTH). METHODS: Computerized literature searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, MANTIS, CINAHL, PEDro, and Cochrane databases. Papers were included if they described clinical (open noncontrolled studies) or randomized controlled trials in which any form of manual therapy was used for TTH, and if they were published after 1994 in the English language. The methodologic quality of the trials was assessed using the PEDro scale. Levels of scientific evidence, based on the quality and the outcomes of the studies, were established for each manual therapy: strong, moderate, limited, and inconclusive evidence. RESULTS: Only six studies met the inclusion criteria. These trials evaluated different manual therapy modalities: spinal manipulation (three trials), classic massage (one trial), connective tissue manipulation (two trials), soft tissue massage (one trial), Dr. Cyriax's vertebral mobilization (one trial), manual traction (one trial), and CV-4 craniosacral technique (one trial). Methodologic PEDro quality scores ranged from 2 to 8 points out of a theoretical maximum of 10 points (mean=5.8+/-2.1). Analysis of the quality and the outcomes of all trials did not provide rigorous evidence that manual therapies have a positive effect in reducing pain from TTH: spinal manipulative therapy showed inconclusive evidence of effectiveness (level 4), whereas soft tissue techniques showed limited evidence (level 3). CONCLUSIONS: The authors found no rigorous evidence that manual therapies have a positive effect in the evolution of TTH. The most urgent need for further research is to establish the efficacy beyond placebo of the different manual therapies currently applied in patients with TTH.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗