PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Signal Recognition Particle”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 487 records · Page 27Linked to original sources

Signal peptide hydrophobicity is critical for early stages in protein export by Bacillus subtilis.

Signal peptides that direct protein export in Bacillus subtilis are overall more hydrophobic than signal peptides in Escherichia coli. To study the importance of signal peptide hydrophobicity for protein export in both organisms, the alpha-amylase AmyQ was provided with leucine-rich (high hydrophobicity) or alanine-rich (low hydrophobicity) signal peptides. AmyQ export was most efficiently directed by the authentic signal peptide, both in E. coli and B. subtilis. The leucine-rich signal peptide directed AmyQ export less efficiently in both organisms, as judged from pulse-chase labelling experiments. Remarkably, the alanine-rich signal peptide was functional in protein translocation only in E. coli. Cross-linking of in vitro synthesized ribosome nascent chain complexes (RNCs) to cytoplasmic proteins showed that signal peptide hydrophobicity is a critical determinant for signal peptide binding to the Ffh component of the signal recognition particle (SRP) or to trigger factor, not only in E. coli, but also in B. subtilis. The results show that B. subtilis SRP can discriminate between signal peptides with relatively high hydrophobicities. Interestingly, the B. subtilis protein export machinery seems to be poorly adapted to handle alanine-rich signal peptides with a low hydrophobicity. Thus, signal peptide hydrophobicity appears to be more critical for the efficiency of early stages in protein export in B. subtilis than in E. coli.

Alanine↗

Saccharomyces cerevisiae secretes and correctly processes human interferon hybrid proteins containing yeast invertase signal peptides.

Synthetic oligonucleotides coding for the yeast invertase secretion signal peptide were fused to the gene for the mature form of human interferon (huIFN-alpha 2). Two plasmids (E3 and F2) were constructed. E3 contained the invertase signal codons in a reading frame with the mature huIFN-alpha 2 gene. F2 had a deletion of the codon for alanine at amino acid residue-5 in the invertase signal and an addition of a methionine codon located between the coding sequences for the invertase signal and mature huIFN-alpha 2. Both hybrid genes were located adjacent to the promoter from the 3-phosphoglycerate kinase gene on the multicopy yeast expression plasmid, YEp1PT. Yeast transformants containing these plasmids produced somewhat more IFN than did the same expression plasmid containing the IFN gene with its human secretion signal sequence. HuIFN-alpha 2, purified from the medium of yeast cells containing E3, was found to be processed at the correct site. The huIFN-alpha 2 made by plasmid F2 was found to be completely processed at the junction between the invertase signal (a variant) and the methionine of methionine-huIFN-alpha 2. These results strongly suggested that the invertase signal (or its variant) attached to huIFN was efficiently recognized by the presumed signal recognition particle and was cleaved by the signal peptidase in the yeast cells. These results also suggested that amino acid changes on the right side of the cleavage site did not necessarily prevent cleavage or secretion.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Discrimination between SRP- and SecA/SecB-dependent substrates involves selective recognition of nascent chains by SRP and trigger factor.

Besides SecA and SecB, Escherichia coli cells possess a signal recognition particle (SRP) to target exported proteins to the SecY translocon. Using chemical and site-specific cross-linking in vitro, we show that SRP recognizes the first signal anchor sequence of a polytopic membrane protein (MtlA) resulting in cotranslational targeting of MtlA to SecY and phospholipids of the plasma membrane. In contrast, a possible interaction of SRP with the secretory protein pOmpA is prevented by the association of trigger factor with nascent pOmpA. Trigger factor also prevents SecA from binding to the first 125 amino acids of pOmpA when they are still associated with the ribosome. Under no experimental conditions was SecA found to interact with MtlA. Likewise, virtually no binding of trigger factor to ribosome-bound MtlA occurs even in the complete absence of SRP. Collectively, our results indicate that at the stage of nascent polypeptides, polytopic membrane proteins are selected by SRP for co-translational membrane targeting, whereas secretory proteins are directed into the SecA/SecB-mediated post-translational targeting pathway by means of their preferential recognition by trigger factor.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Unregulated exposure of the ribosomal M-site caused by NAC depletion results in delivery of non-secretory polypeptides to the Sec61 complex.

Nascent polypeptide associated complex (NAC) interacts with nascent polypeptides emerging from ribosomes. Both signal recognition particle (SRP) and NAC work together to ensure specificity in co-translational targeting by competing for binding to the ribosomal membrane attachment site. While SRP selects signal-containing ribosomes for targeting, NAC prevents targeting of signal peptide-less nascent chains to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Here we show that the ribosome binding that occurs in NAC's absence delivers signalless nascent chains to the Sec61 complex, underscoring the danger of unregulated exposure of the ribosomal M-site. Recently, the idea that NAC prevents ribosome binding has been challenged. By carefully examining the physiologic NAC concentration in a variety of tissues from different species we here demonstrate that the discrepancy resulted from subphysiologic NAC concentrations.

Animals↗

Dual signal peptides mediate the signal recognition particle/Sec-independent insertion of a thylakoid membrane polyprotein, PsbY.

The nuclear psbY gene (formerly ycf32) encodes two distinct single-spanning chloroplast thylakoid membrane proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. After import into the chloroplast, the precursor protein is processed to a polyprotein in which each "mature" protein is preceded by an additional hydrophobic region; we show that these regions function as signal peptides that are cleaved after insertion into the thylakoid membrane. Inhibition of the first or second signal cleavage reaction by enlargement of the -1 residues leads in each case to the accumulation of a thylakoid-integrated intermediate containing three hydrophobic regions after import into chloroplasts; a double mutant is converted to a protein containing all four hydrophobic regions. We propose that the overall insertion process involves (i) insertion as a double-loop structure, (ii) two cleavages by the thylakoidal processing peptidase on the lumenal face of the membrane, and (iii) cleavage by an unknown peptidase on the stromal face on the membrane between the first mature protein and the second signal peptide. We also show that this polyprotein can insert into the thylakoid membrane in the absence of stromal factors, nucleoside triphosphates, or a functional Sec apparatus; this effectively shows for the first time that a multispanning protein can insert posttranslationally without the aid of signal recognition particle, SecA, or the membrane-bound Sec machinery.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Identification of novel protein-protein interactions at the cytosolic surface of the Sec63 complex in the yeast ER membrane.

Precursors of secretory proteins are targeted to the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum by specific protein complexes that recognize their signal sequence. All eukaryotic cells investigated so far have been found to possess the signal recognition particle (SRP) that targets the majority of precursors to the translocation machinery. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae a number of proteins are translocated independently of SRP. These precursors rely on a different signal sequence-binding complex, which includes Sec62p, Sec63p, Sec71p and Sec72p. Identifying interactions between individual components of this tetrameric protein complex is important in the understanding of its function. We demonstrate a specific interaction between the only two essential proteins in this complex, Sec62p and Sec63p. Second, we show evidence of homodimerization of Sec72p molecules and further identify the YLR301w gene product as a novel in vivo interacting partner of Sec72p. Finally, we determine the authentic N-terminus of Sec62p and describe interacting subdomains of both Sec62p and Sec63p.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Distinct requirements for translocation of the N-tail and C-tail of the Escherichia coli inner membrane protein CyoA.

Inner membrane proteins (IMPs) of Escherichia coli use different pathways for membrane targeting and integration. YidC plays an essential but poorly defined role in the integration and folding of IMPs both in conjunction with the Sec translocon and as a Sec-independent insertase. Depletion of YidC only marginally affects the insertion of Sec-dependent IMPs, whereas it blocks the insertion of a subset of Sec-independent IMPs. Substrates of this latter "YidC-only" pathway include the relatively small IMPs M13 procoat, Pf3 coat protein, and subunit c of the F(1)F(0) ATPase. Recently, it has been shown that the steady state level of the larger and more complex CyoA subunit of the cytochrome o oxidase is also severely affected upon depletion of YidC. In the present study we have analyzed the biogenesis of the integral lipoprotein CyoA. Collectively, our data suggest that the first transmembrane segment of CyoA rather than the signal sequence recruits the signal recognition particle for membrane targeting. Membrane integration and assembly appear to occur in two distinct sequential steps. YidC is sufficient to catalyze insertion of the N-terminal domain consisting of the signal sequence, transmembrane segment 1, and the small periplasmic domain in between. Translocation of the large C-terminal periplasmic domain requires the Sec translocon and SecA, suggesting that for this particular IMP the Sec translocon might operate downstream of YidC.

Blotting, Western↗

Is Ffh required for export of secretory proteins?

In Escherichia coli, protein export from the cytoplasm may occur via the signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent pathway or the Sec-dependent pathway. Membrane proteins utilize the SRP-dependent route, whereas many secretory proteins use the cytoplasmic Sec machinery. To examine the possibility that signal peptide hydrophobicity governs which targeting route is utilized, we used a series of PhoA signal sequence mutants which vary only by incremental hydrophobicity changes. We show that depletion of SRP, but not trigger factor, affects all the mutants examined. These results suggest secretory proteins with a variety of signal sequences, as well as membrane proteins, require SRP for export.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗

Folding and intracellular transport of the yeast plasma-membrane H(+)-ATPase: effects of mutations in KAR2 and SEC65.

We have developed two independent assays to study the integration, folding, and intracellular transport of the polytopic plasma membrane H(+)-ATPase in yeast. To follow folding, controlled trypsinolysis was used to distinguish between the E1 conformation of the ATPase (favored in the presence of ADP) and the E2 conformation (favored in the presence of vanadate). By this criterion, wild-type ATPase appears to recognize its ligands and assume distinct conformations within a short time after its biosynthesis. To follow intracellular transport, we have exploited the fact that export of newly synthesized ATPase from the endoplasmic reticulum is accompanied by kinase-mediated phosphorylation, leading to a shift in electrophoretic mobility. Because proper folding is required for transport from the endoplasmic reticulum, the mobility shift also serves as a convenient bioassay for correct folding. As a first step toward identifying cell components important in folding of the nascent ATPase, we have used the dual assays to examine the role of KAR2, encoding the yeast homolog of immunoglobulin heavy chain binding protein/78-kDa glucose-regulated protein, and SEC65, encoding a subunit of the yeast signal recognition particle. Although mutation of KAR2 caused defective translocation of several secretory precursors into the endoplasmic reticulum lumen, ATPase folding and intracellular transport were unperturbed. By contrast, in a sec65 mutant, the folding and intracellular transport of newly synthesized ATPase were delayed. Our data suggest that conformational maturation of the ATPase is a rapid process in wild-type cells and that membrane integration mediated by signal recognition peptide is important for the proper folding of this polytopic protein.

Cell Membrane↗

Domain interactions in E. coli SRP: stabilization of M domain by RNA is required for effective signal sequence modulation of NG domain.

The E. coli protein, Fth, binds to 4.5S RNA through its M domain to form the signal recognition particle (SRP). The other domain of Fth (NG) is a GTPase, which binds and is coordinately regulated by its receptor, FtsY. We find that the helical M domain is inherently flexible. Binding of 4.5S RNA to Fth stabilizes the M domain yet has little apparent effect on the binding of signal peptides. However, in the absence of the RNA, signal peptide binding results in a global destabilization of Fth, which is prevented by binding of 4.5S RNA. Signal peptide binding to isolated NG domain also causes a pronounced destabilization, implicating the NG domain in direct recognition of signal peptide.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

SRPrises in RNA-protein recognition.

The recent structure determination of the phylogenetically conserved cor re of the signal recognition particle (SRP) reveals a novel of highly un usual RNA-protein interface, where non-canonical base pairs play a centr al role. The structure shows how a helix-turn-helix motif can be employ ed to bind RNA and offers hints as to how the signal peptide is recogniz ed by the SRP.

Helix-Turn-Helix Motifs↗

The tmRDB and SRPDB resources.

Maintained at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Texas, the tmRNA database (tmRDB) is accessible at the URL http://psyche.uthct.edu/dbs/tmRDB/tmRDB.html with mirror sites located at Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama (http://www.ag.auburn.edu/mirror/tmRDB/) and the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Denmark (http://tmrdb.kvl.dk/). The signal recognition particle database (SRPDB) at http://psyche.uthct.edu/dbs/SRPDB/SRPDB.html is mirrored at http://srpdb.kvl.dk/ and the University of Goteborg (http://bio.lundberg.gu.se/dbs/SRPDB/SRPDB.html). The databases assist in investigations of the tmRNP (a ribonucleoprotein complex which liberates stalled bacterial ribosomes) and the SRP (a particle which recognizes signal sequences and directs secretory proteins to cell membranes). The curated tmRNA and SRP RNA alignments consider base pairs supported by comparative sequence analysis. Also shown are alignments of the tmRNA-associated proteins SmpB, ribosomal protein S1, alanyl-tRNA synthetase and Elongation Factor Tu, as well as the SRP proteins SRP9, SRP14, SRP19, SRP21, SRP54 (Ffh), SRP68, SRP72, cpSRP43, Flhf, SRP receptor (alpha) and SRP receptor (beta). All alignments can be easily examined using a new exploratory browser. The databases provide links to high-resolution structures and serve as depositories for structures obtained by molecular modeling.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

A complex of the signal sequence binding protein and the SRP RNA promotes translocation of nascent proteins.

Translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane is initiated by the signal recognition particle (SRP), a cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein complex consisting of a 7S RNA and six polypeptides. To investigate the functions of the SRP components, we have tested the activities of several SRP subparticles. We show that the SRP GTPase (SRP54) alone binds a signal sequence and discriminates it from a non-signal sequence. Although SRP54 alone is unable to promote translocation, SRP54 in a complex with SRP RNA is both necessary and sufficient to promote translocation of an elongation-arrested nascent protein in a GTP-regulated manner. For co-translational translocation, additional SRP components are required. We discuss the implications of our results for the function of the Escherichia coli SRP which is homologous to the SRP54/SRP-RNA complex.

Animals↗

Protein targeting: getting into the groove.

The 54 kDa subunit of the signal recognition particle has to identify a diverse family of substrates and deliver them in a controlled manner to the translocation machinery of the endoplasmic reticulum. Important new insights into the function of this sorting protein have emerged from recent biochemical and structural studies.

Animals↗

The targeting pathway of Escherichia coli presecretory and integral membrane proteins is specified by the hydrophobicity of the targeting signal.

Previous studies have demonstrated that presecretory proteins such as maltose binding protein (MBP) and outer membrane protein A (OmpA) are targeted to the Escherichia coli inner membrane by the molecular chaperone SecB, but that integral membrane proteins are targeted by the signal recognition particle (SRP). In vitro studies have suggested that trigger factor binds to a sequence near the N terminus of the mature region of OmpA and shunts the protein into the SecB pathway by blocking an interaction between SRP and the signal peptide. By contrast, we have found that the targeting pathway of a protein under physiological conditions is dictated by the composition of its targeting signal. Replacement of the MBP or OmpA signal peptide with the first transmembrane segment of AcrB abolished the dependence on SecB for transport and rerouted both proteins into the SRP targeting pathway. More modest alterations of the MBP signal peptide that simply increase its hydrophobicity also promoted SRP binding. Furthermore, we obtained evidence that SRP has a low affinity for typical signal peptides in vivo. These results imply that different classes of E. coli proteins are targeted by distinct pathways because bacterial SRP binds to a more restricted range of targeting signals than its eukaryotic counterpart.

ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters↗

Chloroplast SRP54 interacts with a specific subset of thylakoid precursor proteins.

Signal recognition particles (SRPs) have been identified in organisms as diverse as mycoplasma and mammals; in several cases these SRPs have been shown to play a key role in protein targeting. In each case the recognition of appropriate targeting signals is mediated by SRP subunits related to the 54-kDa protein of mammalian SRP (SRP54). In this study we have characterized the specificity of 54CP, a chloroplast homologue of SRP54 which is located in the chloroplast stroma. We have used a nascent chain cross-linking approach to detect the interactions of 54CP with heterologous endoplasmic reticulum-targeting signals. 54CP functions as a bona fide signal recognition factor which can discriminate between functional and non-functional targeting signals. Using a range of authentic thylakoid precursor proteins we found that 54CP discriminates between thylakoid-targeting signals, interacting with only a subset of protein precursors. Thus, the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding protein, cytochrome f, and the Rieske FeS protein all showed strong cross-linking products with 54CP. In contrast, no cross-linking to the 23- and 33-kDa proteins of the oxygen-evolving complex were detected. The selectivity of 54CP correlates with the hydrophobicity of the thylakoid-targeting signal and, in the case of light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding protein, with previously determined transport/integration requirements. We propose that 54CP mediates the targeting of a specific subset of precursors to the thylakoid membrane, i.e. those with particularly hydrophobic signal sequences.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Crystal structure of the conserved subdomain of human protein SRP54M at 2.1 A resolution: evidence for the mechanism of signal peptide binding.

Protein SRP54 is an integral part of the mammalian signal recognition particle (SRP), a cytosolic ribonucleoprotein complex which associates with ribosomes and serves to recognize, bind, and transport proteins destined for the membrane or secretion. The methionine-rich M-domain of protein SRP54 (SRP54M) binds the SRP RNA and the signal peptide as the nascent protein emerges from the ribosome. A focal point of this critical cellular function is the detailed understanding of how different hydrophobic signal peptides are recognized efficiently and transported specifically, despite considerable variation in sequence. We have solved the crystal structure of a conserved functional subdomain of the human SRP54 protein (hSRP54m) at 2.1 A resolution showing a predominantly alpha helical protein with a large fraction of the structure available for binding. RNA binding is predicted to occur in the vicinity of helices 4 to 6. The N-terminal helix extends significantly from the core of the structure into a large but constricted hydrophobic groove of an adjacent molecule, thus revealing molecular details of possible interactions between alpha helical signal peptides and human SRP54.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Structure of the most conserved internal loop in SRP RNA.

The signal recognition particle (SRP) directs translating ribosomes to the protein translocation apparatus of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane or the bacterial plasma membrane. The SRP is universally conserved, and in prokaryotes consists of two essential subunits, SRP RNA and SRP54, the latter of which binds to signal sequences on the nascent protein chains. Here we describe the solution NMR structure of a 28-mer RNA composing the most conserved part of SRP RNA to which SRP54 binds. Central to this function is a six-nucleotide internal loop that assumes a novel Mg2+-dependent structure with unusual cross-strand interactions; besides a cross-strand A/A stack, two guanines form hydrogen bonds with opposite-strand phosphates. The structure completely explains the phylogenetic conservation of the loop bases, underlining its importance for SRP54 binding and SRP function.

Base Sequence↗