PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Aortic Dissection”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 505 records · Page 28Linked to original sources
PubMed1987

Intravenous digital subtraction angiography in the diagnosis and management of acute aortic dissection.

Eleven patients presenting with the clinical diagnosis of suspected aortic dissection underwent intravenous digital subtraction aortography. In nine patients digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed as the investigation of first choice. In five of these the diagnosis was confirmed with this technique alone and surgical repair was undertaken without further investigation. Direct cine aortography was also undertaken in the other four patients and confirmed the DSA findings, demonstrating aortic dissection in one case and no dissection in three others. In two of the eleven patients, direct cine aortography was performed as the initial investigation. The results of subsequent digital aortography concurred in both cases, aortic dissection being demonstrated in one patient. In two cases, despite normal cine and digital aortography, aortic dissection was confirmed by computed tomography. We have found DSA to be a valuable technique for diagnosing aortic dissection, with no false positive or false negative findings when compared to direct cine aortography. Since it is a less traumatic procedure than direct aortography it should be the investigation of choice if computed tomography is not immediately available.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed1992

[Perioperative management for type A acute aortic dissection].

Twenty nine cases of type A acute aortic dissection were subjected to a retrospective study concerning perioperative management. Two keys pointed out for the management were as follow; (1) An optimal control of blood pressure is the most important measure to avoid advance of aortic dissection or rupture of dissecting aneurysm. Both pericardiac tamponade and aortic valve insufficiency should be taken care of from their onset, since they are often complicated after aortic dissections and their onset is fatal. (2) Separated brain perfusion and profound hypothermia with total circulatory arrest might involve a high risk of inducing postoperative brain damage and mortality, especially for old patients.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

[Neurologic symptoms in acute thoracic aortic dissection--a case report].

Acute thoracic aortic dissection is a life-threatening illness. It is often difficult to diagnose preclinically due to its many possible symptoms. One out of three patients has neurological deficits. The prognosis depends on rapid diagnosis and immediate adequate therapy. Therefore, every emergency physician should know the signs and risk factors of this disease. The most important goals of prehospital therapy are management of pain and anxiety and pharmacological control of the systolic blood pressure and heart rate. We report on a 46-year-old female patient who developed neurological deficits caused by an acute thoracic aortic dissection.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Intravascular ultrasound-guided creation of re-entry sites to improve intermittent claudication in patients with aortic dissection.

PURPOSE: To report percutaneous fenestration of aortic dissection flaps to relieve distal ischemia using a novel intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided fenestration device. CASE REPORTS: Two men (47 and 62 years of age) with aortic dissection and intermittent claudication had percutaneous ultrasound-guided fenestration performed under local anesthesia. Using an ipsilateral transfemoral approach, the intimal flap was punctured under real-time IVUS guidance using a needle-catheter combination through which a guidewire was placed across the dissection flap into the false lumen. The fenestration was achieved using balloon catheters of increasing diameter introduced over the guidewire. Stenting of the re-entry was performed in 1 patient to equalize pressure across the dissection membrane in both lumens. The procedures were performed successfully and without complications. In both patients, ankle-brachial indexes improved from 0.76 to 1.07 and from 0.8 to 1.1, respectively. Both patients were without claudication at the 3- and 6-month follow-up examination. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous intravascular ultrasound-guided fenestration and stenting at the level of the iliac artery in aortic dissection patients with claudication is a technically feasible and safe procedure and relieves symptoms.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed2004

Warfarin-associated thoracic aortic dissection in an elderly woman.

BACKGROUND: The risk/benefit ratio of warfarin therapy changes in the over 75s, when haemorrhagic side-effects become more common. These may not always be reported in the literature. CASE REPORT: A woman of 80 years, on long-term warfarin therapy presented with an acute dissecting thoracic aortic aneurysm; on investigation the only precipitating factor found was an international normalised ratio of 4.8. This patient, who also had an abdominal aortic aneurysm, survived, on discontinuation of her anticoagulant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a previously unreported complication of warfarin therapy in a patient over 75 years of age, to add to the cautions in prescribing this drug in patients of this age group.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Aortic dissection presenting as superior vena cava syndrome.

Aortic dissection usually presents with chest pain, abnormal pulses, and a widened mediastinum on chest radiograph. It is rarely associated with the superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS), which more commonly occurs in the setting of malignant disease. A patient who had SVCS as a result of a painless aortic dissection is presented and compared with other previously reported cases of simultaneous SVCS and aortic dissection.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

ILEAD--ischemia of the lower extremities due to aortic dissection: the isolated presentation.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Lower extremity symptoms accompanying dissecting hematomas of the aorta are well described. Isolated lower extremity ischemia as the presenting syndrome of aortic dissection is rare and frequently misinterpreted so that the diagnosis of aortic dissection is delayed or missed, often with catastrophic results. This study was undertaken to determine its common characteristics and to reinforce recognition of this life-threatening phenomenon. METHODS: After the first patient in our series presented with isolated lower extremity ischemia due to aortic dissection, a prospective search for similar presentations was undertaken over 2 years. We also conducted a retrospective search for all aortic dissections at our hospital for the past 10 years and a MEDLINE search for all reported aortic dissections in the literature of the past 20 years, as well as for all reports of isolated ischemia of the lower extremities due to aortic dissection. RESULTS: Three patients with isolated ischemia of the lower extremities due to aortic dissection were found prospectively after the index case. Over 10 years, 40 patients with acute aortic dissection were diagnosed at our hospital. The MEDLINE search revealed 1,751 aortic dissections of which 10% had lower extremity symptoms. Only 10 cases of aortic dissection were reported as lower extremity ischemia with symptoms isolated to one or both lower extremities. Smoking, hypertension, male gender, hypercholesterolemia, and recent history of coronary artery bypass grafting were common predisposing risk factors for this rare presentation. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic isolated ischemia of the lower extremities due to aortic dissection is rare and often missed. Awareness of its characteristics, aided by the acronym ILEAD, made it possible to suspect the true origin of this misleading syndrome.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed2005

Indications, timing, and prognosis of operative repair of aortic dissections.

Since the first description of aortic dissection in the 1700s, the understanding and treatment of this catastrophic disease has evolved. Aortic dissections are identified as a tear in the aortic intima and inner layer of the media that allows for blood flow within the aortic wall. The area of the vessel involved determines its classification. The classification, in turn, helps to predict outcomes, which allows for appropriate treatment planning. The goal of this article is to outline the operative indications and timing for Stanford type A and type B dissections, based on prior reported data and our own clinical experience with 176 patients treated surgically at the Yale Center for Thoracic Aortic Disease. With this data we will revisit the importance of looking at each patient individually to devise an appropriate operative plan, with the knowledge that treatment for type A dissections is operative and treatment for type B dissections is medical unless patients present with actual or impending rupture, malperfusion, or failure of medical management.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Four-channeled aortic dissection and rupture.

A four-channeled aortic dissection is quite rare, which is a highly life-threatening situation predisposing to aortic rupture. We report a successful management of a four-channeled aortic dissection and an aortic rupture in a 59-year-old woman with Marfan's syndrome 11 years after an initial Bentall procedure for DeBakey type I dissection. The total arch and the descending thoracic aorta were replaced under deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Successful treatment for intraoperatively evolving acute aortic dissection in a neonate.

Acute aortic dissection is a life-threatening condition. We report the case of a neonatal one-stage correction of coarctation and hypoplastic aortic arch repair plus ventricular septal defect closure. While dissecting the head vessels after cannulation of the ascending aorta and commencing cardiopulmonary bypass, type A aortic dissection evolved. This required immediate ascending aorta and aortic arch reconstruction with coarctation of the aorta resection under hypothermic circulatory arrest. The surgical management of this rather unique situation is discussed here.

Acute Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

MR evaluation of chronic aortic dissection.

Thirty patients with suspected or known chronic aortic dissection were imaged with magnetic resonance (MR), CT, and angiography. Five of these patients had previously undergone surgical repair of the ascending aorta for a type A dissection. Magnetic resonance demonstrated an intimal flap and a double lumen in 25 cases. In four cases with a thrombosed false lumen, proved angiographically, an intimal flap and double channel were not seen. In two of four aortic dissections with a thrombosed false lumen, CT made the diagnosis by showing displaced intimal calcifications not visualized on MR. In one case the aortic dissection was made on CT and angiography but was not supported by MR which showed an aortic aneurysm, subsequently confirmed at surgery. Magnetic resonance, CT, and aortography differentiated between type A (nine patients) or B (20 patients) dissection in all cases and demonstrated extension into the abdominal aorta. Extension into the iliac arteries was seen on MR in three patients but missed in nine patients. Magnetic resonance differentiated the true and false lumen in all but one case. Thrombosis of the false channel was identified in four cases by a decrease in signal intensity on the second echo image. Cardiac gating and longitudinal contiguous sections seemed to be more suitable for appreciation of the relationships with arch vessels. Transverse contiguous slices allowed determination of the origin of celiac, mesenteric, and renal arteries from either the true or the false lumen. This study confirms that MR is an accurate and noninvasive method for the evaluation and follow-up of chronic aortic dissection, obviating the need for iodinated contrast media.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Heritable disorders predisposing to aortic dissection.

Heritable disorders of connective tissue often predispose patients to aortic pathology and in particular aortic dissection. The Marfan syndrome, vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, familial forms of thoracic aortic aneurysms or aortic dissection, and bicuspid aortic valve are all examples of heritable disorders that have associated defects affecting the integrity of the aortic wall, posing a risk of both aneurysmal dilation and dissection. The purpose of this review was to outline the phenotypes of the heritable syndromes that predispose to aortic dissection, present a guideline to their management and surveillance, and to offer insight into some of the surgical pitfalls that occur when repairing ascending aortic dissections in these types of patients.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed1999

Application of AdvaSeal for acute aortic dissection: experimental study.

BACKGROUND: In the surgical treatment of acute aortic dissection, intractable hemorrhage often occurs. We performed an animal study to test the hypothesis that a new sealant, AdvaSeal (Ethicon Inc, Johnson & Johnson Medical KK, Somerville, NJ), can close the false channel of aortic dissection. METHODS: Acute descending aortic dissection was created surgically in 12 mongrel dogs. In 7 of these (treated group), AdvaSeal was applied to the false cavity for reinforcing and fusing the dissected layers and also to the suture line. The other 5 dogs (control) were left untreated. Specimens were harvested 2 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: The sealant could be used in wet conditions. In the treated group, hemostasis was easily achieved during surgery. All false cavities were perfectly thrombosed, causing no deleterious effects related to the sealant. In the control group, all false lumina remained patent. CONCLUSIONS: The advantage of AdvaSeal was its effectiveness on wet tissue and its adhesiveness, allowing good hemostasis and closure of the false lumen. The sealant can be an easy and efficacious sealant in treatment for acute aortic dissection.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Return to home early days after acute aortic dissection surgery.

AIM: The length of hospital stay after acute aortic dissection surgery tends to be prolonged. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of our protocol for early discharge after acute aortic dissection surgery. METHODS: This study enrolled 17 consecutive acute aortic dissection patients who returned to their own home within 2 weeks of surgery. In seven patients total aortic arch replacement was performed and in 7 partial arch replacement. The main aim of the first 24 h after surgery was to achieve early extubation. Patients were encouraged to return to their own home 4 days and later after surgery. The prerequisite criteria for discharge were the following: independent mobility, stable hemodynamics, apyrexia, adequate oral intake, normal bowel function, healthy surgical wound and the patient's agreement for discharge. RESULTS: The mean age of these patients was 59. The postoperative ventilation time, length of intensive care unit stay and postoperative hospital stay were 11 h, 37 h and 6.9 days, respectively. Two (12%), 13 (76%) and 14 (82%) patients returned to their own home by postoperative day 4, 7 and 10, respectively. Three patients were readmitted to a peripheral hospital in the 4 week postoperative period. The reason for all readmissions was lack of family support. Two other patients underwent pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusion at an other hospital as outpatients. There was no complication caused by early discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Early discharge after aortic dissection surgery is safe and recommended to patients who have normal bowel function and adequate family support.

Acute Disease↗