SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “CHOLECYSTECTOMY”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 505 records · Page 28Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: In severe cholecystitis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be technically difficult, and is associated with an increased rate of procedure conversions and common bile duct lesions. METHODS: We investigated the safety and complications of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis in a medium- to long-term follow-up evaluation. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 345 patients during a period of 64 months. In 46 of the patients (13.3%), a subtotal cholecystectomy was performed. The results were compared with data on laparoscopic cholecystectomy from 16,130 patients in 84 surgical institutes in Switzerland, collected prospectively by the Swiss Association for Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery (SALTS). RESULTS: The median operating time was 93 min (range, 50-140) min. The overall rate of procedure conversions in acute cholecystitis was lowered significantly from 23.2% (SALTS) to 9.7%. There was no bile duct lesion, as compared with the rate of 0.8% in the SALTS data. In follow-up evaluations, fluid collections in 16 patients (35%) and residual gallstones in 6 patients (13%) were of no clinical relevance. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis offers a simple and safe solution that prevents bile duct injuries and decreases the rate of conversion in anatomically difficult situations.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is not yet clearly established. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis and to compare the results with delayed cholecystectomy. METHODS: Between January 2001 and November 2002, 40 patients with a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis were assigned randomly to early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 24 h of admission (early group, n = 20) or to initial conservative treatment followed by delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 6 to 12 weeks later (delayed group, n = 20). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the conversion rates (early, 25% vs delayed, 25%), operating times (early, 104 min vs delayed, 93 min), postoperative analgesia requirements (early, 5.3 days vs delayed, 4.8 days), or postoperative complications (early, 15% vs delayed, 20%). However, the early group had significantly more blood loss (228 vs 114 ml) and shorter hospital stay (4.1 vs 10.1 days). CONCLUSIONS: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is safe and feasible, offering the additional benefit of a shorter hospital stay. It should be offered to patients with acute cholecystitis, provided the surgery is performed within 72 to 96 h of the onset of symptoms.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2005

Gastroduodenoscopy: a routine examination of 2,800 patients before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Unrecognized gastric and duodenal peptic ulcer is a common cause of epigastric pains for patients with cholelithiasis qualified for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Undiagnosed gastric or duodenal ulcer may be the cause of persistent pains after cholecystectomy. The purpose of the study was to assess the value of a routine preoperative panendoscopy for qualifying patients to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: The study enrolled 2,800 patients treated for cholelithiasis from May 1993 to December 2002. Endoscopic examination was performed for all treated patients 1 to 4 days before their operations. RESULTS: Preoperative endoscopy showed pathologic changes in the stomach or duodenum in 1,187 (42%) of 2,800 patients qualified for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastric ulcer was found in 179 patients (6.4%) duodenal ulcer in 127 patients (4.5%), gastritis in 735 patients (26.3%), polyps in 143 patients (5.1%), and cancer in 3 patients (0.1%). The surgery was postponed for patients with ulcer, and antiulcer treatment was started. In 16 patients, the symptoms associated with cholelithiasis subsided after healing of the ulcer. Cholelithiasis in these patients was asymptomatic, and a cholecystectomy was not performed. CONCLUSIONS: Panendoscopy should be a routine examination performed for each patient qualified to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy. For some patients with asymptomatic cholelithiasis, pain in fact is caused by peptic ulcer.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

The Eindhoven laparoscopic cholecystectomy training course--improving operating room performance using virtual reality training: results from the first E.A.E.S. accredited virtual reality trainings curriculum.

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to investigate operating room performance of surgical residents, after participating in the Eindhoven virtual reality laparoscopic cholecystectomy training course. This course is the first formal surgical resident trainings course, using a variety of complementary virtual reality (VR) skills training simulation in order to prepare surgical residents for their first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The course was granted EAES certification. METHODS: The four-day course is based on multimedia and multimodality approach. A variety of increasingly difficult simulation training sessions, next to intimate focus-group "knowledge sessions" are included. Both basic and procedural VR simulation is featured, using MIST-VR and the Xitacts' LapChol simulation software. The operating room performance of twelve surgical residents who participated in the course and twelve case-control counterparts were compared. The case-control group was matched for clinical number laparoscopic cholecystectomy performance (maximum of 4 procedures). Two observers analyzed a randomly mixed videotape, featuring the part of the "clip-and-cut" procedure of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and were blinded for participants' group status. Structured questionnaires including multiple observation scales were used to assess performance. RESULTS: Residents of both the experimental and control group did not differ in demographic parameters, except for number of laparoscopic cholecystectomies in favor of the control group (p-value 0.008). Both observers judge the experimental group to perform significantly better (p-value 0.004 and 0.013). Experimental group residents valued their course highly in terms of their laparoscopic surgical skills improvement and the use of VR simulators in the surgical curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: The Eindhoven Virtual Reality laparoscopic cholecystectomy training course improves surgical skill in the operating room above the level of residents trained by a variety of other training methods.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Early versus delayed-interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a metaanalysis.

BACKGROUND: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been advocated for the management of acute cholecystitis, but little evidence exists to support the superiority of this approach over delayed-interval operation. The current systematic review was undertaken to compare the outcomes and efficacy between early and delayed-interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in an evidence-based approach using metaanalytical techniques. METHODS: A search of electronic databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, was conducted to identify relevant articles published between January 1988 and June 2004. Only randomized or quasi-randomized prospective clinical trials in the English language comparing the outcomes of early and delayed-interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis were recruited. Both qualitative and quantitative statistical analyses were performed. The effect size of outcome parameters was estimated by odds ratio or weighted mean difference where feasible and appropriate. RESULTS: A total of four clinical trials comprising 504 patients met the inclusion criteria. Failure of conservative treatment requiring emergency cholecystectomy occurred for 43 patients (23%) in the delayed group. Metaanalyses demonstrated a significantly shortened total length of hospital stay in the early group (weighted mean difference, -1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.42 to -0.99; p < 0.001). Pooled estimates did not show any significant differences between the two approaches in terms of operation time, conversion rate, overall complication rate, incidence of bile leakage, and intraabdominal collection. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy of early and delayed-interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis were comparable. Because evidence suggested that early laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduced the total length of hospital stay and the risk of readmissions attributable to recurrent acute cholecystitis, it is therefore a more cost-effective approach for the management of acute cholecystitis.

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic↗

PubMed2000

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by a single surgeon using a visual field tracking camera: early experience.

BACKGROUND: This report describes a visual field tracking camera for laparoscopic surgery that allows the visual field to be changed without moving the laparoscope. We also report on our early experience with this camera for single-surgeon laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: The visual field tracking camera has a tracking mechanism (composed of a zoom lens and a charge-coupled device [CCD] slide mechanism) built into the camera head. The 80 degrees visual field observed with the laparoscope can be expanded using the zoom lens, and the field can be shifted by changing the size of the area being viewed by the CCD. This is accomplished by pushing a switch on the forceps or by verbal command. Cholecystectomy was carried out on 12 patients with gallstones using this camera. The operations were performed by either a single surgeon or two surgeons. Forceps held with a forceps holder were inserted through the right port to lift the fundus of the gallbladder. The single surgeon used the other two ports to resect the gallbladder by the two-handed technique. RESULTS: In all cases, cholecystectomy was completed without any need to move the laparoscope at any point during the operation. Seven operations were performed by a single surgeon. Mainly for education purposes, five other operations were performed by a pair of surgeons. The mean time required for surgery was 76 +/- 17 min. This time did not differ from that of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed during the same period on 22 patients by teams of three surgeons using conventional cameras. CONCLUSIONS: Using the visual field tracking camera, laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed without any need to touch the laparoscope. This camera allowed laparoscopic cholecystectomy to be performed by a single surgeon.

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic↗

PubMed2001

Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Outcomes of 847 planned procedures.

BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomy is now being performed on an outpatient basis at many centers. The purpose of this study was to review the results of our large experience with this procedure. METHODS: Between 1990 and 1997, 2288 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our clinic. A total of 847 (37%) were scheduled as outpatients. The selection criteria for planned outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy called for nonfrail patients with an ASA < 4 who were living < 2 h from the hospital. All patients received detailed preoperative instruction about outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A questionnaire was sent to 309 patients to sample their opinions. RESULTS: Since 1993, we have increased the number of planned outpatient cholecystectomies performed at our clinic, but the percentage of cholecystectomies completed on an outpatient basis has remained approximately 60%. A total of 547 of 847 operations scheduled as outpatient procedures (74.5%) were completed as planned, and 204 patients (24%) were kept in the hospital overnight. Twenty-seven (3%) were converted to open procedures. Eighteen laparoscopic patients (2%) stayed > 1 day (range, 2-20). None of the patients died. Of the 142 patients (46%) who completed our opinion survey, 66% were happy with their experience, 32% would like to have stayed in the hospital, and 2% were undecided. CONCLUSION: Successful same-day surgery requires proper patient instruction, appropriate patient selection, and a low threshold to convert patients to inpatient status when the situation warrants. No major complications occurred as a result of same-day discharge, and two-thirds of the patients said that they preferred outpatient surgery.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: In the light of laparoscopic cholecystectomy increasingly applied to all forms of cholecystitis, this study aimed at evaluating the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy applied to all cases of acute cholecystitis, and at determining factors associated with the risk of conversion to open cholecystectomy. METHODS: The clinical, biochemical, radiologic, and operative data from 124 consecutive cases of acute cholecystitis were analyzed retrospectively to determine the complications and morbidity after operation. The data were analyzed further by univariate and multivariate analysis to identify factors associated with conversion. RESULTS: No major bile duct injury or mortality occurred. Bile leak from the stump of the cystic duct developed in four patients. These were managed successfully by endoscopic biliary stent placement. The mean duration of hospital stay was 3.8 days in the laparoscopic group and 8.2 days in the open group. Of the 124 patients (18.5%), 23 underwent conversion to open cholecystectomy. Univariate analysis identified the following factors as associated with conversion: common duct dilation greater than 7 mm observed on ultrasound, (p < 0.05), pericholecystic collection seen on ultrasound (p < 0.0001), emphysematous cholecystitis (p < 0.01), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic evidence of Mirizzi syndrome (p < 0.05), and pericholecystic collection at operation (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, only pericholecystic collection (p < 0.015) and gallbladder wall thickness greater than 5 mm (p < 0.013) were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis can be applied safely to all comers, offering the advantage of a shortened hospital stay. Pericholecystic collection, as observed on ultrasound, is associated with a high risk of conversion to open cholecystectomy.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2001

Deep venous thrombosis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and prevention with nadroparin.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative thromboembolic disease has been suggested to occur with higher frequency during laparoscopic cholecystectomy than during other laparoscopic procedures or conventional cholecystectomy. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the occurrence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients, whether they were treated with low-molecular-weight heparins or not. METHODS: All 238 laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients included in the study underwent pre- and postoperative venous duplex scanning of both legs. Subcutaneous Nadroparin was administred to 105 patients. The remaining 133 patients did not receive pharmacologic prophylaxis. The different risk factors for thromboembolic disease were distributed evenly between the two groups, except for the duration of general anesthesia. RESULTS: No patient had postoperative clinical manifestations of DVT or pulmonary embolism. In five patients, DVT was detected at duplex scan approximately 10 days after surgery. Four DVTs were found among the 133 patients who did not receive Nadroparin (1.68%). In the group with pharmacologic prevention, one patient manifested a DVT (0.42%), giving a total DVT incidence of 2.10% after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The difference between the two groups was not significant (p = 0.27), but the results seem to indicate a tendency toward a lower incidence in the Nadroparine group. CONCLUSIONS: In the light of the study results, it seems advisable to use thromboembolic prophylaxis during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic↗

PubMed2005

Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to determine the optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. METHODS: We retrieved randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared early with delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis by systematically searching Medline and the Cochrane Library for studies published between 1966 and 2003. The outcomes of primary interest were mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: The ten trials we analyzed comprised 1 014 subjects; 534 were assigned to the early group and 480 assigned to the delayed group. The combined risk difference of mortality appeared to favor open cholecystectomy in the early period (risk difference, -0.02; 95% confidence interval, -0.44 to -0.00), but no differences were found among laparoscopic procedures or among all procedures. The combined risk difference of morbidity showed no differences between the open and laparoscopic procedures. The combined risk difference of the rate of conversion to open surgery showed no differences in the included laparoscopic studies; however, the combined total hospital stay was significantly shorter in the early group than in the delayed group. CONCLUSIONS: There is no advantage to delaying cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis on the basis of outcomes in mortality, morbidity, rate of conversion to open surgery, and mean hospital stay. Thus, early cholecystectomy should be performed for patients with acute cholecystitis.

Cholecystectomy↗

PubMed1991

Results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a university hospital.

This study analyzed the first 100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed at a university teaching hospital by a single surgeon. Patients presented with chronic cholecystitis (92), acute cholecystitis (5), acalculus cholecystitis (2), and asymptomatic cholelithiasis (1). The operative time ranged from 59 minutes to 185 minutes (mean: 110 minutes). Cholangiography was performed in 88 patients, and common bile duct stones were discovered in 3. Choledocholithiasis was managed successfully through the cystic duct in all cases. Two procedures were converted to open cholecystectomy. Operative complications included ductal injury in one patient, bile leak in two, wound cellulitis in four, and atelectasis in one. Ninety-seven patients were released within 24 hours after surgery. Mean hospital charges for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were $828 less than the cost incurred for open cholecystectomy. These early results support the view that laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe, cost-effective method for performing cholecystectomy with a remarkable improvement in patient recovery time.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1991

A practical approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

A prospective study of 500 consecutive cholecystectomies was initiated with the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted in 96% of patients presenting with primary gallbladder disease and was completed in 95%. There were no deaths or bile duct injuries. Two patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were transfused for postoperative bleeding, and only one patient required reoperation for any reason. A prospective study showed reduced operating time (20 minutes) and patient charges ($546) using electrosurgical dissection compared with laser. Reusable trocars were used without any associated injury or morbidity. An effective strategy for selective cholangiography was developed based on patient history, liver enzymes, and common duct diameter. In conclusion, laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to be a safe operation. The cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be enhanced ($1,271) with no loss of patient benefit using the combination of electrosurgery, reusable trocars, and selective cholangiograms in low-risk patients.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1992

Multipractice analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1,983 patients.

We analyzed the results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1,983 patients from a variety of practice settings in order to evaluate a large, cross-sectional experience for this new procedure. Twenty general surgeons from 9 clinics in 4 states examined the records and outcome of their laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients through March 1991. In 88 patients (4.5%), the operation was converted to an open procedure, usually because of marked inflammation and unclear anatomy. A total of 644 cases were performed with laser dissection and 1,339 with cautery, and the results of these 2 methods were similar. There were 41 complications. Reoperation for repair was necessary in 18 patients, including 5 with common duct injuries, and, to date, the outcome has been good in each patient. Seventy-six patients (3.8%) have had recognized common duct stones; these were removed preoperatively by endoscopic sphincterotomy (ERS) in 20 patients, during cholecystectomy in 46 patients, and postoperatively by ERS in 4 patients. In six patients, common duct stones became apparent 1 to 4 months after cholecystectomy. We conclude that trained general surgeons can perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy safely with risks comparable to those for conventional open cholecystectomy.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1991

Acalculous biliary pain: cholecystectomy alleviates symptoms in patients with abnormal cholescintigraphy.

A 45-minute infusion of an octapeptide of cholecystokinin (Kinevac; Squibb Diagnostics, New Brunswick, NJ) was used to measure the gallbladder ejection fraction during cholescintigraphy in 40 normal volunteers. Cholecystokinin cholescintigraphy was shown to be a reproducible test. The maximum mean gallbladder ejection fraction occurred 15 minutes after cholecystokinin infusion and was 74.5% +/- 1.9% (mean +/- SEM). A gallbladder ejection fraction greater than 40% (mean -3SD) was arbitrarily defined to be normal. The gallbladder ejection fraction test was then used to identify patients with acalculous biliary symptoms who may respond to cholecystectomy. A total of 103 patients was tested; 21 had abnormal gallbladder ejection fractions and were randomized into two groups, cholecystectomy or no operation. These patients were followed up symptomatically at 3-month intervals for 13-54 months (mean, 34 months). Of the 11 patients who underwent cholecystectomy, 10 (91%) lost their symptoms and 1 improved. Of the 10 patients in the group that did not undergo surgery, all continued to be symptomatic, 2 of whom requested cholecystectomy after 13 and 24 months, respectively. Of the 13 gallbladders obtained from surgery, 12 showed evidence of chronic cholecystitis, muscle hypertrophy, and/or narrowed cystic duct. A normal gallbladder ejection fraction was recorded in 82 patients, and further treatment was left to the discretion of their referring clinician. On follow-up, 50 patients were asymptomatic and 10 were symptomatic without specific treatment of the biliary tract; 14 underwent cholecystectomy, 8 of whom were asymptomatic. Pathological abnormalities were recorded in 6 of the removed gallbladders. It is concluded that the gallbladder ejection fraction obtained after a 45-minute infusion of cholecystokinin during cholescintigraphy is a reproducible measure of gallbladder emptying, and that cholecystectomy alleviates the biliary-type pain of patients with a reduced gallbladder ejection fraction.

Adult↗

PubMed1993

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: stones, stents and sphincterotomy.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is clearly a useful adjunct in the management of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy who have common bile duct stones. Whether endoscopic sphincterotomy plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to traditional open cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration is a question which remains to be answered by prospective, randomized trials. The immense popularity of laparoscopic cholecystectomy may prohibit such a study in the USA. In expert hands, endoscopic stone extraction is usually successful, so ERCP can be deferred until after cholecystectomy unless there is serious suspicion of a duct stone preoperatively. Actual clinical practice will depend, however, on the skill of the surgeon, the skill of the endoscopist, and the commitment to removing the gallbladder laparoscopically. It would seem prudent for surgeons to continue to direct their energy toward conquering the common bile duct via the laparoscope, and leave ERCP and stone extraction in the realm of the endoscopist who has been extensively trained in this difficult technique. Proficiency at ERCP, sphincterotomy and stone extraction requires considerable training, and the procedure should not be attempted by individuals who have performed fewer than 100 ERCPs and 25 individually supervised sphincterotomies, according to the ASGE Standards of Training, 1992. As experience with video endoscopic surgery increases and technology improves, it will become possible to remove most duct stones at the time of cholecystectomy, thus obviating the need for endoscopic sphincterotomy. In addition, ERCP should be regarded as the treatment of choice for postoperative cystic duct stump leaks. Studies have shown that any type of biliary decompression, i.e. sphincterotomy, stents or nasobiliary catheters, will be successful. The authors recommend that, in the absence of duct stones, stenting or nasobiliary catheters be used as they are less invasive. Bile duct leaks may also be managed endoscopically, but success depends on the individual characteristics of the duct injury. The decision to manage late onset strictures endoscopically should be individualized, and consideration of local endoscopic expertise, operative risk, interval between surgery and stricture, and the patient's wishes should be made.

Bile Ducts↗

PubMed1998

Prophylactic cholecystectomy is not indicated following renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate management of gallstones in patients undergoing renal transplantation is controversial. Screening for gallstones and subsequent prophylactic cholecystectomy has been recommended by some authors for kidney transplant candidates. Our program does not practice routine pretransplant screening for gallstones, and we reviewed our data to determine the outcome of our management approach. METHODS: We reviewed the records of the 1,364 currently followed patients who have undergone kidney transplant at our institution since 1985 in order to evaluate the morbidity and mortality of biliary disease in the post-transplant period. We attempted to contact all patients by telephone or mail survey for the presence of biliary tract disease or operations. RESULTS: Six hundred and sixty-two patients were fully evaluated. Fifty-two (7.85%) required cholecystectomy for stone disease. Seven patients underwent incidental cholecystectomy during other operations, 2 patients developed acalculus cholecystitis, and 14 patients with asymptomatic cholelithiasis are being followed up. Surgical indications included 38 biliary colic, 9 acute cholcystitis, 3 gallstone pancreatitis, and 2 patients who were asymptomatic. Fifty-two patients underwent 30 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, 20 open cholecystectomies, and 2 conversions. Surgery occurred from 7 days to 9.6 years following transplantation. Overall, the median hospital stay (no postoperative stay) was 4 days (range 1 to 57). Patients undergoing laparoscopy had a median stay of 2 days compared with 7 days for those undergoing an open procedure. Complications were seen in 6 patients (11.5%) with no morbidity and no graft loss. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year graft survival was 98%, 96%, and 85%, respectively, in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Transplant patients are not at an increased risk for developing biliary tract disease compared with nontransplant patients. Gallstone disease does not have a negative impact on graft survival. Treatment of gallstones has a low risk and does not represent an increased risk of complications in patients following renal transplantation.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Cholecystectomy is becoming an increasingly common operation in children.

PURPOSE: To determine the cause of a marked rise in cholecystectomy at a regional children's hospital. METHODS: Retrospective review of 185 patients undergoing cholecystectomy since 1984. The years 1984 to 1990 (group I) and 1991 to 1996 (group II) were compared. RESULTS: Cholecystectomy for gallbladder disease increased from 4.4/year (group I) to 16.3/ year (group II). Abdominal ultrasound examinations increased during this time. The ratio of children diagnosed with gallstones and then undergoing cholecystectomy also increased (P = 0.005). In group 11, 43% of children had no apparent etiology for gallstones, and more children developed complications of gallstones and evidence of choledocholithiasis. CONCLUSIONS: (1) The increased incidence of cholecystectomy is probably multifactorial. (2) Gallstone identification has increased owing to increased patient visits and more liberal use of ultrasonography in patients with abdominal pain. (3) More patients with cholelithiasis now undergo cholecystectomy perhaps because of a change in physician perception of the disease and an apparent increase in complications from gallstones.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

The impact of patient delay and physician delay on the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now used in the management of acute cholecystitis. Under these circumstances unfavorable conditions may result in conversion and complications. Information about these conditions may help in planning the laparoscopic approach or in proceeding directly to open cholecystectomy. This study was initiated to evaluate perioperative factors associated with conversion and complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Special attention was paid to the duration of complaints until surgery, to the delay on the part of the patient, and to the delay on the part of the physician. METHODS: Between January 1994 and December 1997, we attempted to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy on 348 patients with acute cholecystitis. All perioperative data were collected on standardized forms. RESULTS: There were 182 cases (52%) of acute uncomplicated cholecystitis, 90 (26%) of gangrenous cholecystitis, 33 of hydrops (9.5%), and 43 of empyema of the gallbladder (12.5%). Seventy six patients (22%) needed conversion to open cholecystectomy and complications occurred in 57 cases. Advanced cholecystitis was associated with significant patient delay (P = 0.01), and it had a significantly higher conversion rate (39%) compared with early cholecystitis (14.5%); (P <0.00001). Conversion rates were also associated with male gender (P = 0.0017), a history of biliary disease (P = 0.0085), and a patient delay of >48 hours (P = 0.028). The total and infectious complication rates were associated with an age older than 60 years (P = 0.023 and 0.007, respectively) and male gender (P = 0.026 and 0.014, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In acute cholecystitis, patient delay is associated with a high conversion rate. Early timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy tends to reduce the conversion rate, as well as the total and the infectious complication rates. Male gender, a history of biliary disease, and advanced cholecystitis are associated with conversion. Male and older patients are associated with a high total and infectious complication rates.

Acute Disease↗