SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
This commentary examines the use of Y-chromosome testing to reconstruct a genetic ancestry for the Lemba, a group in southern Africa that has long considered itself Jewish. The commentary looks especially at the reasons why this project drew such attention from the mainstream media.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) is a new tool to measure the specific impact of result disclosure after genetic testing. The authors compared its performance with that of questionnaires measuring general and cancer-specific distress. Participants (158 women) responded 1 month after they received genetic test results. The women were divided into 4 standard clinical test result groups: BRCA1/2 positive, BRCA1/2 negative, panel negative, and true negative. Factor analysis supported the formation of 3 subscales: Distress (6 items, alpha = .86), Uncertainty (9 items, alpha = .77), and Positive Experiences (4 items, alpha = .75). All 3 MICRA subscales differentiated participants who were BRCA1/2 positive from the other 3 groups. MICRA thus helps identify subgroups of vulnerable genetic testing participants.
Our understanding of the biology of colon cancer has matured to the point that it is a useful general paradigm for understanding solid tumor development. Recent advances provide insight into the genetic alterations underlying the development of colon cancer. These insights provide unique opportunities for genetic testing in predisposed, asymptomatic patients that can direct screening efforts and their clinical management. This review examines several inherited colon cancer predispositions, well described clinically for a century, that are now amenable to genetic testing. Additional discussion focuses on colon cancer predisposition traits that occur with high frequency but low penetrance characteristics. Finally, genetic tests for tumor markers that potentially have prognostic or therapeutic implications are reviewed.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the demand for genetic testing for Huntington's disease among at-risk individuals and for prenatal testing among parents at risk of transmitting the disease, from January 1987 to March 1993. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to all State coordinators of genetic testing services. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety adults (5.5% of those at risk) and 56 fetuses were tested. Nine per cent more women than men used the service. Most people tested were married and had offspring. Men generally presented for testing at an older age than women. CONCLUSION: The low uptake for testing is not surprising given the severity and untreatability of the illness. Careful monitoring is required, particularly of the effects on individuals told of their genetic status and of possible abuse of the information by third parties.
The prospect for genetic testing to better delineate the risk for coronary heart disease will become a reality in the next decade. Advances in this area will follow the accelerated trajectory in our ability to dissect the genetics of complex diseases including coronary heart disease. A brief overview of the present state of knowledge will follow the discussion of present approaches in discovering these genetic predispositions. The key issues that will likely shape the field in the near future will also be presented.
Predictive genetic testing for cancer allows identification of those with the mutation (mutation positive) who should undergo cancer surveillance aiming at early detection of cancer and those without the mutation (mutation negative), whose unnecessary worry can be alleviated and who need not undergo frequent surveillance. However, there is a risk that predictive testing might have a harmful emotional impact on an individual. In the course of a predictive genetic testing protocol, we assessed general anxiety (by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI]), fear of cancer and death, satisfaction with life and attitude to the future using a questionnaire survey in 271 individuals tested for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Measurements were made before the first counseling (baseline), at the test disclosure session (STAI only) and 1 and 12 months after disclosure. Although at every measurement, the mutation-positive individuals were more afraid of cancer than those who were mutation negative, in both groups fear of cancer decreased significantly from baseline after disclosure. The mutation-positive subjects were more anxious than their counterparts immediately after the test disclosure, but the differences had disappeared at the follow-ups. In other variables, neither differences between the groups defined by mutation status nor changes with time were detected. Our findings suggest that counseling and testing relieve fear of cancer; no harmful emotional impact was detectable at the 1-year follow-up. To confirm these findings, however, the impact of testing should be studied after a longer interval. Furthermore, to evaluate the ultimate interpretation of these results, studies are needed to investigate the impact of fear of cancer on surveillance behavior among the mutation-positive subjects.
Males with a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation are not at greatly increased risk for cancer, whereas their (grand)daughters, and other female relatives who carry the mutation, are. Males from BRCA1/BRCA2 families may opt for genetic testing to confirm whether or not they may have transmitted the mutation to their children and, if so, to inform them at an appropriate age about the genetic risk and its implications. The psychological implications of genetic testing for men at risk of being a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carrier have received little attention. We report on 28 men requesting BRCA1 or BRCA2 testing, and their partners. Men were at 25% (n =4) or 50% risk (n =24) of being a mutation carrier, the majority with daughters and half of them with daughters aged over 20 years. Levels of psychological distress were assessed several weeks before and after disclosure of the test result. In addition, we investigated the level of intrusive thoughts and feelings about breast and ovarian cancer and the tendency to avoid these. By means of interviews and questionnaires, participants could report on (expected) emotional implications of genetic testing for themselves and their children, on experiences with cancer in the family and on personality trait optimism. Distress levels prior to the result in tested men and their partners were low. Many men and partners expected the test result to affect their children's, but not their own level of problems. Men without daughters and those with an optimistic personality had especially low distress prior to disclosure. Most men reported that they did not actively avoid the issue. Only four of the 28 men were identified as mutation carriers. High distress after disclosure of the result was reported by one mutation carrier and by three non-mutation carriers. Verbatim transcripts from interviews showed a large variation of psychological reactions in male mutation carriers (eg regarding guilt feelings). Low pre-test distress in males does not necessarily indicate avoidance of the issue. Future studies may indicate which psychological reactions occur in male mutation carriers when the problem becomes more acute, eg when a daughter is found to carry the mutation and/or is diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer.
Advances in genetic technology increase the ability to test children and adolescents for late-onset conditions, disease susceptibilities, and carrier status. Genetic tests may offer medical or psychologic benefits but may also create harm; alteration of the child's self-concept or parent-child bonds and risk of stigmatization are examples of the latter. The article examines developmental theories concerning children's ability to make choices as well as informed consent and ethical considerations in genetic testing. Because optimal care requires awareness of the complex psychosocial and ethical issues involved in childhood genetic testing, nurses must be prepared to acknowledge and discuss such issues with families.
Informed probands are key actors for disclosing genetic information to their relatives when a mutation has been identified in the family. The objectives were to study women's attitudes towards the family disclosure of positive breast cancer genetic testing results and to determine the predictive factors of the diffusion patterns observed. A national multi-center cross-sectional survey was carried out at five French cancer genetic clinics during a 1-year period. Self-administered questionnaires were completed after the consultation by 84.5% (398/471) of women attending breast cancer genetic clinics for the first time. Among the 383 respondents who had at least one living first-degree relative to inform, 8.6% would inform none, 33.2% would inform at least one of them, and 58.2% would inform all of them. The sibship would be the most frequently informed blood relatives, sisters in 86.9% and brothers in 79% compared with mother in 71.4%, children in 70.4%, and father in 64.9%. Women of the family would be more frequently informed than men (P < 0.05). After multivariate adjustment, age, the fact to be affected by cancer, the number of daughters, and the emotional disturbance due to cancer in a close relationship were the main determinants (P < 0.05) of the diffusion patterns observed. The first step of the relatives' attendance to genetic counseling and the proband's willingness to disclose breast cancer genetic tests results was high in this study and was clearly dependent on the women's personal and emotional characteristics.
BACKGROUND: Many women, even women at low risk, are interested in genetic testing for breast cancer risk. However, the test has little to offer for women at low to moderate risk. We applied the Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) to investigate predictors of women's motivation to obtain such a test. METHODS: Women at low to moderate risk (n = 330) were recruited through a physician network. They received an informational letter by mail and completed a telephone survey and a written baseline questionnaire. RESULTS: Structural equation analyses with motivation to test as the outcome variable showed that the full model was not supported by the data. However, modifications to the model resulted in good model fit and explained 51% of the variance. Women with increased breast cancer worries, which were influenced by perceived risk, and women who saw more disadvantages of not getting tested showed more motivation to pursue testing. Women who saw more advantages of not getting tested showed less motivation. CONCLUSIONS: Applying the PMT was helpful in determining factors that play a role in women's intentions to obtain genetic testing. Counseling should aim at decreasing perceived risk and breast cancer worries and include a discussion of the consequences of not getting tested.
OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the attitudes of men unselected for a family history for prostate cancer concerning genetic testing for prostate cancer risk or genetic testing for inherited cancer predisposition. To explore this, we examined the interest in molecular testing for hereditary prostate cancer (HPC) predisposition among a self-selected cohort of 342 men presenting for prostate cancer screening. METHODS: Participants were surveyed concerning their attitudes about DNA testing for HPC predisposition and knowledge of prostate cancer-associated risk factors, including heredity. RESULTS: Of the participants completing the survey, 92% expressed interest in learning about DNA testing, and 89% stated that they would undergo DNA analysis for HPC predisposition, if available. Twenty-eight percent of respondents failed to demonstrate an adequate understanding of the concept of "inherited tendency." The demonstrated level of understanding of this concept did not differ by the respondent's family history, although it varied by race. An interest in learning about or undergoing testing did not vary by race, family history, or demonstrated understanding of the concept of inherited risk. CONCLUSIONS: Among men presenting for routine prostate cancer screening, interest in learning about testing for HPC predisposition and in having such testing performed may be high. The data also provide evidence that, in a population of men unselected for family history, interest in molecular testing for this common, male-specific cancer may parallel the high interest level demonstrated among women in DNA testing for inherited breast and ovarian cancer risk.
Reproductive genetic testing technologies are expanding at an exponential rate. Nurses are increasingly being called upon to provide these services to women. This paper discusses the status of nursing education in genetics and identifies immediate needs for nurses in order to be adequately prepared to respond to these increased demands. The future role of nurses in providing genetic services is delineated.
It is evident that human genetic variation is associated with many if not all human diseases including the more prevalent chronic diseases. As a result, genetics is becoming integrated into health care in all medical specialties, including oral medicine and its specialties. At the level of public health, genetic information will become increasingly important in research, policy, and program development. As application of genome technologies moves from the research laboratory to the clinical setting, a complex array of challenges will face dental clinicians in their efforts to use genetic information to improve health care and prevent disease on an individual, family, and community level. The broader social, ethical, and legal implications raised by the clinical use of genomic information have not received the same attention as did recent gene identification aspects of the Human Genome Project. The goal of this review is to foster attention and dialogue within the dental community of the ethical and social issues emerging from the availability of genetic information. Specific areas addressed include genetic testing, confidentiality, discrimination, informed consent, risk communication, and professional education.
BACKGROUND: With the exception of Huntington disease, the psychological and psychosocial impact of DNA testing for neurogenetic disorders has not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychosocial impact of genetic testing for autosomal dominant forms of hereditary ataxia and neuromuscular disorders. Patients Fifty subjects at risk for autosomal dominant forms of spinocerebellar ataxia (n = 11), muscular dystrophy (n = 28), and hereditary neuropathy (n = 12). DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective, descriptive, observational study in a university setting of individuals who underwent genetic counseling and DNA testing. Participants completed 3 questionnaires before testing and at regular intervals after testing. The questionnaire set included the Revised Impact of Event Scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, demographic information, and an assessment of attitudes and feelings about genetic testing. RESULTS: Thirty-nine subjects (78%) completed 6 months to 5 years of posttest follow-up. Common reasons for pursuing genetic testing were to provide an explanation for symptoms, emotional relief, and information for future planning. Thirty-four (68%) had positive and 16 (32%) had negative genetic results. In those with a positive result, 26 (76%) had nonspecific signs or symptoms of the relevant disorder. Forty-two participants (84%) felt genetic testing was beneficial. Groups with positive and negative test results coped well with results. However, 13 subjects (10 with positive and 3 with negative results) reported elevated anxiety levels, and 3 (1 with positive and 2 with negative results) expressed feelings of depression during the follow-up period. The test result was not predictive of anxiety or depression. CONCLUSIONS: Most individuals find neurogenetic testing to be beneficial, regardless of the result. Anxiety or depression may persist in some persons with positive or negative test results. Testing can have a demonstrable impact on family planning and interpersonal relationships. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term impact of such testing.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Mutations in hepatic nuclear factor 1alpha cause a monogenic form of diabetes, maturity onset diabetes of the young type 3 (MODY3). Our aim was (1) to assess the uptake of genetic testing for MODY3 and to determine factors affecting it, and (2) to compare attitudes to predictive genetic testing between families with MODY3 and a previously studied group at risk of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). METHODS: Adult members of two extended MODY3 pedigrees, either with diabetes or a 50% risk of having inherited the mutation (n=144, age 18-60 years), were invited to an educational counselling session followed by a possibility to obtain the gene test result. Data were collected through questionnaires before counselling and 1 month after the test disclosure. RESULTS: Eighty-nine out of 144 (62%) participated in counselling, and all but one wanted the test result disclosed. No significant sociodemographic differences were observed between the participants and non-participants. The counselling uptake was similar among diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. Uncertainty about the future and the risk for the children were the most common reasons to take the gene test. At follow-up, most subjects in both MODY3 (100%) and HNPCC (99%) families were satisfied with their decision to take the test and trusted the result. The majority of both diabetic and non-diabetic subjects considered that the MODY3 gene test should be offered either in childhood (50 and 37%) or as a teenager (30 and 37%). CONCLUSIONS: Genetic testing for MODY3 was well accepted among both diabetic and non-diabetic participants. The subjects found the gene test reliable and they were satisfied with their decision regarding the predictive test.