PubMed1996
Four centers in the United States and Sweden have been working for 2 years to develop systems and methods for measuring fit at the prosthodontic interface. Two systems are based on stylus contact techniques, one system uses a laser as its reader source, and one system is photogrammetric. All the systems are capable of providing data as three-dimensional x, y, and z axes coordinate values that can be transformed into linear and angular data that characterize the bearing surfaces of abutments or abutment replicas and their mating components in the prosthesis framework. The centroid, a single point computed from the collected data, was the measurement unit, derived for these bearing surfaces, that was used to compare the systems. All four methods can most likely detect misfits that are relevant in the clinical setting; however, only one system can be used intraorally. When any measurement system is assessed, the data should always be examined for repeatability to establish the reliability of the system. This investigation made comparisons among the measurement methods used at the four centers. It was apparent from this study that comparisons of data from measurement systems should be rounded to the nearest 10 microns. The SDs determined in the comparisons were larger than 5 microns and therefore misfits should be calculated in terms smaller than 10 microns. This final point is important to the clinician who relies on research reports about precision of fit when selecting treatment approaches in caring for the implant prosthodontic needs of their patients.