PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Practice Guidelines as Topic”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 505 records · Page 28Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Role and modalities of information and education in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: development of recommendations for clinical practice based on published evidence and expert opinion.

OBJECTIVES: To develop recommendations for the information and education of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) seen in everyday practice, using evidence from the literature, supplemented with expert opinion when needed. METHODS: A scientific committee developed eight questions using the Delphi consensus procedure. A task force reviewed the literature for answers to these questions, using the PubMed Medline database (1980-2004) and the 2002-2004 databases of the annual meetings held by the French Society for Rheumatology (SFR), the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR); the indexing terms for the search were rheumatoid, arthritis, patient, education, information, knowledge, general practitioner, family doctor, and continuing medical education. Only articles in French or English were included. A panel of rheumatologists used the evidence thus compiled to develop recommendations for each question; gaps in evidence were filled by calling on the panelists' expert opinion. For each recommendation, the level of evidence and extent of agreement among panelists were specified. RESULTS: There were four general questions about the objectives, supports, and mode of delivery (group or one-on-one) of patient information and education, as well as on evaluating knowledge, and four specific questions on program content. The search identified 1235 articles; 144 were selected on the title and 118 of those on the abstract. Three abstracts presented at meetings were also kept. The evidence from the literature was presented to the panelists during interactive workshops. The panelists then developed eight recommendations, all of which were grade D because no published studies specifically addressed everyday clinical practice. Agreement among panelists ranged across recommendations from 85.7% to 100%. CONCLUSION: Recommendations about educating and informing patients with RA in everyday practice were developed. They should increase practice uniformity and ultimately optimize the management of patients with RA.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed2006

Venous thromboembolism: scope of the problem and the nurse's role in risk assessment and prevention.

Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, comprising different manifestations of the same clinical entity referred to as venous thromboembolism, are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Despite pulmonary embolism being considered the most preventable cause of in-hospital death, the use of appropriate thromboprophylaxis remains suboptimal in many patients. Nurses are on the frontline of thrombosis prevention. By playing an essential role in diagnosis and risk assessment, applying timely preventive methods, and providing vital educational and psychologic support for patients with venous thromboembolism, skilled nursing intervention can save lives.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

Preventing reactivation of ocular histoplasmosis: guidance for patients at risk.

BACKGROUND: Ocular histoplasmosis syndrome (OHS), a significant cause of vision loss in young and middle-aged adults, is associated with the fungus Histoplasma capsulatum (Hc). There is considerable evidence that recurrent reactivation of perimacular ocular histoplasmosis lesions is an important cause of disease progression and that vision loss is at least, in part, a consequence of host sensitivity to fungal antigen. METHODS: The etiology and pathogenesis of OHS is reviewed and specific recommendations are made for patients with OHS that may decrease the risk of reactivation of ocular histoplasmosis lesions and slow disease progression. CONCLUSION: Patients with perimacular chorioretinal scars secondary to OHS should be informed by the clinician that they are at risk for vision loss; they should be told the symptoms of choroidal neovascularization and how to self-monitor their vision with an Amsler grid. We recommend they also be instructed on how to decrease their risk of reinfection by Hc. Aggressive treatment of dermatomycoses, onychomycosis, vaginal candidiasis, and other chronic fungal infections may decrease the risk of reactivation of ocular lesions. Patients with OHS who are considering LASIK surgery should be informed that the procedure may trigger choroidal neovascularization.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Cancer screening in older adults in an era of genomics and longevity.

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of cancer genomics and cancer screening in older adults with a focus on breast, prostate, and colon cancers. DATA SOURCES: Journal articles, research articles, and web sites. CONCLUSION: Cancer screening in older populations is often in the context of one or more co-morbid conditions, cancer survivorship, genomic information, and competing health priorities. The field of cancer screening has outgrown the tools available to enable health care providers and older adults to make informed cancer screening decisions. Research is needed to develop clinical screening tools that integrate age, cancer risk, life expectancy, and comorbidity. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Health care providers are faced with opportunities and challenges in the prevention and early detection of cancer in older Americans.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Evidence-based practice of transfusion medicine: is it possible and what do the words mean?

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) optimizes clinical decision making by dictating that clinical decisions be based on the best available research evidence and by integrating best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values. Several rankings of the strength of the evidence generated from different types of clinical research designs have been presented, and, in addressing a particular problem, clinicians can base their decision making on the types of clinical reports that have been published, along with an assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of each study. At a policy level, the concept of EBM would dictate that policy decisions also be made based on the best available research evidence. In transfusion medicine, however, decisions are based on a broader range of inputs, and the criteria for evaluating the efficacy and/or cost-effectiveness of proposed interventions differ from those used in other areas. Reasons why policy decisions are often based on considerations other than the best research evidence include public expectations about transfusion safety and proposals for applying the precautionary principle to transfusion medicine. Using the debate over the appropriateness of introducing universal white-cell reduction as an example, this review describes 2 perspectives for assessing evidence and/or making clinical or policy decisions: the evidence-based approach and the precautionary-principle approach; and also considers whether decisions in transfusion medicine can be truly evidence based.

Blood Transfusion↗
PubMed1997

Effects of intensive diet and exercise intervention in patients taking cholesterol-lowering drugs.

Patients taking cholesterol-lowering drugs were placed on a very low fat, high-complex-carbohydrate diet with daily aerobic exercise and achieved 19%, 20% and 29% reductions in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides, respectively. Fifty-one percent of the primary care physicians had not used diet therapy before initiating drugs and 29% did not use diet therapy along with the drugs as recommended by the National Cholesterol Education Program.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Interventions to overcome clinician- and patient-related barriers to pain management.

Barriers to optimal cancer pain management exist among clinicians and patients, and within the healthcare system. This article focuses on clinician- and patient-related barriers and the interventions that have been tested to overcome them. Although individual studies have shown promise in improving patient outcomes, overall the studies do not provide clear answers to guide practice. Further research is required to determine what components of educational interventions are necessary to facilitate optimal cancer pain management.

Algorithms↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Defining specific goals of therapy in treating dyslipidemia in the patient with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Because patients with low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (HDL-C) are at high risk for clinical coronary artery disease (CAD) events, these patients require aggressive treatment with lifestyle modifications-increased exercise, smoking cessation, and weight loss in overweight patients-and available pharmacological agents. Drugs that raise HDL-C include nicotinic acid, fibric acid derivatives, estrogens, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins), alpha-blockers, and alcohol. However, all agents that increase HDL-C may not have the same clinical benefit, just as, as shown in genetic studies in humans and mice, genetic causes of high HDL-C do not always protect against CAD, nor do genetic causes of low HDL-C always increase risk for CAD. Better understanding of the complexities of HDL metabolism and the mechanisms by which HDL protects against CAD is needed to enable the development of new therapeutic strategies--novel drugs or gene delivery systems--to increase HDL-C and reduce CAD events. The statins are the agents with the greatest evidence for slowing progression of CAD and reducing clinical events in patients with low HDL-C, but additional research is needed to determine the potential benefits of additional interventions that increase HDL-C, including combination therapy, which may provide greater improvements in the entire lipid profile.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Evidence-based analysis of prophylactic treatment of asymptomatic retinal breaks and lattice degeneration.

PURPOSE: To assess the quality of information in the literature regarding the benefits of prophylactic treatment of asymptomatic retinal tears and lattice degeneration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Asymptomatic retinal breaks occur in approximately 7% of patients over age 40, and lattice degeneration is present in approximately 8% of the general population. Because retinal breaks cause retinal detachment and lattice degeneration is associated with approximately 30% of retinal detachments, prophylactic treatment of these lesions has sometimes been recommended. LITERATURE REVIEWED: A panel of vitreoretinal experts performed a literature review of all publications regarding prevention of retinal detachment that have been published in English. These articles were then used to prepare recommendations for patient care in an American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern (PPP). Each recommendation was rated according to: (1) its importance in the care process and (2) the strength of evidence supporting the given recommendation. RESULTS: Most recommendations were rated as A (most important to patient care). Only a single publication was graded as I (providing strong evidence in support of a recommendation), and this was not a prospective trial. Of the few publications rated as II (substantial evidence), most were studies documenting a lack of treatment benefit. Because of an absence of level I and level II studies in the literature, level III (consensus of expert opinion) was the basis for most recommendations in the PPP. CONCLUSIONS: The current literature regarding prevention of retinal detachment does not provide sufficient information to support strongly prophylactic treatment of lesions other than symptomatic flap tears. Prospective randomized trials of prophylactic therapy are indicated. Eyes highly predisposed to retinal detachment should be considered for such studies.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Over the counter medicines and the need for immediate action: a further evaluation of European Commission recommended wordings for communicating risk.

A study examined people's interpretation of European Commission (EC) recommended verbal descriptors for risk of medicine side effects, and actions to take if they do occur. Members of the general public were presented with a fictitious (but realistic) scenario about suffering from a stiff neck, visiting the local pharmacy and purchasing an over the counter (OTC) medicine (Ibruprofen). The medicine came with an information leaflet which included information about the medicine's side effects, their risk of occurrence, and recommended actions to take if adverse effects are experienced. Probability of occurrence was presented numerically (6%) or verbally, using the recommended EC descriptor (common). Results showed that, in line with findings of our earlier work with prescribed medicines, participants significantly overestimated side effect risk. Furthermore, the differences in interpretation were reflected in their judgements of satisfaction, side effect severity, risk to health, and intention to take the medicine. Finally, we observed no significant difference between people's interpretation of the recommended action descriptors ('immediately' and 'as soon as possible').

Adolescent↗