PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “RAS”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 505 records · Page 28Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Four human ras homologs differ in their abilities to activate Raf-1, induce transformation, and stimulate cell motility.

Human cells contain four homologous Ras proteins, but it is unknown whether each of these Ras proteins participates in distinct signal transduction cascades or has different biological functions. To directly address these issues, we assessed the relative ability of constitutively active (G12V) versions of each of the four Ras homologs to activate the effector protein Raf-1 in vivo. In addition, we compared their relative abilities to induce transformed foci, enable anchorage-independent growth, and stimulate cell migration. We found a distinct hierarchy between the four Ras homologs in each of the parameters studied. The hierarchies were as follows: for Raf-1 activation, Ki-Ras 4B > Ki-Ras 4A >>> N-Ras > Ha-Ras; for focus formation, Ha-Ras >/= Ki-Ras 4A >>> N-Ras = Ki-Ras 4B; for anchorage-independent growth, Ki-Ras 4A >/= N-Ras >>> Ki-Ras 4B = Ha-Ras = no growth; and for cell migration, Ki-Ras 4B >>> Ha-Ras > N-Ras = Ki-Ras 4A = no migration. Our results indicate that the four Ras homologs significantly differ in their abilities to activate Raf-1 and induce distinctly different biological responses. These studies, in conjunction with our previous report that demonstrated that the Ras homologs can be differentially activated by upstream guanine nucleotide exchange factors (Jones, M. K., and Jackson, J. H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1782-1787), indicate that each of the four Ras proteins may qualitatively or quantitatively participate in distinct signaling cascades and have significantly different biological roles in vivo. Importantly, these studies also suggest for the first time that the distinct and likely cooperative biological functions of the Ki-ras-encoded Ki-Ras 4A and Ki-Ras 4B proteins may help explain why constitutively activating mutations of Ki-ras, but not N-ras or Ha-ras, are frequently detected in human carcinomas.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1994

ras mutations and expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Mutational activation and overexpression of the family of ras proto-oncogenes have been associated with many human tumors. The role of mutations of H-ras, K-ras, and N-ras, as well as expression of the respective protein products (p21s) in normal mucosa, dysplastic mucosa, and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) of the head and neck has not been fully described. In our study, 51 tumors (40 paraffin embedded and 11 fresh frozen) were examined to determine if mutational activation of ras is an important molecular event in head and neck SCC. Analyses of codons 12, 13, and 61 of H-ras, K-ras, and N-ras revealed no mutations, suggesting that mutational activation of ras is not important in the majority of head and neck SCCs. Immunocytochemistry (ICC) was used to define the expression of H-ras, K-ras, and N-ras in normal mucosa, dysplastic mucosa, and SCC of the head and neck and to determine if expression of ras family members correlated with early or late events in the development of SCC. Expression of p21N-ras in nine samples of histologically normal head and neck mucosa revealed moderate staining in the basal proliferative layers with progressively less staining as cells matured. The most superficial layers of normal mucosa failed to express p21N-ras. A low level of p21H-ras was expressed in all layers of normal mucosa while K-ras was not expressed. ICC of SCC tumor sections revealed cytoplasmic expression of N-ras in nine of nine tumors, H-ras in five of nine tumors, and K-ras in one of nine tumors. Expression of H-ras, K-ras, and N-ras in head and neck SCC was not related to histologic differentiation or TNM staging; however, p21N-ras was overexpressed in seven of nine tumors. Furthermore, the pattern of N-ras expression in dysplastic lesions revealed expression in all layers of the mucosa in contrast to normal mucosa, which expresses p21N-ras primarily in the basal proliferative layer. The change in p21N-ras expression pattern in dysplastic mucosa and its overexpression in the majority of tumors suggest that loss of control of N-ras expression may be an early step in carcinogenesis of head and neck SCC.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoenzyme S disrupts Ras-mediated signal transduction by inhibiting guanine nucleotide exchange factor-catalyzed nucleotide exchange.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoenzyme S double ADP-ribosylates Ras at Arg(41) and Arg(128). Since Arg(41) is adjacent to the switch 1 region of Ras, ADP-ribosylation could interfere with Ras-mediated signal transduction via several mechanisms, including interaction with Raf, or guanine nucleotide exchange factor-stimulated or intrinsic nucleotide exchange. Initial experiments showed that ADP-ribosylated Ras (ADP-r-Ras) and unmodified Ras (Ras) interacted with Raf with equal efficiencies, indicating that ADP-ribosylation did not interfere with Ras-Raf interactions. While ADP-r-Ras and Ras possessed equivalent intrinsic nucleotide exchange rates, guanine nucleotide exchange factor (Cdc25) stimulated the nucleotide exchange of ADP-r-Ras at a 3-fold slower rate than Ras. ADP-r-Ras did not affect the nucleotide exchange of Ras, indicating that the ADP-ribosylation of Ras was not a dominant negative phenotype. Ras-R41K and ADP-r-Ras R41K possessed similar exchange rates as Ras, indicating that ADP-ribosylation at Arg(128) did not inhibit Cdc25-stimulated nucleotide exchange. Consistent with the slower nucleotide exchange rate of ADP-r-Ras as compared with Ras, ADP-r-Ras bound its guanine nucleotide exchange factor (Cdc25) less efficiently than Ras in direct binding experiments. Together, these data indicate that ADP-ribosylation of Ras at Arg(41) disrupts Ras-Cdc25 interactions, which inhibits the rate-limiting step in Ras signal transduction, the activation of Ras by its guanine nucleotide exchange factor.

ADP Ribose Transferases↗
PubMed2003

Affinity with Raf is sufficient for Ras to efficiently induce rat mammary carcinomas.

The role of three major Ras downstream effector pathways in the induction of mammary cancer was studied using an in situ mammary ductal gene delivery model. Replication-defective retroviral vectors were used to infect endogenous rat mammary epithelial cells with three individual Ras effector loop mutants, each of which transduces its signal through a different Ras effector pathway (Raf, PI3K or RalGDS). Several groups have used Ras effector loop mutants in cultured cells, clearly characterizing the signaling specificity of each over a wide range of cell lines and conditions. Each of the three Ras effector loop mutations impairs Ras for neoplastic transformation of immortal cell lines in culture. In contrast, when evaluated in vivo by infecting endogenous rat mammary epithelial cells in situ with retroviral vectors, we find that codon 12 mutant activated V12-Ras and all three V12-Ras effector loop mutants individually induce mammary carcinomas. Most notably, a Ras effector loop mutant that lacks affinity with PI3K and RalGDS but retains affinity with Raf (E38-V12-Ras) is relatively similar in potency to V12-Ras for mammary carcinoma induction. Two other Ras effector loop mutants, each lacking affinity with Raf, one retaining affinity with PI3K (C40-V12-Ras), the other with RalGDS (G37-V12-Ras), resulted in much longer tumor latency than E38-V12-Ras and V12-Ras and a reduced carcinoma frequency. Tumor latencies for V12-Ras, E38-V12-Ras, C40-V12-Ras and G37-V12-Ras were 4, 4, 11 and 12 weeks, respectively. We conclude that the Ras-Raf pathway can function independently of the Ras-PI3K and Ras-RalGDS pathways for rapid induction of rat mammary carcinomas, while Ras-PI3K and Ras-RalGDS pathways may also individually induce mammary carcinomas following a long latency.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed2006

Diet, lifestyle and risk of K-ras mutation-positive and -negative colorectal adenomas.

K-ras mutation-positive (K-ras+) and -negative (K-ras-) colorectal adenomas may differ clinically and pathologically. As environmental compounds may cause mutations in the growth-related K-ras oncogene or affect clonal selection depending on mutational status, we evaluated whether the aetiology of K-ras+ and K-ras- adenomas differs. K-ras mutations in codons 12 and 13 were assessed in colorectal adenoma tissue (K-ras+: n = 81, K-ras-: n = 453). Dietary and lifestyle data were collected through questionnaires that were also administered to 709 polyp-free controls. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that intake of vitamin B2 and monounsaturated fat were differently associated with risk of K-ras+ and K-ras- adenomas; vitamin B2 was inversely associated with K-ras- (highest vs. lowest tertile: odds ratio (OR) = 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.50-0.97, p trend = 0.020), but not with K-ras+ adenomas, and a positive association with monounsaturated fat was confined to K-ras- adenomas (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.06-2.34, p trend = 0.029). Besides, potential, not statistically significant, differences in risk arose because red meat was distinctly positively associated with K-ras+ adenomas (OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 0.94-3.09, p trend = 0.061); total dietary and polyunsaturated fat tended to be inversely associated with risk of K-ras+ but not of K-ras- adenomas; inverse associations with dairy products, calcium, protein and tea were confined to K-ras- adenomas, and smoking was more markedly positively associated with K-ras- adenomas. No differences in risk of K-ras+ and K-ras- adenomas could be detected for other factors. In conclusion, dietary and lifestyle factors may influence risk of K-ras+ and K-ras- adenomas differently. However, epidemiological literature on diet, lifestyle and colorectal K-ras mutations is inconsistent.

Adenoma↗
PubMed1995

Guanine nucleotide exchange factors: activators of Ras superfamily proteins.

Members of the Ras superfamily of proteins function as regulated GDP/GTP switches that cycle between active GTP-complexed and inactive GDP-complexed states. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) stimulate formation of the GTP-bound state, whereas GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) catalyze the formation of the GDP-bound state. We describe three studies that evaluate the mechanism of action of GEFs for Ras (SOS1 and RasGRF/CDC25) or Ras-related Rho (Dbl and Vav) proteins. Growth factor-mediated activation of Ras is believed to be mediated by activation of Ras GEFs (CDC25/GRF and SOS1/2). Although the mechanisms of Ras GEF regulation are unclear, recent studies suggest that translocation of SOS1 to the plasma membrane, where Ras is located, might be responsible for Ras activation. Our observation that the addition of the Ras plasma membrane-targeting sequence to the catalytic domains of CDC25 and SOS1 greatly enhanced their transforming and transactivation activities (10-50 fold and 5-10 fold, respectively) suggests that membrane translocation alone is sufficient to potentiate GEF activation of Ras. We have determined that two Ras-related proteins, designated R-Ras and R-Ras2/TC21, can trigger the malignant transformation of NIH 3T3 cells via activation of the Ras signal transduction pathway. Furthermore, like Ras and R-Ras, we observed that TC21 GTPase activity was stimulated by Ras GAPs. However, we observed that both SOS1 and CDC25 were activators of normal TC21, but not R-Ras, transforming activities. Therefore, TC21, but not R-Ras, may be activated by the same extracellular signaling events that activate Ras proteins. Dbl family proteins are believed to function as GEFs and activators of the Ras-related Rho family of proteins. However, one Dbl family oncogene, designated Vav, has been reported to be a GEF for Ras proteins. Therefore we were interested in determining whether Dbl family oncogenes cause transformation by triggering the constitutive activation of Rho or Ras proteins. Our results suggest that Dbl oncogenes cause transformation via a Ras-independent activation of MAP kinases and Rho family proteins.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2001

Prenylation of target GTPases contributes to signaling specificity of Ras-guanine nucleotide exchange factors.

Ras-GRF1 and Ras-GRF2 constitute a family of calmodulin-regulated guanine-nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) that activate Ras proteins. Here we show that whereas Ras-GRF1 activated both Ha-Ras and R-Ras in cells, Ras-GRF2 activated only Ha-Ras. The inability of Ras-GRF2 to activate R-Ras was the consequence of the GTPase being post-translationally modified, since Ras-GRF2 activated unprocessed R-Ras as effectively as unprocessed Ha-Ras when assays were performed either in vivo or in vitro. Moreover, Ras-GRF2 failed to activate fully processed R-Ras in vitro. The particular C-terminal lipid attached to the GTPases played an important role in determining signaling specificity, since R-Ras became more responsive to Ras-GRF2 when it was farnesylated instead of geranylgeranylated. Similarly, Ha-Ras became less responsive to Ras-GRF2 when it was geranylgeranylated instead of farnesylated. Analysis of chimeras between Ras-GRF1 and Ras-GRF2 demonstrated that a 30-amino acid segment embedded with their catalytic domains was responsible for recognizing the presence of different lipids on Ras proteins. These results indicate that the specific lipid moiety attached to GTPases can contribute to signaling specificity of Ras-GEFs.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2003

The C-terminal end of R-Ras contains a focal adhesion targeting signal.

R-Ras promotes cell adhesion and activation of integrins through a process that is yet unknown. We show here that active R-Ras (38V) promotes the formation of focal adhesions and a spread cell shape. By contrast, the dominant-negative mutant of R-Ras (43N) reduces the number of focal adhesions, leading to the formation of refractile cells. In adherent cells wild-type R-Ras, activated (38V) R-Ras and endogeous R-Ras were preferentially targeted to focal adhesions, whereas the dominant-negative mutant (43N) of R-Ras was excluded from these structures. Activated mutants of H-Ras and K-Ras were not found in focal adhesions. We dissected R-Ras to find out the determinants that are important for the targeting process. The outermost region in the N-terminus of R-Ras, as well as the intact proline-rich sequence in the C-terminus of RRas that mediates binding to Nck, were not essential. Mutating the potential palmitoylation site (C213A) of RRas results in depalmitoylation and accumulation of R-Ras in the Golgi. Using H-Ras/R-Ras, R-Ras/H-Ras and RRas/K-Ras hybrid molecules we showed that the C-termini (175-218 amino acids) of R-Ras contains the signal for focal adhesions targeting. Exchanging the hypervariable region of H-Ras to R-Ras inhibited the targeting of R-Ras to focal adhesions, whereas H-Ras obtained the ability to localize to focal adhesions after receiving the hypervariable region of R-Ras. This indicates that R-Ras targeting is mediated both by the nucleotide binding status as well as through a specific region in the C-terminus of R-Ras. These results indicate that targeting and activation of R-Ras are linked processes in the formation of focal adhesions.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed2000

Role of Ras isoforms in the stimulated proliferation of human renal fibroblasts in primary culture.

The proliferation of renal fibroblasts is implicated in the pathophysiologic processes of renal fibrosis. Many of the growth factors involved in proliferation are known to activate intracellular signaling pathways that converge on Ras monomeric GTPases. Although three ras family genes exist, their functional specificity is not yet known. Using antisense oligonucleotides, a role for Kirsten (Ki)-Ras in the stimulated proliferation of a primate renal fibroblast cell line was previously demonstrated. This study examines Ras in primary cultures of adult human renal fibroblasts. Using reverse transcription-PCR, mRNA for Harvey (Ha)-ras, Ki(4B)-ras, and neural (N)-ras, but not Ki(4A)-ras, were detected. Antisense oligonucleotides targeting Ha-, Ki-, and N-ras mRNA, which were used for liposomal transfection at 100 to 200 nM, were demonstrated to be active and isoform-specific in quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assays. Cellular Ras protein levels, as estimated using isoform-specific monoclonal antibodies, indicated that Ki-Ras was the predominantly expressed isoform (>95% of total Ras protein) under both serum-containing and serum-free conditions, with N- and Ha-Ras being detected in small amounts. Consistent with this finding, the antisense oligonucleotide directed against Ki-Ras reduced total cellular Ras levels by >70%, whereas Ha-Ras, N-Ras, and control oligonucleotides had no significant effect. Proliferation of oligonucleotide-transfected cells was measured using epidermal growth factor (EGF) and serum stimulation. The Ki-Ras oligonucleotide at 100 nM reduced serum-stimulated proliferation by >50% and EGF-stimulated proliferation by 25%, compared with data obtained with the control oligonucleotide (P: < 0. 01). The N-Ras oligonucleotide was not active, compared with the control oligonucleotide. The Ha-Ras oligonucleotide was not significantly active at 100 nM but reduced serum-stimulated proliferation by 13% and EGF-stimulated growth by 40% at 200 nM (P: < 0.01). These results demonstrate that Ki-Ras(4B) is the predominantly expressed Ras isoform in human renal fibroblasts in primary culture and is important for both serum- and EGF-stimulated proliferation. Ha-Ras appears to be expressed at low levels but may also play a distinct role in stimulated proliferation.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed1995

Ras-related proteins in signal transduction and growth control.

Ras proteins are members of a superfamily of small GTPases that are involved in many aspects of cell growth control. The ras p21 protooncogene products, H-ras, K-ras, and N-ras, transmit signals from growth factor receptors to a cascade of protein kinases that begins with the Raf protooncogene product, and leads to alterations in transcription factors and cell cycle proteins in the nucleus. This cascade is controlled at several points: Ras p21 proteins are regulated by GAPs and by exchange factors, whose activities are altered by growth factor receptor activation (Boguski and McCormick, 1993: Nature 366:643-654). Transmission of signals from Ras to Raf is regulated by the Ras-related protein Rap1 (a protein capable of reverting cell transformation) and by cAMP. Other aspects of Ras p21 regulation will be discussed, including the existence of RasGDl proteins that inhibit GDP dissociation from Ras, and may thus regulate the level of active Ras in the cell. The role of Ras in activation of Raf kinase appears to be limited to the recruitment of Raf to the plasma membrane, at which time Raf becomes stably modified to render it active (Leevers et al., 1994: Nature 369:411-414; Stokoe et al., 1994: Science 264:1463-1467). The nature of these modifications is unclear. Raf in the plasma membrane becomes associated with insoluble structural cell components that may be part of the activation. Furthermore, Raf is associated with proteins of the 14-3-3 family that appear necessary for kinase activation. The 14-3-3 proteins interact with all three conserved regions of Raf, including the kinase domain. In addition to Raf, Ras proteins interact with two known classes of proteins in a manner consistent with effector functions: these are the GAPs and regulators of the Ras-related protein Ral referred to as RalGDS. These biochemical data suggest that other functional pathways are regulated by Ras, including, perhaps, pathways involved in regulating cell shape and motility. The protein R-Ras p21 is about 50% identical to the Ras p21 protooncogene product. This protein is incapable of transforming cells, even though it interacts with Raf and other putative Ras effectors (Fernandez-Sarabia and Bischoff, 1993: Nature 366:274-275). On the other hand, it has recently been shown that R-Ras binds to the protooncogene product Bcl-2, a protein that transforms B cells by blocking apoptosis. R-Ras is regulated by the same GAP molecules as H-Ras and the other Ras protooncogene products, and may therefore be activated in a manner co-ordinate with these growth-promoting proteins. The possible connection between R-Ras and apoptosis will be discussed.

Animals↗