SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Content validation”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 523 records · Page 29Linked to original sources

PubMed2006

Measuring peer caring behaviors of nursing students: scale development.

BACKGROUND: Caring is one of the most important domains of nursing research, peer caring among student nurses, and its potential effects on nurse caring behaviors remains largely unexplored. Few tools in the literature target peer caring interactions, and which were either irrelevant to our research purpose or culturally inappropriate for nursing student population in Taiwan. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to develop a culturally sensitive instrument to measure peer caring behavior from the student perspective and to offer a descriptive answer to "what is peer caring in Taiwan." DESIGN: The study uses both qualitative and quantitative methods in developing the "Peer Caring Measurement (PCM)" questionnaire. SETTINGS: Students from a 5-year associate degree nursing program in a university of technology in southern Taiwan were recruited into this study. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen first- through fourth-year student volunteers between the ages of 16 and 20 were interviewed to explore caring behavior in student peer-to-peer interactions. Two classes from each of the first, second, third, and fourth year students, a total of 360 students were randomly selected to assess the internal consistency of "PCM", and 47 first-year students were conveniently selected to examine the stability of the tool. METHODS: Interviews were conducted in an unstructured manner. Qualitative data were analyzed by a constant comparative method. The questionnaire survey was used to assess the validity and reliability of "PCM". RESULTS: A 17-item "PCM" was developed; the content validity, construct validity, and reliability of the tool were ensured by expert review, factor analysis, and internal consistency. Three factors, labeled assistant caring, academic caring, and affective caring, accounted for 63.197% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: The "PCM" addressed the multidimensional construct of peer caring. It was validated in a Chinese language version and can be used in college settings to evaluate student interactions and their peer caring behaviors.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1994

Does intraoperative hepatic ultrasonography change surgical decision making during liver resection?

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative hepatic ultrasonography (IOUS) has been used to accurately identify and localize hepatic tumors as an adjunct to hepatic resection and for the detection of occult liver metastases during primary resection of other gastrointestinal carcinomas. The face validity of IOUS to identify more lesions than conventional diagnostic modalities and the content validity of IOUS to change the planned surgical management has been assessed in a blinded, prospective manner. METHODS: Sixty-two patients were studied at two institutions by one surgeon. IOUS was compared with computed tomography (CT) angioportography in 30 patients undergoing planned hepatic resection (19 metastatic, 11 primary) and with conventional hepatic ultrasonography (+/- venous enhanced CT scan) in 32 patients undergoing primary excision of gastrointestinal carcinomas. RESULTS: Twenty of the 30 hepatic resections (67%) were changed or guided by IOUS as determined by the operating surgeon at the completion of the laparotomy. IOUS detected 26 more metastases (44%) in 10 of 19 patients (1 to 5 per patient). Two patients had preoperatively suspected metastases refuted by IOUS-guided biopsy. Eight of the 11 patients (73%) undergoing resection of primary carcinoma of the liver had the planned procedure changed or guided by IOUS. This included four hepatocellular carcinomas with more extensive involvement at the confluence of the hepatic veins and the inferior vena cava, necessitating resection with the aid of total vascular isolation. In 32 patients undergoing primary resection of gastrointestinal carcinomas, 5 patients (16%) had the stage of disease altered by IOUS when compared with conventional ultrasound (+/- venous enhanced CT scan). CONCLUSIONS: The validity of IOUS is good. IOUS guided the intraoperative surgical management of two thirds of the patients undergoing hepatic resection when compared with CT angioportography. Intraoperative hepatic ultrasonography using a reproducible systematic approach can change the clinical management of patients undergoing hepatic resection for malignancy.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2003

Reliability and validity of instruments measuring job satisfaction--a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Although job satisfaction research has been carried out for decades, no recent overview of job satisfaction instruments and their quality is available. Aim The aim of this systematic review is to select job satisfaction instruments of adequate reliability and validity for use as evaluative tools in hospital environments. METHODS: Systematic literature searches were performed in the Medline and PsycInfo databases. First, the construct of job satisfaction was operationalized by generating work factors from both theoretical studies and meta-analyses or reviews of empirical studies on job satisfaction. Secondly, emphasis was placed on the internal consistency, construct validity and responsiveness of these instruments.Twenty-nine job satisfaction instruments were retrieved in total. RESULTS: Seven instruments met the defined reliability and validity criteria. Of the seven, the 'Measure of Job Satisfaction' had an adequate content validity. Only the 'Job in General Scale' provided data about 'responsiveness' to change. CONCLUSION: Few instruments have shown both high reliability and high validity, but little is known about their evaluative potential.

Humans↗

PubMed1991

Research in physical medicine and rehabilitation. XII. Measurement tools with application to brain injury.

There are basic principles and techniques of measurement that are relevant across biomedical disciplines. The purpose of this article is to explain some of the most important of these for medical rehabilitation, to illustrate how to use them to choose assessment instruments and to describe the nature of measurement in medical rehabilitation by examples in brain injury rehabilitation. Reliability is basic to any scientific measure. Validity, the ultimate criterion, is closely associated with the purpose of the measure. Content validity, criterion validity and construct validity are explained. Sensitivity to rehabilitative interventions and significance in patients' real lives (ecological validity) are emphasized. Measures of functional outcomes (disability) may show improvement after rehabilitation even when impairment measures do not. An extensive but selected list of measures of coma, global status, disabilities, communicative and cognitive impairments, and handicaps is presented, and their main uses are illustrated. Examples illustrate how to choose measures to study comprehensive program-level outcomes, to study learning-based interventions and to develop a general purpose database. Although there are many measures of activities of daily living and mobility, little published evidence of reliability and validity could be found even for some well-known scales. Ecologically valid and sensitive outcome measures are especially needed. Studies of the clinical utility of measures were also scarce. Many of these gaps can be spanned by clinical researchers with limited resources. Physical medicine and rehabilitation will benefit from formal studies of the reliabilities and validities of both its old and its new measurement instruments and by increased sophistication in choice of measures.

Brain Injuries↗

PubMed1998

The impact of urge urinary incontinence on quality of life: importance of patients' perspective and explanatory style.

OBJECTIVES: The impact of urinary incontinence (UI) on health-related quality of life (QoL) is significant yet variable, but little is known about patient-defined content areas regarding the influence of UI on QoL and whether patient-specific factors correlate with specific content areas of UI-related QoL. In order to identify the most valid content areas for a new UI-related QoL questionnaire, our primary goal was to determine the content areas of greatest concern regarding UI-related QoL among older persons with urge incontinence. The second goal was to examine the possible role of patients' explanatory style as a mediator of UI impact on health-related QoL. Data on the questionnaire will be presented elsewhere. DESIGN: Focus groups comprising urge-incontinent persons were used to obtain verbatim descriptions of the impact of UI on QoL. SETTING: A university-affiliated tertiary hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling women (n = 25) and men (n = 5) more than 60 years of age, with urge incontinence, recruited from newspaper, newsletter, and radio advertisements. MEASUREMENTS: Qualitative content analysis of focus group transcripts was used to determine QoL items. These were compared with previously described UI-related QoL items obtained from the literature. Subjects' statements regarding causes of UI were evaluated for predominant explanatory style. RESULTS: Thirty-two UI-related QoL items were identified, more than half of which were not described previously. Compared with expert-defined UI-related QoL items from the literature, patient-defined items focused more on coping with embarrassment and interference from UI than on prevention of actual activity performance. Explanatory statements were made frequently by patients talking about their UI. Although positive style explanatory statements were most common, they did not correlate with any QoL items. By contrast, there was a significant correlation between negative explanatory style and six specific UI-related QoL items. CONCLUSIONS: Focus groups of older persons with urge incontinence suggest that experts and patients view the impact of urge UI on QoL differently. Whereas experts focus more on functional impact, patients more often cite the impact of UI on their emotional well-being and on the interruption of activities. In addition, the association between negative explanatory style and specific UI-related QoL items suggests that explanatory style may be an important mediator of patients' perceptions of UI-related QoL.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed1998

On the validity of the Beck Depression Inventory. A review.

The present review discusses validity aspects of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) on the basis of meta-analyses of studies on the psychometric properties. Shortcomings of the BDI are its high item difficulty, lack of representative norms, and thus doubtful objectivity of interpretation, controversial factorial validity, instability of scores over short time intervals (over the course of 1 day), and poor discriminant validity against anxiety. Advantages of the inventory are its high internal consistency, high content validity, validity in differentiating between depressed and nondepressed subjects, sensitivity to change, and international propagation. The present paper outlines agreements and contradictions between the various studies on the BDI and discusses the potential factors (composition of the subject sample, statistical procedures, point in time of measurement) accounting for the variance in their results. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is world-wide among the most used self-rating scales for measuring depression. Since the test construction in 1961, the test has been employed in numerous (more than 2,000) empirical studies. The present review will only consider those investigations which are primarily concerned with the validity or the psychometric properties of the BDI. Since most studies are oriented along the criteria of the classical test theory, our review will discuss to what extent the BDI meets these criteria.

Depressive Disorder↗

PubMed2001

Evaluation of psychosocial measures for understanding weight-related behaviors in pregnant women.

The greatest weight gain for US. women occurs during the childbearing years of 25 to 34, and many obese women attribute their adult weight gain to childbearing. Few studies have examined psychosocial influences on women's behaviors during pregnancy, in part because of the lack of valid and reliable measures of psychosocial constructs relevant to pregnant women. Based on existing theory and an in-depth interview study, the psychosocial constructs of locus of control, self-efficacy, body image, feelings about motherhood, and career orientation were identified. Scales for each construct were constructed by drawing items from existing validated scales and writing items based on the in-depth interviews; their content validity assessed using factor analysis with oblique rotation and their reliability using Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was assessed by examining the associations between scale scores and preexisting conditions of participants. Data for evaluating the scales came from a study of 622 pregnant women in a rural health care system who completed questionnaires and whose medical records were audited. Cronbach's alpha of the scales ranged from 0.73 to 0.89. Scale scores were strongly associated with lifestyle behaviors, body weight, and demographic characteristics of the participants. The analysis provides evidence of the validity of measures of psychosocial factors related to health behaviors of pregnant women. These measures should be useful in studying weight-related behaviors in pregnant women.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Validation of a questionnaire used to assess safety and professionalism among arborists.

This article summarizes a validation study of an instrument designed to measure safety and professionalism practices of arborists. A sample of 386 arborists from the State of Louisiana responded to the 58-item questionnaire. Analyses focused on several aspects of Messick's validation framework. Structural validity evidence was provided by analyses that indicate that the measures are unidimensional. Content validity evidence was supported by generally high positive values of the biserial correlations and optimal values of standardized mean-square item fit indices. Substantive validity evidence was provided by analyses that support the use of the two-point rating scale and a rank ordering of item means that is consistent with substantive theory. Person fit indices indicated little misfit among measures. Support for the generalizability aspect of validity was provided by an acceptable level of internal consistency and fairly tight error bands around estimated arborist measures. Additionally, few items exhibited DIF. Finally, with respect to the external aspect of validity, group differences between arborist measures were consistent with substantive theory.

Adult↗

PubMed1993

Family problems during cancer chemotherapy.

Although reports suggest that a cancer diagnosis affects all members of a family, limited descriptions are available of the types of problems families experience when a family member has cancer. Adult patients with cancer (n = 100) and their family members (n = 126) were interviewed in their homes at 1 1/2 weeks, 7 1/2 weeks, and 6 months following the initiation of chemotherapy. The Problem Centered Family Coping Interview, a semistructured tool with established content validity, was used to identify family problems that occurred in the previous month. Content analysis was performed on interviews using empirically based categories. Families reported from one to eight problems occurring in the previous month (mean = 3.4). Cancer-related health concerns accounted for 48%-52% of the problems identified at all three interviews. This study's findings enhance knowledge about the family's cancer experience.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

PubMed2000

Assessing validity in written tests of general practice - exploration by factor analysis of candidate response patterns to paper 1 of the MRCGP examination.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the content validity of Paper 1 of the MRCGP examination. METHOD: Exploratory factor analysis was carried out on candidate responses to Paper 1 of the May and October MRCGP examination in 1998. Contribution of each test question across factors was assessed using a pattern matrix of the oblique rotation. Common dimensions and variations between factor sets were identified. Key testing areas were then matched against the 'domains of competence' intended to be assessed by Paper 1 (as defined within the examination blueprint matrix). RESULTS: Whilst critical appraisal, disease prevention/evidence-based medicine and clinical management emerged as areas tested consistently, content variation was observed between factor sets extracted from both sittings. In addition, some overlap, in terms of domains tested, was seen among other assessment instruments used within the examination. CONCLUSION: Paper 1 conforms to the majority of its stated intentions. However, further development of techniques for investigating validity will be required in order to minimize content variation between both sittings of the examination as well as to help more closely define areas of competence to be tested by Paper 1 of the MRCGP examination.

Education, Medical, Undergraduate↗

PubMed2005

Psychometric properties and validation of the German-language King's Health Questionnaire in women with stress urinary incontinence.

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of and validate the German-language version of the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). METHODS: A total of 145 women treated for stress incontinence with surgery or physiotherapy completed the the KHQ and the SF-36 before and after treatment. Psychometric analyses of the quality of life (QoL) instruments determined the reliability (Cronbach's alpha), internal and external validity, and responsiveness of the KHQ subscales. RESULTS: The KHQ showed good internal consistency, content validity, and criterion validity as measured by correlation with scores on the SF-36. Cronbach's alpha coefficient ranged from 0.76 to 0.86, indicating a high internal consistency of the subscales. Concerning criterion validity, correlations between the KHQ subscales and the SF-36 were low to moderate. The highest correlation was found between the general health perception subscales of both questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate good psychometric properties for the German-language KHQ.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

The QLDS: a scale for the measurement of quality of life in depression.

It has been apparent for some time that utilisation of health services is more influenced by how people feel than by their 'objective' symptoms. Research has also shown that compliance with treatment regimens is dependent on the impact of that treatment on the patient's well-being. Such findings highlight the need to assess the patient's view of his or her progress through the health care system. This has led to a growing interest in quality of life assessment and, in particular, to the impact of illness and its treatment on the quality of life of the patient. Perhaps surprisingly, interest in quality of life measures for outcome assessment in Psychiatry has been slower to develop than in other specialties. While a number of clinician- and patient-completed measures of the severity of depressive symptoms exist, no measure of the quality of life of depressed patients is available. This paper describes the development and testing of the Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS), a new measure designed to fill this gap. The theoretical basis for the instrument is that life gains its quality from the ability and capacity of the individual to satisfy his or her needs. The items included in the QLDS were derived from 30 qualitative interviews with depressed or recently recovered patients. Further interviews were held with depressed patients to establish the face and content validity of the instrument. Respondents had little trouble completing the questionnaire and found the content to be relevant to their experience of depression. The QLDS represents an important advance in our ability to understand the impact of depression on quality of life.

Depression↗

PubMed1989

Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--IV: Progress and a research agenda.

Remaining questions relative to the measurement of health-state preferences are outlined and applications discussed. We recommend more widespread use of functional measurement to better understand preference structures. Further research should be conducted on the reliability and validity of preference values produced by different scaling methods, including careful examination of the content validity of health-state descriptions. Construct validation studies using the multitrait-multimethod matrix would be useful as well as comparisons of stated preferences with revealed preferences. Despite the many unanswered measurement questions, preference values are currently being used in decision making at both the individual and societal levels. Several global health status measures incorporate preference values, and preferences are increasingly being used in cost-effectiveness studies. If preferences are to be used effectively, research on their measurement must accelerate to keep pace with the urgency for application.

Epidemiologic Methods↗

PubMed2003

Incremental validity of new clinical assessment measures.

The authors address conceptual and methodological foundations of incremental validity in the evaluation of newly developed clinical assessment measures. Incremental validity is defined as the degree to which a measure explains or predicts a phenomenon of interest, relative to other measures. Incremental validity can be evaluated on several dimensions, such as sensitivity to change, diagnostic efficacy, content validity, treatment design and outcome, and convergent validity. Indices of incremental validity can vary depending on the criterion measures, comparison measures, and individual differences in samples. The authors review the rationale for, principles, and methods of incremental validation, including the selection of comparison and criterion measures, and address data analytic strategies and the conditional nature of incremental validity evaluations in the selection of measures. Incremental validity contributes to, but is different from, cost-benefits, which reflect the cost of acquiring the data and the benefits from the data. The impact of an incremental validity index on whether a measure is selected will be moderated by the cost of acquiring the new data, the importance of the measured phenomenon, and the clinical utility of the new data.

Humans↗

PubMed2004

A depressive symptom scale for the California Psychological Inventory: construct validation of the CPI-D.

To facilitate life span research on depressive symptomatology, a depressive symptom scale for the California Psychological Inventory (CPI) is needed. The authors constructed such a scale (the CPI-D) and compared its psychometric properties with 2 widely used self-report depression scales: the Beck Depression Inventory and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. Construct validity of the CPI-D was examined in 3 studies. Study 1 established content validity, classifying CPI-D items into Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition depressive symptoms. Study 2 used 3 large samples to gather evidence for reliability and validity: correlational analyses demonstrated alpha reliability and convergent and discriminant validity; factor analysis provided evidence for discriminant validity with anxiety; and regression analyses demonstrated comparative validity with existing standard PI scales. Study 3 used clinician ratings of depression and anxiety as criteria for external validity.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Development, validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a new leg ulcer measurement tool.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an assessment tool--the Leg Ulcer Measurement Tool (LUMT)--that would be able to detect changes in the appearance of lower extremity ulcers. SUBJECTS: Twenty-two subjects with chronic leg ulcers of various etiologies (arterial, venous, diabetes) participated in the validation study. DESIGN: An interdisciplinary panel consisting of 9 local wound care specialists confirmed content validity. Concurrent criterion validity was determined by correlation of the size domain (1 of 14 clinician-rated domains in the LUMT) with acetate tracing measurement of wound surface area. Reliability was determined using repeated assessments by 4 wound care specialist and 2 inexperienced evaluators; responsiveness was determined using monthly reassessments by a single rater for 4 months. RESULTS: Concurrent criterion validity was r = 0.82. Excellent values of intrarater and interrater reliability (ICC > 0.75) were obtained for total LUMT scores and for many of the 14 individual domains; however, several domains were found to be less reproducible. The LUMT detected change in wound status over time (responsiveness coefficient = 0.84). CONCLUSION: The LUMT can be used by 1 or more assessors, with relatively little previous training, to make reproducible evaluations of lower extremity ulcer appearance and to document change in appearance over time. The LUMT represents a novel assessment tool specifically designed and validated for clinical or research use on chronic leg ulcers.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Evaluating the impact of overactive bladder on sexual health in women: what is relevant?

INTRODUCTION: To assess sexual health, relevant, valid, and reliable questionnaires need to be used. AIM: To assess the relevance and content validity of three sexual health questionnaires in women with overactive bladder (OAB) and urinary incontinence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sexual Quality of Life Questionnaire--Female (SQoL-F), Sexual Function Questionnaire (SFQ), and Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ). METHODS: Women with OAB and urinary incontinence were recruited from five urology clinics in the United States; those who were interested in participating were mailed questionnaire packets with instructions. Each questionnaire item was followed by three questions regarding the understandability, relevance, and impact of bladder condition when responding to the question. Patients returned the completed questionnaires by mail; clinical information was obtained from chart review. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients (74% response) returned the questionnaires. The mean age was 56 years; 78% were white; 64% were married. In this sample, 64% had urge incontinence; 32% had mixed incontinence; and 4% had stress incontinence. Participants experienced bladder symptoms for a mean of 12.2 years with the following treatments: surgery (43%), bladder training (26%), exercise/biofeedback (42%), and medications (67%). SQoL-F items were understood by more than 97% of the respondents, more than 89% for SFQ, and more than 82% for PISQ. There were two SQoL-F items, one SFQ item, and 11 PISQ items that less than 60% of the respondents deemed relevant to their bladder condition. Correlations among questionnaire items and relevance to bladder condition ranged from 0.04 to 0.64 for the SQoL-F, 0.04 to 0.47 for the SFQ, and 0.01 to 0.58 for the PISQ. CONCLUSION: Women with OAB found the majority of items on all three questionnaires to be relevant to their bladder condition. Of these questionnaires, the SQoL-F had the highest understandability, fewest questions considered irrelevant, and correlated well with OAB symptoms.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Development of written case studies as simulations of diagnosis in nursing.

Written case studies, as simulations of diagnosis in nursing, are valuable tools for research, education, and practice. This article presents guidelines and methods for systematic development of valid and reliable case studies. Examples of purposes, objectives, and methods are given. A content validity form and directions also are provided.

Humans↗