PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Current Procedural Terminology”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 523 records · Page 29Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

When is it appropriate to bill physician services using modifier -59?

Accurate coding of medical services is a constant challenge for physicians and could jeopardize a practice if not taken seriously. Insurance carriers use sophisticated claims-processing software that easily identifies coding trends by physicians and flags outliers within specialties. The Office of Inspector General (OIG) and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) hire auditors to identify areas for review which are commonly miscoded. One area that has been flagged for review is billing with modifier -59 because misuse of this modifier has increased inappropriate reimbursement. Be cautious when using this modifier, due to the legal and compliance ramifications when documentation does not adequately support the "distinct procedural service" to justify the use of modifier -59.

Current Procedural Terminology↗
PubMed2005

Physician documentation in support of appropriate billing with modifier '-25'.

What is one of the surest ways for a practice to lose revenue and invite the unwanted attention of government auditors? By failing to select and document the appropriate use of modifiers to code for services provided. For example, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) has made it known that they will closely review professional billing with the use of modifier '-25.' The use of this particular modifier appeared on their radar screen, because in one recent year Medicare paid approximately 1.7 billion dollars for Evaluation and Management (E/M) services billed with modifier '-25'. The OIG feels an increase of this amount warrants further investigation to determine if these claims were billed and reimbursed appropriately. Additionally, Oklahoma Medicaid auditors are actively scrutinizing the use of modifier '-25' to a degree even more stringent than Medicare and the CPT code book's description allow. Therefore, it is important that physicians be knowledgeable in determining when it is appropriate to bill using this modifier.

Current Procedural Terminology↗
PubMed2006

Concurrent care.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Concurrent Review↗
PubMed2006

Scope of practice comparison: a tool for curriculum decision making.

The proportion of claims filed for specific dental procedures (ADA codes # 05110, 05120, 03320, 03330, 04260, 02150) between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2004 by Texas general practitioners participating in a preferred provider network was compared to the proportion of these procedures performed by students graduating from the three Texas dental schools during the same period. Analysis of the data revealed that Texas dental students provide class two amalgam restorations in permanent teeth (02150) at approximately the same frequency as Texas general practitioners. Both groups provide periodontal osseous surgery (04260) at an extremely low frequency (<0.02% of total procedures). Bicuspid endodontic procedures (03320) were performed at a slightly higher frequency by students (0.43% of all procedures) than by general practitioners (0.36% of all procedures), and molar endodontic procedures (03330) were performed at a slightly higher frequency by general practitioners (0.65%) than by students (0.36%). Significant discrepancies between the groups were noted for the two complete denture procedures (05110, 05120). Students provided these procedures at frequencies fifteen times (05110) and twenty-five times (05120) greater than general practitioners. Dental schools should use data provided by scope of practice analyses to help determine an appropriate breadth and depth for their educational programs.

American Dental Association↗
PubMed2006

Measuring nurse practitioner productivity.

As the role of the nurse practitioner (NP) evolves, the need to demonstrate productivity becomes more important. Productivity data provides NPs with practice statistics to generate business or use in contract negotiations with potential clients such as employers, managed care organizations, and insurance companies. However, beyond the numbers of patients seen per day or amount of reimbursement a provider brings to the practice, NPs may provide additional benefit that is not captured with physician productivity measures. Information to acquaint NPs with key aspects of recording productivity and ways NPs can organize productivity data within their practice to determine worth of service are presented.

Clinical Competence↗