PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “FOSSILS”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 523 records · Page 29Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Dynamic bone remodeling in later Pleistocene fossil hominids.

Histomorphometric analysis of femoral and tibial diaphyseal fragments from seven Late Archaic and three Early Modern humans are compared with those of the Pecos, a pre-Columbian Native American population. The ten samples, from Broken Hill (EM-793), Shanidar 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, Tabun 1, and Skhul 3, 6, and 7, provide age-at death results consistent with earlier estimates for most individuals. The Pleistocene groups exhibit less bone turnover and smaller osteons than Recent populations. Resorption and formation were both coupled and balanced in these Pleistocene populations, but the overall vigor of individual cells from both the osteoclast and osteoblast cell lines was less than in Recent populations. Thus the greater bone mass in Later Pleistocene members of the genus Homo is not the result of higher levels of bone turnover, at least among adults.

Age Determination by Skeleton↗
PubMed1998

Biomechanical behaviour of modern human molars: implications for interpreting the fossil record.

Finite-element models of 29 intact molars were created and subjected to cleavage-type loads in order to assess differences in the biomechanical behaviour of molars. A simulated food particle, which was one-third the size of the intercuspal distance and had the properties of a Mezzettia seed, was pushed onto the occlusal basin of these models at various angles, resulting in either both or one particular cusp being preferentially loaded. In all cases, the maximum tensile stresses occurred in enamel at the intercuspal fissure. With regard to first maxillary molars, supporting (functional) and guiding (nonfunctional) cusps apparently dissipate loads equally well, whereas, in second and third maxillary molars, the guiding cusps are better designed to resist loads. Overall, lingual cusps of maxillary posterior molars dissipate loads poorly. Conversely, loads exerted toward supporting cusps of mandibular molars are consistently well dissipated, regardless of position along the tooth row. Because the directions of loads to which these teeth are best adapted change along the tooth row, it seems reasonable to suggest that these may correlate with the well-documented structural and functional orofacial complex. This study indicates that the biomechanical behaviour of molars and the orofacial skeleton are likely to have undergone complementary directional changes during evolution. Consequently, caution must be exercised in making inferences about dietary adaptations of extinct species on the basis of isolated teeth or fragmentary gnathic remains without proper regard of the orofacial skeleton as a whole.

Anthropology, Physical↗
PubMed2002

The Maka femur and its bearing on the antiquity of human walking: applying contemporary concepts of morphogenesis to the human fossil record.

MAK-VP-1/1, a proximal femur recovered from the Maka Sands (ca. 3.4 mya) of the Middle Awash, Ethiopia, and attributed to Australopithecus afarensis, is described in detail. It represents the oldest skeletal evidence of locomotion in this species, and is analyzed from a morphogenetic perspective. X-ray, CT, and metric data are evaluated, using a variety of methods including discriminant function. The specimen indicates that the hip joint of A. afarensis was remarkably like that of modern humans, and that the dramatic muscle allocation shifts which distinguish living humans and African apes were already present in a highly derived form in this species. Its anatomy provides no indication of any form of locomotion save habitual terrestrial bipedality, which very probably differed only trivially from that of modern humans.

Animals↗