SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “HALOPERIDOL”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 523 records · Page 29Linked to original sources

PubMed1999

NMDA receptor blockade attenuates the haloperidol induction of Fos protein in the dorsal but not the ventral striatum.

Neuroleptic blockade of dopamine receptors is known to produce an increase in the expression of Fos. This increase may be related to elevations in glutamate transmission which in turn activates N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. In the present study, we examine the role of these receptors in the haloperidol-induced augmentation of Fos in the caudate-putamen and nucleus accumbens of Wistar rats. Animals were divided into four groups for each experiment and each was injected either with saline; a noncompetitive NMDA antagonist, dizocilpine maleate (MK801, 5 mg/kg); haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg); or MK801 followed by an injection of haloperidol. Fos-immunoreactive cells appear in large numbers in all parts of the striatum 3 h after the administration of haloperidol. Pretreatment with MK801 attenuates the haloperidol-induced increase in Fos in the caudate-putamen. However, antagonism of the NMDA receptor does not significantly reduce the density of Fos-immunoreactive cells in any territory of nucleus accumbens, i.e., shell, core, or rostral pole. These data suggest that haloperidol acts in an NMDA-dependent manner in the caudate-putamen, but independently in parts of nucleus accumbens traditionally considered to be targets of antipsychotic drugs.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

FosB in rat striatum: normal regional distribution and enhanced expression after 6-month haloperidol administration.

Subcortical motor nuclei show differential expression of FosB immediate early gene products and specifically deltaFosB after short (8, 19, or 21 days) chronic exposure to typical and atypical neuroleptics represented by haloperidol and clozapine, respectively. We quantitatively examined whether there are light microscopic regional variations in area density of FosB or the truncated deltaFosB in several motor-related nuclei of adult rats receiving vehicle or long chronic (6 months) administration of either depot haloperidol or clozapine in their drinking water. In control animals the dorsomedial and ventromedial caudate-putamen nucleus (CPN) had a significantly higher density of FosB-immunoreactive cells than the dorsolateral and ventrolateral regions. The nucleus accumbens (NAc) core also serving motor functions had a higher basal expression than the limbic shell region in control animals. The mediolateral gradient in area density of FosB-labeled cells was maintained in animals receiving either haloperidol or clozapine. In animals receiving haloperidol, but not clozapine, however, there was a regionally selective increase in the area density of only FosB-immunoreactive neurons in the dorsolateral and ventrolateral CPN and in both the core and shell of the NAc. Only the animals receiving chronic haloperidol showed vacuous chewing movements, the animal equivalent of tardive dyskinesia in humans. Our results suggest that, whereas the medial striatal neurons are activated under basal conditions, long chronic haloperidol induced FosB expression more exclusively in the lateral CPN and NAc core, implicating these regions specifically in the motor side effects of this drug.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Haloperidol dose for the acute phase of schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Haloperidol is a benchmark, accessible antipsychotic against which the effects of newer treatments are gauged. OBJECTIVES: The primary goal of this review is to determine the best range of doses for haloperidol for the treatment of people acutely ill with schizophrenia. SEARCH STRATEGY: The reviewers searched Biological Abstracts (1980-1999), CINAHL (1982-1999), The Cochrane Library (1999, Issue 2), The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (December 1999), EMBASE (1980-1999), MEDLINE (1966-1999) and PsycLIT (1887-1999). They also inspected all references of all identified trials and included studies sought as a citation on SCISEARCH database (1980-1999). Authors of identified studies and pharmaceutical companies were also contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were selected if they involved people being treated for acute schizophrenia, randomised to two or more dose ranges of non-depot haloperidol, and if they reported clinically meaningful outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The reviewers independently and blindly inspected citations (10% reliability check), they ordered papers, and reliably re-inspected and quality assessed the full reports. The reviewers, again working independently, also extracted data. For homogeneous dichotomous data the relative risk (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis. Reviewers assumed that people who left the study early or were lost to follow-up had a negative outcome. Weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated for continuous outcomes that reported intention to treat (ITT), last observation carried forward (LOCF) data. Data was excluded if loss to follow-up was greater than 50%. MAIN RESULTS: Sixteen trials with nineteen different randomised dose comparisons were included. No studies reported data on relapse rates, quality of life and none compared >1.5-3.0 mg/day haloperidol to higher dose ranges. Using low doses (>3-7.5mg/day) did not clearly result in loss of efficacy (no clinically important improvement in global state, versus >7.5-15mg/day n=48, 1 RCT, RR 1.09 CI 0.7 to 1.8; versus >15-35mg/day n=81, 2 RCTs, 0.95 CI 0.8 to 1.2). Doses of haloperidol in the range of >3-7.5 mg/day had a lower rate of development of clinically significant extrapyramidal adverse effects than higher doses (clinically significant extrapyramidal adverse effects, versus >7.5-15mg/day n=64, 2 RCTs, RR 0.12 CI 0.01 to 2.1; versus >15-35mg/day n=144, 3 RCTs RR 0.59 CI 0.5 to 0.8, NNH 3 CI 2 to 6; versus >35mg/day n=86, 2 RCTs, RR 0.70 CI 0.5 to 1.1). All other comparisons between dose ranges did not yield statistically significant differences, but several, particularly with lower dose ranges, were underpowered to detect clinically meaningful differences. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: No results are conclusive and all are based on small, short, studies. It would be understandable, however, if clinicians were cautious in prescribing doses in excess of 7.5 mg/day of haloperidol to a person with uncomplicated acute schizophrenia, and if people with schizophrenia were equally reticent to take greater doses. Further research is needed regarding the efficacy and tolerability of the >1.5-3.0 mg/day dose range.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2005

Haloperidol plus promethazine for psychosis induced aggression.

BACKGROUND: Health services often manage agitated or violent people and for emergency psychiatric services such behaviour is particularly prevalent (10%). The drugs used in this situation should ensure that the person swiftly and safely becomes calm. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether haloperidol plus promethazine is an effective treatment for psychosis induced agitation/aggression. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (July 2004). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised clinical trials involving aggressive people with psychosis for which haloperidol plus promethazine was being used. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We reliably selected, quality assessed and extracted data from all relevant studies. For binary outcomes we calculated standard estimations of risk ratio (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Where possible we estimated weighted number needed to treat or harm (NNT/H). MAIN RESULTS: We identified two relevant high quality studies. One compared the haloperidol plus promethazine mix with midazolam (n=301) and one with lorazepam (n=200). The combined results were largely heterogeneous. In Brazil, haloperidol plus promethazine was an effective means of tranquillisation with over two thirds of people being tranquil or sedated by 30 minutes, but midazolam was more swift (n=301, RR 2.9 CI 1.75 to 4.80, NNH 5 CI 3 to 12). In India, however, 95% of people were tranquil or sedated by 30 minutes if allocated to the combination treatment (vs lorazepam, n=200, RR 0.26 CI 0.10 to 0.68, NNT 8 CI 6 to 17). Over the next few hours of treatment reported differences are negligible. One person given midazolam had respiratory depression (reversed by flumazenil), one given lorazepam had respiratory difficulty. A single person given haloperidol plus promethazine had an epileptic fit. Once the initial tranquillisation was administered, few needed additional medications for continued agitation (n=501, 2 RCTs, RR needing additional tranquillising drugs by four hours 1.67 CI 0.62 to 4.54, 4% vs 2%, I squared 50%) and there were no differences in the low levels of use of restraints. About 28% of people in Brazil in both groups had another episode of aggression in the first day after the initial injection (n=301, RR 0.89 CI 0.62 to 1.29). About half of all people in the Indian study were discharged by four hours (n=200, RR 1.13 CI 0.85 to 1.50) and a similar proportion in Brazil by 15 days (n=301, RR 1.05 CI 0.84 to 1.29). Both studies attained 99% follow up for their primary outcomes. Even by two weeks only 4% of people could not be accounted for (n=501, 2 RCTs, RR 0.91 CI 0.38 to 2.17). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that both benzodiazepines work, but that midazolam has a faster onset and thereby reduces the risk of exposure to violence. Both benzodiazepines have the potential to cause respiratory depression, probably midazolam more so than lorazepam, and we would question the use of this group of drugs outside of those services fully confident of observing for and managing the consequences of respiratory distress. Most evidence, however, exists for the haloperidol plus promethazine mix, with currently more than 400 people randomised to the combination. The onset of action is swift and faster than lorazepam. The combination also seems safe with no clear longer term consequences. We would expect policy makers recommending other drug managements to have equally compelling evidence to support their guidance and hope that this would not be founded in conjecture or consensus, which may be more difficult to defend than evidence from high quality studies.

Aggression↗

PubMed2003

EEG abnormalities associated with antipsychotics: a comparison of quetiapine, olanzapine, haloperidol and healthy subjects.

In this study the effects of the atypical antipsychotics quetiapine and olanzapine, and the typical antipsychotic haloperidol on EEG patterns were retrospectively investigated in 81 patients under stable monotherapy with either drug (quetiapine: n=22, olanzapine: n=37, haloperidol: n=22). These three subgroups were compared with a control group of healthy subjects (n=30) which were matched regarding sex and age. Diagnoses of patients were schizophrenia (DSM-IV 295.xx, n=61), brief psychotic disorder (DSM-IV 298.8, n=9), schizoaffective disorder (DSM-IV 295.70, n=8) and delusional disorder (DSM-IV 297.1, n=3). There were no statistically significant differences regarding demographic characteristics between the groups. Digital EEG recordings were retrieved from a database and visually assessed by two independent investigators, and one blinded regarding medication. One patient from the quetiapine group (5%), 13 olanzapine patients (35%), five of the haloperidol patients (23%) and two subjects of the control group (7%) had an abnormal EEG. Epileptiform activity was observed in four patients (11%) of the olanzapine group, and none in the others. EEG abnormalities were statistically significantly increased with dose in the olanzapine group, in contrast to patients treated with haloperidol, quetiapine or healthy subjects. In conclusion, EEG abnormalities seem to occur rarely in patients treated with quetiapine comparable to the control group, but significantly more often with haloperidol and olanzapine, possibly due to different receptor profiles of these substances. To our knowledge, this is the first electrophysiological investigation comparing the new atypical antipsychotics quetiapine, haloperidol, olanzapine with healthy subjects.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Subchronic haloperidol increases CB(1) receptor binding and G protein coupling in discrete regions of the basal ganglia.

The present study was designed to test whether chronic neuroleptic treatment, which is known to alter both expression and density of dopamine D(2) receptors in striatal regions, has effects upon function and binding level of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor in the basal ganglia by using receptor autoradiography. As predicted, subchronic haloperidol treatment resulted in increased binding of (3)H-raclopride and quinpirole-induced guanosine 5'-O-(gamma-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) in the striatum when compared to that measured in control animals. This increased D(2) receptor binding and function after 3 days washout was normalized after a 2-week washout period. Effect of haloperidol treatment was studied for CB(1) receptor binding and CP55,940-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS in the striatum, globus pallidus, and substantia nigra. (3)[H]CP55,940 binding levels were found in rank order from highest to lowest in substantia nigra > globus pallidus > striatum. Furthermore, subchronic haloperidol treatment resulted in elevated binding levels of (3)[H]CP55,940 in the striatum and the substantia nigra and CB(1) receptor-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS bindings in the substantia nigra after 3 days washout. These increased binding levels were normalized at 1-4 weeks after termination of haloperidol treatment. Haloperidol treatment had no significant effect on CB(1) receptor or [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding levels in globus pallidus. The results help to elucidate the underlying biochemical mechanism of CB(1) receptor supersensitivity after haloperidol treatment.

Analgesics↗

PubMed2007

Chronic haloperidol treatment results in a decrease in the expression of myelin/oligodendrocyte-related genes in the mouse brain.

Schizophrenia is a complex psychiatric illness that manifests as a combination of positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and cognitive deficits. Antipsychotic drugs, such as haloperidol, attenuate dopamine receptor signaling in neurons and constitute the frontline treatment for the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. However, haloperidol treatment has also been reported to exacerbate preexisting negative symptoms/cognitive deficits and the severity of these deficits has been correlated with white matter pathology in schizophrenia. Indeed, several studies implicate oligodendrocyte function in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia, but it is unknown whether these effects are related to drug treatment. It is well established that haloperidol alters gene expression in neurons. However, its effect on oligodendrocytes is unknown. In this study, we investigate the effects of chronic haloperidol treatment on the expression of eight genes known to play critical roles in myelin/oligodendrocyte function. We treated male mice with haloperidol (2 mg/kg/day) for 30 days and measured gene expression changes by using in situ hybridization analysis and quantitative densitometry. Haloperidol caused a decrease in the expression of these genes in several white matter regions of the mouse CNS. In contrast, clozapine (10 mg/kg/day) had no effect on the expression of a subset of these genes. This has important implications for both disease pathology and the consideration of treatment options for patients.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed1989

Comparative bioavailability of a new commercial tablet formulation and two lots of a reference formulation of haloperidol.

The bioavailability of a new tablet formulation (5 mg) of haloperidol was estimated relative to two lots of a reference product. Twenty-eight healthy male volunteers completed all three phases in that they received the test (T) and the two reference formulations (R1 and R2) in a balanced three-way crossover design. Using a sensitive HPLC method, plasma concentrations of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol were monitored over a period of 96 h following administration of each formulation. Haloperidol was measurable in the plasma of all the volunteers, whereas reduced haloperidol was measurable in only 6 out of 28 volunteers following each administration. Therefore, the assessment of bioequivalence in this study is based on haloperidol data only. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), and area under the curve up to the last measurable concentration (AUCot) or infinity (AUCo infinity) were compared by analyses of variance and found not to be significantly different across the formulations. The relative bioavailability based on T:R1 or T:R2 ratios of AUCo infinity, AUCot, and Cmax was, in each case, within the acceptable range of 100 +/- 20%. Also, the relative bioavailability of R1 compared with R2 was within 100 +/- 20% in terms of the above bioavailability parameters. Except for tmax, all other pharmacokinetic parameters showed wide intersubject variation.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1992

Measurement of haloperidol in human breast milk by high-performance liquid chromatography.

A high-performance liquid chromatographic method was developed for the assay of haloperidol in human breast milk. The method involves rapid extraction of haloperidol and chromatography with a reversed-phase C18 column and a mobile phase of phosphate buffer (pH 4.0):acetonitrile (70:30, v/v). Moperone was used as the internal standard. Haloperidol and moperone were detected with ultraviolet detection at 254 nm. The sensitivity was 5 ng/mL of milk, and the standard curve was linear in the concentration range 5-250 ng/mL. The average interassay coefficient of variation for samples with drug in the concentration range 25-125 ng/mL was less than 8.8%. The absolute recovery of haloperidol by the method was greater than 94.4%. No interference with endogenous substances in human milk was observed. The method was used to determine haloperidol levels in breast milk from patients undergoing chronic haloperidol treatment.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗

PubMed2001

D2 but not D3 receptors are elevated after 9 or 11 months chronic haloperidol treatment: influence of withdrawal period.

Previous postmortem studies have identified divergent alterations in D2 and D3 receptors in schizophrenia but those results cannot be interpreted without further understanding of whether antipsychotic regulation of the D3 receptor is different from that of the D2 receptor. Depot parenteral administration of haloperidol decanoate was utilized to achieve consistent high levels in rat brain for 9 months with 2-month withdrawal or 11 months with 48-h withdrawal and compared to vehicle control and acute haloperidol (48-h) treatment groups. Autoradiographic means for measuring levels of D2 ([(3)H]-spiperone) and D3 receptors ([(125)I]trans 7-OH-PIPAT) and of D3 mRNA by in situ hybridization histochemistry in rat caudate-putamen, nucleus accumbens, islands of Calleja, and olfactory tubercle determined that there were significant group differences for regulation of D2 receptor. Chronic haloperidol for 9 or 11 months elevated D2 but not D3 receptors or D3 mRNA in all regions measured. Acute haloperidol treatment had no significant effects for any measure. Treatment for 9 months with a 2-month withdrawal resulted in a persistent increase in D2 receptors that was greater than that observed in the 11 months with 48-h withdrawal. This effect was most noticeable in the olfactory tubercle. These data confirm previous findings that short- or long-term haloperidol treatment leads to elevations in D2 but not D3 receptors or D3 mRNA, and long-term withdrawal from chronic haloperidol does not lead to elevations in D3 receptors or D3 mRNA. This suggests that an elevation in D3 receptors identified at postmortem in schizophrenics withdrawn from antipsychotics is not the result of the previous drug history [Gurevich et al. (1997) Arch Gen Psychiatry 54:225-232].

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Diet and chronic haloperidol effects on rat midbrain dopamine neurons.

The effects of dietary glucose (chow containing 0%, 10%, 20%, or 40% glucose, w/w) on chronic haloperidol-induced changes in dopamine (DA) neuronal activity were tested. Rats were treated daily by oral gavage for 21 days with either water or 0.5 mg/kg haloperidol, then anesthetized for in vivo electrophysiological recording. The numbers of spontaneously active DA neurons in the substantia nigra (A9) and ventral tegmental area (A10) regions of the midbrain were estimated with the cells-per-track sampling method. In rats fed standard chow, haloperidol significantly reduced the number of active neurons in both regions compared to water controls. In water controls there were no differences in DA cells per track between rats fed standard chow or chow containing 10% or 20% glucose, whereas these glucose diets significantly attenuated the effects of chronic haloperidol on DA cells per track. The 40% glucose diet itself nonsignificantly reduced cells per track and, in turn, nonsignificantly attenuated the effects of haloperidol. The results demonstrate that dietary glucose content can alter haloperidol-induced changes in the activity of midbrain DA neurons.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2006

[123I]TPCNE--a novel SPET tracer for the sigma-1 receptor: first human studies and in vivo haloperidol challenge.

[123I]TPCNE (1(trans-[123I]iodopropen-2-yl)-4-[(4-cyanophenoxy)methyl] piperidine; Ki = 0.67 nM; log P = 3.36) is a novel sigma-1 receptor SPET ligand. In this study, we developed an optimized labeling method for [123I]TPCNE and investigated the kinetics, binding characteristics, and whole-body distribution of this tracer for the first time in humans. We also performed a challenge with the sigma-1 receptor antagonist haloperidol against [123I]TPCNE. Seven healthy volunteers were recruited. Dynamic brain SPET scans were performed following i.v. administration of 185 MBq [123I]TPCNE in all seven subjects. Three of the subjects were given oral haloperidol (2.5 mg) approximately 1 h before the scan. The dynamic data were analyzed with both reversible and irreversible compartmental models.[123I]TPCNE showed high uptake in brain and liver. All non-haloperidol-treated subjects showed a high whole-brain uptake (average: 8.7% of injected activity). No significant clearance of the tracer was seen up to 30 h post injection. In the haloperidol-treated subjects, the time-activity curves clearly demonstrated clearance of the tracer from the brain. Regional radioactivity concentrations were reduced by haloperidol from 42% in the cerebellum to 73% in the thalamus.[(123)I]TPCNE demonstrated high brain uptake, with highest binding found in the posterior cingulate. A region in which binding was unaffected by haloperidol pretreatment could not be identified, and the time-activity data were best described by an irreversible model.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Differential effects of amfonelic acid on the haloperidol- and clozapine-induced increase in extracellular DOPAC in the nucleus accumbens and the striatum.

This study compares the effects of the nonamphetamine stimulant amfonelic acid on the increase in extracellular 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) induced by haloperidol and clozapine in the nucleus accumbens and the striatum of anaesthetized rats. DOPAC was simultaneously recorded in both regions using differential pulse voltammetry with electrically pretreated carbon fibre electrodes. Amfonelic acid (2.5 mg/kg s.c.) did not alter basal striatal DOPAC but produced a significant reduction in extracellular DOPAC in the nucleus accumbens. Haloperidol (1 mg/kg s.c.) increased extracellular DOPAC in both regions. When amfonelic acid was injected 5 min before haloperidol, the increase in DOPAC was potentiated in both the nucleus accumbens and the striatum but with a greater effect in the striatum. Clozapine (30 mg/kg i.p.) increased extracellular DOPAC in both regions, an effect partially attenuated by amfonelic acid in both regions but to a greater extent in the striatum. When ritanserin (5 mg/kg i.p.), a serotonergic antagonist (5-HT-2), was co-administered with haloperidol, the potentiation by amfonelic acid of the increase in extracellular DOPAC induced by haloperidol was attenuated in both the nucleus accumbens and the striatum. The present results confirm that amfonelic acid can be used to discriminate neurochemically between haloperidol and clozapine in vivo. The effects of amfonelic acid on the neuroleptic-induced changes in extracellular DOPAC were greater in the striatum than the nucleus accumbens. These results further demonstrate that both neuroleptics increase dopamine metabolism in the two brain regions but by different mechanisms, supporting the view that the regulation of dopamine metabolism differs in the two regions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic Acid↗

PubMed1994

Effects of haloperidol, quinelorane, and lithium on regional neurotensin/neuromedin N concentrations: further evidence for neurotensin/neuromedin N-dopamine interactions.

In order to further characterize the pharmacologic mechanisms that mediate the antipsychotic drug-induced increase in neurotensin (NT) in nucleus accumbens and striatum, the effects of three weeks treatment with psychotherapeutic levels of lithium alone or in conjunction with haloperidol were compared to the ability of haloperidol alone to alter NT and neuromedin N (NMN) regional brain concentrations in rats. A separate experiment examined the ability of a selective dopamine D2 receptor agonist, quinelorane, to alter NT/NMN regional concentrations after three weeks of treatment as compared to haloperidol, a D2 receptor antagonist. Haloperidol (1 mg/kg) increased both NT and NMN concentrations in several brain regions and these parallel peptide increases were highly correlated. Lithium chloride (0.4 mM) had no effect, either alone or with haloperidol, on NT/NMN concentrations. Quinelorane (1 mg/kg), however, effectively increased both NT and NMN concentrations in the caudate nucleus and nucleus accumbens, as did haloperidol (2 mg/kg). These data indicate that the induction of NT and NMN, whose adjacent sequences are contained in a pro-hormone product of a single gene, occurs in tandem and remains proportional, as well as demonstrating that putative D2 receptor agonists can produce effects on NT/NMN systems that are similar to D2 receptor antagonists.

Animals↗

PubMed1987

Pharmacokinetics of haloperidol in psychotic patients.

Nine psychotic patients under continuous oral treatment with haloperidol were randomly given a test dose of 1.5-5 mg haloperidol orally and/or intravenously. Serum levels of haloperidol were determined by high performance liquid chromatography and serum concentration data obtained were submitted to pharmacokinetic analysis. The steady state concentration ratio between blood and plasma was determined and found to be 0.79 +/- 0.03. The blood clearance was then calculated to be 550 +/- 133 ml/min. The mean hepatic extraction ratio was intermediate (0.37). Consequently, for a drug mainly eliminated by hepatic metabolism like haloperidol, the total blood clearance and the extent of oral bioavailability can be affected by changes in hepatic blood flow, hepatic enzyme activities and drug binding. During continuous oral treatment with haloperidol, however, it can be shown that changes in the total metabolic capacity of the liver due to hepatic enzyme induction or inhibition should be important for the therapeutic effects of haloperidol. The volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss) was large (7.9 +/- 2.5 l/kg). The terminal half-life was 18.8 h after intravenous and 18.1 h after oral administration. The oral bioavailability (0.60 +/- 0.18) were in accordance with previous results in healthy subjects. A mean lag time after oral dose was 1.3 +/- 1.1 h and a longer absorption half-life (1.9 +/- 1.4 h) was found in the patients compared with healthy volunteers.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1981

Effects of chronic haloperidol treatment on ingestive behaviour and body weight regulation in the rat.

This study was designed to investigate the effects of two doses of haloperidol on body weight, food spillage and food and water intake using rats as subjects. In the first experiment, 12 male Wistar albino rats were observed in individual cages for 30 days, six receiving a daily injection of haloperidol (1 mg/kg IP in 1 ml/kg isotonic saline), while the other six received a control injection of isotonic saline in the experimental phase. In the second experiment, 12 rats were observed for 9 days in individual cages, six receiving a daily injection of 10 mg/kg haloperidol in 4 ml/kg isotonic saline in the experimental phase. In both studies, haloperidol depressed food intake and food spillage. With the lower dose of haloperidol (1 mg/kg), body weight was not depressed until several days after a significant reduction of food intake had been recorded. With the higher dose (10 mg/kg), body weight was depressed during the first 24 h, but quickly returned to normal, although food intake remained depressed. It is suggested that haloperidol may have a limited facilitatory effect on body weight.

Animals↗

PubMed1983

The effect of d-amphetamine and haloperidol alone and in combination on milk drinking in rats.

The effects of d-amphetamine (0.5-4.0 mg/kg IP) and haloperidol (0.015-1.0 mg/kg IP) alone and in combination on intake of a sweetened milk solution were determined in rats. Experimental sessions consisted of a 15-min access to the milk solution once a day, 7 days a week. d-Amphetamine was administered 15 min prior to the session and haloperidol was administered 60 min prior to the session. The interaction of these compounds was determined by repeated determination of the dose-response function for d-amphetamine in combination with different doses of haloperidol. When given alone, each drug produced a dose-dependent decrease in milk intake. In combination with haloperidol, the decrement caused by d-amphetamine was shifted to lower doses in a dose-dependent manner. Isobolographic analysis of the interaction indicates that the intermediate doses (0.03-0.06 mg/kg) of haloperidol were additive and the highest doses (0.12-0.25 mg/kg) of haloperidol were infraadditive with d-amphetamine. Dose-dependent neuropharmacological actions of these compounds may account for dose-dependent interactions.

Animals↗

PubMed1980

Chronic administration of haloperidol during development: behavioral and psychopharmacological effects.

Chronic haloperidol treatment during prenatal and postnatal development was found to induce long-term behavioral and psychopharmacological effects. Rats tested shortly after termination of the chronic treatment at weaning or as young adults were hyperactive in the open field and exhibited an attenuated behavioral response to amphetamine and an accentuated cataleptic response to later doses of haloperidol, when compared with control offspring of the same age. Tests at an intermediate interval (adolescence period) showed no significant difference from control offspring on any of these behavioral measures. Adult rats administered haloperidol chronically for the same duration were also hyperactive after termination of treatment. In contrast to the effects of haloperidol during development, these adults exhibited an accentuated behavioral response to amphetamine and an attenuated cataleptic response to a later dose of haloperidol. Compensatory mechanisms in response to chronic haloperidol treatment during development thus appear to be different from those in adulthood.

Animals↗