PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “resectability”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 523 records · Page 29Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Local resection of biliopancreatic cancer.

Biliopancreatic tumors that are potentially amenable to local resection include proximal bile duct tumors (Klatskin tumors), mid-choledochal duct tumors and tumors arising from the papilla of Vater. This paper reviews our experience in the AMC, with local resection of these conditions. From 1983-1997, 112 patients underwent surgical resection of a carcinoma of the hepatic duct confluence (Klatskin tumor). Local resection was undertaken in 80 patients (52 patients with type I and II tumors, and 28 patients with type III tumors) whereas in 32 patients with type III tumors, hilar resection was performed with liver resection. Negative surgical margins were achieved in 10 patients after local resection of type I and II tumors (19.2%), in 1 patient after local resection of a type III tumor (3.6%), and in 5 patients after hilar resection and liver resection (15.6%). Middle-third carcinomas of the extra-hepatic biliary tract are less common than proximal or distal bile duct tumors. From 1993-1998, 12 patients underwent resection of a mid-choledochal duct carcinoma. In 8 patients, local resection was performed and in 4 patients, subtotal pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) because of the close relationship of the tumor and the pancreas. Four patients had negative surgical margins, 2 after local resection (25%) and 2 after PPPD (50%). Although accepted for villous adenomas located in the ampulla, local resection for ampullary carcinoma is controversial. Nine patients underwent local resection of a presumed adenoma that proved to be an ampullary carcinoma. In 4 patients with T1 tumors, resection of the carcinoma was locally complete (44%). Additional PPPD was performed in 6 patients, including the 4 patients with complete local resections, showing no residual tumor at the previous site of excision, but, lymphnode metastases in two resection specimens (both of patients with presumed T1 tumors). Hence, local resection of a T1 ampullary carcinoma might result in tumor free margins, but does not deal with (usually retropancreatic) lymphnode metastases. In conclusion, local resection is applicable to Klatskin type I and II tumors. Local resection may be considered in the proximally located, mid-choledochal duct carcinomas but, when located closer to the pancreas, PPPD is the preferred treatment. For ampullary adenomas, local resection is feasible unless frozen section examination raises suspicion on a malignancy. Local resection of even limited ampullary carcinomas is not advisable because of lymphatic dissemination of the tumor and consequently, inadequate clearance.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

[Liver resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine hepatic metastases].

Over a period of 11 years a total of 140 liver resections for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine hepatic metastases were performed in 127 patients (73 women, 54 men; median age 53 years). There were 120 first, 14 second and 6 third liver resections. Primary tumors were: breast cancer (n = 34), leiomyosarcoma (n = 20), pancreatic cancer (n = 16), renal cell carcinoma (n = 13), melanoma (n = 9), gastric cancer (n = 9), lung cancer (n = 6) and adrenal cancer (n = 6) and miscellaneous tumors (n = 14). Extrahepatic tumor manifestation (including synchronous primary tumors) was found in 69/140 cases (49%); 61 of 120 patients with a first liver resection had extrahepatic tumor (51%). In the 120 first liver resections, 82 (68%) R0, 13 (11%) R1 and 25 (21%) R2 excisions were possible. Median survival after first liver resection was 20 months; after R0 resection a median survival of 28 months and after R1/2 resection of 8 months was achieved. The 5-year survival rate was 16% for the total group, 24% in patients with R0 resection and 0% for R1/2 resections. After a second liver resection (n = 14) there was a median survival of 28 months (5-year-survival-rate of 21%) for all patients and of 41 months (5-year survival rate 38%) after R0 resection. Morbidity and mortality after the first liver resection were 32.5% and 5.8%, respectively. In patients without extrahepatic tumor at the time of the first liver resection a median survival of 32 months (5-year survival rate 25%) and 7 months was achieved after R0 resection and R1/2 resection, respectively. In case of extrahepatic tumor the median survival was 24 months (5-year survival rate 23%) for R0 resection compared to 8 months after R1/2 resection. These data suggest that not the presence of extrahepatic tumor but rather the possibility of a R0 resection is most decisive for the prognosis after liver resection. We conclude that patients with liver metastases of non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine tumors may benefit from liver resection. Similar to colorectal metastases, a second or third liver resection can be worthwhile in selected cases. Even in more unfavorable tumor entities, several cases of long-term survival were observed after surgical therapy. Therefore, the indication for liver resection should be considered carefully in every single case.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2000

The influence of the radicality of resection and dose of postoperative radiation therapy on local control and survival in carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract.

PURPOSE: To evaluate dose concepts in postoperative irradiation of carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract according to the radicality of resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, the charts of 257 patients with histologically-proven carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract (40 T1, 80 T2, 53 T3, 84 T4 tumors, with nodal involvement in 181 cases) were reviewed according to the radicality of resection and dose of irradiation administered. Sixty-four patients had tumor-free resection margins (> 3 mm), 66 patients had close resection margins (< 3 mm), and 101 patients had R1 resections, and 26 patients had R2 resections. A median dose of 56 Gy was applied to the primary tumor bed and the cervical lymphatics (2 Gy/fraction, 5 fractions/week). In cases of R1 or R2 resection, or of close margins (< 3 mm), the tumor bed or, respectively, tumor residuals were boosted with doses up to a median of 66 Gy. Locoregional tumor control and survival was investigated by uni- and multivariate analyses according to T-, N-stage, grade of resection, total dose of radiation, and presence or absence of extracapsular tumor spread and lymphangiosis carcinomatosa. RESULTS: An overall 3- and 5-year survival rate of 60% and 45%, respectively, was achieved. Rates for freedom from locoregional recurrence were 77% and 72% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. The survival rates according to the grade of resection at 5 years were 67% for patients resected with tumor-free margins, 59% for patients resected with close margins, 26% for patients with R1 resection, and 27% for patients with R2 resection. Within a median follow-up period of 4.7 years for living patients, a total of 67 recurrences (26%) were observed (in 9% of patients resected with tumor-free margins, in 27% with close margins, in 37% of R1 resected, and in 19% of R2 resected patients). Freedom from locoregional recurrence at 3 years was achieved in 100% of the patients resected with tumor-free margins, in 92% of patients resected with close surgical margins, in 87% of R1 and 69% of R2 resected patients. In multivariate Cox-regression analysis, the variables grade of resection (p = 0.00031) and total dose of irradiation (p = 0.0046) were found as factors influencing locoregional control. Variables influencing survival according to multivariate analysis are T-stage (p = 0.0057), N-stage (p = 0.024), grade of resection (p = 0.000015), total dose of irradiation (p < 0. 000000). Extracapsular tumor spread and lymphangiosis carcinomatosa are factors of borderline significance (p = 0.055, p = 0.066). CONCLUSION: In postoperative radiotherapy of head and neck carcinomas, doses adapted to the risk of locoregional recurrent disease should be applied. Patients with R1 and R2 resections should be treated with doses of more than 68 Gy (2 Gy/fraction, 5 fractions/week) (with close margins [< 3 mm] more than 66 Gy) to achieve an improvement in locoregional control and survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Hepatic metastases from leiomyosarcoma: A single-center experience with 34 liver resections during a 15-year period.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a large single-center experience with hepatic resection for metastatic leiomyosarcoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Liver resection is the treatment of choice for hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma. In contrast, the role of liver resection for hepatic metastases from leiomyosarcoma has not been defined. METHODS: The records of 26 patients who between 1982 and 1996 underwent a total of 34 liver resections for hepatic metastases from leiomyosarcoma were reviewed. There were 23 first, 9 second, and 2 third liver resections. The records were analyzed with regard to survival and predictive factors. RESULTS: In the 23 first liver resections, there were 15 R0, 3 R1, and 5 R2 resections. Median survival was 32 months after R0 resection and 20.5 months after R1/2 resection. The 5-year survival rate was 13% for all patients and 20% after R0 resection. In 10 patients with extrahepatic tumor at the time of the first liver resection, 6 R0 and 4 R2 resections were achieved. After R0 resection, the median survival was 40 months (range 5-84 months), with a 5-year survival rate of 33%. After repeat liver resection, the median survival was 31 months (range 5-51 months); after R0 resection, median survival was 31 months and after R1/2 resection it was 28 months. There was no 5-year survivor in the overall group after repeat liver resection. CONCLUSIONS: Despite frequent tumor recurrence, the long-term outcome after liver resection for hepatic metastases from leiomyosarcoma is superior to that after chemotherapy and chemoembolization. Although survival after tumor debulking also seems to be more favorable than after nonoperative therapy, these data indicate that only an R0 resection offers the chance of long-term survival. The presence of extrahepatic tumor should not be considered a contraindication to liver resection if complete removal of all tumorous masses appears possible. In selected cases of intrahepatic tumor recurrence, even repeated liver resection might be worthwhile. In view of the poor results of chemoembolization and chemotherapy in hepatic metastases from leiomyosarcoma, liver resection should be attempted whenever possible.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Arterial and vena caval resections combined with pancreaticoduodenectomy in highly selected patients with periampullary malignancies.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To obtain a margin-negative resection and increase the indication for resection of periampullary malignancies, pancreaticoduodenectomy with a SM-PVR (superior mesenterico-portal vein resection) has been performed. However, an arterial resection, other vascular resections except SM-PVR (e.g., an inferior vena caval resection), or a metastatic tumor resection combined with pancreaticoduodenectomy has yet to be fully elucidated because of the high risk of postoperative complications and extremely poor long-term survival in patients undergoing these exceptional procedures. The present report focused on highly selected patients undergoing an arterial resection or a vena caval resection associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODOLOGY: Besides 31 patients with periampullary tumors undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy associated with SM-PVR in our department, a group of 4 patients underwent arterial resections and another patient underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with a resection of liver metastasis together with an inferior vena caval resection. These five patients were reported in the present study. RESULTS: A 27 year-old-woman presented pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head and a liver metastasis in which involvements of the superior mesenterico-portal vein and the inferior vena cava were shown. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed with SM-PVR associated with a left hemihepatectomy combined with a segment 1 resection and an inferior vena caval resection. The patient did not present severe postoperative complications and experienced a good quality of life during 16 months after surgery. Four other patients underwent arterial resections. These arterial resections were performed only when a margin-negative resection was feasible. The superior mesenteric artery was resected and reconstructed with a Goretex graft in one patient. The right hepatic artery was resected and reconstructed with a saphenous graft in two patients. The other patient underwent a resection of the common hepatic artery and reconstruction was performed with the splenic artery. Three of the four patients presented postoperative complications but were conservatively treated. Two patients are still alive 25 months and 8 months after surgery. One patient died of sepsis 5 months after surgery, and the other died of cancer progression 19 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The indication for retropancreatic arterial resection associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy should be carefully evaluated only when a margin-negative resection can be achieved. An appropriate bypass method of arterial reconstruction should be selected because a direct end-to-end anastomosis is not always feasible. Hepatectomy for metastases of pancreatic ductal carcinoma should be also regarded as an exceptional procedure.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

Extended local resection for advanced gastric cancer: increased survival versus increased morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize factors predictive of improved survival following gastrectomy with additional organ resection for the treatment of gastric cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Recent large series have reported significant survival disadvantages to patients who have undergone gastrectomy with splenectomy or pancreaticosplenectomy, and yet gastrectomy with additional organ resection is needed to accomplish an R0 resection in some cases. Gastrectomy with splenectomy and other organ resections has been associated with advanced T-stage, positive resection margins, and higher postoperative morbidity and mortality rather than an absolute predictor of survival. METHODS: The authors reviewed the Department of Surgery prospective gastric database at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from July 1985 to July 2000. During this period, of the 2,112 patients with primary gastric cancer, 1,133 underwent an R0 resection. The R0 resection group included 865 patients who underwent gastrectomy alone and 268 patients who underwent gastrectomy with another organ resection. Clinicopathologic, operative, complication, and survival data were compared between these two groups. Chi-square analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to compare and estimate median survival. RESULTS: The most common organs resected were the spleen and pancreas, with an even distribution of other organs. Pathologic factors revealed that the gastrectomy with organ resection group had significantly larger lesions, greater T-stage, and a higher incidence of advanced nodal disease than the group who did not undergo additional organ resection. The incidence of pathologically confirmed T4 cancers in the additional organ resection group was only 14%. The overall 5-year survival rate for patients with T3/T4 disease was 27% with additional organ resection. The overall 5-year survival rate for the gastrectomy with organ resection group (32%, median 32 months) was significantly less than the group that did not undergo additional resection (50%, median 63 months) on univariate analysis. However, additional organ resection was not a predictor of survival on multivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis identified advanced T-stage (T3 or greater) and nodal stage (N1 or greater) as adverse predictors of survival in this group. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival following gastrectomy with additional organ resection is possible. Depth of invasion and the extent of lymph node metastasis are the most important predictors of survival following gastrectomy with additional organ resection, and a R0 resection has been achieved. Judicious use of additional organ resection for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer must be emphasized, given the increased overall morbidity and infrequent finding of actual T4 disease. Additional organ resection can be performed with minimal morbidity and can improve the chance of overall survival in patients with advanced T-stage disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Aggressive surgical approaches to hilar cholangiocarcinoma: hepatic or local resection?

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that surgical excision of hilar cholangiocarcinoma rather than palliative surgical therapy, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy caused prolonged survival in some patients, However, excision is associated with high operative morbidity and mortality rates, particularly when hepatic resection is also performed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical implications of hepatic resection in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS: The study involved 76 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma who were undergoing surgical resections. Twenty-one patients (28%) underwent a combined resection, with reconstruction of the portal vein in 20 patients and reconstruction of the hepatic artery in 7 patients. Sixty-five patients undergoing seven different types of hepatic resection with extrahepatic bile duct resection (BDR) and 11 patients undergoing BDR only were retrospectively compared for background, operative morbidity and mortality, and survival. RESULTS: Curative resection was obtained in 5 of 11 (45%) patients undergoing local resection and in 49 of 65 (75%) patients undergoing hepatic resection (p < 0.05). The surgical morbidity rates were 34% and 27% for hepatic and local resection, respectively. The 30-day mortality and hospital mortality rates were 4.6% and 15% for hepatic resection and 0% and 0% for local resection, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was 26% for all resected patients (76 patients); it was 40% versus 0% for curative versus noncurative resections (p < 0.05). No significant difference in surgical resection rates was revealed between hepatic and local resection among resected and curative resected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive surgical approaches to obtain curative resections could bring about a better prognosis in hilar cholangiocarcinoma independently of whether hepatic resection or local resection is performed.

Adult↗