PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ADAR”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Aptazyme-directed A-to-I RNA editing.

As a promising therapeutic approach, the RNA editing process can correct pathogenic mutations and is reversible and tunable, without permanently altering the genome. RNA editing mediated by human ADAR proteins offers unique advantages, including high specificity and low immunogenicity. Compared to CRISPR-based gene editing techniques, RNA editing events are temporary, which can reduce the risk of long-term unintended side effects, making off-target edits less concerning than DNA-targeting methods. Moreover, ADAR-based RNA editing tools are less likely to elicit immune reactions because ADAR proteins are of human origin, and their small size makes them relatively easy to incorporate into gene therapy vectors, such as adeno-associated virus vectors (AAVs), which have limited space. Despite the promise of RNA editing as a therapeutic approach, precise temporal and spatial control of RNA editing is still lacking. Therefore, we have developed a small molecule-inducible RNA editing strategy by incorporating aptazymes into the guide RNA of the BoxB-λN-ADAR system. This chapter provides detailed protocols for targeted RNA editing by ADAR deaminases using aptazyme-based guide RNAs controlled by exogenous small molecules, marking the earliest use of aptazymes to regulate RNA editing strategies. Once small molecules are added or removed, aptazymes trigger self-cleavage to release the guide RNA, thus achieving small molecule-controlled RNA editing. To satisfy different RNA editing applications, we have realized the conditional activation and deactivation of A-to-I RNA editing of target mRNA using switch aptazymes. We provide step-by-step protocols for constructing guide RNA plasmids for regulatory purposes and conducting small molecule-induced RNA regulatory editing experiments in cells.

Animals↗

The importance of internal loops within RNA substrates of ADAR1.

Adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADARs) are a family of RNA editing enzymes that convert adenosines to inosines within double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). Although ADARs deaminate perfectly base-paired dsRNA promiscuously, deamination is limited to a few, selected adenosines within dsRNA containing mismatches, bulges and internal loops. As a first step in understanding how RNA structural features promote selectivity, we investigated the role of internal loops within ADAR substrates. We observed that a dsRNA helix is deaminated at the same sites whether it exists as a free molecule or is flanked by internal loops. Thus, internal loops delineate helix ends for ADAR1. Since ADAR1 deaminates short RNAs at fewer adenosines than long RNAs, loops decrease the number of deaminations within an RNA by dividing a long RNA into shorter substrates. For a series of symmetric internal loops related in sequence, larger loops (>/=six nucleotides) acted as helix ends, whereas smaller loops (</=four nucleotides) did not. Our work provides the first information about how secondary structure within ADAR substrates dictates selectivity, and suggests a rational approach for delineating minimal substrates for RNAs deaminated by ADARs in vivo.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

A minor fraction of basic fibroblast growth factor mRNA is deaminated in Xenopus stage VI and matured oocytes.

Adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADARs) convert adenosine to inosine in double-stranded regions of RNA. ADAR activity is in the nucleus in Xenopus laevis stage VI oocytes, and released into the cytoplasm at oocyte maturation. We previously demonstrated that a cytoplasmic double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) binding factor(s), cyto-dsRBP, protects microinjected dsRNA from the ADAR released at maturation. Here we describe experiments to determine whether an endogenous dsRNA, the duplex formed between sense and antisense transcripts of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), is protected in a similar manner. Consistent with the presence of cyto-dsRBP, we observed that the majority of bFGF RNA was not deaminated, before or after maturation. However, a minor fraction of the bFGF RNA was deaminated whether the RNA was isolated from stage VI oocytes or matured oocytes. Since ADAR activity is in the nucleus in stage VI oocytes, our results suggest that a fraction of the bFGF RNAs are hybridized in the nucleus and are ADAR substrates. Adenosine deaminations result in A-to-G changes in cDNAs, so we quantified the fraction of modified molecules using restriction-enzyme assays of RT-PCR products. Caveats due to recombination during RT-PCR are discussed.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

Double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminases ADAR1 and ADAR2 have overlapping specificities.

Adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADARs) deaminate adenosines to produce inosines within RNAs that are largely double-stranded (ds). Like most dsRNA binding proteins, the enzymes will bind to any dsRNA without apparent sequence specificity. However, once bound, ADARs deaminate certain adenosines more efficiently than others. Most of what is known about the intrinsic deamination specificity of ADARs derives from analyses of Xenopus ADAR1. In addition to ADAR1, mammalian cells have a second ADAR, named ADAR2; the deamination specificity of this enzyme has not been rigorously studied. Here we directly compare the specificity of human ADAR1 and ADAR2. We find that, like ADAR1, ADAR2 has a 5' neighbor preference (A approximately U > C = G), but, unlike ADAR1, also has a 3' neighbor preference (U = G > C = A). Simultaneous analysis of both neighbor preferences reveals that ADAR2 prefers certain trinucleotide sequences (UAU, AAG, UAG, AAU). In addition to characterizing ADAR2 preferences, we analyzed the fraction of adenosines deaminated in a given RNA at complete reaction, or the enzyme's selectivity. We find that ADAR1 and ADAR2 deaminate a given RNA with the same selectivity, and this appears to be dictated by features of the RNA substrate. Finally, we observed that Xenopus and human ADAR1 deaminate the same adenosines on all RNAs tested, emphasizing the similarity of ADAR1 in these two species. Our data add substantially to the understanding of ADAR2 specificity, and aid in efforts to predict which ADAR deaminates a given editing site adenosine in vivo.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

RNA editing activity is associated with splicing factors in lnRNP particles: The nuclear pre-mRNA processing machinery.

Multiple members of the ADAR (adenosine deaminases acting on RNA) gene family are involved in A-to-I RNA editing. It has been speculated that they may form a large multicomponent protein complex. Possible candidates for such complexes are large nuclear ribonucleoprotein (lnRNP) particles. The lnRNP particles consist mainly of four spliceosomal subunits that assemble together with the pre-mRNA to form a large particle and thus are viewed as the naturally assembled pre-mRNA processing machinery. Here we investigated the presence of ADARs in lnRNP particles by Western blot analysis using anti-ADAR antibodies and by indirect immunoprecipitation. Both ADAR1 and ADAR2 were found associated with the spliceosomal components Sm and SR proteins within the lnRNP particles. The two ADARs, associated with lnRNP particles, were enzymatically active in site-selective A-to-I RNA editing. We demonstrate the association of ADAR RNA editing enzymes with physiological supramolecular complexes, the lnRNP particles.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

The conserved protein kinase-A target motif in synapsin of Drosophila is effectively modified by pre-mRNA editing.

BACKGROUND: Synapsins are abundant synaptic vesicle associated phosphoproteins that are involved in the fine regulation of neurotransmitter release. The Drosophila member of this protein family contains three conserved domains (A, C, and E) and is expressed in most or all synaptic terminals. Similar to mouse mutants, synapsin knock-out flies show no obvious structural defects but are disturbed in complex behaviour, notably learning and memory. RESULTS: We demonstrate that the N-terminal phosphorylation consensus motif RRxS that is conserved in all synapsins investigated so far, is modified in Drosophila by pre-mRNA editing. In mammals this motif represents the target site P1 of protein kinase A (PKA) and calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase I/IV. The result of this editing, by which RRFS is modified to RGFS, can be observed in cDNAs of larvae and adults and in both isolated heads and bodies. It is also seen in several newly collected wild-type strains and thus does not represent an adaptation to laboratory culture conditions. A likely editing site complementary sequence is found in a downstream intron indicating that the synapsin pre-mRNA can form a double-stranded RNA structure that is required for editing by the adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) enzyme. A deletion in the Drosophila Adar gene generated by transposon remobilization prevents this modification, proving that the ADAR enzyme is responsible for the pre-mRNA editing described here. We also provide evidence for a likely function of synapsin editing in Drosophila. The N-terminal synapsin undeca-peptide containing the genomic motif (RRFS) represents an excellent substrate for in-vitro phosphorylation by bovine PKA while the edited peptide (RGFS) is not significantly phosphorylated. Thus pre-mRNA editing by ADAR could modulate the function of ubiquitously expressed synapsin in a cell-specific manner during development and adulthood. CONCLUSION: Similar to several other neuronal proteins of Drosophila, synapsin is modified by ADAR-mediated recoding at the pre-mRNA level. This editing likely reduces or abolishes synapsin phosphorylation by PKA. Since synapsin in Drosophila is required for various forms of behavioural plasticity, it will be fascinating to investigate the effect of this recoding on learning and memory.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

Five novel mutations of RNA-specific adenosine deaminase gene with dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria.

Dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria (OMIM127400) is a rare autosomal dominant pigmentary genodermatosis caused by mutations in the RNA-specific adenosine deaminase (ADAR) gene. This study investigated 5 families and 3 sporadic patients with dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria in the Chinese Han population from Anhui province, China. By direct sequencing, 5 novel ADAR gene mutations (c.982C>T, c.1491insA, c.2568_2571delTAAC, c.2969C>G and c.3040G>T) and 3 mutations described previously (c.3203-2A>G, c.3247C>T and c.3286C>T) were identified, all of which were heterozygous. We reviewed a total of 48 mutations in the ADAR gene in patients with dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria by previous reports and speculated that the mutation hotspots on the ADAR gene might be located in exons 9-15. The tRNA-specific and double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminase domain is essential for the deaminase activity of the ADAR encoded protein.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

Glutamate receptor RNA editing: a molecular analysis of GluR2, GluR5 and GluR6 in human brain tissues and in NT2 cells following in vitro neural differentiation.

The properties of some glutamate receptors are modified by RNA editing. This post-transcriptional mechanism involves the enzymatic deamination of specific adenosines in the pre-mRNA of the glutamate receptors, performed by specific RNA adenosine deaminases (ADARs). This event gives rise to the substitution of a gene-encoded amino acid with a different one that modifies the physiological properties of the ion channel. Here we report an analysis of the editing levels of AMPA GluR2, and kainate GluR5 and GluR6 in a human teratocarcinoma cell line (NT2) during in vitro neural differentiation, in conjunction with an analysis of the expression levels of GluR and ADAR genes. The editing levels were analysed using a specific standardised assay based on sequence analysis. This assay can be performed on all editing sites with a high level of sensitivity and reproducibility. Whereas GluR gene expression increased during NT2 neural differentiation, the expression of ADAR genes may be detected at comparable levels even in undifferentiated NT2 cells, remaining relatively stable during the differentiation process. Furthermore, most of the glutamate receptor editing sites increased their editing levels during NT2 neural differentiation, suggesting that the level of ADAR mRNAs is not closely related to the variable editing levels detected in the GluRs analysed. In human brain tissues, the editing levels appeared finely modulated in the different areas, indicating the possible formation of ion channels with different functional properties, thus generating a complex tissue-specific regulation of receptors and modulation of excitatory stimuli.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

In vitro analysis of the binding of ADAR2 to the pre-mRNA encoding the GluR-B R/G site.

The ADAR family of RNA-editing enzymes deaminates adenosines within RNA that is completely or largely double stranded. In mammals, most of the characterized substrates encode receptors involved in neurotransmission, and these substrates are thought to be targeted by the mammalian enzymes ADAR1 and ADAR2. Although some ADAR substrates are deaminated very promiscuously, mammalian glutamate receptor B (gluR-B) pre-mRNA is deaminated at a few specific adenosines. Like most double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) binding proteins, ADARs bind to many different sequences, but few studies have directly measured and compared binding affinities. We have attempted to determine if ADAR deamination specificity occurs because the enzymes bind to targeted regions with higher affinities. To explore this question we studied binding of rat ADAR2 to a region of rat gluR-B pre-mRNA that contains the R/G editing site, and compared a wild-type molecule with one containing mutations that decreased R/G site editing. Although binding affinity to the two sequences was almost identical, footprinting studies indicate ADAR2 binds to the wild-type RNA at a discrete region surrounding the editing site, whereas binding to the mutant appeared nonspecific.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

A phylogenetic analysis reveals an unusual sequence conservation within introns involved in RNA editing.

Adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADARs) are RNA editing enzymes that convert adenosines to inosines within cellular and viral RNAs. Certain glutamate receptor (gluR) pre-mRNAs are substrates for the enzymes in vivo. For example, at the R/G editing site of gluR-B, -C, and -D RNAs, ADARs change an arginine codon (AGA) to a glycine codon (IGA) so that two protein isoforms can be synthesized from a single encoded mRNA; the highly related gluR-A sequence is not edited at this site. To gain insight into what features of an RNA substrate are important for accurate and efficient editing by an ADAR, we performed a phylogenetic analysis of sequences required for editing at the R/G site. We observed highly conserved sequences that were shared by gluR-B, -C, and -D, but absent from gluR-A. Surprisingly, in contrast to results obtained in phylogenetic analyses of tRNA and rRNA, it was the bases in paired, helical regions whose identity was conserved, whereas bases in nonhelical regions varied, but maintained their nonhelical state. We speculate this pattern in part reflects constraints imposed by ADAR's unique specificity and gained support for our hypotheses with mutagenesis studies. Unexpectedly, we observed that some of the gluR introns were conserved beyond the sequences required for editing. The approximately 600-nt intron 13 of gluR-C was particularly remarkable, showing >94% nucleotide identity between human and chicken, organisms estimated to have diverged 310 million years ago.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

Substrate recognition by ADAR1 and ADAR2.

RNA editing catalyzed by ADAR1 and ADAR2 involves the site-specific conversion of adenosine to inosine within imperfectly duplexed RNA. ADAR1- and ADAR2-mediated editing occurs within transcripts of glutamate receptors (GluR) in the brain and in hepatitis delta virus (HDV) RNA in the liver. Although the Q/R site within the GluR-B premessage is edited more efficiently by ADAR2 than it is by ADAR1, the converse is true for the +60 site within this same transcript. ADAR1 and ADAR2 are homologs having two common functional regions, an N-terminal double-stranded RNA-binding domain and a C-terminal deaminase domain. It is neither understood why only certain adenosines within a substrate molecule serve as targets for ADARs, nor is it known which domain of an ADAR confers its specificity for particular editing sites. To assess the importance of several aspects of RNA sequence and structure on editing, we evaluated 20 different mutated substrates, derived from four editing sites, for their ability to be edited by either ADAR1 or ADAR2. We found that when these derivatives contained an A:C mismatch at the editing site, editing by both ADARs was enhanced compared to when A:A or A:G mismatches or A:U base pairs occurred at the same site. Hence substrate recognition and/or catalysis by ADARs could involve the base that opposes the edited adenosine. In addition, by using protein chimeras in which the deaminase domains were exchanged between ADAR1 and ADAR2, we found that this domain played a dominant role in defining the substrate specificity of the resulting enzyme.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

Substrate analogues for an RNA-editing adenosine deaminase: mechanistic investigation and inhibitor design.

ADARs are adenosine deaminases that act on RNA and are responsible for RNA-editing reactions that occur in eukaryotic mRNAs, including the mRNAs of glutamate and serotonin receptors. ADARs capable of editing biologically relevant RNA substrates have been identified. In addition, the consequence of the RNA-editing reaction on the function of the gene product is known in several cases. However, our understanding of the chemical mechanism of the ADAR-catalyzed adenosine deamination in RNA is lagging. By studying analogues of a naturally occurring substrate for ADAR2, we infer features of the enzyme's active site and reaction mechanism. 8-Aza substitution at adenosine in various RNA substrates accelerates the rate of deamination at these sites by ADAR2 (2.8-17-fold). The magnitude of this "aza effect" depends on the RNA structural context of the reacting nucleotide. N(6)-Methyladenosine in RNA is a slow substrate for ADAR2 (rate is 2% that of adenosine), with no product observed with N(6)-ethyladenosine, suggesting a limited size of the leaving group pocket. 2,6-Diaminopurine ribonucleoside in RNA is not a substrate for ADAR, in contrast to adenosine deaminase (ADA), which catalyzes a similar reaction on nucleosides. This and other results indicate that ADAR2 uses a base recognition strategy different from that of ADA. Consistent with the large 8-aza effect observed for the ADAR2 reaction, we find that 8-azanebularine, as the free nucleoside, inhibits the ADAR2 reaction (IC(50) = 15 +/- 3 mM) with no inhibition observed with nebularine or coformycin.

Adenosine↗

A transition state analogue for an RNA-editing reaction.

Deamination at C6 of adenosine in RNA catalyzed by the ADAR enzymes generates inosine at the corresponding position. Because inosine is decoded as guanosine during translation, this modification can lead to codon changes in messenger RNA. Hydration of 8-azanebularine across the C6-N1 double bond generates an excellent mimic of the transition state proposed for the hydrolytic deamination reaction catalyzed by ADARs. Here, we report the synthesis of a phosphoramidite of 8-azanebularine and its use in the preparation of RNAs mimicking the secondary structure found at a known editing site in the glutamate receptor B subunit pre-mRNA. The binding properties of analogue-containing RNAs indicate that a tight binding ligand for an ADAR can be generated by incorporation of 8-azanebularine. The observed high-affinity binding is dependent on a functional active site, the presence of one, but not the other, of ADAR2's two double-stranded RNA-binding motifs (dsRBMs), and the correct placement of the nucleoside analogue into the sequence/structural context of a known editing site. These results advance our understanding of substrate recognition during ADAR-catalyzed RNA editing and are important for structural studies of ADAR.RNA complexes.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

Systematic identification of abundant A-to-I editing sites in the human transcriptome.

RNA editing by members of the ADAR (adenosine deaminases acting on RNA) family leads to site-specific conversion of adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) in precursor messenger RNAs. Editing by ADARs is believed to occur in all metazoa, and is essential for mammalian development. Currently, only a limited number of human ADAR substrates are known, whereas indirect evidence suggests a substantial fraction of all pre-mRNAs being affected. Here we describe a computational search for ADAR editing sites in the human transcriptome, using millions of available expressed sequences. We mapped 12,723 A-to-I editing sites in 1,637 different genes, with an estimated accuracy of 95%, raising the number of known editing sites by two orders of magnitude. We experimentally validated our method by verifying the occurrence of editing in 26 novel substrates. A-to-I editing in humans primarily occurs in noncoding regions of the RNA, typically in Alu repeats. Analysis of the large set of editing sites indicates the role of editing in controlling dsRNA stability.

Adenosine↗

Long RNA hairpins that contain inosine are present in Caenorhabditis elegans poly(A)+ RNA.

Adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADARs) are RNA-editing enzymes that convert adenosine to inosine within double-stranded RNA. In the 12 years since the discovery of ADARs only a few natural substrates have been identified. These substrates were found by chance, when genomically encoded adenosines were identified as guanosines in cDNAs. To advance our understanding of the biological roles of ADARs, we developed a method for systematically identifying ADAR substrates. In our first application of the method, we identified five additional substrates in Caenorhabditis elegans. Four of those substrates are mRNAs edited in untranslated regions, and one is a noncoding RNA edited throughout its length. The edited regions are predicted to form long hairpin structures, and one of the RNAs encodes POP-1, a protein involved in cell fate decisions.

3' Untranslated Regions↗

Hepatitis D virus RNA editing is inhibited by a GFP fusion protein containing a C-terminally deleted delta antigen.

During its life cycle, hepatitis D virus (HDV) produces two forms of delta antigen (HDAg), small delta antigen (SDAg) and large delta antigen (LDAg), which differ in their C-terminal 19 amino acids. Host enzymes termed ADARs (adenosine deaminases that act on double-stranded RNA) are required for LDAg production. These enzymes change the stop codon (UAG) of SDAg to a tryptophan codon (UGG). However, the temporal and spatial regulation of HDV RNA editing is largely unknown. In this study, we constructed three GFP fusion proteins containing different lengths of SDAg and characterized their cellular localization and effects on HDV replication. One of these fusion proteins, designated D(1-88)-GFP, inhibited LDAg but not SDAg production, suggesting that D(1-88)-GFP inhibits HDV RNA editing. Two experiments further supported this supposition: (i). RT-PCR analysis combined with NcoI restriction enzyme digestion revealed that HDV RNA editing was reduced by 42% in HeLa-D(1-88)-GFP when compared with HeLa cells; and (ii). the ratio of SDAg/LDAg production from the reporter RNAs was reduced in cells co-transfected with ADAR-expressing and reporter plasmids in the presence of D(1-88)-GFP. Double fluorescence microscopy found that D(1-88)-GFP was either associated with SC-35 or was adjacent to PML (premyelocytic leukaemia antigen) at nuclear speckles, but D(1-88)-GFP was not co-localized with ADAR, which was mainly located in the nucleolus. In situ hybridization showing co-localization of HDV RNA with D(1-88)-GFP at nuclear speckles suggested that HDV RNA editing might occur in the nuclear speckles and require other nuclear factor(s), in addition to ADAR.

Base Sequence↗

The properties of a tRNA-specific adenosine deaminase from Drosophila melanogaster support an evolutionary link between pre-mRNA editing and tRNA modification.

Pre-mRNA editing involving the conversion of adenosine to inosine is mediated by adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADAR1 and ADAR2). ADARs contain multiple double-stranded RNA(dsRNA)-binding domains in addition to an adenosine deaminase domain. An adenosine deaminase acting on tRNAs, scTad1p (also known as scADAT1), cloned from Saccharomyces cerevisiae has a deaminase domain related to the ADARs but lacks dsRNA-binding domains. We have identified a gene homologous to scADAT1 in the region of Drosophila melanogaster Adh chromosome II. Recombinant Drosophila ADAT1 (dADAT1) has been expressed in the yeast Pichia pastoris and purified. The enzyme has no activity on dsRNA substrates but is a tRNA deaminase with specificity for adenosine 37 of insect alanine tRNA. dADAT1 shows greater similarity to vertebrate ADARs than to yeast Tad1p, supporting the hypothesis of a common evolutionary origin for ADARs and ADATs. dAdat1 transcripts are maternally supplied in the egg. Zygotic expression is widespread initially and later concentrates in the central nervous system.

5' Untranslated Regions↗

RNA editing in Drosophila melanogaster: New targets and functional consequences.

Adenosine deaminases that act on RNA [adenosine deaminase, RNA specific (ADAR)] catalyze the site-specific conversion of adenosine to inosine in primary mRNA transcripts. These re-coding events affect coding potential, splice sites, and stability of mature mRNAs. ADAR is an essential gene, and studies in mouse, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Drosophila suggest that its primary function is to modify adult behavior by altering signaling components in the nervous system. By comparing the sequence of isogenic cDNAs to genomic DNA, we have identified and experimentally verified 27 new targets of Drosophila ADAR. Our analyses led us to identify new classes of genes whose transcripts are targets of ADAR, including components of the actin cytoskeleton and genes involved in ion homeostasis and signal transduction. Our results indicate that editing in Drosophila increases the diversity of the proteome, and does so in a manner that has direct functional consequences on protein function.

Adenosine Deaminase↗