PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Administration, Sublingual”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1989

[Biological availability of glycerol trinitrate after sublingual administration].

The relative bioavailability of a glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) spray (Nitro-Corangin Spray) compared to that of another GTN Spray was evaluated in 12 healthy male volunteers using an open, randomized cross-over design with two treatment phases. The parameters Cmax, tmax and AUC0-1 showed no statistically significant differences between the two treatments. It is concluded that the two GTN-Sprays may be considered bioequivalent.

Administration, Sublingual↗
PubMed1991

Effect of the acute sublingual administration of ketanserin in hypertensive patients.

The purpose of this study has been to compare the acute antihypertensive effect of a dose of 20 mg of ketanserin in 18 patients after sublingual administration and in 19 after oral administration. In three patients ketanserin and ketanserin-ol plasma levels were measured after both sublingual and oral administration. The results showed a more rapid, considerable antihypertensive effect after sublingual administration. In addition, the high plasma levels of ketanserin-ol, the metabolite produced by hepatic reduction of ketanserin, reached after sublingual administration, rather than transmucosal absorption, indicate that the clinical effect observed is due to more rapid dissolution of the tablet formulation and liberation of the active drug.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Pharmacokinetic aspects of the sublingual administration of vincamine.

The sublingual absorption of vincamine used as tracer occurs in two successive absorption steps: true sublingual absorption and absorption in the gastrointestinal tract of the drug dissolved in the saliva and not absorbed through the buccal mucosa. This is confirmed by a pharmacokinetic study and simulation. These two successive absorptions can explain the increase in the amounts of drug absorbed.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2006

Pharmacokinetics of olanzapine after single-dose oral administration of standard tablet versus normal and sublingual administration of an orally disintegrating tablet in normal volunteers.

Olanzapine (OLZ) is a second-generation antipsychotic agent available in 2 solid oral dosage forms, a standard oral tablet (SOT) and an orally disintegrating tablet (ODT). This study assessed the absorption of each by different routes of administration. Secondarily, the influence of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) genotype was assessed. It was hypothesized that more rapid absorption of the OLZ ODT would occur when administered sublingually versus standard oral administration. A randomized, 3-way crossover study assessed the 5-mg OLZ formulations in healthy volunteers (n = 10). Blood was collected (0-8 hours) to assess OLZ pharmacokinetics using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Both routes of ODT administration resulted in more measurable early concentrations relative to SOT. However, there were no statistically significant differences observed between any of the OLZ exposures for observed pharmacokinetic parameters (C(max), T(max), AUC(0-8h)). The homozygous TT genotype for P-gp resulted in an increased AUC of OLZ for SOT administration but not for either condition where sublingual absorption could occur.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B↗
PubMed1990

Sublingual administration of captopril versus nitroglycerin in patients with severe congestive heart failure.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition has proven to be a successful approach for the long-term treatment of patients with congestive heart failure. This investigation compared the acute hemodynamic changes after sublingual administration of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril with those after nitroglycerin. A total of 24 patients with severe left heart failure (New York Heart Association classes III and IV) were given 25 mg captopril and 0.8 mg nitroglycerin sublingually in this randomized, cross-over study. Hemodynamic monitoring revealed a clear improvement in pre- and afterload parameters for both drugs (P less than 0.01 and P less than 0.001), while captopril induced a higher increase in cardiac index (+49.2% vs. +25%), stroke volume index (+53.5% vs. +25.7%), and stroke work index (+55% vs. +28%) than nitroglycerin (P less than 0.001). Although not statistically significant, the onset of change for most hemodynamic parameters was measured earlier after nitroglycerin (after 12-19 vs. 16-22 minutes). Captopril revealed later peak effects (after 47-84 vs. 25-55 minutes, P less than 0.001) and a longer sustained improvement in hemodynamic values (return to baseline values after 117-162 vs. 68-120 minutes, P less than 0.001). No side effects occurred after either captopril or nitroglycerin in this study. Thus, these results indicate there is an early improvement in hemodynamic parameters after the sublingual administration of both drugs in patients with severe congestive heart failure, and that captopril induces a more pronounced and prolonged improvement than nitroglycerin.

Administration, Sublingual↗
PubMed1994

[FDDF (fast dissolving dosage form) piroxicam for sublingual administration in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis].

Open non-comparative study for the evaluation of the efficacy and tolerance of piroxicam FDDF for sublingual administration in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Thirty patients (6 males and 24 females) suffering from rheumatoid arthritis in the active phase have been treated. All the patients had to fulfil the criteria for the rheumatoid arthritis classification proposed by the American Rheumatism Association (ARA). The efficacy of therapy has been evaluated, after 2, 4 and 6 week of treatment, through the changes in: the number of painful or tender joints on motion, the number of swollen joints, grip strength, ESR. Also day pain, night pain, duration of morning stiffness and functional index have been evaluated. As regards the functional index, activities as dressing, arising, eating, walking, taking care of hygiene, bending, standing and sitting have been considered. The study sample was composed by 30 patients, with a mean age of 59.73 years, suffering from rheumatoid arthritis from 4.76 years. As regards efficacy parameters, day pain, which is recorded on a 21 compartment visual analogue scale, was initially of 8.13 (+/- 3.73), and after 2 weeks of therapy decreased of about 1 point and after 4 weeks was of 6.57 (+/- 3.73). This improvement was already statistically significant at the first control (p = 0.01). At the first control also morning stiffness resulted improved in a statistically significant way (p < 0.0001). As regards functional index a statistically significant improvement was observed in the disability of walking and of picking up objects after 2 weeks; after 4 weeks a significant improvement was observed in the disability of arising and of bending. These changes in functional ability probably depend upon the kind of joint involved and the duration of these lesions. Also the grip strength resulted statistically improved at the 2 control. As regards objective values, there was a statistically significant improvement in tender and swollen joints after only 2 weeks. As regards ESR, which is an index of disease activity, was initially of 40.73 (+/- 16.75) in mean; at the end of the 6th week it was of 34.72 (+/- 15.13): this reduction was statistically significant. No improvement was observed in night pain, normally the pain form which is more difficult to cure. As regards toleration, only 2 patients reported side-effects: the first reported epigastralgia and the second oral burning Both side-effects lasted 1 day and, according to the physician, their relation with the study drug is not sure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Administration, Sublingual↗
PubMed1996

Dextromoramide pharmacokinetics following sublingual administration.

The extent of absorption and other pharmacokinetic parameters of dextromoramide following sublingual administration were assessed in five patients receiving chronic opioid analgesia. The use of the standard 5 mg tablet formulation was associated with negligible absorption in two patients, a prolonged time to peak concentration in the other three and substantial variability in clearance. The study concluded that the standard tablet formulation cannot be recommended for sublingual use where reliable, rapid onset analgesia is required.

Absorption↗
PubMed2006

Comparison of oxycodone pharmacokinetics after buccal and sublingual administration in children.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated and compared the pharmacokinetics of two oral administration routes of oxycodone parenteral liquid (10 mg/mL)--single buccal and sublingual administration--in 30 generally healthy awake children, aged 6-91 months. METHODS: Two groups of children undergoing inpatient surgery were enrolled. In a randomised fashion, children received a single dose of oxycodone 0.2 mg/kg buccally (n = 15) or sublingually (n = 15). Regular blood samples were collected for up to 12 hours, and plasma was analysed for oxycodone, oxymorphone and noroxycodone using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Bioavailability was similar after administration at the two instillation sites. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUCinfinity) was 2400-8000 ng x min/mL (median 4200 ng x min/mL) in the buccal group and 2700-7900 ng x min/mL (median 5500 ng x min/mL) in the sublingual group. After buccal administration, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was 5.4-39 ng/mL (16 ng/mL) after buccal and 5.5-42 ng/mL (22 ng/mL) after sublingual administration. Twelve of the 15 children in both groups reached the oxycodone analgesic concentration of 12 ng/mL, which was sustained for 43-209 minutes (median 160 minutes) in the children with buccal oxycodone and for 32-262 minutes (median 175 minutes) in the children with sublingual oxycodone. The terminal elimination half-lives were closely similar in the two groups: 104-251 minutes (median 140 minutes) in the buccal group and 110-190 minutes (150 minutes) in the sublingual group. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that in young children the absorption of oxycodone is similar after buccal and sublingual instillation.

Administration, Buccal↗