PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Anesthesia”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Can local anesthesia be recommended for routine use in elective knee arthroscopy? A comparison between local, spinal, and general anesthesia.

Local anesthesia (LA) for outpatient knee arthroscopy is not a standard procedure at most hospitals. To evaluate the LA technique for knee arthroscopy on medically healthy patients, this study compared 3 anesthesia techniques. Four hundred patients were randomized to either local (n = 200), general (n = 100), or spinal (n = 100) anesthesia. Evaluated outcomes included the patient's subjective view of the procedure, and nausea and pain at rest and during active movement. All variables were recorded perioperatively and postoperatively. In addition, the performing surgeon's opinion of the degree of patient pain and the technical difficulty of the procedure were noted. Three hundred forty-two patients completed the study. In the group receiving local anesthesia (n = 180) the median visual analog scale pain score during surgery was 6 mm (mean, 17.5; SD, 23.2; range, 0 to 100 mm). Twenty-one LA patients would have preferred another form of anesthesia. In 29 patients, LA was not considered as the optimal anesthesia by the performing surgeon. Eight LA patients agreed with the surgeon that the anesthesia method used was not optimal, of these patients, 5 had synovitis (3%). In 5% of the LA patients there were technical problems. Thus, this study shows that elective knee arthroscopy can be performed under local anesthesia in 92% of the patients from a technical point of view. Excluding patients who do not choose local anesthesia and those who have hypertrophic synovitis preoperatively, knee arthroscopies can be performed as safely and effectively under local anesthesia as under any other form of anesthesia. For most patients, local anesthesia can be recommended as the standard procedure for outpatient knee arthroscopy.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Cardiovascular reflexes during anesthesia induction and tracheal intubation in elderly patients: the influence of thoracic epidural anesthesia.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine whether thoracic epidural anesthesia performed prior to general anesthesia provides hemodynamic protection from the stress of laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation; to access the autonomic reflex response to epidural anesthesia, general anesthesia, and airway stimulation. DESIGN: Randomized unblind, controlled study. PATIENTS AND SETTING: 20 elderly (over 60) patients scheduled for colonic or gastric surgery at a university medical center. INTERVENTIONS: All patients (n = 10, in each group) underwent a standardized anesthesia induction sequence that included fentanyl 2 micrograms/kg, thiopental sodium 3 to 5 mg/kg (up to loss of eyelid reflex), and vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg followed by laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Before general anesthesia, thoracic epidural anesthesia was performed with plain 1% lidocaine in the epidural group. Preoperatively, baroreflex function was assessed by the Valsalva maneuver and the cough test. Spectral analysis of heart rate (HR) variability was performed before as well as during anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were no differences between the two groups in basal hemodynamics autonomic reflex status. Thoracic epidural anesthesia (median upper level at T2, median lower level at L2) was associated with stable hemodynamics, preservation of baroreflex sensitivity, and increased ratio of low to high frequency (LF/HF) components of HR variability, suggesting withdrawal of vagal activity. In both groups, general anesthesia induction was associated with decreased total HR variability and tracheal intubation was followed by increased LF/HF ratio, reflecting cardiac sympathetic activation. Patients with thoracic epidural anesthesia presented significant attenuation of the maximal rise in mean arterial pressure, and the increase in HR tended to be lower although not significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic epidural blockade combined with general anesthesia was associated with preserved baroreflex function, and it afforded hemodynamic protection during laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

[Anesthesia in ear surgery. A resource economical analysis and patient assessment of general anesthesia versus local anesthesia in ear surgery].

Although it has long been known that surgery on the middle ear may be carried out under local anaesthesia (LA), the majority of ear operations in Denmark are carried out under general anaesthesia (GA). A prospective review is presented of 103 ear operations of which 71 were undertaken under local anaesthesia and 32 under general anaesthesia. Local anaesthesia has considerable advantages as compared with general anaesthesia, particularly that the anaesthetic capacity is released and can be employed for other purposes. Employment of local anaesthesia does not present any disadvantages for the surgeon and the procedure appears to be acceptable for the majority of patients. In order not to bring the procedure into disrepute, patients should be assessed meticulously preoperatively by an experienced surgeon so that operation under local anaesthesia is not performed in unsuitable patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Use of the laryngeal mask airway in combination with regional anesthesia facilitates induction and emergence from general anesthesia in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is selected as an alternative to the endotracheal tube (ETT) when rapid recovery from general anesthesia is considered. However, the clinical significance of this airway for abdominal surgery is unclear. Thus, we evaluated whether the LMA, in combination with regional anesthesia, facilitates the induction of and emergence from general anesthesia in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Anesthesia-controlled time in a ETT/Epidural Anesthesia (EA) group [n = 11; general anesthesia, combined with epidural anesthesia, was maintained by sevoflurane (< 3%) supplemented with a fixed rate of propofol (3 mg/kg/h) under controlled ventilation using the ETT] was compared with that in a LMA/Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia (CSEA) group [n = 10; in combination with spinal-epidural anesthesia, general anesthesia was maintained as the same protocol as the ETT/EA under spontaneous ventilation using the LMA]. Time for airway placement in the LMA/CSEA group was significantly shorter than that in the ETT/EA group. Intervals from the end of surgery until the removal of the airway or the decision to exit the operating room in the LMA/CSEA group were shorter than those in the ETT/EA group. No practical sign of aspiration pneumonia and/or atelectasis was found in patients in either group. Under the circumstance of regional anesthesia being requested for post-surgical pain management, we concluded that the LMA facilitated the emergence from as well as the induction of anesthesia without any practical complication when used for patients in colorectal surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Recovery of cognitive function after remifentanil-propofol anesthesia: a comparison with desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia.

UNLABELLED: We compared the recovery characteristics of remifentanil, desflurane, and sevoflurane when used for anesthesia in elective operative procedures. Sixty ASA physical status I and II patients, aged 18-65 yr, were randomly assigned to receive remifentanil-propofol, desflurane-N2O, or sevoflurane-N2O anesthesia. Before the induction of anesthesia, the patients of the desflurane and sevoflurane groups received fentanyl 2 microg/kg. In all groups, anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained either with remifentanil 0.25 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1), desflurane, or sevoflurane 0.85 MAC with 65% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Anesthetics were titrated to achieve an adequate level of surgical anesthesia and to maintain mean arterial pressure within 20% of baseline values. Early recovery times and a modified Aldrete Recovery Score > 9 were recorded. Trieger Dot Test and Digit Substitution Test (DSST) were performed the day before surgery and in the postanesthesia care unit to evaluate intermediate recovery. The remifentanil-propofol group had a significantly faster emergence than desflurane or sevoflurane, with no difference between both inhaled anesthetics. Thirty min after anesthesia administration, patients in the remifentanil-propofol and in the desflurane groups gave significantly more correct responses in the DSST compared with sevoflurane (remifentanil 87%, desflurane 83%, sevoflurane 56%), the impairment in the sevoflurane patients corresponding to the effects of a blood alcohol level of approximately 0.1% and, thus, being of clinical importance. Ninety minutes after anesthesia administration, no significant difference could be demonstrated among the groups in the DSST scores. Emergence and return of cognitive function was significantly faster after remifentanil-propofol compared with desflurane and sevoflurane up to 60 min after anesthesia administration. IMPLICATIONS: We compared awakening and intermediate recovery times after remifentanil-propofol anesthesia to desflurane-N2O and sevoflurane-N2O anesthesia. Emergence and return of cognitive function was significantly faster after remifentanil-propofol compared with desflurane and sevoflurane up to 60 min after anesthesia administration.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Reduction of anesthesia process times after the introduction of an internal transfer pricing system for anesthesia services.

To improve operating room workflow, an internal transfer pricing system (ITPS) for anesthesia services was introduced in our hospital in 2001. The basic principle of the ITPS is that the department of anesthesia receives reimbursement only for the surgically controlled time, not for anesthesia-controlled time (ACT). A reduction in anesthesia process times is therefore beneficial for the anesthesia department. In this study, we analyzed the ACT (with its parts: preparation before induction, induction, extubation, and recovery room transfer) for 3 yr before and 3 yr after the introduction of the ITPS in 55,776 cases. Furthermore, the anesthesia cases were subsegmented into 10 different anesthesia techniques, and the process times were studied. The average total ACT was reduced from 40.4 +/- 23.5 min in 1998 to 34.3 +/- 21.7 min in 2003. The main effect came from reductions in anesthesia preparation time and recovery room transfer time, whereas induction and extubation time changed little. A significant reduction in average ACT was seen in 7 of 10 analyzed anesthesia techniques, ranging from 4 to 18 min. We conclude that transfer pricing of anesthesia services based on the surgically controlled time can be a successful approach to reduce anesthesia process times.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed1979

Effect of althesin anesthesia on blood loss during therapeutic abortion. A comparison with local and thiopental anesthesia.

During recent years, the use of steroid anesthesia has rapidly increased. In our hospital, a number of surgical procedures have been performed under Althesin anesthesia, and in some cases the peroperative bleeding seemed to be rather profuse. Blood loss was studied in 90 healthy women in the first trimester of pregnancy undergoing therapeutic abortion using different types of anesthesia. The patients were divided into three equal groups according to the duration of pregnancy. In each group, 10 patients underwent operation under local anesthesia, 10 under thiopental anesthesia and 10 under Althesin. In all three groups, blood loss was the smallest when local anesthesia was used (Fig 1). Amounting to only one third to one half of that occurring under thiopental anesthesia. Under thiopental anesthesia the blood loss gradually increased with increasing gestational age with moderate variations. Alternatively, in this investigation, Althesin anesthesia was characterized by pronounced blood loss, particularly in the ninth and tenth weeks of pregnancy, and in some cases by rather profuse bleeding. We find that Althesin anesthesia should be used for gynecological surgery only in departments which are equipped to control profuse bleeding and possible cardiovascular complications.

Abortion, Therapeutic↗
PubMed2001

No-anesthesia clear corneal phacoemulsification versus topical and topical plus intracameral anesthesia. Randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the intraoperative pain scores during clear corneal phacoemulsification under no anesthesia, topical anesthesia, and topical plus intracameral anesthesia. SETTING: Dr. Agarwal's Eye Hospital and Eye Research Center, Chennai, India. METHODS: Seventy-five patients were randomized to have phacoemulsification under no anesthesia, topical anesthesia, or topical plus intracameral anesthesia. Uncooperative or illiterate patients and those with hard cataract, a shallow anterior chamber, or small pupils were excluded. A protocol was established for supplemental anesthesia in case of breakthrough pain during the surgery. Each patient was asked to grade the overall severity of intraoperative pain immediately after surgery on a 10-point visual analog scale. Also evaluated were the general discomfort during surgery, discomfort from the microscope lights, surgeon stress during surgery, and total surgical time. Comparison among the 3 groups was performed using an analysis of variance. RESULTS: No supplemental anesthesia was required in any group. No significant difference was noted in the mean scores of the subjective sensation of pain with or without topical anesthesia (P =.610). The mean scores of patient discomfort from the microscope lights and surgical time were also statistically insignificant. Patient discomfort and surgeon stress during surgery were significantly greater in the no-anesthesia group than in the topical and topical plus intracameral groups (P =.0235 and P = 0.0206, respectively). CONCLUSION: No-anesthesia clear corneal phacoemulsification was performed by a highly experienced, skilled surgeon without causing an unacceptable level of pain. However, this technique is not suitable for every cataract surgeon or patient.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

[Systematic recording of perioperative events associated with anesthesia as quality indicator in ambulatory anesthesia].

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the quality of several anesthetic techniques used for major outpatient surgery in our hospital, by quantifying for each the relative risk (RR) of adverse events during anesthesia and in the postoperative period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand seventeen patients who underwent surgery between 18 May 1998 and 23 October 1998 were studied retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 52.27 +/- 24.65 yr; 44.18% were ASA I, 40.56% were ASA II, 14.56% ASA III and 0.67% ASA IV. Mean time of surgery was 33 +/- 16.49 min and mean recovery time until discharge was 77.3 +/- 93.4 min. Admission was necessary for 0.6% of the patients and re-admission for 0.3%. General anesthesia was used with 19%, anesthetic monitoring with 17%, regional anesthesia (including peribulbar) with 46% and local anesthesia plus sedation with 16.6%. In 95% of the cases, no adverse events occurred during anesthesia; in 94.8% no such events occurred during the early recovery period. During surgery and postoperative recovery, intradural anesthesia was associated with significantly greater RR of adverse events in comparison with general anesthesia (6.6 and 2.2 respectively) and in comparison with monitored anesthesia (7.2 and 3.3). No differences in RR were found between general anesthesia and monitored anesthesia. Problems were slight to moderate in severity and mainly related to nausea and vomiting (2%). CONCLUSIONS: Recording perioperative events permits evaluation of the quality of anesthesic procedures. Intradural anesthesia is associated with more complications.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

[Cause of hypotension during spinal anesthesia--the relation between the level of anesthesia and the hypotension].

A retrospective study was conducted on the cause of hypotension during spinal anesthesia and also on the relation between the level of anesthesia and the hypotension. Two hundred twenty three patients who had received spinal anesthesia for gynecological surgery were divided into two groups. Group I consisted of 87 patients with a significant decrease in blood pressure, while group II consisted of 136 patients with no significant decrease in blood pressure. First, the age, dosage of spinal anesthesia, amount of preoperative transfusion, and level of spinal anesthesia were reviewed and compared between the group I and II. Next, all the patients were classified by the level of spinal anesthesia, and the degree of decrease in blood pressure and the frequency of a significant decrease in blood pressure were examined by each level of spinal anesthesia. Only the level of spinal anesthesia was found to differ significantly between the group I and II. The degree of hypotension was greater at higher levels of spinal anesthesia. More than 50% of the patients with T5 or higher levels of anesthesia had a significant decrease in blood pressure. We conclude that the cause of the significant decrease in blood pressure during high spinal anesthesia is in most part due to the blockade of the cardiac sympathetic nerve.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Local anesthesia and midazolam versus spinal anesthesia in ambulatory pilonidal surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate two anesthetic techniques, namely, local anesthesia with sedation, and spinal anesthesia, with respect to recovery times, postoperative side effects, pain scores, patient satisfaction, and hospital costs for ambulatory pilonidal disease surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. SETTING: University Hospital of Pamukkale. PATIENTS: 60 consenting patients scheduled for pilonidal disease operation with Limberg flap technique. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Group 1 (n = 30) received spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 1.5 mL 0.5%, and Group 2 (n = 30) received local infiltration with a 50-mL mixture containing 10 mL bupivacaine 0.5%, 10 mL prilocaine HCl 2%, and 30 mL isotonic solution with 1:200,000 epinephrine in combination with intravenous (i.v.) midazolam sedation. MEASUREMENTS: Perioperative and postoperative side effects, patient satisfaction, preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and VAS scores from the fourth hour postoperatively until the seventh day were assessed. Anesthesia, operation, surgery, and total hospital time, and costs (drug, resources, and labor) were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: No difference was found between groups in the frequency of side effects. Urinary retention was diagnosed in two patients in the spinal anesthesia group. There was no statistical significant difference seen in satisfaction scores between groups. No statistical significance in VAS pain scores between groups was noted except for the fourth postoperative hour values. The average time spent in the operating room (OR) was greater in the spinal anesthesia group. All Group 2 patients achieved fast-tracking criteria in the OR and were able to bypass the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Total hospital time and total cost were significantly higher in the spinal anesthesia group than local anesthesia-sedation group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of local anesthesia-sedation for ambulatory anorectal surgery resulted in a shorter hospital time, lower hospital costs, and no side effects compared with spinal anesthesia.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

[A clinical report of 11 years' experience of anesthesia for cesarean section (n = 721)--particularly spinal anesthesia (n = 648)--in a hospital outpatient clinic].

Experience with anesthesia for cesarean sections in a small obstetric and gynecology clinic attached to a general hospital is reported. The course of cases and the particular circumstances are described. During a period of 11 years 721 cesarean sections were performed, 643 (90%) under hyperbaric spinal anesthesia. The remaining operations were performed under general anesthesia. The distribution of elective and emergency cases to the different anesthetic methods is shown. In the early years size G22 needles where most frequently used, while later size G25 was used. The average extent of anesthesia with spinal anesthetic agents was to T 6.2 +/- 1.4. Some indications for intubation anesthesia and special features of spinal anesthetics are listed. The Apgar scores were 8.3 for 1 min and 9.5 for 5 min. In contrast to the patients operated on under general anesthesia, the majority of the patients treated during spinal anesthesia received (prophylactic) hypotensive treatment. There were no severe complications or deaths related to anesthesia. Some important points related to spinal anesthesia for cesarean sections are mentioned. The results show that with attention to detail and observation of correct procedures by qualified anesthetists, the vast majority of cesarean sections can be done very successfully under spinal anesthesia.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed1993

Physiologic responses to hyperthermia during epidural anesthesia and combined epidural/enflurane anesthesia in women.

BACKGROUND: During combined epidural/isoflurane anesthesia, the core temperature triggering finger-tip vasoconstriction is approximately 1 degree C less than that triggering redilation. This hysteresis suggests that thermoregulatory responses are not dependent entirely on current thermal status (state-dependence), but may be influenced also by the system's recent thermal history (direction-dependence). Once triggered, the gain and maximum response intensity of many thermoregulatory responses is nearly normal during isoflurane anesthesia. However, it remains unknown whether preserved gain and maximum response intensities are a characteristic paradigm describing thermoregulatory responses to general anesthetics. Also unknown is whether the sweating and pre-capillary vasodilation thresholds are comparably impaired by different volatile anesthetics. Accordingly, the authors tested the hypotheses that, during one minimum alveolar concentration of enflurane anesthesia: (1) there is a direction-dependent hysteresis for sweating; (2) the sweating and active vasodilation thresholds increase approximately 1.2 degrees C, as they do during one minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane; and (3) the gain and maximum intensity of sweating are well preserved. METHODS: Six female volunteers each were studied on 2 days, once during epidural anesthesia alone and once with combined enflurane (1.7%)/epidural anesthesia. On each study day, core hyperthermia was induced by cutaneous warming restricted to the legs. Warming continued until chest sweating reached maximal values; the volunteers then were cooled gradually until sweating stopped. The core temperature at which the sweating rate departed from baseline values was considered the activation threshold. Gain was expressed as the slope of the sweating rate versus core temperature curve within the range 25-75% of the maximum sweating rate. Hysteresis was evaluated by subtracting the tympanic membrane temperature at which the sweating rate suddenly increased during warming (approximately 25% above baseline values) from that at which sweating precipitously decreased during cooling (approximately 75% of maximum values). RESULTS: The sweating threshold was 1.4 +/- 0.7 degrees C higher during combined enflurane/epidural anesthesia than during epidural anesthesia alone. Maximum intensity was approximately 700 g.m-2.h-1, and the gain approximately 1,300 g.m-2.h-1.degrees C-1 during each treatment. No hysteresis was detected on either study day. CONCLUSIONS: One minimum alveolar concentration of enflurane increased the sweating threshold only slightly more than previously reported for isoflurane. As in previous studies of sweating and vasoconstriction during isoflurane anesthesia, gain and maximum response intensity were well preserved during enflurane anesthesia. An increase in the interthreshold range (temperatures not triggering thermoregulatory responses), with little change in gain and maximum response intensities, appears to be the typical effect of volatile anesthetics. Sweating during enflurane anesthesia appears to be state-dependent and little influenced by the direction of core temperature perturbations.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Epidural ropivacaine anesthesia decreases the bispectral index during the awake phase and sevoflurane general anesthesia.

The sedative effects of epidural anesthesia without volatile and IV anesthetics and quantification of the degree of epidural anesthesia-induced sedation have not been investigated. In the current study we evaluated the effects of epidural anesthesia on the bispectral index (BIS) during the awake phase and during general anesthesia. After placing the epidural catheter, the patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups receiving either 5 mL of epidural saline (group S) or the same volume of 0.75% ropivacaine (group R). The BIS measurements during the awake phase were performed at 7, 12, 13, 14, 22, and 23 min after the epidural injection. General anesthesia was then induced with propofol and vecuronium and maintained with 0.75% sevoflurane. From approximately 10 min after tracheal intubation, the BIS measurements were made at 1-min intervals for 10 min. The BIS during the awake phase was significantly lower in group R than in group S (P < 0.05). The BIS during general anesthesia was significantly lower in group R than in group S (P < 0.0001). Epidural anesthesia decreased the BIS during the awake phase and during general anesthesia. The decrease of the BIS associated with epidural anesthesia was more prominent during general anesthesia than during the awake phase.

Aged↗