PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Anesthesia, Intravenous”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Recovery after total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using propofol and inhalation anesthesia (IA) using halothane in day case surgery.

The aims of this study were to compare recovery by clinical tests, the Perceptual Speed Test (PST) and the Ball Bearing Test (BBT), home recovery, side effects and satisfaction of anesthesia between total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and inhalation anesthesia using halothane in day case surgery and to determine average cost per case of each technique from the provider's the perspective. Forty patients were randomly allocated into TIVA and IA groups. The anesthetic times were 42.1 +/- 26.47 minutes and 37.6 +/- 14.75 minutes respectively. Recovery was assessed by the time to orientation, sitting up, standing up and to success in obtaining baseline values of the PST & BBT. The observer was blinded to the anesthetic technique that the patient received. Recovery tests showed no difference between the two groups. The recovery times of TIVA and IA as assessed by the PST and BBT were 1.2 +/- 0.41 and 1.1 +/- 0.31 hour respectively. From a home questionnaire, both groups showed no difference in the first 2-3 hours of home recovery, incidence of side effects and satisfaction of anesthesia. When asked about the difficulty in getting home, no TIVA patients complained of sleepiness whereas 6/16 IA patient did (p = 0.018). The average cost per case of TIVA and IA was 642.15 and 363.15 bahts respectively.

Administration, Inhalation↗

[Comparison of requirement for postoperative analgesics after inhalation and total intravenous anesthesia].

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the requirement for postoperative analgesics in 88 patients undergoing abdominal total hysterectomy with inhalation anesthesia or with total intravenous anesthesia. METHODS: Anesthesia was induced in the inhalation anesthesia (GOS, n = 52) group with propofol and fentanyl, and maintained with sevoflurane, nitrous oxide balanced with oxygen, and additional administrations of fentanyl up to 0.2 mg in total. The patients in the total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA, n = 36) group were managed with target controlled infusion for propofol and intermittent administration of fentanyl. Effect site concentrations of fentanyl at the end of surgery were calculated using a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model. We divided the postoperative time course and evaluated the types, dosages, and prescription times of postoperative analgesics in each. RESULTS: Both total dosage and effect-site concentration of fentanyl were higher in the TIVA group than in the GOS group, and total prescription time in the TIVA group was significantly less during the 24 hrs after the operation. Supplemental prescription intervals of buprenorphine were significantly less in the TIVA group. Since administration of fentanyl during operation was adequate, patients in the TIVA group were considered to be in a sufficient analgesic state at the end of operation. CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative pain can be reduced with TIVA.

Adult↗