PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Antibiotic Prophylaxis”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery.

Antibiotic prophylaxis is generally administered either to prevent wound infection or to hinder the development of endocarditis. Although the use of antibiotics in certain circumstances to prevent wound infection can be straightforward, there are other circumstances in which the decision to use antibiotics is much less clear. Endocarditis prophylaxis has traditionally been based on the American Heart Association's guidelines, which do not cover dermatologic surgery. This article discusses the rationale and controversies surrounding the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of both wound infection and endocarditis, reviews the few studies that pertain to dermatology, and provides recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis on a case-by-case basis for those who perform dermatologic surgery.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Upper genital tract isolates at delivery as predictors of post-cesarean infections among women receiving antibiotic prophylaxis.

The introduction of antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery has decreased the risk of postpartum endometritis and wound infection, but factors that contribute to prophylaxis failure are not understood. To determine factors that might contribute to postpartum infections following antibiotic prophylaxis, we cultured amniotic fluid, decidua, and chorioamniotic membrane specimens for anaerobic and facultative bacteria and for genital mycoplasmas at cesarean delivery. Women were assessed daily for the development of infections, and if endometritis developed, a protected endometrial culture was obtained. Postpartum endometritis developed in 16 and wound infection in four of 102 women. Infection rates were similar for women receiving cefotetan (N = 50) or cefoxitin (N = 52) for prophylaxis. The isolation of group B streptococcus (P less than .001) or Enterococcus faecalis (P = .03) from the upper genital tract at delivery was significantly associated with postpartum endometritis. Antibiotic-resistant organisms (other than enterococci) were recovered uncommonly at delivery or with postpartum infections. Group B streptococcus was susceptible to the prophylactic agents used, suggesting that virulence factors other than antibiotic resistance are important for the development of postpartum endometritis. Group B streptococcus, E faecalis, and bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis were recovered from the endometrium at the time of postpartum endometritis.

Bacterial Infections↗

Antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery.

Antibiotic prophylaxis is widely used in orthopaedic surgery although proof of its usefulness is lacking in some areas. The increasing use of joint replacement surgery and fracture fixation means that surgeons must examine the use of antibiotic prophylaxis very carefully. Its usefulness has been well demonstrated in joint replacement surgery although further work is required in traumatic orthopaedics. Additionally further investigation is required into the side effects and cost benefits of prophylaxis.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Antibiotic prophylaxis.

The appropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis is confusing for all surgeons and it is certainly not straight-forward for dermatologists. There are no set guidelines which encompass skin surgery. This article reviews antibiotic prophylaxis both to prevent wound infections and to prevent endocarditis. Some of the issues and controversies surrounding the use of antibiotic prophylaxis are discussed, and guidelines are provided which should be of assistance to those who perform dermatologic surgery.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Antibiotic prophylaxis: problems in paradise.

The age of antibiotic prophylaxis may be receding into its twilight years because the assumption upon which it was based has not proved generally true. Although antibiotics treat infections, limited benefit has been demonstrated in preventing infections. These are two entirely different biologic entities, a distinction which appears to have gone unappreciated by many for more than 50 years. If the principles of antibiotic prophylaxis established more than 40 years ago had been assiduously followed, many of its abuses could have been avoided. This may not have stopped our legal colleagues, but it would have been worth an effort on behalf of our patients. It is likely that the massive overuse of antibiotics as litigation prevention has contributed to the global epidemic of antibiotic-resistant micro-organisms and an unknown number of serious adverse effects to the antibiotics themselves. Even with this abuse, much money has still flowed from defendant to plaintiff. Substantial data exist that antibiotics do not prevent bacteremias. The absolute risk rate for bacterial endocarditis after dental treatment even in at-risk patients is very low. Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical infections requires specific dosing schedules (perioperative surgical prophylaxis) to be successful. Hopefully the difficulties presented herein regarding antibiotic prophylaxis will lead to their more enlightened use in the future.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

[Antibiotic prophylaxis in day surgery in dermatology].

Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of surgical wounds infections is still a matter of debate in dermatology. The authors have performed an open and randomized study on the prophylactic efficacy of azithromycin, 500 mg per os 1 h prior to the procedure in a dermosurgical office. The absence of postsurgical infections when the intervention has been executed in sites without risk of contamination both in the treated and no treated group, has demonstrated that, in the presence of correct prophylactic measures, no antibiotic prophylaxis is necessary. On the other hand, when the procedure has been performed in sites under risk of infection, the antibiotic prophylaxis has instead demonstrated a significant efficacy. The study has documented that azithromycin allows to efficacely prevent bacterical suprainfection with a good compliance of the patient in the cases in which dermosurgical activity is performed in sites with risk of infection (face, scalp, genitals, perineo, feet).

Adult↗

Questionnaire survey of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in Italian surgical departments.

Correct antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the incidence of postoperative infections. 600 questionnaires on perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis were sent to Italian Surgical Departments. Each questionnaire included a series of 17 multi-choice-questions concerning the specific approach of the department to: organization, type, timing, duration, auditing of prophylaxis. 435 departments (72.5%) responded to the questionnaire; 50 of these were blank, so 385 out of 435 (88.5%) were suitable for statistical evaluation. Results were as follows: 90.5% of departments perform some form of prophylaxis under the control, in 90.5% of cases, of surgeons; 89.3% differentiate antibiotics according to class of operation; 67.4% give the antibiotic preoperatively and prefer i.v. injection (61.0%), mostly in the ward (56.2%); in 33.3% of cases the prophylaxis is standard (more than 2 doses), but 55.8% of Italian surgeons do not give a boost-dose in operations longer than 3 h; 54.2% of patients receive a cephalosporin (mostly III generation), with a rotation of molecules in 53.9% of cases; 71.7% of departments register the incidence of infections, but only 43.2% control the patients 30 days after surgery; finally, 54.2% of departments work together with a bacteriology laboratory active 24 hours, while in 81.7% of cases the hospital has an Infection Committee which meets together usually without a programmed date (60.3%). In conclusion, antibiotic prophylaxis in Italian Surgery Departments appears adequate, even though some problems still remain regarding time-dose-duration-schedule, rotation of molecules, excess of cephalosporins, availability of a 24-h bacteriological laboratory and infection surveillance after discharge.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗

Antibiotic prophylaxis strategies in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is defined as a nosocomial pneumonia occurring > 48 h after endotracheal intubation. VAP may occur very early after intubation and it is usually defined as early-onset pneumonia, which occurs during the first 4 days. The occurrence of VAP is associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality. The pathogenesis of VAP often results from aspiration of colonised secretions in injured patients and this colonisation of the upper airway acts as a main risk factor in the development of pneumonia. It has been hypothesised that the bacterial inoculum may be decreased through the administration of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis. Antibiotic prophylaxis strategies to prevent VAP can be administered over an extended period to cover all microorganisms using selective digestive decontamination regimens, or in a short-term course of no more than 24 h. Probably, the second strategy is the most useful in the prevention of VAP because it has a lower impact on the emergence of bacterial resistance. This manuscript aims to review current opinions regarding antibiotic prophylaxis strategies in the prevention of VAP.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

[Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in visceral surgery--pro and contra].

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis aims at reducing the enormous cost of hospital-acquired infections. Primary indications for antibiotic prophylaxis are wounds of the clean-contaminated and contaminated category. Use of antibiotic prophylaxis in clean surgery is still very controversial. To be effective, the antibiotic must be given in the period immediately before incision. A single-dose application is at least as effective as a multiple-dose regimen. Second-generation cephalosporins are still the main stay of antibiotic prophylaxis. In colorectal surgery they should be combined with, e.g., Metronidazol.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗

[Antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section].

We investigated the guidelines for patient selection and drug regimens for use of antibiotic prophylaxis in relation to Caesarean section in the maternity clinics in Denmark. A questionnaire was sent to all the Danish maternity clinics that perform Caesarean section, concerning indications for use of antibiotic prophylaxis and antibiotic regimens to patients undergoing acute and elective Caesarean section. All departments (n = 48) returned the questionnaire. Twenty departments (46%) provided written guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis. Four departments (8%) used antibiotic prophylaxis in elective Caesarean sections, 25 departments (52%) used antibiotics in all emergency sections. In the presence of rupture of the membranes or prolongation of labour (> 12 hrs) 58 and 63% of the departments used antibiotic prophylaxis, respectively. The most frequent first choice drug was cefuroxim, employed by 27 departments (56%). Concerning timing, 21 departments (44%) gave antibiotics after cord clamping and 13 departments (27%) before incision. We propose a nation-wide prospective investigation on the rate of infections associated with Caesarean section to set up rational guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗

[Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Use in orthopaedics].

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopaedics is only indicated if a foreign body such as a prosthetic joint remains in the operation site. For this indication first or second generation cephalosporins should be preferred. It is essential to administer the antibiotic within 30 min before incision. In the case of an extended intervention (more than 3 h) a repeated dose should be considered. It is evidence-based that prolonged perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (more then 24 h) is not beneficial. To avoid the emergence of resistances or hygienic insufficiencies surveillance of surgical site infections should be enforced. Optimal conditions are necessary to achieve a rate of surgical site infection in orthopaedics below 1% in patients with normal infection risk profile.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Antibiotic prophylaxis influences cardiovascular stability in complicated surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Antibiotic prophylaxis is used in many surgical procedures but there are frequent cardiovascular instabilities following antibiotics in perioperative period. A clinic modelling randomised trial (CMRT) in pigs was developed to compare the effects of 2 commonly used antibiotic combinations on cardiovascular stability during major surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty pigs (both sexes) were randomised into 3 groups, receiving either saline (placebo), co-amoxiclav or cefuroxime/metronidazole in clinically relevant doses as antibiotic prophylaxis. A laparotomy was performed and the abdomen remained open. Surgical complications were simulated by removing one third of the blood volume. For fluid resuscitation, 500 ml hetastarch (HAES(TM)) were infused rapidly (therapy of complication) and polymyxin B (15 mg/kg bodyweight) was applied for induction of histamine release reactions (complication of therapy). The main end points were histamine release reactions, these were classified by 2 blinded investigators. RESULTS: Neither cardiovascular changes nor histamine release reactions were detected immediately after the administration of antibiotics or placebo alone. Plasma histamine concentrations increased after bleeding in the co-amoxiclav group (p < 0.05). After fluid resuscitation and induction of anaphylactoid reactions, the median histamine release and cardiovascular changes were not significantly different between the groups. However, the incidence of typical histamine release related reactions differed significantly between the groups: 8/10 for the controls, 6/10 in the co-amoxiclav and 2/10 in the cefuroxime/metronidazole group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The stability and reproducibility of this model clearly demonstrated the concept of a 'clinic modelling randomised trial' as a useful tool. Antibiotic prophylaxis influences the organism's capability to cope with intraoperative bleeding and fluid resuscitation problems. Indeed antibiotic prophylaxis may be beneficial. These effects of antibiotics could only be demonstrated in complex surgical models. Thus new antibiotics should be investigated in complex animal models prior to prospective randomised clinical trials or usage in clinical practice.

Animals↗

Should we offer antibiotic prophylaxis post sexual assault?

Our objective was to assess whether antibiotic prophylaxis should be offered to women post sexual assault by considering acceptability of prophylaxis, follow up attendance rates and the prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in these women. Retrospective case notes review of female survivors of rape or sexual assault attending the Rose Clinic, Ambrose King Centre, Royal London Hospital between 1 January 1997 and 31 May 1999 was carried out. The following selection criteria were applied: age greater than 16 years; attending within two weeks of assault; having experienced vaginal and/or anal penetration. All women were screened for STI using standard investigation methods detailed below. Antibiotic prophylaxis was offered within two weeks of the assault, the antibiotic regimens used as recommended. The women were invited to attend for results at two weeks and offered a further screen at three months post assault. Bacterial vaginosis was present in 32% of the women screened, Chlamydia trachomatis was identified in 8%, none tested positive for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Of the 25 women who were offered antibiotic prophylaxis, 88% accepted. Follow up attendances were 57% at two weeks and 30% at three months. Antibiotic prophylaxis was acceptable to women. Among recent rape victims, follow-up rates are low confirmed by our study. These factors support the use of antibiotic prophylaxis post sexual assault. There was an apparently high prevalence of STIs amongst women in this study. More research is required with respect to this aspect of the work and to consider the cost-benefit analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis.

Adolescent↗

Antibiotic prophylaxis in incisional hernia repair using a prosthesis.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean surgery with implantation of prosthetic material is widely accepted, although there are no studies on its use in abdominal incisional hernia repair. The objective was to evaluate antibiotic chemoprophylaxis in incisional herniorrhaphy with the implantation of prosthetic material. A prospective non-randomized study (1990-1998) was conducted to analyse 216 patients undergoing surgery for abdominal incisional hernia who required a prosthesis (polypropylene) in the reconstruction and who met the criteria for clean surgery. Risk factors were observed in 31.5%, the most frequent being diabetes and obesity. The incisional hernia was located mostly in the abdominal midline and in 64.4% measured over 10 cm. Antibiotic prophylaxis was administered in 140 patients (64.8%) via the systemic route, the antibiotics being first- or second-generation cephalosporins or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Surgical wound infection occurred in 39 patients (18.1%), 19 who had received antibiotic prophylaxis (13.6%) and 20 who had not (26.3%). In multivariate analysis using logistic regression, the variables with statistical significance for local septic infection were antibiotic prophylaxis and number of risk factors. We can conclude therefore that antibiotic chemoprophylaxis is useful in abdominal incisional herniorrhaphy surgery with implantation of prosthetic material for reducing local septic complications.

Aged↗

[Do guidelines bring an improvement in the perioperative course? A study of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis].

INTRODUCTION: Although the effectiveness of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is proven, it is not used adequately. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether hospital-based guidelines are useful tools to improve the management of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis. MATERIAL: In a retrospective study the actual quality of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis as given by the criteria choice of drugs, dosage, timing, continuation and 2nd dose after > 3 h was evaluated. After information and establishment of adequate guidelines we started a prospective analysis to test compliance and rate of adequate prophylaxis. Differences were calculated according to the chi 2-test with P < 0.05 significance niveau. RESULTS: The percentage of cases in which antibiotics were indicated but not administered was reduced from 15.5% to 8.4%. Compared to the result of the retrospective analysis, the prospective study showed a significantly higher percentage of adequately administered antibiotics (35.7% vs. 63.5%). This was mainly due to the compliance with dosage recommendations and to the 2nd dose in longer surgical procedures. DISCUSSION: Guidelines lead to a significant improvement in perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. To increase this effect, further approaches such as integration of guidelines into computer-based systems should be evaluated.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the guidelines for patient selection and drug regimens for application of antibiotic prophylaxis in relation to cesarean section in the maternity clinics in Denmark. METHODS: A questionnaire to all the Danish maternity clinics that perform cesarean section, concerning indications for application of antibiotic prophylaxis and antibiotic regimens to patients undergoing acute and elective cesarean section. RESULTS: All departments (n = 48) returned the questionnaire. Twenty departments (46%) provided written guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis. Four departments (8%) used antibiotic prophylaxis to elective cesarean sections, 25 departments (52%) applied antibiotics to all emergency sections. In the presence of the rupture of membranes or prolongation of labor (> 12 hrs) 58% and 63% of the departments applied antibiotic prophylaxis, respectively. The most infrequent first choice drug was cefuroxim, employed by 27 departments (56%). Concerning timing, 21 departments (44%) applied antibiotics after cord clamping and 13 departments (27%) before incision. CONCLUSION: We propose a nation-wide prospective investigation on the rate of infections associated with cesarean section to set up rational guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Is antibiotic prophylaxis for bacterial endocarditis cost-effective?

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic prophylaxis for bacterial endocarditis is recommended by the American Heart Association (AHA) before undergoing certain dental procedures. Whether such antibiotic prophylaxis is cost-effective is not clear. The authors' objective is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of predental antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with underlying heart disease. METHODS: The authors conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model to compare cost-effectiveness of 7 antibiotic regimens per AHA guidelines and a no prophylaxis strategy. The study population consisted of a hypothetical cohort of 10 million patients with either a high or moderate risk for developing endocarditis. RESULTS: Prophylaxis for patients with moderate or high risk for endocarditis cost $88,007/quality-adjusted life years saved if clarithromycin was used. Prophylaxis with amoxicillin and ampicillin resulted in a net loss of lives. All other regimens were less cost-effective than clarithromycin. For 10 million persons, clarithromycin prophylaxis prevented 119 endocarditis cases and saved 19 lives. CONCLUSION: Predental antibiotic prophylaxis is cost-effective only for persons with moderate or high risk of developing endocarditis. Contrary to current recommendations, our data demonstrate that amoxicillin and ampicillin are not cost-effective and should not be considered the agents of choice. Clarithromycin should be considered the drug of choice and cephalexin as an alternative drug of choice. The current published guidelines and recommendations should be revised.

Adult↗

Antibiotic prophylaxis in periodontal surgery. A retrospective study.

Antibiotics are frequently used in periodontal and minor oral surgery to prevent complications. The potential disadvantages of antibiotic prophylaxis are well documented. This study compares the incidence of complications for procedures performed with and without antibiotic prophylaxis. The clinical records of 1499 patients who received treatment at a university teaching hospital were reviewed. 1078 surgical procedures were done on 596 patients. 895 surgical procedures were done without prophylactic antibiotics, with 17 complications (1.9 per cent). 183 procedures were done using antibiotic prophylaxis, with 1 complication (0.55 per cent). The difference between the incidences of complications in the two groups was not statistically significant (P < 0.001). In view of the questionable benefits and potential disadvantages of using antibiotics, their routine use during or following periodontal surgery must be questioned.

Adolescent↗