PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Cannabinoids”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Spontaneous cannabinoid withdrawal produces a differential time-related responsiveness in cannabinoid CB1 receptor gene expression in the mouse brain.

This study aimed to examine the behavioural and neurochemical (cannabinoid CB1 receptor gene expression) changes induced by spontaneous cannabinoid withdrawal in mice. Tolerance was assessed by measuring rectal temperature and motor activity in the open-field test after CP-55, 940 administration. Cannabinoid withdrawal symptoms were determined by measuring motor activity and behavioural signs of abstinence. Cessation of CP-55, 940 treatment in tolerant mice induced a spontaneous time-dependent behavioural withdrawal syndrome consisting of marked increases (140%) in motor activity, number of rearings (170%), decreases in grooming (57%), wet dog shakes (73%) and rubbing behaviours (74%) on day 1, progressively reaching values similar to vehicle-treated mice on day 3. Interestingly, this spontaneous cannabinoid withdrawal resulted in CB1 gene expression upregulation (20-30%) in caudate-putamen, ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus, central amygdaloid nucleus and CA1, whereas in the CA3 field of hippocampus, a significant decrease (15-20%) was detected. Taken together, the results of this study suggest that cessation of CP-55, 940 administration in tolerant mice produces a behavioural cannabinoid withdrawal syndrome and a selective and differential responsiveness in CB1 receptor gene expression in several brain regions of the mice. These findings further suggest a time and regional differential role for cannabinoid receptors in short- and long-term neuroadaptations that occur after exposure to cannabis derivatives.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Regulation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the central nervous system by chronic cannabinoids.

Marijuana produces a number of characteristic behaviors in humans and animals, including memory impairment, antinociception, and locomotor and psychoactive effects. However, tolerance and dependence to cannabinoids develops after chronic use, as demonstrated both clinically and in animal models. The potential therapeutic benefits of certain cannabinoid-mediated effects, as well as the use of marijuana for its psychoactive properties, has raised interest in understanding the cellular adaptations produced by chronic administration of this class of drugs. The primary active constituent of marijuana, delta9-tetrahydrohydrocannabinol (THC), binds to specific G-protein-coupled receptors. The central nervous system (CNS) effects of THC are mediated by CB1 receptors, which couple primarily to inhibitory G-proteins. High levels of CB1 receptors are found in the basal ganglia, hippocampus, cortex, and cerebellum, consistent with the profile of behavioral effects. Studies over the past decade have determined that CB1 receptors undergo downregulation and desensitization following chronic administration of THC or synthetic cannabinoid agonists. In general, these adaptations are regionally widespread and of considerable magnitude, and are thought to contribute to tolerance to cannabinoid-mediated behavioral effects. Adaptation at the effector level has been more difficult to characterize, although it appears that alterations in cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and protein kinase A (PKA) activity may be particularly important in cannabinoid dependence. A striking characteristic of CB 1 receptor adaptation is the region dependence of the magnitude and rate of development of downregulation and desensitization. These regional differences may provide interesting insights into the mechanisms of CB1 receptors receptor signaling in different brain regions. Moreover, region-specific adaptations in CB1 receptors following chronic cannabinoid administration may produce differential adaptations at the in vivo level.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed1995

Construction of a steric map of the binding pocket for cannabinoids at the cannabinoid receptor.

In order to gain information about the topology of the brain cannabinoid receptor (CB1), a Receptor Steric (RS) Map for cannabinoids at this receptor was calculated. The classical cannabinoids (-)-11-hydroxy-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (K1 = 210 +/- 56 nM), (-)-9-nor-9-beta-hydroxy-hexahydrocannabinol (K1 = 124 +/- 17 nM), nabilone (K1 = 120 +/- 13 nM), and the non-classical cannabinoid, CP-55,244 (K1 = 1.4 +/- .3 nM) were used as template molecules. The RS map was obtained as the union of the van der Waals' volumes of only those accessible conformers identified by MMP2 calculations that were able to clear a region of steric interference at the CB1 receptor previously characterized by us [Reggio, P.H., Panu, A.M. and Miles, S. (1993), J. Med. Chem., 36, 1761-1771]. The utility of the RS Map was explored by screening the accessible conformers of the classical cannabinoid, cannabinol (CBN), (K1 = 3200 +/- 450 nM), for its ability to fit within the RS map. Only the global minimum energy conformer of CBN (53.2% abundance at 298K) was able to fit within the RS map. These results imply that one reason for the reduced affinity of CBN may be that only 53.2% of CBN molecules are shaped properly to fit in the binding pocket for cannabinoids at the CB1 receptor.

Brain Chemistry↗
PubMed1995

Structure-activity relationships defining the ACD-tricyclic cannabinoids: cannabinoid receptor binding and analgesic activity.

Previous studies of the structure-activity relationships (SAR) for binding of a series of AC-bicyclic cannabinoid structures to the cannabinoid receptors in rat brain (believed to comprise the CB1 subtype) demonstrated the importance of the A-ring aryl C-3 side chain and phenolic hydroxyl substituents, and elucidated the importance of a C-ring hydroxyalkyl substituent [Melvin et al. Mol. Pharmacol. 44, 1008-1015 (1993)]. The present investigation examines the SAR surrounding this region (D-ring) of the molecule that is not present in the structure of delta(9)-THC and other classical cannabinoid compounds. Both rigid fused ring benzo and cyclohexyl derivatives (creating the D-ring) retained binding affinity for the cannabinoid receptor. Extension of ketone or hydroxyl substituents from the C2 position of the D-ring resulted in a 3-fold increase in binding affinity over the unsubstituted structure. However, the fused ring structure is not critical for the interaction with the receptor in as much as opening the ring did not decrease the potency. Extension of the D-ring C-2 alcohol by one carbon in length resulted in a pair of structures, for which the greatest affinity for the CB1 receptor occurred for the hydroxymethyl group in the axial conformation [(+/-)-CP-55,244]. Upon resolution, the latter provided a pair of enantiomers: (-)-CP-55,244 was approximately 3-fold more potent than the racemic mixtures, and (+)-CP-55,244 failed to bind to the CB1 receptor with an IC50 below 1 mM. Opening of the D-ring of these structures resulted in a loss of binding affinity. This study demonstrates that the potency could be optimized in (-)-CP-55,244 for both binding to the CB1 receptor and the biological activity of analgesia. In addition, the rigid positioning of the hydroxypropyl moiety of CP-55,940 enforced by the decalin ring structure of CP-55,244 increased the enantioselectivity by greater than 100-fold. These data define the critical stereochemistry for a region of the nonclassical ACD-tricyclic cannabinoid structure that contributes a potential hydrogen bonding component to the ligand-receptor interaction mechanism. Inasmuch as this region of the molecule is not present on classical ABC-tricyclic cannabinoid compounds, these studies elucidate a unique agonist recognition site on the CB1 receptor.

Analgesics↗
PubMed1998

Cannabinoid-precipitated withdrawal: a time-course study of the behavioral aspect and its correlation with cannabinoid receptors and G protein expression.

To characterize the time course of the behavioral and biochemical aspects of the cannabinoid withdrawal syndrome, we injected the cannabinoid antagonist SR141716A (5 mg/kg i.p.) in rats made tolerant to CP-55,940 (0.4 mg/kg i.p., twice daily for 6.5 days), 1, 24 and 96 h after the last CP-55,940 injection. Because the CB1 receptor and G protein alpha subunit are involved in cannabinoid tolerance, we observed their changes throughout the brain during the withdrawal syndrome by use of in situ hybridization. In vehicle-pretreated rats SR141716A per se induced abnormal behavior significantly different from the vehicle group: wet dog shakes, forepaw fluttering and scratching. These signs remained significantly elevated even after the second and third antagonist doses. SR141716A significantly modified the mRNA levels of G alpha s and G alpha i subunits in some brain areas without affecting CB1 receptor and G alpha o expression. These findings led us to conclude that SR141716A may have intrinsic activity. Concerning cannabinoid withdrawal, the first SR141716A injection in tolerant rats resulted in behavioral signs different from those observed with the antagonist alone; this moderate withdrawal syndrome was characterized by turning, chewing and digging. Additional SR141716A doses 24 and 96 h later did not induce a significant abstinence syndrome. In situ hybridization after the first SR141716A injection showed that CB1 receptor and G protein alpha subunits, whose levels were low in tolerance, recovered their basal level of expression. Thus, the general desensitization of the cannabinoid receptor and of the transduction system in tolerance are recovered in abstinent rats and might be part of the molecular mechanisms underlying cannabinoid dependence.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Pharmacological evaluation of cannabinoid receptor ligands in a mouse model of anxiety: further evidence for an anxiolytic role for endogenous cannabinoid signaling.

Extracts of Cannabis sativa have been used for their calming and sedative effects for centuries. Recent developments in drug discovery have suggested that modulation of neuronal endogenous cannabinoid signaling systems could represent a novel approach to the treatment of anxiety-related disorders while minimizing the adverse effects of direct acting cannabinoid receptor agonists. In this study, we evaluated the effects of direct cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists and endocannabinoid-modulating drugs on anxiety-like behavior in mice using the elevated-plus maze. We found that the direct CB1 receptor agonists (1R,3R,4R)-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexan-1-ol (CP 55,940) (0.001-0.3 mg/kg) and 2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3[(4-morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo [1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazinyl]-(1-naphthalenyl)methanone mesylate) (WIN 55212-2) (0.3-10 mg/kg) increased time spent on the open arms (To) at low doses only. At the highest doses tested, both compounds altered overall locomotor activity. In contrast, Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (0.25-10 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent reduction in To. The endocannabinoid uptake/catabolism inhibitor 4-hydroxyphenylarachidonylamide (AM404) (0.3-10 mg/kg) produced an increase in To at low doses and had no effect at the highest dose tested. The fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor cyclohexyl carbamic acid 3'-carbamoyl-biphenyl-3-yl ester (URB597) (0.03-0.3 mg/kg) produced a monophasic, dose-dependent increase in To. The CB1 receptor antagonists N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide HCl (SR141716) (1-10 mg/kg) and N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (AM251) (1-10 mg/kg) produced dose-related decreases in To. These data indicate that activation of CB1 cannabinoid receptors reduces anxiety-like behaviors in mice and further support an anxiolytic role for endogenous cannabinoid signaling. These results suggest that pharmacological modulation of this system could represent a new approach to the treatment of anxiety-related psychiatric disorders.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Chronic delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol treatment produces a time-dependent loss of cannabinoid receptors and cannabinoid receptor-activated G proteins in rat brain.

Chronic treatment of rats with delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta9-THC) results in tolerance to its acute behavioral effects. In a previous study, 21-day delta9-THC treatment in rats decreased cannabinoid activation of G proteins in brain, as measured by in vitro autoradiography of guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thiotriphosphate) ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding. The present study investigated the time course of changes in cannabinoid-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding and cannabinoid receptor binding in both brain sections and membranes, following daily delta9-THC treatments for 3, 7, 14, and 21 days. Autoradiographic results showed time-dependent decreases in WIN 55212-2-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS and [3H]WIN 55212-2 binding in cerebellum, hippocampus, caudate-putamen, and globus pallidus, with regional differences in the rate and magnitude of down-regulation and desensitization. Membrane binding assays in these regions showed qualitatively similar decreases in WIN 55212-2-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding and cannabinoid receptor binding (using [3H]SR141716A), and demonstrated that decreases in ligand binding were due to decreases in maximal binding values, and not ligand affinities. These results demonstrated that chronic exposure to delta9-THC produced time-dependent and region-specific down-regulation and desensitization of brain cannabinoid receptors, which may represent underlying biochemical mechanisms of tolerance to cannabinoids.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

The CB1 cannabinoid receptor is the major cannabinoid receptor at excitatory presynaptic sites in the hippocampus and cerebellum.

Endocannabinoids work as retrograde messengers and contribute to short-term and long-term modulation of synaptic transmission via presynaptic cannabinoid receptors. It is generally accepted that the CB1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1) mediates the effects of endocannabinoid in inhibitory synapses. For excitatory synapses, however, contributions of CB1, "CB3," and some other unidentified receptors have been suggested. In the present study we used electrophysiological and immunohistochemical techniques and examined the type(s) of cannabinoid receptor functioning at hippocampal and cerebellar excitatory synapses. Our electrophysiological data clearly demonstrate the predominant contribution of CB1. At hippocampal excitatory synapses on pyramidal neurons the cannabinoid-induced synaptic suppression was reversed by a CB1-specific antagonist, N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (AM251), and was absent in CB1 knock-out mice. At climbing fiber (CF) and parallel fiber (PF) synapses on cerebellar Purkinje cells the cannabinoid-dependent suppression was absent in CB1 knock-out mice. The presence of CB1 at presynaptic terminals was confirmed by immunohistochemical experiments with specific antibodies against CB1. In immunoelectron microscopy the densities of CB1-positive signals in hippocampal excitatory terminals and cerebellar PF terminals were much lower than in inhibitory terminals but were clearly higher than the background. Along the long axis of PFs, the CB1 was localized at a much higher density on the perisynaptic membrane than on the extrasynaptic and synaptic regions. In contrast, CB1 density was low in CF terminals and was not significantly higher than the background. Despite the discrepancy between the electrophysiological and morphological data for CB1 expression on CFs, these results collectively indicate that CB1 is responsible for cannabinoid-dependent suppression of excitatory transmission in the hippocampus and cerebellum.

6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione↗
PubMed1996

Electrically evoked acetylcholine release from hippocampal slices is inhibited by the cannabinoid receptor agonist, WIN 55212-2, and is potentiated by the cannabinoid antagonist, SR 141716A.

This study examined the effect of the cannabinoid receptor agonist, WIN 55212-2, on the electrically evoked release of [14C]acetylcholine (ACh) from superfused brain slices from the hippocampus, a region with a high density of cannabinoid receptors. A comparison was also made with [14C]ACh release from the nucleus accumbens, which has relatively fewer cannabinoid receptors. In the hippocampal slices, WIN 55212-2 produced a dose-dependent inhibition of [14C]ACh release, with an EC50 of 0.03 microM and a maximal inhibition of 81% at 1 microM. In the nucleus accumbens slices, WIN 55212-2 produced a weak inhibition of [14C]ACh release, which did not quite reach statistical significance. The inhibition of electrically evoked hippocampal [14C]ACh release by WIN 55212-2 could be prevented by the cannabinoid receptor antagonist, SR 141716A (EC50, 0.3-1.0 microM). In addition to antagonizing the effects of WIN 55212-2, SR 141716A alone produced a 2-fold potentiation of the electrically stimulated [14C]ACh release in this region (EC50, 0.1-0.3 microM). By contrast, in nucleus accumbens slices, no potentiation of the stimulated release of [14C]ACh release by SR 141716A was observed. Basal [14C]ACh release was unaffected by WIN 55212-2 or SR 141716A in either area. These results suggest that cannabinoid receptor activation can produce a strong inhibition of ACh release in the hippocampus. Furthermore, the potentiation of ACh release in the hippocampus by SR 141716A alone suggests either that this compound is an inverse agonist at cannabinoid receptors or it is antagonizing the actions of an endogenous ligand acting on these receptors.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of cannabinoid ligands affinities and efficacies in murine tissues and in transfected cells expressing human recombinant cannabinoid receptors.

Affinities and efficacies of several reference cannabinoid ligands were investigated at central and peripheral cannabinoid receptors in three different species (rat, mouse, and human). The tested compounds belong to different chemical classes such as classical and non-classical terpene derivatives (Delta(8)-THC, Delta(9)-THC, HU 210, CP 55,940, CP 55,244, CP 55,243 and CP 47,947), aminoalkylindole (WIN 55,212-2, WIN 55,212-3) and diarylpyrazole cannabinoids (SR 141716A, SR 144528). As cannabinoid receptors have been shown to be mainly coupled to Gi/o type G- proteins, and by using the [(35)S]-GTPgammaS nucleotide binding modulation, we characterized the functional activity of these ligands which can act as agonists (positive intrinsic activity), partial agonists (partial positive intrinsic activity), antagonists (no intrinsic activity), or inverse agonists (negative intrinsic activity). To our knowledge, some derivatives (Delta(8)-THC, WIN 55,212-3, CP 55,243 and CP 47,947) have never been characterized in [(35)S]-GTPgammaS binding assays and up to now, this study represents the largest survey of reference cannabinoids performed in unique experimental conditions and in the same laboratory.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

CB(1) cannabinoid receptor antagonism promotes remodeling and cannabinoid treatment prevents endothelial dysfunction and hypotension in rats with myocardial infarction.

1. To study the long-term effects of altered cannabinoid receptor activity on myocardial and vascular function, Wistar rats were treated with the selective CB(1) antagonist AM-251 (0.5 mg kg(-1) d(-1)), the potent synthetic cannabinoid HU-210 (50 micro g kg(-1) d(-1)) or vehicle for 12 weeks after coronary artery ligation or sham operation. 2. AM-251 further reduced the pressure-generating capacity, shifted the pressure volume curve to the right (P<0.05) and increased the left-ventricular operating volume (AM-251: 930+/-40 micro l vs control: 820+/-40 micro l vs HU-210: 790+/-50 micro l; P<0.05) in rats with large myocardial infarction (MI). 3. Left-ventricular CB(1) immunoactivity in rats 12 weeks after large MI was unaltered as compared with noninfarcted hearts. 4. Cannabinoid receptor activation through HU-210, a cannabinoid that alters cardiovascular parameters via CB(1) receptors, increased the left-ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP, P<0.05). However, it prevented the drop in left-ventricular systolic pressure (HU-210: 142+/-5 mm Hg; P<0.05 vs control: 124+/-3 mm Hg; and P<0.001 vs AM-251: 114+/-3 mm Hg) and prevented endothelial dysfunction (ED) in aortic rings of rats with large MI (P<0.05). 5. Compared with AM-251, HU-210 prevented the decline in the maximal rate of rise of left-ventricular pressure and the maximum pressure-generating ability (P<0.05). In rats with small MI, HU-210 increased cardiac index (P<0.01) and lowered the total peripheral resistance (P<0.05). 6. The study shows that during the development of congestive heart failure post-large MI, cannabinoid treatment increases LVEDP and prevents hypotension and ED. Presumed CB(1) antagonism promotes remodeling despite unchanged myocardial CB(1) expression.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Inhibition of rat C6 glioma cell proliferation by endogenous and synthetic cannabinoids. Relative involvement of cannabinoid and vanilloid receptors.

The effects of the endocannabinoids anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) upon rat C6 glioma cell proliferation were examined and compared with a series of synthetic cannabinoids and related compounds. Cells were treated with the compounds each day and cell proliferation was monitored for up to 5 days of exposure. AEA time- and concentration-dependently inhibited C6 cell proliferation. After 4 days of treatment, AEA and 2-AG inhibited C6 cell proliferation with similar potencies (IC(50) values of 1.6 and 1.8 microM, respectively), whereas palmitoylethanolamide showed no significant antiproliferative effects at concentrations up to 10 microM. The antiproliferative effects of both AEA and 2-AG were blocked completely by a combination of antagonists at cannabinoid receptors (SR141716A and SR144528 or AM251 and AM630) and vanilloid receptors (capsazepine) as well as by alpha-tocopherol (0.1 and 10 microM), and reduced by calpeptin (10 microM) and fumonisin B(1) (10 microM), but not by L-cycloserine (1 and 100 microM). CP 55,940, JW015, olvanil, and arachidonoyl-serotonin were all found to affect C6 glioma cell proliferation (IC(50) values of 5.6, 3.2, 5.5, and 1.6 microM, respectively), but the inhibition could not be blocked by cannabinoid + vanilloid receptor antagonists. It is concluded that the antiproliferative effects of the endocannabinoids upon C6 cells are brought about by a mechanism involving combined activation of both vanilloid receptors and to a lesser extent cannabinoid receptors, and leading to oxidative stress and calpain activation. However, there is at present no obvious universal mechanism whereby plant-derived, synthetic, and endogenous cannabinoids affect cell viability and proliferation.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Down-regulation of cannabinoid-1 (CB-1) receptors in specific extrahypothalamic regions of rats with dietary obesity: a role for endogenous cannabinoids in driving appetite for palatable food?

Agonists at cannabinoid-1 (CB-1) receptors stimulate feeding and particularly enhance the reward aspects of eating. To investigate whether endogenous cannabinoids might influence appetite for palatable food, we compared CB-1 receptor density in the forebrain and hypothalamus, between rats fed standard chow (n=8) and others given palatable food (n=8) for 10 weeks to induce dietary obesity. CB-1 receptor density was significantly decreased by 30-50% (P<0.05) in the hippocampus, cortex, nucleus accumbens and entopeduncular nucleus of diet-fed rats. Furthermore, CB-1 receptor density in the hippocampus, nucleus accumbens and entopeduncular nucleus was significantly inversely correlated with intake of palatable food (r(2)=0.25-0.35; all P<0.05). By contrast, CB-1 receptor binding in the hypothalamus was low and not altered in diet-fed rats. CB-1 receptor down-regulation is consistent with increased activation of these receptors by endogenous cannabinoids. Acting in areas such as the nucleus accumbens and hippocampus, which are involved in the hedonic aspects of eating, cannabinoids may therefore drive appetite for palatable food and thus determine total energy intake and the severity of diet-induced obesity. However, cannabinoids in the hypothalamus do not appear to influence this aspect of eating behaviour.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Plant-derived, synthetic and endogenous cannabinoids as neuroprotective agents. Non-psychoactive cannabinoids, 'entourage' compounds and inhibitors of N-acyl ethanolamine breakdown as therapeutic strategies to avoid pyschotropic effects.

There is good evidence that plant-derived and synthetic cannabinoids possess neuroprotective properties. These compounds, as a result of effects upon CB(1) cannabinoid receptors, reduce the release of glutamate, and in addition reduce the influx of calcium following NMDA receptor activation. The major obstacle to the therapeutic utilization of such compounds are their psychotropic effects, which are also brought about by actions on CB(1) receptors. However, synthesis of the endogenous cannabinoids anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol, which also have neuroprotective properties, are increased under conditions of severe inflammation and ischemia, raising the possibility that compounds that prevent their metabolism may be of therapeutic utility without having the drawback of producing psychotropic effects. In this review, the evidence indicating neuroprotective actions of plant-derived, synthetic and endogenous cannabinoids is presented. In addition, the pharmacological properties of endogenous anandamide-related compounds that are not active upon cannabinoid receptors, but which are also produced during conditions of severe inflammation and ischemia and may contribute to a neuroprotective action are reviewed.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Neuroprotective properties of cannabinoids against oxidative stress: role of the cannabinoid receptor CB1.

Neuroprotective effects have been described for many cannabinoids in several neurotoxicity models. However, the exact mechanisms have not been clearly understood yet. In the present study, antioxidant neuroprotective effects of cannabinoids and the involvement of the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) were analysed in detail employing cell-free biochemical assays and cultured cells. As it was reported for oestrogens that the phenolic group is a lead structure for antioxidant neuroprotective effects, eight compounds were classified into three groups. Group A: phenolic compounds that do not bind to CB1. Group B: non-phenolic compounds that bind to CB1. Group C: phenolic compounds that bind to CB1. In the biochemical assays employed, a requirement of the phenolic lead structure for antioxidant activity was shown. The effects paralleled the protective potential of group A and C compounds against oxidative neuronal cell death using the mouse hippocampal HT22 cell line and rat primary cerebellar cell cultures. To elucidate the role of CB1 in neuroprotection, we established stably transfected HT22 cells containing CB1 and compared the protective potential of cannabinoids with that observed in the control transfected HT22 cell line. Furthermore, oxidative stress experiments were performed in cultured cerebellar granule cells, which were derived either from CB1 knock-out mice or from control wild-type littermates. The results strongly suggest that CB1 is not involved in the cellular antioxidant neuroprotective effects of cannabinoids.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Changes in the cannabinoid receptor binding, G protein coupling, and cyclic AMP cascade in the CNS of rats tolerant to and dependent on the synthetic cannabinoid compound CP55,940.

Chronic exposure to CP55,940 produced a significant down-regulation of cannabinoid receptors in the striatum, cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum of rat brain. At 24 h after SR141716-precipitated withdrawal, we observed a tendency to return to basal levels in the striatum and cortex, whereas the specific binding remained lower in the hippocampus and cerebellum. When we surveyed cannabinoid receptor-activated G proteins, in chronic CP55,940-treated rats the guanosine 5'-O:-(3-[(35)S]thiotriphosphate) ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding assay revealed a decrease of activated G proteins in the striatum, cortex, and hippocampus, whereas no significant changes were seen in the cerebellum. At 24 h after the SR141716-precipitated withdrawal, [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding increased compared with that of rats chronically exposed to CP55,940, attaining the control level except for cerebellum, where we observed a trend to overcome the control amounts. Concerning the cyclic AMP (cAMP) cascade, which represents the major intracellular signaling pathway activated by cannabinoid receptors, in the cerebral areas from rats chronically exposed to CP55,940 we found alteration in neither cAMP levels nor protein kinase A activity. In the brain regions taken from CP55, 940-withdrawn rats, we only observed a significant up-regulation in the cerebellum. Our findings suggest that receptor desensitization and down-regulation are strictly involved in the development of cannabinoid tolerance, whereas alterations in the cAMP cascade in the cerebellum could be relevant in the mediation of the motor component of cannabinoid abstinence.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Behavioral effects of cannabinoids show differential sensitivity to cannabinoid receptor blockade and tolerance development.

This study compared the potency and efficacy of the cannabinoids delta-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-THC), HU-210, WIN 55,212-2 and CP 55,940 in suppressing food-reinforced operant behavior, increasing reaction latency in a hot-plate test and inducing hypothermia, and tested whether these behavioral effects induced by CP 55,940 showed differential sensitivity to the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A, and to tolerance development. After acute i.p. administration to rats, operant behavior was more potently affected than reaction latency and body temperature, but the order of potency of the different drugs was similar across the tests: HU-210<CP 55,940<WIN 55,212-2=delta-THC. SR141716A blocked the hypothermic and analgesic effects more potently/efficiently than the response-rate suppressive effect of CP 55,940. After repeated administration of CP 55,940, the extent and speed of tolerance development was most pronounced in the hypothermia test, and least pronounced in the operant test. It is concluded that the more the behavioral effect induced by a cannabinoid receptor agonist is situated at the left-hand side of the dose-spectrum, the more the effect is resistant to blockade by a cannabinoid receptor antagonist and to the development of tolerance. The possible consequence of this observation for the therapeutic use of cannabinoids is discussed.

Analgesics↗