Endoscopic video capsules: radiologic findings of spontaneous entrapment in small intestinal diverticula.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Capsules↗
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Results for “Capsule Endoscopes”
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Capsule endoscopy regional transit abnormality: a sign of underlying small bowel pathology.
BACKGROUND: Wireless capsule endoscopy is being used increasingly to investigate GI bleeding of obscure etiology and other small bowel abnormalities. Currently, there is no standard for capsule endoscopy image interpretation and classification METHODS: This report describes an abnormality, termed "regional transit abnormality," noted during a review of capsule endoscopic images. Capsule regional transit abnormality simply refers to delayed capsule transit within a segment of small bowel, with or without visualization of a mucosal abnormality. The slowed transit usually is accompanied by mucosal collapse, sometimes with the appearance of the capsule pressing or impacting upon the mucosa. Regional transit abnormality usually persists more than 15 minutes CONCLUSIONS: Capsule regional transit abnormality is considered to be a "red flag" sign that indicates a likelihood of some underlying small bowel pathology.
Adult↗
Diagnostic yield and clinical outcomes after capsule endoscopy in 100 consecutive patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.
OBJECTIVES: The endoscopic capsule is a useful tool for visualizing the small bowel in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. In this study the authors evaluated the diagnostic aid provided by the endoscopic capsule, the factors predicting a significant finding and their impact on the patients' clinical evolution. METHODS: A total of 100 patients (52 men and 48 women, average age 64.4 years) underwent capsule endoscopy. Of this group, 52 patients presented with obscure-overt bleeding and 48 with obscure-occult bleeding. After an average follow-up time of 11.4 months, the clinical outcome was evaluated in 95 patients. RESULTS: The endoscopic capsule identified significant findings in 68% of patients. The most common diagnosis (33.8%) was angiodysplasias. The most important factor predicting significant findings was the previous need for transfusion in the overt bleeding group. As the result of the findings, a specific intervention was made in 75.8% of patients. At the end of follow-up, the clinical outcome was considered positive in 71.6% of patients. Capsule retention occurred in one patient, who required surgery. CONCLUSION: In patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, capsule endoscopy provides a high degree of diagnostic aid. The best candidates for this procedure are patients with obscure-overt bleeding who have required blood transfusions. Capsule endoscopy has a positive influence on an important proportion of patients, whether oriented towards new diagnostic techniques or towards a definitive treatment.
Adolescent↗
A comparison of endoscopic and capsule small intestinal biopsy techniques in children with upper gastrointestinal disorders.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the adequacy for histological diagnosis and morphometric analysis of small intestinal biopsies obtained by either endoscopic forceps or a capsule technique. METHODOLOGY: Small intestinal biopsies from 176 children were reviewed, 92 obtained by endoscopy and 84 by capsule. RESULTS: The adequacy for making a histological diagnosis was 96 and 81% for endoscopic and capsule biopsies, respectively, and for morphometric analysis it was 86 and 71%. There were more tissue specimens from children who had endoscopic compared with capsule biopsies (2.3 vs 1.8 specimens per patient). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic biopsies provide better specimens for histological diagnosis and endoscopy has the advantage of allowing macroscopic assessment of the upper gastrointestinal tract which can be of value in recognizing unexpected pathology and in identifying patchy mucosal changes.
Adolescent↗
An improved pressure-sensitive capsule for endoscopic measurement of esophageal variceal pressure.
A new small noninvasive pressure-sensitive capsule for the endoscopic measurement of esophageal varix pressure was evaluated and compared to an initial Yale-designed capsule to test the hypothesis that the diameter of the capsule measuring surface is a limiting factor for the accuracy and variability of capsule pressure measurements. Capsule pressures obtained with each capsule, using rabbit mesenteric vessels comparable in size to human esophageal varices, were correlated with direct intraluminal pressure measurements. There was an excellent correlation between capsule pressure measurements obtained with the small capsule and intraluminal pressure (r2 = 0.97) which was significantly greater than the correlation obtained when the initial capsule was studied (r2 = 0.89, P less than 0.01). The variability of capsule pressure measurements obtained with the small capsule was less than that observed when measurements were obtained with the initial capsule (P less than 0.01). Therefore, this new small capsule should provide the most accurate and reproducible noninvasive measurements of variceal pressure.
Animals↗
How much helpful is the capsule endoscopy for the diagnosis of small bowel lesions?
AIM: To assess the practically usefulness and diagnostic yield of this new method in a group of patients with suspected small bowel lesions. METHODS: Capsule endoscopic (CE) examination by using M2A capsule endoscope TM (Given Imaging, Yoqneam, Israel) was performed in thirty nine patients (26 males, 13 females) with suspected small intestinal lesions. The composing of the patients was as follows: obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in twenty three patients, known Crohn's disease in 6 patients, in whom CE was used to evaluate the severity and extension of the diseases, chronic diarrhea in 8 patients, abdominal pain in one patient and malignancy in one patient with unknown origin. RESULTS: In two patients CE failed. Different abnormalities were revealed in 26 patients overall. Detection rate of abnormalities was highest among patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and the source of bleeding was demonstrated in 17 of 23 patients with obscure bleeding (73.9%). Entero-Behcet was diagnosed in two patients by CE as a source of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. In 6 patients with known Crohn's disease, CE revealed better evaluation of the disease extension. In 3 of 8 (37.5%) patients with chronic diarrhea; CE revealed some mucosal abnormalities as the cause of chronic diarrhea. In a patient with unexplained abdominal pain and in a cancer patient with unknown origin, CE examination was normal. CONCLUSION: In our relatively small series, we found that capsule endoscopy is a useful diagnostic tool particularly in diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, chronic diarrhea and in estimating the extension of Crohn's disease.
Abdominal Pain↗
Comparison of suction capsule and endoscopic biopsy of small bowel mucosa.
Small bowel mucosal biopsy specimens were studied in 52 consecutive patients. Twenty-six patients underwent biopsy by a suction capsule and 16 patients by endoscopy using an 8-mm forceps. Additionally, 10 patients were asked to undergo biopsy by both techniques in the same morning. Material was obtained in 81% of attempts by suction and 100% by endoscopy. Tissue obtained was excellent in 58%, good in 28%, and poor in 14% of suction biopsy specimens. Corresponding grades for endoscopy were 65%, 31%, and 4%. The frequency of abnormal findings was not different by either technique. In the 10 patients who had both procedures, mean time to completion was 43 min by suction and 12 min by endoscopy. Intravenous premedication was used in endoscopy, and patient comfort was judged as excellent in 60% with endoscopy, whereas 60% judged suction biopsy as very uncomfortable. The mean fluoroscopy time of 3.9 min necessary for suction biopsy was eliminated with endoscopy. Biopsy with an 8-mm forceps through the endoscope is the preferred way to obtain tissue from the proximal small bowel.
Biopsy↗
Histological comparison of suction capsule and endoscopic small intestinal mucosal biopsies in children.
Small intestinal biopsies are part of the routine evaluation of children with chronic diarrhea and malabsorption, and are commonly performed via suction capsule. Because this technique entails x-ray exposure, longer procedure time, and technical failures, most small intestinal biopsies in adults are currently obtained via endoscopy. Endoscopy is believed to yield morphologically inferior specimens, and, therefore, its use for obtaining small intestinal biopsies in children has remained limited. The histological adequacy of biopsy specimens obtained in 30 children by endoscopy and in 30 children by suction capsule was compared. Biopsies were assessed for quality of orientation, size (length and depth), presence of Brunner's glands and crush artifact, and for the ability to confirm or exclude a mucosal abnormality. Small intestinal biopsies obtained via endoscopy were shown to yield tissue specimens that are histologically comparable to those obtained by suction capsule, and that are equally suitable for interpretation.
Biopsy↗
Effects of capsule endoscopy on cardiac pacemakers.
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Capsule endoscopy is a new, noninvasive diagnostic technique which enables visualization of the mucosa of the small intestine in physiological conditions and without the need to subject the patient to external radiation. Wireless capsule video endoscopy is contraindicated in patients with a cardiac pacemaker. However, on the basis of the characteristics of the radiofrequency band used by the endoscopic capsule, together with a series of other factors, it is possible that the patient's use of a pacemaker should not be a contraindication to capsule endoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This work had two phases: an in vitro study, using an interference detector, and an in vivo study involving 20 patients with cardiac pacemakers who showed symptoms or signs that justified a capsule endoscopy investigation. RESULTS: No interference was observed during the first, in vitro, phase of the study. In the second phase, patients wore a Holter recorder for a mean time of 10 hours, during which the average number of recorded QRS complexes exceeded 30,000. All the pacemakers functioned normally. Interference due only to myopotentials was detected in a single patient in whom modification of the pacemaker programming was necessary. In the other 19 patients, neither sensing nor stimulation failures were observed. CONCLUSIONS: No interference between the pacemaker and the endoscopic capsule was observed. All the pacemakers functioned normally, and no increased incidence of adverse effects was observed. Neither was any pacemaker-induced interference observed on the capsule endoscopy images.
Aged↗
The accuracy of PillCam ESO capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy for the diagnosis of esophageal varices: a prospective three-center pilot study.
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Variceal bleeding is a major complication of cirrhosis, and is associated with a 20 % mortality at 6 weeks. Current international guidelines recommend that patients with cirrhosis are screened by conventional upper endoscopy (esophagogastroduodenoscopy, EGD) in order to detect esophageal varices. The recently developed PillCam ESO esophageal capsule endoscope has been shown to be an accurate diagnostic tool in the investigation of patients with gastroesophageal reflux and Barrett's esophagus. We compared the PillCam ESO capsule endoscope with EGD for the detection of esophagogastric varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy in patients with cirrhosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A pilot trial was conducted at three sites. Patients with cirrhosis who were undergoing clinically indicated EGD for screening or surveillance for esophageal varices underwent a PillCam ESO study followed by an EGD within 48 hours. Capsule videos were assessed by an investigator who was blinded to the patient's medical history and EGD findings. RESULTS: A total of 23 of the 32 enrolled patients were found to have esophageal varices at both EGD and PillCam ESO endoscopy. In one patient PillCam ESO detected small varices that were not seen at EGD. The overall concordance between PillCam ESO and EGD was 96.9 % for the diagnosis of esophageal varices and 90.6 % for the diagnosis of portal hypertensive gastropathy. There were no adverse events related to PillCam ESO endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: In a high-prevalence population, PillCam ESO may represent an accurate noninvasive alternative to EGD for the detection of esophageal varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy. A large-scale trial is underway to validate and expand these findings.
Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal↗
M2A capsule endoscopy. A breakthrough diagnostic tool for small intestine imaging.
It is estimated that 19 million people in the United States may suffer from diseases related to the small intestine, including obscure bleeding, irritable bowel syndrome, Crohns disease, chronic diarrhea, and cancer. Current diagnostic methods, including push enteroscopy and radiology, produce historically low diagnostic yield. Early studies show that the M2A Capsule Endoscope effectively visualizes the entire small bowel and demonstrates a 71% superior diagnostic yield when compared to push enteroscopy according to clinical trials reviewed by the FDA. In addition to potentially higher diagnostic yields, it provides a noninvasive diagnostic alternative where none previously existed. The M2A Capsule Endoscope received FDA clearance in August 2001 and is currently in use at major medical centers throughout the United States and Europe.
Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal↗
The wireless capsule: new light in the darkness.
The development of wireless capsule endoscopy offers the potential to examine the whole small intestine, with its 5-meter length, and has the advantage of being painless. Using a miniature CMOS camera and a short focal length lens, images are obtained, as the optical window of the capsule sweeps past the gut wall, without requiring air inflation of the gut lumen. The capsule endoscope is propelled by peristalsis through the gastrointestinal tract. The video images are transmitted using radiotelemetry to an array of aerials attached to the body which allows image capture. The images are stored on a small portable recorder carried on a belt and subsequently downloaded for analysis. The system allows more than 7 h of continuous recording of images of the gastrointestinal tract. The patients are free to continue their daily routine during the examination. The capsule endoscope has performed well in trials in patients with difficult gastrointestinal bleeding and in comparative studies with push enteroscopy. It has received both a CE mark and FDA approval for use in patients. It has been used to date in about 4,000 patients. The current clinical data are reviewed.
Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal↗
Clinical usefulness of the endoscopic video capsule as the initial intestinal investigation in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: validation of a diagnostic strategy based on the patient outcome after 12 months.
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: In patients with obscure digestive bleeding, the bleeding source is frequently located in the small bowel. Capsule endoscopy (CE) is an effective method of investigating the whole small bowel in such patients. In the present study, a diagnostic approach was tested in patients with obscure digestive bleeding in which CE was included as the initial examination of the small bowel when the esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy findings were normal. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients admitted between October 2000 and February 2002 for obscure digestive bleeding underwent CE as the initial intestinal investigation, and the further management was decided on the basis of the results. After 12 months, follow-up data were obtained from all patients and referring physicians. The positive predictive value was calculated as the percentage of patients in whom CE detected a relevant lesion, and the negative predictive value as the percentage of patients with normal CE in whom no intestinal lesion was detected during the follow-up period. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (21 men, 23 women, aged 63 +/- 17 y) were included in the study. Twenty-two had overt bleeding and 22 had occult bleeding. CE detected an intestinal lesion in 18 patients (41.9 %)-- nine with angiomas, five with ulcers, one with a tumor, two with portal hypertension, and one with ischemic ileitis. The findings were normal in 17 patients (39.5 %). CE detected upper gastrointestinal lesions missed at EGD in four patients and blood in the stomach in two patients or in the proximal colon in three, leading to new endoscopies. Intestinal lesions detected at CE were treated as follows: push enteroscopy with treatment in eight patients, surgery in four, and medical treatment in six. In eight patients who underwent push enteroscopy, the procedure did not reveal lesions missed by CE. After 1 year, 15 of the 18 patients treated for intestinal lesions had no further bleeding and no anemia; one died after surgery (for resection of an ischemic intestinal loop), one relapsed, and one was diagnosed with a different intestinal condition. In all patients with extraintestinal lesions or blood detected at CE, further endoscopies led to diagnosis and therapy, with a favorable outcome. In patients with normal CE, no intestinal lesion was detected, but an extraintestinal source of bleeding was diagnosed and treated in nine patients (in the upper gastrointestinal tract in five cases and in the colon in four). Three patients had anemia of hematological origin and four had inadequate iron intake. The positive predictive value of CE was 94.4 % in patients with intestinal lesions, and the negative predictive value was 100 % in patients with normal CE findings. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with obscure digestive bleeding, CE positively predicted the intestinal diagnosis or normal status in 95.5 % of cases. A diagnostic approach to obscure digestive bleeding that includes CE after the initial endoscopic work-up thus appears to be a valid strategy for small-bowel examinations.
Adult↗
Endoscopic-guided capsule endoscopy in a patient with small-bowel varices after Whipple's operation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Diagnosis, Differential↗
Comparison of suction capsule and endoscopic biopsy of small bowel mucosa.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biopsy↗
Clinical usefulness of the endoscopic video capsule in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Colonoscopy↗
Wireless capsule endoscopy: a comparison with push enteroscopy in patients with gastroscopy and colonoscopy negative gastrointestinal bleeding.
BACKGROUND: The development of wireless capsule endoscopy allows painless imaging of the small intestine. Its clinical use is not yet defined. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and technical performance of capsule endoscopy and push enteroscopy in a series of 50 patients with colonoscopy and gastroscopy negative gastrointestinal bleeding. METHODS: A wireless capsule endoscope was used containing a CMOS colour video imager, transmitter, and batteries. Approximately 50,000 transmitted images are received by eight abdominal aerials and stored on a portable solid state recorder, which is carried on a belt. Push enteroscopy was performed using a 240 cm Olympus video enteroscope. RESULTS: Studies in 14 healthy volunteers gave information on normal anatomical appearances and preparation. In 50 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding and negative colonoscopy and gastroscopy, push enteroscopy was compared with capsule endoscopy. A bleeding source was discovered in the small intestine in 34 of 50 patients (68%). These included angiodysplasia (16), focal fresh bleeding (eight), apthous ulceration suggestive of Crohn's disease (three), tumour (two), Meckel's diverticulum (two), ileal ulcer (one), jejunitis (one), and ulcer due to intussusception (one). One additional intestinal diagnosis was made by enteroscopy. The yield of push enteroscopy in evaluating obscure bleeding was 32% (16/50). The capsule identified significantly more small intestinal bleeding sources than push enteroscopy (p<0.05). Patients preferred capsule endoscopy to push enteroscopy (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study capsule endoscopy was superior to push enteroscopy in the diagnosis of recurrent bleeding in patients who had a negative gastroscopy and colonoscopy. It was safe and well tolerated.
Adolescent↗
Usefulness of capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected small bowel disease.
AIM: To study the usefulness and safety of capsule endoscopy as a diagnostic tool in various small bowel disorders. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of a series of cases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between August 2001 and August 2002, 92 capsule endoscopy procedures were performed in 88 patients (53M/39F, age: 43.87 +/- 16.78). Indications included: chronic diarrhea (n=33); unknown abdominal pain (n=29); occult gastrointestinal bleeding or iron-deficiency anemia (n=13); abdominal discomfort in NSAID takers (n=7); staging of gastrointestinal tumors (n=4), and asymptomatic controls (n=2). Previously performed gastroscopy, colonoscopy, and small-bowel follow-through were not conclusive in all patients. RESULTS: Most frequently relevant findings included: jejuno-ileal aphtas and ulcerations (29 patients), vascular malformations (13 patients), and intestinal neoplasm (6 patients). The groups with a higher rate of findings related to this indication were occult gastrointestinal bleeding (76.92%) and chronic diarrhea (67.85%), with the lowest rate in the abdominal pain group (34.48%). Therapeutic strategy was directly changed in 36 of 88 patients (40.90%) because of capsule-endoscopic findings. The only observed complication was the failed excretion of one of the capsules because of an unknown ulcerated intestinal stricture. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy is a safe procedure which can study the entire small bowel, meaning a valuable tool for the management of patients with suggestive signs and symptoms of intestinal disorders.
Adolescent↗