PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Catalogs, Drug as Topic”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

[Computerized decision support in drug prescribing II: A national database to provide up-to-date and unbiased information].

Prescribers today encounter increasing demands for up-to-date knowledge of medical advances and drug therapies, and for a straightforward dialogue with patients. Cost-effective drug treatment calls for fast and intuitive access to information about drugs, treatment strategies and patient data. There are several computer-based drug-prescribing systems in Sweden. Information independent of the drug industry is wanting, as are uniform national standards for medical content and functionality. Decision-support systems must facilitate decisions about therapy, drug distribution and intake, as well as quality work, i.e. support the entire process which defines an effective drug therapy. A very important feature is access to a patient's drug list showing all current drugs. This joint initiative by county councils aims at drawing up a national Swedish specification of requirements for a suitable decision-support system and at creating a national entity responsible for distributing unbiased information from a unique database to a range of computerized medical records systems.

Catalogs, Drug as Topic↗
PubMed2003

[What information is given on adverse drug reactions from new drugs?].

BACKGROUND: It is not known to what extent information on previously unknown adverse reactions is communicated to doctors after the approval of a new drug. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included seven drugs, approved between 1982 and 1995 and the first in their class to be approved in Norway. We recorded the number of adverse reactions listed in the annual editions of the Norwegian physicians' desk reference(Felleskatalogen) from the first edition that included the drug and up until the 2001 edition. RESULTS: Only 51 % of the adverse reactions listed in the 2001 edition were included in the first post-approval edition. On average, 1.6 new adverse reactions were added for each drug every year. By contrast: in a group of 12 drugs approved before 1970, 0.14 new adverse reactions were added for each drug every year between 1989 and 2001. INTERPRETATION: With a new drug it is to be expected that many adverse reactions are not acknowledged as such. Caution is warranted because of the fact that even though it is not listed in the physicians' desk reference, any event appearing in a patient exposed to a new drug may be an adverse reaction.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗