SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Chest Tubes”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed1986

Is milking and stripping chest tubes really necessary?

The purpose of this study was to determine if chest tubes that are not milked or stripped occlude more frequently than milked or stripped tubes, and if the amount of drainage varies according to the treatment of the tubes. Following coronary artery bypass graft procedures, 49 male subjects had their chest tubes milked every 2 hours, had them stripped every 2 hours, or served as controls (i.e., their tubes were neither milked nor stripped). An analysis of variance was applied to the results. There was no significant difference in total drainage volume, hourly zero drainage, heart rate, or occurrence of arrhythmias among the three groups of subjects. Four to 16 hours postoperatively, a significantly higher volume of drainage occurred in the subjects whose chest tubes had been stripped. Stripping is particularly discouraged during this interval. The chest tubes remained patent with or without milking or stripping. We conclude that neither milking nor stripping is necessary for the proper care of chest tubes. We recommend that tubes be positioned such that they promote continuous drainage.

Aged↗

PubMed1995

Effectiveness of chest tube clamping in massive hemothorax.

OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of chest tube clamping in massive hemothorax. DESIGN, MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was assessed in 32 spontaneously breathing Yorkshire piglets with 2.5 mm (groups A and B) or 4.0 mm (groups C and D) lacerations of the thoracic aorta. MEASUREMENTS: Hemodynamics, blood loss, length of survival, and arterial blood gases (on 100% oxygen) were monitored. The four groups of eight animals all had chest tubes but groups A and C had these tubes clamped. Measurements were made at baseline, immediately after aortic injury, and every 15 minutes until death. RESULTS: Groups C and D survived 39 +/- 4 and 38 +/- 5 minutes respectively compared to 68 +/- 6 and 70 +/- 4 minutes in groups A and B. Total blood loss was not statistically significantly different among the four groups (1225 +/- 72, 1312 +/- 84, 1020 +/- 90, and 1110 +/- 84 mL for groups A, B, C, and D respectively). The rate of blood loss was greater in groups C and D (29.4 +/- 0.2 mL and 30.1 +/- 0.3 mL/min) compared with 14.7 +/- 0.5 mL and 16.0 +/- 0.9 mL/min respectively in groups A and B. Blood loss rate was similar with clamped or unclamped chest tubes. All groups had similar baseline cardiac output (3.5 to 3.8 L/min) and arterial blood pressures (110 to 114 mm Hg) with a greater decrease in these parameters following the larger lacerations and no difference with chest tube clamping. Arterial PO2 decreased from approximately 400 to 50 mm Hg with clamping but only decreased to approximately 350 mm Hg without clamping. The hypoxia was associated with significant hypercapnea (PCO2 of 78 mm Hg). CONCLUSIONS: Chest tube clamping did not decrease hemorrhage or mortality but worsened gas exchange without improving hypotension and is therefore not recommended in the treatment of massive hemothorax.

Animals↗

PubMed1995

Chest tube removal practices in critical care units in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Pain assessment and management are recognized as major problems in critical care settings. However, little is known about pain management practices related to medical procedures performed in the ICU, particularly removal of chest tubes. OBJECTIVES: To describe practices related to chest tube removal in the United States, with an emphasis on pain assessment and management. METHODS: A survey instrument was developed and mailed to 995 members of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses who cared for patients with chest tubes. They were asked about chest tube removal practices in their institutions. RESULTS: Chest tubes are removed primarily by physicians and house staff, although 11% of respondents reported that specially trained nurses removed the tubes. Only 16% indicated that a prescription for pain medication was routinely available before chest tube removal. The drug administered most frequently was intravenous morphine sulfate, but the dose varied considerably. Nurses were generally satisfied (65.6%) with practices related to chest tube removal in their unit; nurses who were not satisfied (34.4%) wished to see better pain management practices (45%), removal of tubes by the patient's assigned nurse (17.8%), a protocol for tube removal (13.9%), notification of the nurse before removal (12.2%), and other changes (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Practices associated with chest tube removal, especially pharmacologic management of procedure-related pain, vary in critical care units. Caregivers are advised to develop practice policies to guide decisions about management of acute pain in this patient population.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Pigtail catheters vs large-bore chest tubes for management of secondary spontaneous pneumothoraces in adults.

It is still uncertain if large-bore chest tubes (20F-28F) is superior to pigtail catheter (10F-14F) in terms of the management of secondary spontaneous pneumothoraces (SSP). This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety associated with placement of large-bore chest tubes vs pigtail catheters in adults experiencing the first episode of SSP. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 91 patients experiencing the first episode of SSP in a university hospital over a 3.5-year period who received treatment by either a large-bore chest tube or a pigtail catheter. Any patient who was younger than 18 years or experiencing mechanical ventilation-related barotraumas or pyopneumothorax was excluded from this study. Various parameters including demographical characteristics, size of pneumothorax, complications, time of pigtail or chest tube extubation, and length of hospital stay were collected and analyzed. Among the enrolled 91 patients, including 76 (83.5%) men with a mean age of 60 +/- 19 years, 69 were initially treated with a pigtail, and 22 patients received conventional chest tubes. Fifty patients (72.5%) undergoing the pigtail drainage and 16 (72.7%) undergoing large-bore chest tube treatment of SSP were successfully treated (P = .88). In addition, there was no significant difference in terms of length of hospital stay, extubation time, recurrence rate, and complication. Pigtail catheters offer a safe and effective alternative for large-bore chest tubes to adult patients experiencing the first episode of SSP, and we strongly suggested that pigtail tube drainage should be considered as the initial treatment of choice.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1981

Effectiveness of chest tube evacuation of pneumothorax in neonates.

This is a retrospective review of the effectiveness of 149 chest tubes placed in attempts to evacuate 91 pneumothoraces among 57 infants. Forty-four percent of initial evacuation attempts were ineffective; 42% of total chest tubes throughout the clinical courses were ineffective. The largest number of these ineffective chest tubes lay posterior in the pleural cavity. Fifty-six percent of posterior tubes were ineffective whereas only 4% of anterior tubes were ineffective. Other causes for failure included tubes which had perforated the lung, diaphragm, or mediastinum or were lying subcutaneously. On some occasions, chest tubes were mistakenly used to evacuate intrathoracic air which was actually a pulmonary pseudocyst or pneumomediastinum. Two thoracostomy sites were chosen: the superior and lateral. Eighty-five percent of chest tubes inserted through the superior approach lay anteriorly in the pleural cavity whereas only 47% of the laterally inserted tubes lay anteriorly. Superior thoracostomy tubes were significantly more effective than lateral tubes because of their more frequent anterior location. There were also fewer complications with superior thoracostomy tubes. Whereas only 10% of superiorly inserted tubes encroached upon the mediastinum, 32% of lateral tubes did so. To be effective, chest tubes should be placed anteriorly in the pleural space; this location is more often achieved via the superior thoracostomy approach.

Female↗

PubMed2002

Removal of chest tubes in children without water seal after elective thoracic procedures: a randomized prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Chest tubes are often placed in children after elective thoracic surgical procedures. Depending on surgeon preference, tubes can be pulled directly from suction or after a trial of water seal. Removal of the tube without water seal potentially allows earlier removal, decreased postoperative pain, and earlier discharge from the hospital. No randomized, prospective study has been performed to compare the two methods to determine whether omission of the water seal period is safe after elective thoracic surgery in children. STUDY DESIGN: This is a single-blinded, randomized study conducted between June 1998 and June 2000. Children undergoing elective, noncardiac, nonesophageal thoracic operations were placed into water seal or a nonwater seal groups. Groups were compared for development of pneumothorax or pleural effusion after chest tube removal. RESULTS: Fifty-two children participated in the study, with 28 in group I (suction) and 24 in group II (water seal). Operations included both pulmonary and nonpulmonary thoracic operations performed both thoracoscopically and open. No child developed a major pleural effusion after chest tube removal. Three children (11%) in group I and eight (33%) in group II developed pneumothorax. No child required reinsertion of the chest tube and all were successfully treated with observation and oxygen. There was no marked difference between the groups regarding development of pneumothorax, but the power of the study is low. CONCLUSIONS: A water seal trial is not necessary for safe removal of chest tubes in children undergoing elective surgery. Chest tubes can be removed safely and earlier when pulled directly from suction for both pulmonary and nonpulmonary thoracic pediatric procedures.

Chest Tubes↗

PubMed1998

Curved chest tube for drainage of malignant pleural effusion.

Thoracentesis with a chest tube insertion and drainage of large pleural effusion is widely performed in patients with malignant lung diseases. One potential problem with a conventional chest tube placement is occasional incomplete evacuation of effusion owing to inappropriate position of the tip where the drainage holes opened. We have developed a curved chest tube and evaluated the position of tip placement just after the placement and before removal on plain chest X-ray in 20 patients with massive pleural effusions due to lung cancer. In 15 of the 20 patients, the tip of the tube was successfully positioned at the paravertebral gutter in posterobasal with higher drainage efficacy compared with other patients whose tube tips happened to be positioned at other sites. There were no significant complications. This study suggested that the curved chest tube would be safe and useful in completing drainage of pleural effusion.

Adult↗

PubMed1993

Evaluation of conventional chest tube therapy for iatrogenic pneumothorax.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess conventional, large chest tube therapy in iatrogenic pneumothorax and to determine the optimal moment when to use more invasive procedures. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Medical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Forty-seven patients with needle-induced iatrogenic pneumothorax. Twenty-four patients had an underlying pleural or pulmonary disorder. INTERVENTIONS: After insertion of a 20- to 24-French plastic chest tube connected to an underwater seal, suction was maintained until gas egress stopped or up to 10 days in patients with a persisting gas leak. RESULTS: In 96 percent, a definite occlusion of the pneumothorax was achieved. In all patients without an underlying lung disorder, gas egress stopped definitely after 72 h. In the presence of an underlying lung disorder, 92 percent of the pneumothoraces were healed after 10 days of continuous suction therapy. At 72 h, only 71 percent of the latter group were healed (p < 0.05 vs patients without lung disease). No major complication of chest tube therapy occurred. CONCLUSION: Conventional chest tube therapy is a safe and effective treatment for iatrogenic pneumothorax. In patients with an underlying lung disease, gas egress may last for up to 10 days. In these patients, the earlier use of a more invasive approach may be justified if the air leak persists.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

A questionnaire survey on practice of chest tube management.

AIM: With the aim towards better education of junior medical staff on chest tube management, we designed a questionnaire to survey their practice and at the same time to assess their level of understanding of the physical principles of chest tube and its drainage system. METHODS: The questionnaire was distributed to 130 junior medical staff (house officers, medical officers, trainee medical officers and specialist medical officers) from 7 Medical and Surgical Departments in Singapore General Hospital. Eighty-seven (66.9%) candidates responded. The mean age of the respondents was 27 +/- 2.1. They had an average of 3.2 +/- 1.9 years after basic medical qualification and 5 hospital postings. Nine respondents had obtained higher medical qualifications. RESULTS: About a quarter of the respondents, and 40% of those with higher medical qualifications gave appropriate answers. Ninety percent indicated that they received no lectures on chest tube management. Incomplete response ranged from 0% to 6%. CONCLUSION: To improve education on chest tube management, our results and the feedback we obtained from the respondents, suggest that lectures on important physical principles of chest tube and its drainage system should be delivered to all junior medical staff.

Chest Tubes↗

PubMed1995

Recurrent pneumothoraces in ventilated patients despite ipsilateral chest tubes.

The incidence of recurrent pneumothoraces was analyzed in mechanically ventilated patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or non-ARDS causes of respiratory failure who had ipsilateral chest tubes in place. The radiographs of 39 consecutive patients with 47 initial pneumothoraces were evaluated for pneumothorax recurrence and chest tube positioning, which was prospectively defined as having a "vertical" or "horizontal" orientation. "Horizontal" positioning indicated that the chest tube may have been placed into a major fissure or the posterior hemithorax. Sixteen of the 47 pneumothoraces in all study patients, 14 of the 21 pneumothoraces in patients with ARDS, and 2 of the 26 pneumothoraces in patients without ARDS recurred (p < 0.0001) despite an ipsilateral chest tube; 9 of the 14 ARDS pneumothorax recurrences were tension types. "Horizontal" chest tube positioning in patients with ARDS had a positive predictive value of 86% and 64% for recurrences of pneumothoraces and tension pneumothoraces, respectively. Recurrent pneumothoraces occur commonly in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS despite ipsilateral chest tubes. Because pneumothorax recurrences appear to be related to horizontal chest tube placement, imaging studies should verify that chest tubes are placed in optimally in the anterior hemithorax away from interlobar fissures in this patient population.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

High vacuum drainage of the chest using a miniature double lumen chest tube.

The purpose of this study was to test the safety and efficacy of a high vacuum pressure drainage system with a 7F double lumen chest tube. Methods included animal experiments, where seven rabbits were subjected to bilateral tube thoracostomies, using a 7F double lumen chest tube at 340 torr on one side and more than 500 torr on the other for 30 minutes. Then, a preliminary clinical study was done. Three patients were treated with a 7F double lumen chest tube and a vacuum box at 340 torr after a thoracoscopic sympathectomy for approximately 60 minutes. An additional 460 patients were treated with a conventional system, using a 20F single lumen chest tube and chest drainage system at 14.7 torr following the same operation. All animals tolerated the test well. Suction injury of the lung was noted on the control side. In the clinical study, the air leaks stopped within 15 minutes, and no patients showed a radiologic sign of lung suction injury. Six patients in the control group developed subcutaneous emphysema. In conclusion, high vacuum pressure drainage of the chest using the 7F double lumen chest tube is safe and effective.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Subcutaneous emphysema associated with chest tube drainage.

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous emphysema may complicate a pneumothorax, but may also occur as a consequence of its treatment by chest tube drainage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors involved in the association between subcutaneous emphysema and chest tube drainage, and the clinical outcomes in these cases. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and sixty-seven patients undergoing chest tube drainage within a 12-month period were evaluated retrospectively. There were 30 reported cases of subcutaneous emphysema (SE). Comparisons were made between those with subcutaneous emphysema and those who did not develop this complication. RESULTS: A total of 134 patient notes were evaluated (25 SE and 109 non-SE). Subcutaneous emphysema was more commonly associated with trauma, bronchopleural fistulae, large and bilateral pneumothoraces, and mechanical ventilation. Subcutaneous emphysema was also associated with prolonged drainage, poor tube placement, tube blockage, side-port migration, and a greater number of chest tubes. Importantly, those with SE had a longer length of stay and increased mortality. CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous emphysema can be spontaneous or traumatic, but is associated with avoidable causes such as inadequate chest tube drainage, particularly due to poor tube placement, anchorage and blockage, and also with side-port migration into the subcutaneous tissue. It is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality, and may indicate the need for urgent chest tube replacement.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1982

A new technique for securing a chest tube.

Most techniques described for securing a chest tube in position do not discuss closing the orifice in the chest wall after removal of the tube. An air tight closure of the chest wall and good approximation of the wound edges after removal of the chest tube must be done to prevent complications and obtain a cosmetically good scar. A technique for securing a chest tube is described that permits excellent approximation of the wound edges upon removal.

Humans↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Timing of chest tube removal after coronary artery bypass surgery.

AIM: Assessing the impact of chest tube removal timing following a coronary artery bypass grafting surgery on the clinical outcome. METHODS: Eighty-three consecutive patients were randomly assigned to either have the chest tube removed 24 hours (Group A) or 48 hours (Group B) postoperatively. Chest tubes were removed on the condition that drainage was less than 100 cc for the last 8 hours. Pre- and postoperative data were analyzed. RESULTS: The following preoperative and intraoperative risk factors were more prevalent among Group A patients: previous MI (60.5% vs 40.7%, p = 0.11), previous CVA (9.1% vs 0%, p = 0.11), hypertension (72.7% vs 55.6%, p = 0.14), pump time (111.6 min vs 96.8 min, p = 0.07), and cross-clamp time (73.8 min vs 64.4 min, p = 0.07). Postoperatively, there was a lower demand for analgesics in Group A (2.1 times for 12 hours at 36 hours vs 3.6 p = 0.09), lower white blood cell count (10,947 at 48 hours vs 11,576, p = 0.39) a higher oxygen saturation (91.9% at 48 hours vs 88.9%, p = 0.07), higher expiratory volumes (594 mL at 36 hours vs 514 mL p = 0.08) and earlier mobilization (23% walking at 48 hours vs 4%, p = 0.01). Pleural effusion and atelectasis were less frequent in Group A in both chest X-rays (66% vs 73%, p = 0.6 and 64% vs 75%, p = 0.47, respectively) and CT scans (19% vs 41%, p = 0.1 and 84% vs 96%, p = 0.42, respectively). There was no difference between the two groups in the prevalence of serous wound discharge and the length of hospital stay and there were no reported cases of pneumonia throughout the study. CONCLUSION: In cases where no excessive drainage accumulates, early removal of the chest tubes was found to be a policy that improves the postoperative outcome and decreases the need for supportive treatment such as analgetics, physiotherapy, nurse care, and oxygen. This policy did not involve significant residual effusions.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

What happens when chest tubes are removed in children?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence, onset, and severity of complications in children after chest tube removal. DESIGN: A prospective evaluation of patients. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care unit in a tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred and one consecutive children requiring intraoperative placement of chest tubes for cardiac or noncardiac thoracic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 120 chest tubes placed in 101 patients, 16 were associated with positive findings after removal. Of these 16, only six required changes in management, and only two were serious complications. There was no association of complications with duration of chest tube placement. Children who developed complications were younger. All serious complications were immediately apparent after chest tube removal. CONCLUSION: Serious complications of chest tube removal in children are very uncommon and in this series were immediately apparent.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1992

Fluoroscopic chest tube insertion and patient care.

Catheters and chest tubes may be placed under fluoroscopic control to reduce pleural effusions. This procedure has been adopted as a routine procedure at the UCLA School of Medicine in Los Angeles, California to improve patient care. This technique was modified for the placement of large chest tubes, which can be placed by a radiologist without multiple attempts or complications. Our experience with 2234 patients who underwent this procedure between 1977 and 1990 is described.

Catheterization↗

PubMed2002

When to remove a chest tube? A randomized study with subsequent prospective consecutive validation.

BACKGROUND: Operative procedures on the pleural space are usually managed by chest tube drainage. Timing for removing the tube is empirically established, with wide variation among surgeons. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of establishing a volume of 200 mL/d of uninfected drainage as a threshold for removal of chest tube, as compared with more frequently used volumes of 100 and 150 mL/d. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized study was performed in a single institution. Patients (n = 139) submitting to pleural drainage after surgical procedures were randomized to one of three groups, defined by the planned timing of chest tube removal (depending on the threshold volume per day of pleural fluid drained): G-100 (< or = 100 mL/d, n = 44); G-150 (< or =150 mL/d, n = 58); and G-200 (< or = 200 mL/d, n = 37). Subsequently, another 91 consecutive patients had chest tubes removed when drainage was less than 200 mL/d (G-val, prospective validation group). All patients had similar discharge and 60-day followup. Drainage time, hospital stay, and reaccumulation rate were registered. RESULTS: Drainage time (median days: 3.5 for G-100, 3 for G-150, 3 for G-200, 3 for G-val) and hospital stay (median days: 4 for G-100, 3 for G-150, 3 for G-200, 3 for G-val) were not statistically different among groups. Radiologic reaccumulation rates were 9.1% for G-100, 13.1% for G-150, 5.4% for G-200, and 10.9% for G-val, and the thoracenteses rates were 2.3%, 0.8%, 2.7%, and 3.3%, respectively, with no major differences among groups (G-100 versus G-150 versus G-200; G-200 versus G-val). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the threshold of daily drainage to 200 mL before removing the chest tube did not markedly affect drainage, hospitalization time, or overall costs, nor did it increase the likelihood of major pleural fluid reaccumulation. This volume (200 mL/d) could be recommended for chest tube withdrawal decision for uninfected pleural fluid with no evidence of air leaks.

Chest Tubes↗

PubMed1987

Transthoracic needle aspiration: use of a small chest tube to treat pneumothorax.

The primary complication of transthoracic needle aspiration is pneumothorax. The efficacy and safety of using a small chest tube to treat this complication were examined by reviewing the records of 876 patients who underwent transthoracic needle aspirations between January 1981 and February 1986. Among these patients, 212 (24%) sustained a pneumothorax, and 92 (11%) required placement of a small 9-French chest tube attached to a flutter-type (Heimlich) valve. Duration of chest-tube drainage ranged between 24 hr and 3 weeks (mean, 2.2 days). Complete resolution of the pneumothorax and subsequent removal of the chest tube after 24 hr of drainage occurred in 38 (41%) of the 92 patients. Twenty-nine (32%) required 48 hr of drainage, and nine (10%) required 3 days. The remaining 16 (17%) required longer periods of drainage ranging from 4 days to 3 weeks. The tubes of six of this last group of patients were attached to a suction apparatus, and three of these patients eventually had a 28-French chest tube placed surgically. No significant complications occurred. The use of a small chest tube for treatment of pneumothorax after transthoracic needle aspiration is easy, safe, and efficacious.

Biopsy, Needle↗