Choledochostomy; advantages of a modified T tube.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The treatment of common bile duct stones is controversial. The objective of our study was to report the results of choledochotomy, rigid choledochoscopy and systematic external biliary drainage in the treatment of stones of the common bile duct. Over a 15-year period, 555 patients were operated in our department according to a precise surgical protocol. 14% of these patients were operated as an emergency and 11.8% were operated immediately after endoscopic sphincterotomy. One third of patients suffered from cholangitis. The endoscopic investigation of the common bile duct was positive in 81.5% of patients. The investigation was negative in 18.5% and negative choledochotomy was significantly more frequent in patients operated for acute pancreatitis (p < 0.05). External biliary drainage was performed in 95.7% of patients. When necessary, a bilioenteric anastomosis (3%) or a surgical sphincterotomy (1.9%) was also performed. The postoperative mortality rate was 4.8% significantly higher in patients over the age of 70, in patients operated as an emergency and in patients operated immediately after endoscopic sphincterotomy (p < 0.05). The morbidity rate was 8.4%. Residual stones were diagnosed in 4.4% of the patients. The presence of residual stones was significantly more frequent in patients with multiple stones of the common bile duct (p < 0.05). Long-term follow-up was available for 89% of patients, 95% of whom were asymptomatic. These results, based on a homogeneous therapeutic protocol, can be used as a reference for the evaluation of other techniques, especially endoscopic and laparoscopic techniques.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Four different techniques for reconstruction of the bile drainage have been employed in an autologous model. Biochemical liver parameters e. g. Bilirubin, AP, GPT and GOT, cholangiography and histology proved the superiority of our method of an intraductal tubus technique (lost drain method). The covering of the bile duct with the mobilised greater omentum seems to be important for a rapid revascularisation. The superiority of our method was proven in orthotopic liver isografting as well.
The effects of bile duct ligation (BDL), choledochostomy, bile acid sequestering within the intestinal lumen by cholestyramine, and fluid and electrolyte replacement on survival time and development of diarrhea after whole-body exposure to doses of ionizing radiation that result in death from acute intestinal injury were studied. BDL significantly prolonged survival and delayed the onset of diarrhea after exposure to 137Cs gamma rays, fission neutrons, or cyclotron-produced neutrons in the range of doses that produce intestinal death or death from a combination of intestinal and hematopoietic injuries. Cannulation of the bile duct with exteriorized bile flow (choledochostomy) to protect the irradiated intestine from the mucolytic action of bile salts did not duplicate the effect of BDL in increasing survival time. Choledochostomy without fluid replacement eliminated the occurrence of diarrhea in 15.4 Gy irradiated rats. Diarrhea did occur in irradiated animals with choledochostomy if they received duodenal injections of fluid and electrolytes to replace the fluid lost as a result of bile drainage. Duodenal injection of fluid and electrolytes, however, had no significant effect on survival time in irradiated rats. In contrast, injection of fluid and electrolytes into the peritoneal cavity of irradiated rats resulted in an increase in survival time that was comparable to that observed after BDL. Addition of antibiotics to the peritoneally injected fluid and electrolytes further increased survival time (up to 9 days). This survival time approached that seen in animals receiving the same radiation dose but which had the intestine exteriorized and shielded to minimize radiation injury to the intestine. Postmortem histological examinations of the irradiated small intestine showed mucosal regeneration in these long-term survivors receiving fluid and antibiotic therapy. In contrast, duodenal injection of cholestyramine post irradiation to bind bile acids had no effect on survival time or diarrhea incidence. The conclusions from these experiments are that BDL prolongs survival and postpones the onset of diarrhea in irradiated rats dying from acute intestinal injury primarily by slowing down the loss of fluid and electrolytes and that bile acids play no significant role.
The factors that regulate methanogenesis in humans have not been established. The presence of bile acid, which is lost into the colon from the small intestine, may be an important regulatory factor of methanogenesis. To examine this possibility, the effect of human bile on methane production by faecal cultures, and the in vivo effect of biliary diversion on breath methane excretion in a methanogenic choledochostomy patient, were investigated. Faecal suspensions (0.1%) from five methanogenic humans were incubated anaerobically with bile (0.3-30%) from three choledochostomy patients, and headspace methane measured by gas chromatography. All biles inhibited headspace methane. Inhibition of methanogenesis was dose dependent, plateaued at 10-30% bile concentration, and was abolished by 0.6% cholestyramine. The maximum inhibition by bile, median (range), was 38 (0.9-56)% of control methane values. Reversal of the bile fistula in the fourth choledochostomy patient converted that subject from methanogenic to 'non-methanogenic' status, It is concluded that inhibition of methanogens in the caecum by bile acid could significantly reduce the number of methanogens in the colon. This and the effect of transit time could explain much of the known epidemiology of 'non-methanogenesis', which has been related to obesity, (comparatively) fast colonic transit in healthy persons, and to small intestinal Crohn's disease.
To develop a rat model of ascending cholangitis, we constructed a controllable and accessible biliary drainage and infusion system. We first modified a reversible cholestasis model of the rat and then induced ascending cholangitis by administration of Escherichia coli into the proximal choledochostomy tube. After biliary infusion of E. coli, the liver, choledochostomy tube and bile were all positive for E. coli, but no bacteria grew in rats receiving biliary infusion of normal saline. Retrograde cholangiography of the initial choledochostomy ensured that the tube end was in the right position in the proximal common bile duct. The patency of the tube-tube choledochocholedochostomy was confirmed by a cholangiogram on day 90. Thirty days after the tube-tube choledochocholedochostomy, the livers of the experimental animals did not differ from the control livers. The tube-tube choledochocholedochostomy model not only provides reproducible, reliable, reversible cholestasis, but creates a sustainable and accessible biliary infusion system. This can be used for long-term investigations of repeated cholangitis and recurrent cholestasis.
Orthotopic liver transplantation has been performed in Birmingham since 1982. Two types of biliary reconstruction have been used, the choledocho-choledochostomy and the choledocho-cholecysto-choledochostomy (gallbladder (GB) conduit). A retrospective study was undertaken to compare the biliary tract complications encountered at cholangiography in these two groups to assess which reconstruction is safest. In the gallbladder (GB) conduit reconstruction, the incidence of biliary leakage (20.4%) and stricture formation (14.4%), the two most serious complications, was higher than in end-to-end duct anastomosis (11% and 10%, respectively), though these differences did not reach statistical significance. This supports evidence from other centres that the choledocho-choledochostomy is the procedure of choice to minimize biliary complications. Biliary debris (14.2%) presented additional problems and was strongly associated with biliary strictures. T-tube related problems were least troublesome. The close relationship between hepatic artery occlusion and biliary complications, particularly leakage, noted in other studies is also emphasized.