PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Colorectal Surgery”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Ga-67 scan to detect intra-abdominal infection in patients after colorectal surgery.

PURPOSE: Intra-abdominal infection is still an important issue in colorectal surgery. The Ga-67 scan is relatively inexpensive, but the delay in diagnosis and the intense physiologic bowel activity are considerable drawbacks to its use in abdominal investigations. In this study, the authors performed 24-hour Ga-67 scans and read the images with the surgeon to detect abdominal infection in patients who underwent colorectal surgery. METHODS: Sixty-one patients who underwent colorectal surgery were enrolled in this study. Ga-67 scintigraphy was performed 24 hours, and later as needed, after the injection of 111 MBq (3 mCi) Ga-67 citrate. All scans were interpreted together by a nuclear medicine specialist and the surgeon. The intensity of Ga-67 uptake was recorded as grade 0: no uptake; grade 1: less than liver uptake; grade 2: equal to liver uptake; or grade 3: greater than liver uptake. When the intensity of Ga-67 uptake was equal to or greater than grade 2, the pattern of Ga-67 uptake was classified as changing or unchanging. A positive Ga-67 scan was defined as having an intensity of grade 2 or 3 with an unchanging pattern. RESULTS: Nineteen abdominal infections were diagnosed, all by Ga-67 scans, for a diagnostic sensitivity rate of 100%. Of the 42 patients with no intra-abdominal infection, only 2 had positive Ga-67 scans. This resulted in a specificity rate of 95.2%. The overall accuracy of the Ga-67 scan in the detection of intra-abdominal infection after colorectal surgery was 96.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The Ga-67 scan is useful for detecting intra-abdominal infection after colorectal surgery. Reading the images with the surgeon and using a lateral view can decrease the false-positive rate. A negative Ga-67 scan can rule out intra-abdominal infection, whereas a positive Ga-67 scan indicates the need for further patient evaluation after colorectal surgery.

Bacterial Infections↗

Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly.

INTRODUCTION: Open colorectal surgery in elderly patients is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates compared with those in younger age groups. It also requires more intensive postoperative support, longer hospitalization, and in many cases leads to prolonged rehabilitation or institutionalization. Because of its less invasive nature, laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery may lead to a reduced period of convalescence. However, the safety of advanced laparoscopic surgical techniques in the elderly has not been established, so this prospective comparative study was undertaken. METHODS: All patients aged 80 years or more who were undergoing an elective laparoscopic or open colorectal procedure between 1 January 1992 and 30 June 1997 were assessed prospectively. Patients having simple stoma formation were excluded. Perioperative care, operative results and subsequent function were analysed. RESULTS: There were 42 patients in the laparoscopic group and 35 in the open group, with a median age of 84 years in each group. Five patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery required conversion to an open procedure. No complications related to laparoscopy occurred. Three patients died after operation in the laparoscopic group and four in the open group, with morbidity in seven and 15 patients respectively. Median hospital stay was 9 (range 4-21) days for patients having the laparoscopic operation, and 17 (range 7-28) days in the open cases. At 4 weeks after operation 30 of the 35 independent patients surviving the operation in the laparoscopic group and 16 of 28 in the open group were back to preoperative activity levels. CONCLUSION: In this series laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery was safe and was associated with a low incidence of complications, short hospitalization and a rapid return to preoperative activity levels when compared with open colorectal resections in this age group.

Aged↗

Scintigraphic pattern of planar gallium scan in wound infection after colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of postoperative wound infection is higher after colorectal surgery than after other surgical procedures. No studies have evaluated the usefulness of gallium 67 scintigraphy for detecting wound infection after colorectal surgery. We investigated the clinical potential of gallium imaging for detecting wound infection after colorectal surgery. METHODS: Fifty patients who had fever after colorectal surgery were enrolled in this study. All patients had open surgical incisions at the midline of the abdomen. Planar gallium scintigraphy was performed 24 h, and then as needed, after the injection of 111 MBq (3 mCi) Ga 67 citrate. All scans were interpreted by two physicians specializing in nuclear medicine. Intensities of gallium uptake at the surgical wound were recorded as grades 0 (no uptake), 1 (less than liver uptake), 2 (equal to liver uptake), or 3 (greater than liver uptake). When the intensity of gallium uptake was equal to or greater than grade 2, gallium uptake was classified as two patterns: regular and irregular. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were diagnosed with wound infection. When interpretation was based on only gallium-uptake intensity, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the gallium scan were 100%, 75%, and 84%, respectively. When interpretation was based on gallium-uptake intensity and pattern, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 94.4% and 96.9%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy had increased, from 84% to 96%. CONCLUSION: Planar gallium scan is useful for detecting wound infection after colorectal surgery. Gallium-uptake pattern and intensity are important for interpreting planar gallium scans.

Adolescent↗

Surgeon experience with laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery in Washington State.

PURPOSE: To describe the current practice and opinions held by surgeons performing colorectal surgery in Washington regarding laparoscopic colorectal surgery. METHODS: After attempting to identify all surgeons with hospital privileges in colorectal surgery in Washington, a survey was sent to 303 surgeons. The survey asked about the surgeon's practice, volume of colon surgery in the preceding year, the number of laparoscopic colon resections ever performed, the surgeon's opinion on the future practice of laparoscopic colorectal surgery, and whether faced with the personal need to undergo colon resection at the present time, would the surgeon elect to have laparoscopic or open colon resection. RESULTS: In all 170 surveys were returned; 154 returned surveys were from surgeons who had performed at least one colon resection in the preceding year; 53 (34%) respondents had experience with fewer than 20 laparoscopic resections and 83 (55%) have never performed laparoscopic-assisted colectomy (LAC). Only 4 (3%) surgeons had performed more than 50 laparoscopic colon resections. Forty-five percent of respondents indicated that they would currently seek a laparoscopic resection for themselves to treat either a benign condition or an incurable malignancy, and 84% of respondents indicated they would have an open colectomy for a curable malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of surgeons performing colorectal resections in Washington have limited experience with LAC. Surgeon opinion regarding the role of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in clinical practice is mixed. We suggest a model for proctoring of LAC for surgeons interested in implementing laparoscopic colorectal resection into their practice.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of laparoscopic colorectal surgery have been demonstrated in several well designed trials in recent years. At the same time the experience in the field of laparoscopy in the elderly has increased. The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the experience of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in patients over 75 years in our unit. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Surgical Department, San Lorenzo Hospital, Valdagno (VI). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: All the patients over 75 years, out of a total number of 121 unselected patients, undergoing laparoscopic colectomy or laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection between June 2002 and May 2005. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative mortality, operating time, conversion rate, morbidity, time of discharge from hospital. RESULTS: Six patients were converted to open surgery. 87 patients over 75 years underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery. There was no postoperative death, in three cases a reoperation was done, because of postoperative intestinal obstruction in one case (over 75) and for anastomotic fistula in two (one over 75, after low anterior resection). Mean operative time was was 180 minutes (range 150-300). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients is a safe group of procedures for benign and malignant lesions of large bowel, resulting in a low rate of complications even if the time of operation is increased compared with open procedures. Postoperative pain and hospital stay, with return to normal life, are decreased compared with open surgery.

Aged↗

Patients' expectations of colorectal surgery for cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objectives of surgery for colorectal cancer are to achieve radical resection of the tumour and to ensure a satisfactory quality of life for the patient. But what is satisfactory quality of life for the patients? What do patients desire? The goal of our exploratory investigation was to evaluate prospectively the patient pre-operative expectations as objectively as possible and to analyse results in relation to age, gender and socio-economic status. METHODS: In the period from 1998 to 2001, 167 patients were given a questionnaire consisting of 15 questions prior to surgery. The questionnaire included various aspects that were thought to influence the patient's quality of life. Moreover the patients were given the opportunity to rate the questions they considered most important. RESULTS: The following five points were considered most important by the total group of patients: Complete cure of the disease was rated most important (95%); it was the prime expectation of the patients. This was followed by the avoidance of a stoma (81%), a reliable control of defaecation (52%), normal digestion (44%) and little pain (26%). CONCLUSION: Age, gender and education influence the pre-operative expectations of patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. In addition to the surgical standard, the care of the individual patient must be given due consideration in the treatment strategy.

Adult↗

How to prevent port-site metastases in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Various reports concerning port-site metastasis after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer have created a new concern regarding the use of this technique for the treatment of this malignancy. The real incidence is not yet known; neither are its prognostic implications. Numerous experimental studies, both in vitro and in vivo, have been published since 1994. These studies have analyzed the possible role of pneumoperitoneum and carbon dioxide (CO(2)) and pathophysiology, as well as the influence of minimally invasive techniques on tumor response and immunity. There are no definitive results yet, but there is enough evidence to presume that the etiology of this new complication might derive from surgical technique. We present our 8-year experience with laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. We also review our technique for preventing port-site implants. At this writing, we have had no port metastasis in our series of 320 colorectal cancer cases with a mean follow-up period of 54 months. The steps we follow as a routine in all cases of laparoscopic colorectal cancer are (a) fixation of trocars to the abdominal wall, (b) avoidance of touching the tumor, (c) high vascular ligation, (d) intraoperative colonoscopy and intraluminal irrigation with 5% iodine povidone, (e) specimen isolation before extraction from the abdominal cavity, and (f) intraperitoneal and trocar-site irrigation with a tumoricide solution.

Animals↗

Postoperative leakage and abscess formation after colorectal surgery.

Anastomotic leaks following colorectal surgery may be divided into those which are clinically significant and those which are not. Leakage occurs in 3.4-6% of all colorectal cases. It is most commonly associated with rectal anastomoses, being clinically significant in 2.9-15.3% of cases. Mortality following a leak may be 6.0-39.3%. There is no evidence that preoperative bowel preparation reduces the rate and consequences of leaks. There is no evidence for the use of drains when an anastomosis has been made outside the pelvis, but pelvic drainage may be important after anterior resection. The use of covering stomas has not been shown to reduce leak rate but does mitigate the clinical effects of leaks. Prompt diagnosis and further laparotomy can reduce mortality following leakage. Intra-abdominal abscesses can in most cases be treated by radiologically guided drainage. Anastomotic leaks are the most common cause of anastomotic strictures and are also associated with increased rates of local recurrence of cancer.

Abscess↗

Systematic review of thromboprophylaxis in colorectal surgery -- an update.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of thromboembolism after colorectal surgery is higher than after general surgery. The aim of this paper is to update a systematic review addressing thrombosis prophylaxis in connection with colorectal surgery. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, abstract books and reference lists from reviews were searched without language restrictions for randomized controlled trials or clinical controlled trials comparing prophylactic interventions and/or placebo up til August 2003. Five hundred and fifty-eight studies were identified of which 19 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Data extraction was done by at least two of the authors. Outcome was deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism diagnosed by various methods. RESULTS: Any kind of heparin is better than no treatment or placebo (11 studies) with a Peto Odds ratio (POR) at 0.32 (95% CI 0.20-0.53). Unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin (4 studies) were equally effective POR 1.01 (95% CI 0.67-1.52). The combination of graduated compression stockings and LMWH is better than LMWH alone (2 studies) with a POR at 4.17 (95% CI 1.37-12.70). CONCLUSION: The optimal thromboprophylaxis in colorectal surgery is the combination of graduated compression stockings and low-dose unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin.

Anticoagulants↗

[Perioperative transfusion in colorectal surgery].

Several studies have evaluated the role and effect of blood transfusion in colorectal surgery. To date, no recommendation concerning its use in colorectal surgery has been yet published. However, blood transfusion is often required in colorectal surgery, especially in anaemic patients who suffer from malignant disease. The aim of this review is to define the effect of blood transfusion on oncologic and operative results, and to evaluate the clinical potential of alternative to allogeneic blood transfusion in order to promote the development of transfusion policy in colorectal surgery.

Blood Transfusion↗

Is mechanical bowel preparation really necessary in colorectal surgery?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcome of colorectal surgery without mechanical bowel preparation. DESIGN: A descriptive, analytical and observational study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Combined Military Hospital, Kharian and Pano Aqil, from September 1998 to April 2003. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients underwent debridement/resection and repair/primary anastomosis of colon and upper rectum without bowel preparation. Of these, 16 patients were operated in emergency. The anastomosis was carried out with polyglactin (vicryl) interrupted, full thickness single layer and no patient had defunctioning colostomy. Third generation cephalosporin, cefotaxime or ceftazidime and metronidazole were given perioperatively, repeated during surgery if lasted for more than 2 hours and continued for 3-5 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Anastomoses were ileocolic in 29.7%, colicocolic in 61.7% and colorectal in 14.8% cases. Anastomotic failure was seen in 4.2% and wound infection in 8.5% cases. There was one mortality (2.1%) due to unrelated cause. CONCLUSION: Mechanical bowel preparation is not necessary for safe colorectal surgery.

Adolescent↗

Traditional bowel preparation versus osmotic agent mannitol for preoperative colonic cleansing in elective colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: The need for mechanical cleansing of the bowel before elective colorectal surgery is generally accepted. There are various methods for preparation in use today, but it is still controversial which of them is superior to the others. AIM: To determine whether there is a significant difference in postoperative infectious wound complications rate between the traditional bowel preparation and oral lavage with the osmotic agent Mannitol. METHODS: A retrospective study from January 1997 to June 2000 was performed. Patients who underwent elective surgery for colorectal carcinomas were divided into two groups according to the method of colonic cleansing that was used. The traditional bowel preparation was performed with 30.0 cc Castor oil given per os in the day before the operation and three soap enemas (Group I). Patients from the other group (Group II) were given 500 cc 10% Mannitol in the day before the operation. RESULTS: There were 154 patients in Group I and 36 patients in Group II. Infectious wound complications developed in 26 patients from Group I versus 13 patients from Group II. The difference was statistically significant (16.9% vs. 36.1%, p < 0.01). The differences in the incidence of anastomotic leaks and mortality rate between the two groups were without statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The use of Mannitol is associated with increase in the postoperative infectious wound complications and therefore should be avoided as colonic cleansing method in elective colorectal surgery.

Adult↗

A descriptive study of immune status in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: lymphocyte phenotypes.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To describe immune status in patients prior to colorectal surgery for cancer, to establish values to serve as a baseline for subsequent analyses, and to describe a procedure for studying phenotypes of the immune system, elucidating its advantages. DESIGN: One component of a larger longitudinal survey. SETTING: Two large, inner-city university hospitals and two of their affiliated hospitals in the northeastern United States. SAMPLE: Patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer (N = 94). Subjects were primarily male (n = 57) and Caucasian (n = 85) and ranged in age from 26-88 years (mean = 63). Seventy-seven percent (n = 73) had cancer, 23% (n = 21) had benign diseases or conditions. METHODS: Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte phenotypes was performed on blood samples drawn from patients before they underwent surgery for colorectal cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The average absolute lymphocyte subset levels and the average relative lymphocyte subset levels of blood samples taken from patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer were compared (using t-tests) with the subset levels of two normal reference samples. FINDINGS: The average absolute lymphocyte subset levels and average relative lymphocyte subset levels of patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer fell within normal ranges. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that this sample of patients undergoing surgery has one essential element of an intact immune system--normal levels of lymphocyte subsets. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: There is no indication preoperatively that this population is at a higher risk for infection or delayed wound healing. However, there may be other times in the illness trajectory when the immune system does become compromised, and these values prior to surgery will serve as a baseline to identify changes in patients' immune status over time. Further longitudinal studies are necessary.

Adult↗

Impact of single dose as compared to three dose prophylaxis with latamoxef (moxalactam) on the colonic microflora in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Twenty patients undergoing colorectal surgery were given an initial dose of 2 g latamoxef (moxalactam) parenterally at the induction of anaesthesia. Ten of the patients received two subsequent doses at 8 h intervals. A series of serum and faecal specimens were taken for analysis of latamoxef concentrations. Tissue samples from intestinal mucosa and peritoneal fat were also taken at surgery. The mean serum peak level was 119.8 +/- 10.7 mg/l. The mean half life was 2.8 h and the mean area under the serum concentration curve was 345.0 +/- 25.7 mg h/l. The concentrations in intestinal mucosa were high when the tissue was removed within 4 h after the administration of latamoxef (22.6 +/- 1.7 micrograms/g, mean +/- S.E.). The concentrations declined when the tissues were removed later (7.8 +/- 0.7 micrograms/g). The content of latamoxef in peritoneal fat varied, range 0.8-23.4, mean 8.5 +/- 1.4 micrograms/g. Measureable levels of latamoxef in faeces were found in all patients except one. The values varied between 0.2 to 23.0, mean 8.9 +/- 1.5 micrograms/g. Faecal samples were also collected during the investigation period for cultivation of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. The aerobic bacteria-streptococci, enterococci and enterobacteria--were suppressed significantly during the prophylaxis period. Among the anaerobic bacteria--cocci, lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, clostridia, bacteroides and fusobacteria--decreased markedly during the same period. After two weeks the microflora was normalized in all patients. There were no differences between the patients receiving one dose of latamoxef and those receiving three doses. No postoperative infections occurred.

Adult↗

Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Conversion rates following laparoscopic colorectal surgery vary widely between studies, and the outcome of converted patients remains controversial. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the English-language literature was updated until May 1999. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies on 3232 patients were considered for analysis. The overall conversion rate was 15.38%. Seventy nine percent of the studies did not include a definition for conversion; in these studies, the conversion rate was significantly lower than in the series where a specific definition was considered (13.7% vs 18.9%, chi-square test, p < 0.001). Converted patients had a prolonged hospital stay (11.38 vs 7.41 days) and operative time (209 vs 189 min) in comparison with laparoscopically completed patients (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.70-4.00 and 35.90-37.10, respectively). The factors associated with an increased rate for conversion were left colectomy (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.061), anterior resection of the rectum (OR = 1.088), diverticulitis (OR = 1.302), and cancer (OR = 2.944) (for each parameter, Wald chi-square value, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In nonrandomized studies, the rate of laparoscopically completed colorectal resections is close to 85%. Because converted patients have a distinct outcome, a clear definition of conversion is required to compare the results of randomized trials. Such trials should also consider a 20% rate of conversion when estimating the sample size for the desired power level. It is likely that converted patients will have a significant impact on the results of future clinical research in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Aged↗

Predicting conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Fellowship training may be an advantage.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery has clear advantages over open surgery; however, the effectiveness of the approach depends on the conversion rate. The objective of this work was to prospectively validate a model that would predict conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. METHODS: A simple clinical model for predicting conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery was previously developed based on a multivariable logistic regression analysis of 367 procedures. This model was applied prospectively to a follow-up group of 248 procedures by the same team, including 54 procedures performed by one new fellowship-trained surgeon. RESULTS: Patients in the follow-up group were more likely to have cancer (56% vs 44%, p = 0.007) and were more obese (median, 71.0 vs 66.0 kg; p < 0.001). The rate of conversion in the follow-up group was unchanged (8.9% vs 9.0%, p > 0.05). Despite expected trends toward increasing risk of conversion with weight level (<60 kg, 6.8%; 60-<90 kg, 9.0%; >90 kg, 12.1%; p > 0.05) and malignancy (10.1% vs 7.3%, p > 0.05), the model did not distinguish well between groups at risk for conversion. Contrary to the model, however, the fellowship-trained surgeon had a conversion rate that was not higher than that of the other, more experienced surgeons (7.3% vs 9.3%, p > 0.05) even though he was less experienced, and operating on patients who were more obese (median, 75.0 vs 70 kg; p = 0.02) and more likely to have cancer (59% vs 55%, p > 0.05). Recalculated conversion scores that excluded the inexperience point for the fellowship-trained surgeon showed a good fit for the model. Considering the original and follow-up experience together (615 cases), the model clearly stratifies patients into low (0 points), medium (1-2 points), and high risk (3-4 points) for conversion, with respective rates of 2.9%, 8.1%, and 20% ( p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This model appears to be a valid predictor of conversion to open surgery. Fellowship training may provide sufficient experience so that learning curve issues are redundant in early practice. This model now requires validation by other centers.

Body Weight↗

Evidence for early oral feeding of patients after elective open colorectal surgery: a literature review.

AIM: To review research on early oral feeding following elective, open colorectal surgery. BACKGROUND: Fasting following gastrointestinal surgery is a traditional surgical practice, based on fears of causing postoperative complications if oral intake begins before bowel function returns, but fasting following elective surgery is questionable as a best practice. METHODS: Searches in Journals@Ovid CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library for primary studies, published during 1995-2004, used the keywords: 'surgery', 'postoperative', 'elective, 'colorectal', 'bowel, 'colon', 'oral', 'enteral', 'feeding', 'early', 'traditional'. Studies of adults undergoing elective, open colorectal surgery who were allowed fluids and food before bowel function returned (early feeding) were included. Outcomes of interest were safety, tolerability, duration of gastrointestinal ileus and length of hospital stay. Critical appraisal of randomized and controlled studies was undertaken following inclusion. RESULTS: Fifteen studies comprising 1352 patients were reviewed. All studies concluded early feeding was safe, based on complications rates. Total complications were 12.5% (range 0-25%) for 935 early feeding patients, with no increased risk of anastomotic leak, aspiration pneumonia, or bowel obstruction. For all studies an average of 86% patients (range 73-100%) tolerated early feeding. Studies demonstrating faster resolution of postoperative ileus or shorter hospitalization were associated with multimodal perioperative care, including early mobilization, epidural analgesia and comprehensive patient education. Appraisal of five randomized trials revealed no blinding and inadequate randomization. CONCLUSIONS: This review supports early oral feeding after elective, open colorectal surgery and challenges the traditional practice of fasting patients until return of bowel function. Early feeding was safe, well-tolerated and easy to implement. Reduced length of ileus and shorter hospitalization may occur with multimodal protocols. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses can highlight this new evidence for other health professionals, advocate development of clinical protocols featuring early feeding and participate in multi-disciplinary, multi-method research regarding benefits of early feeding.

Aged↗

Cost-effectiveness of blood transfusion and white cell reduction in elective colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: The use of white cell (WBC)-reduced blood in elective colorectal surgery appears to reduce the frequency of postoperative infection. The question to be addressed is whether the cost:benefit ratio justifies the recommendation that WBC-reduced blood should be used for all colorectal surgery. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients admitted for elective colorectal surgery (n = 197) were randomly assigned to receive transfusion consisting of whole blood or WBC-reduced whole blood. Postoperative complications, postoperative stay, and hospital charges were compared. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients received WBC-reduced whole blood, 56 received unfiltered whole blood, and 93 received no transfusion. Postoperative infections were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the group that received unfiltered whole blood. That group also had longer hospital stays: 17 days as compared to stays of 10 and 11 days for the group receiving no transfusion and the group receiving filtered whole blood transfusions, respectively (p < 0.01). The total hospital cost per patient receiving unfiltered whole blood was $12,347, as compared to $7,867 for those who received WBC-reduced whole blood and $7,030 for those who received no transfusion. CONCLUSION: The use of WBC-reduced whole blood transfusions in elective colorectal surgery significantly reduces the frequency of postoperative infection, the length of hospital stay, and the total hospital charges for patients needing blood transfusion.

Adult↗