PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Content validation”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

A practical approach to content validation.

Often researchers are unable to find instruments to estimate variables they want to investigate. Once the variable of interest has been defined and operationalized, demonstrating content validity is the next step in the instrument development process. It requires that experts confirm that the operational definitions created are congruent with the universe of the theoretical definition of the concept. Grounded in appropriate standards and psychometric theory, the process of content validation is explored. Helpful suggestions are provided for the development of a form, the selection of experts, and the collection and analysis of data. The guidelines and examples presented offer a set of blueprints to assist the nurse researcher with a practical approach to the content validation process.

Delphi Technique↗

A content validation study of five nursing diagnoses by critical care nurses.

OBJECTIVE: To identify frequently used nursing diagnoses as perceived by critical care nurses and to examine content validity of defining characteristics of five selected nursing diagnoses. DESIGN: Retrospective, descriptive. SETTING: Critical care units in one midwestern state. SUBJECTS: Registered nurses, members of American Association of Critical Care Nurses, currently practicing in critical care units (n = 59). OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic content validity (DCV) scores and the most frequently used diagnoses as perceived by the subjects as recorded on the Nursing Diagnoses Validation Instrument. PROCEDURE: Mailed to subjects, self-administered. RESULTS: Major defining characteristics were identified for all five nursing diagnoses. Alterations in Comfort and Impaired Skin Integrity were perceived as most frequently used diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations of this study, findings reflected a consensus concerning defining characteristics of the nursing diagnoses Impaired Skin Integrity, Sleep Pattern Disturbance (Adult), and Activity Intolerance. Beginning support was found for defining characteristics of Sleep Pattern Disturbance (Child) and Parental Role Conflict. Additional content validation research that focuses on perceived frequently used diagnoses is indicated to generate clinically relevant nursing diagnoses.

Critical Care↗

Content validity of a trainer's report: summative assessment in general practice.

A structured trainer's report for use in summative assessment in general practice has been designed, and it is important that the content validity of this report is tested before it is widely adopted. The aim of this paper was to assess the content validity of a proposed report from the perspective of doctors who have recently completed vocational training. A postal questionnaire survey was sent out seeking the views of 220 doctors who had completed vocational training in 1994 as to whether or not the proposed contents were items that are needed in general practice, and whether or not the items were suitable for assessment by means of a trainer's report. The response rate was 73.3%. More than 85% of respondents agreed that the 31 items proposed for inclusion in the trainer's report were needed in general practice. While the proportions agreeing that the items were suitable for assessment by a trainer's report were considerably lower, for 26 items significantly more agreed that they were suitable than disagreed. Analysis of the freetext comments made by respondents illustrated their concerns. The results provide support for the content validity of this proposed trainer's report; however it is important that the concerns expressed are addressed.

Adult↗

[Assessment of construct and content validity of Monitor--an index of the quality of nursing care--and the evaluation of clarity and concreteness of the criteria of Monitor].

The purpose of this study was to test construct and content validity of Monitor and to evaluate if its criteria were clear and concrete. The construct validity was evaluated after reviewing the Finnish nursing literature in order to determine how man is perceived and what are the essential principles of Finnish nursing care. Each of the Monitor criteria was then compared with that view of man and the principles present in the literature. The human needs by Yura and Walsh were examined in order to find out to what extent the Monitor-instrument covers these needs. The content validity and the clarity and concreteness of the criteria were evaluated by experts. The results imply that the physical characteristics of man were prevalent in 76 out of 155 criteria. The essential principles were found in Monitor, but the principles concerning health centricity and patients' independence were found only in 13 out of 155 criteria. The instrument covered 4 human needs by Yura and Walsh totally and 20 in part. The experts rated 151 criteria content valid, 143 concrete and 139 clear in this study. Retesting is needed in the future studies.

Health Services Needs and Demand↗

Development of a content-validated venous ulcer guideline.

Evidence-based practice for venous ulcers may improve healing and reduce costs of care. The Association for the Advancement of Wound Care Government and Regulatory Task Force developed a content-validated venous ulcer guideline based on best available evidence supporting each aspect of venous ulcer care. After compiling all-inclusive lists of elements in venous ulcer algorithms published before August 2002, the Task Force objectively rated and summarized up to five best references from MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE literature searches covering each aspect of care. Sixteen multidisciplinary wound care professionals and educators used judgment quantification to content validate all steps. A 2004 email survey of AAWC members (N = 1,514) clarified effects of under-reimbursement on evidence-based venous practice. The Venous Ulcer Guideline containing all elements with A-level evidence plus those with a Content Validity Index >0.75 now resides on the AAWC and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality National Guideline Clearinghouse websites. However, a review of US healthcare environment components, including reimbursement policies, and the results of the survey identified many barriers to implementation of A-level evidence supported steps (sustained graduated high compression, autolytic debridement, and moist wound environments) in practice. Sufficient evidence supports improved venous ulcer care in the US but inadequate and/or inconsistent reimbursement policies impede quality evidence-based venous ulcer practice, delaying healing and increasing the burden of venous ulcers on society.

Algorithms↗

Development and content validity testing of a comprehensive classification of diagnoses for pediatric nurse practitioners.

Pediatric nurse practitioners (PNPs) need an integrated, comprehensive classification that includes nursing, disease, and developmental diagnoses to effectively describe their practice. No such classification exists. Further, methodologic studies to help evaluate the content validity of any nursing taxonomy are unavailable. A conceptual framework was derived. Then 178 diagnoses from the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) 1986 list, selected diagnoses from the International Classification of Diseases, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Third Revision, and others were selected. This framework identified and listed, with definitions, three domains of diagnoses: Developmental Problems, Diseases, and Daily Living Problems. The diagnoses were ranked using a 4-point scale (4 = highly related to 1 = not related) and were placed into the three domains. The rating scale was assigned by a panel of eight expert pediatric nurses. Diagnoses that were assigned to the Daily Living Problems domain were then sorted into the 11 Functional Health patterns described by Gordon (1987). Reliability was measured using proportions of agreement and Kappas. Content validity of the groups created was measured using indices of content validity and average congruency percentages. The experts used a new method to sort the diagnoses in a new way that decreased overlaps among the domains. The Developmental and Disease domains were judged reliable and valid. The Daily Living domain of nursing diagnoses showed marginally acceptable validity with acceptable reliability. Six Functional Health Patterns were judged reliable and valid, mixed results were determined for four categories, and the Coping/Stress Tolerance category was judged reliable but not valid using either test. There were considerable differences between the panel's, Gordon's (1987), and NANDA's clustering of NANDA diagnoses. This study defines the diagnostic practice of nurses from a holistic, patient-centered perspective. It is the first study to use quantitative methods to test a diagnostic classification system for nursing. The classification model could also be adapted for other nurse specialties.

Humans↗

Content validity of the In-Hand Manipulation Test.

Object manipulation skills are a vital area for client assessment in occupational therapy, but in-hand manipulation skills are not specifically included in any standardized tests of hand function for children. The In-Hand Manipulation Test (IMT) was developed for use by occupational therapists with preschool and young school-age children. Assessment of the IMT's content validity was an important precursor to further development of the test. Twenty-four certified occupational therapists rated young children's performance during administration of the IMT before completing a content validity survey about the test. Overall, the IMT's content validity was supported by the feedback from the raters. A final test length of 50 items with two trials per item was considered acceptable, provided that the test takes no longer than 20 to 30 min to administer. The therapists were positive about the content and structure of the rating scale and the approach used in presenting activities to the children. Some issues related to functional validity of some skills or the proportions of in-hand manipulation skills were raised. Further development of the IMT for clinical and research use seems warranted. Revisions to the test will be made, and another pilot study will be conducted before normative data collection. Training for administering and scoring the test will incorporate the recommendations on the basis of this study's results.

Apraxias↗

Moving beyond content validation of nursing diagnoses.

TOPIC: Studies to establish construct and criterion-related validity of nursing diagnoses. PURPOSE: The overwhelming majority of previous studies addressed content validation by nurse experts. This paper describes strategies to move beyond content validation research to construct and criterion-related validation. SOURCES: The range of studies that should be conducted for development of nursing diagnoses are reviewed with examples drawn from the field of psychology. Existing studies on the diagnoses of ineffective breathing pattern, ineffective airway clearance and impaired gas exchange are used as examples. CONCLUSIONS: Many types of studies are needed for each nursing diagnosis. Increased funding and support for nursing diagnosis research will be facilitated by attention to the accuracy of nurses' diagnoses and outcomes of the diagnostic process.

Humans↗

Devising and establishing the face and content validity of explicit criteria of consultation competence in UK primary care nurses.

AIM: The aims of this study were (a) to devise a set of prioritised criteria of consultation competence which primary care nurses need to acquire and (b) to determine the face and content validity of these criteria. METHOD: The criteria of consultation competence as contained in the Leicester Assessment Package (LAP) were modified for use with primary care nurses and sent to a stratified sample of UK primary care nurses (n=1126) to determine their face and content validity. RESULTS: Support for the seven categories of consultation competence varied from 93-98% and for the 39 component competences from 88-98%. There was no consensus for alternative or additional categories or components. CONCLUSIONS; We have established the face and content validity of the derived competences. These are suitable for the teaching and assessment of consultation skills of primary care nurses, at all stages of their professional development, when incorporated within an educational package.

Clinical Nursing Research↗

Content validity of the Quebec licensing examination (OSCE). Assessed by practising physicians.

OBJECTIVE: To assess content validity of the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), which uses multiple encounters with standardized patients and which is included in the Quebec licensing examination (QLEx). DESIGN: Descriptive study using written questionnaires based on Likert-type scales. SETTING: Examination centres of the QLEx. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen practising family physicians with 3 to 6 years' practice experience who passed the QLEx OSCE in May 1993. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Opinion whether the QLEx OSCE globally measured the competence of family physicians; opinion whether OSCE cases and stations made it possible to assess the main clinical abilities required of a family physician; opinion on specific statements about each case, such as how frequently the case was seen in the participants' practice, if the participants knew how to deal with the problem, if the simulated patient was believable, if the clinical situation was realistic, and if the duration of the station was adequate; and participants' self-assessment of their performance on the case. RESULTS: Eleven participants (84.6%) agreed that the OSCE globally measured the competence of a family physician. All agreed that the OSCE cases and stations made it possible to assess the main clinical skills required of a family physician. For most of the cases, participants believed that they knew how to deal with the problem, that the clinical situation was realistic, that the simulated patient was believable, and that the case duration was adequate. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the content validity of the QLEx OSCE and confirm that it assesses the main skills needed for practising family medicine and adequately samples possible encounters or cases seen in family practice.

Adult↗

Survey of wound, ostomy and continence (WOC) nurse clinicians on stomal and peristomal complications: a content validation study.

PURPOSE: Validated and reliable stomal and peristomal complication definitions and associated interventions are lacking. Available literature is either narrowly medically focused or only of case study level. The objectives of this study were to establish content validation data for the proposed stomal and peristomal complication definitions and their associated interventions, to obtain the data related to contact with stomal and peristomal complication patients, and to gain insight into the ostomy care process. METHODS: A researcher-designed survey was sent to 2900 expert Wound, Ostomy and Continence nurse clinicians via a national mailing to a representative nonrandomized sample of participants who identified that they included ostomy care in their professional practice. In total, 686 nurses returned the survey, a response rate of 24%. The purposive sample was asked to quantify the degree of validity of the survey's stated stomal and peristomal definitions and interventions. Hand-written qualitative comments of the participants were transcribed, analyzed, and themes were derived. RESULTS: On a scale of 1 to 4, the mean score for all definitions and interventions was 3.64 (SD=0.30). The overall survey's content validity index was .91. Ratings demonstrated high consensus validation on the stomal and peristomal definitions and interventions, with definitions scoring higher. The mean scores and the content validity index results on selected items were slightly lower for interventions, especially stomal interventions. Qualitative analysis of participants' comments about the whole instrument generated 10 themes and associated subthemes related to omitted complications and interventions and general observations about the ostomy care process and the validation research process. CONCLUSION: The proposed stomal and peristomal definitions and interventions were rated as generally valid. Further research documenting validation of participants' comments is necessary. Given the findings, additional complications and interventions not identified in the literature were noted and need to be further scrutinized and researched.

Adult↗

Devising and establishing the face and content validity of explicit criteria of consultation competence for UK secondary care nurses.

AIM: The aims of this study were (a) to devise a set of prioritised criteria of consultation competence for UK secondary care nurses, and (b) to determine their face and content validity. METHOD: The criteria of consultation competence as contained in the Consultation Assessment and Improvement Instrument (CAIIN) for primary care nurses were adapted as a result of focus group discussions and observation of videotaped consultations with nurses working in secondary care. The amended criteria were sent to a sample of nurse consultants, specialist nurses and nurse practitioners (n = 394) to determine their face and content validity. RESULTS: Support for the seven categories of consultation competence varied from 96% to 99% and for the 37 component competences from 94% to 99%. There was no consensus for alternative or additional categories or components. 87% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed that the categories of consultation competence should be prioritised and 63% strongly agreed or agreed with the suggested weightings. CONCLUSION: We have devised prioritised criteria of consultation competence of UK secondary care nurses and established their face and content validity. This can now facilitate the assessment and improvement of the consultation competence of secondary care nurses for both formative and regulatory purposes.

Clinical Competence↗

Interrater reliability and content validity of a minimal data set to measure outcomes of students receiving school-based occupational therapy and physical therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The 1997 Amendments of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act increased the emphasis on accountability for outcomes of students with disabilities in the United States. The purpose of this study was to determine the content validity and estimate the interrater reliability of the School Outcomes Measure, a new minimal data set to measure groups of students' performance in the areas addressed by school-based therapy. METHOD: Forty-five occupational therapists and physical therapists working in Oklahoma's public schools participated in the content validity study. Eight occupational therapist-physical therapist pairs rated 17 students for the interrater reliability study. Therapists were recruited and data were collected by mail for both studies. RESULTS: Most validity study participants thought the tool was comprehensive and clear, and that they could complete the tool twice a year for their students. The weighted kappa statistic indicated that the therapists' agreement was substantial (.73) to almost perfect (.96) for 25 of the 28 student functional status items. DISCUSSION: The results support the content validity and interrater reliability of the items. This study was an initial step in development of the tool and further studies are needed in the validation process.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Acceptability, sensitivity and content validity of the VECS and VSSS in measuring expectations and satisfaction in psychiatric patients and their relatives.

The Verona Expectations for Care Scale (VECS) and the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale (VSSS) are two newly developed, multidimensional instruments that measure expectations and satisfaction with community-based psychiatric services (CPS) in patients, relatives and professionals. This paper reports on the acceptability, sensitivity and content validity of the VECS and VSSS in 75 patients and 76 relatives attending the South-Verona CPS. The acceptability of the VECS and the VSSS to subjects was good: most items were easily understood and the vast majority of subjects cooperated and gave accurate evaluations. The VECS and VSSS proved to be sensitive to variation both between groups and across dimensions. We demonstrated that the VECS and VSSS questionnaires had a higher sensitivity than unstructured interviews in measuring service expectations and satisfaction and that a domain-specific measurement had a higher sensitivity than an overall one. The content validity of the questionnaires, according to patients' and relatives' views, was very good. We demonstrated that a key characteristic of the content validity was the questionnaire's multidimensionality, with major contributions from the dimensions "Professionals' Skills and Behaviour" and "Types of Intervention". The findings presented in this paper constitute the first complete study available in the literature on the psychometric properties of the measurement of expectations and satisfaction in a psychiatric setting. They indicated that it is possible to measure such subjective aspects in an acceptable, sensitive and valid way and that the VECS and VSSS have good psychometric properties. The data presented appear promising in the qualitative evaluation of the South-Verona CPS and the method should be of interest to those evaluating CPS in other settings.

Attitude↗

Development of a new mobility scale for people living in the community after stroke: content validity.

Mobility inside and outside the home, and in the community, is important to independence of lifestyle after stroke. Existing measures lack content validity relating to these three environments. The aim of this study was to contribute to the content validity phase of developing a new scale for assessing mobility of people with stroke in these settings. An open-ended questionnaire was used to obtain responses from 15 physiotherapists with substantial experience in neurological physiotherapy. Responses were coded to provide a comprehensive list of tasks and destinations. A wide range of destinations was identified for i) inside the home: bedroom, bathroom/toilet, living room, kitchen; ii) outside the home: access to and from property, outside buildings, clothes line, garden and letterbox; iii) in the community: access to health and shopping facilities, leisure sites and public transport. Although a diverse range of tasks was identified, a common theme emerged to emphasise the impact of the environment on mobility. Responses were recorded in all dimensions of a recently published conceptual model of mobility that focused on environment. These dimensions included distance, time constraints, ambient conditions, terrain characteristics, external physical load, attentional demands, postural transitions and traffic level. Further work is required to quantify environmental dimensions which are relevant to the destinations identified in the three environmental settings of this study.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Toward the content validity of premenstrual dysphoric disorder: do anger and irritability more than depressed mood represent treatment-seekers' experiences?

The content validity of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR) has been questioned in the literature. We tested whether mood-related symptoms reported by 26 women seeking treatment for premenstrual disorders were among the proposed criteria. These women were asked to list their premenstrual symptoms and rate the severities of listed symptoms daily for two menstrual cycles before treatment. They completed semistructured interviews to differentiate symptoms of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder from those of other psychiatric disorders in women who had other disorders. All participants reported functional interference due to the symptoms. 19 symptoms of or similar to those of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder were among the 22 most frequent premenstrual symptoms experienced. Premenstrual depressed mood was less frequent than premenstrual irritability or anger when other psychiatric disorders such as major depression were taken into account. Results suggest that the DSM-IV-TR criteria have generally good content validity but may need revision to represent treatment-seekers experiences more accurately.

Adult↗

Content validation of impaired skin integrity and urinary incontinence in the home health setting.

The purpose of this study was to examine content validity of two nursing diagnoses in the home health setting: impaired skin integrity and altered urinary elimination: total incontinence. Eighty-two home health nurses rated the importance of each of the defining characteristics for the two nursing diagnoses. Diagnostic content validity scores (DCV) were calculated for each defining characteristic for both diagnoses using the method described by Fehring (1986). Four characteristics for each diagnosis had DCV scores greater than .75, indicating characteristics were critical indicators for the diagnosis. Erythema, denuded skin, disruptions of dermal and epidermal tissue, and lesions were critical indicators for impaired skin integrity. Lack of awareness of incontinence, constant flow of urine, lack of awareness of bladder cues to void, and incontinence refractory to other treatments were critical indicators for alteration in urinary elimination: total incontinence.

Adult↗

Content validation of instruments: are the perspectives of Anglo reviewers different from those of Hispanic/Latino and American Indian reviewers?

This article reports on the content validation of eight quantitative instruments developed to evaluate the interventions and outcomes for a Nursing Workforce Diversity Grant. During the expert review phase of the content validation process, response patterns to certain instrument items differed, effectively separating the reviewers into two groups. The response patterns of the Hispanic/Latino and American Indian experts were aligned with one another. The responses of the Anglo reviewers were also aligned with one another but not with the responses of the other group, which evaluated as highly relevant instrument items that were organized around five themes: the Importance of a Personal Relationship with Students of Color; the Effect of Isolation from Home and Family; the Importance of Culture and Ethnicity in Personal Identity; the Need for Collaborative, Interactive Learning and a Curriculum of Inclusion; and the Presence of Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism.

Cross-Cultural Comparison↗