PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Contraceptive Removal”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Hysteroscopic removal of occult intrauterine contraceptive device.

Dilatation and curettage or hooking an occult intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) may fail to recover the device on occasion. Theoretically, endoscopic observation should enable the controlled removal of this type of device. Of 200 patients who underwent hysteroscopic examination, 10 had an occult IUD. In 8 cases, the device was visible through the hysteroscope, and in 6 patients a successful removal was accomplished with this endoscopic technic. Failures and problems are discussed, and the importance of adequate preoperative study is stressed. Hysteroscopy is an effective procedure in the recovery of the occult intrauterine contraceptive device in selected nonpregnant patients.

Adult↗

Removal of retained intrauterine contraceptive devices in pregnancy.

Using real-time ultrasound and clinical expertise gained from chorionic villus sampling, we describe a technique for ultrasound-guided intrauterine device removal in those cases in which the string is not visible. Utilizing a stone clamp for intrauterine manipulation, we were easily able to extract the device without interrupting the pregnancy. We concur with recent recommendations advocating all intrauterine devices can be removed if pregnancy termination is declined.

Adult↗

Pregnancy after removal of Norplant implants contraceptive.

Many concerns have been expressed regarding the introduction of a new contraceptive method into family planning programmes. One of the concerns is the return of fertility after discontinuing the method. To evaluate the subsequent fertility status of the Indonesian women after removal of Norplant, a prospective longitudinal study was undertaken in Klinik Radeb Saleh, Jakarta. Fifty-one women whose Norplant were removed because of their wish to become pregnant were followed-up for a period of two years or until pregnancy occurred, whichever was earlier. Two groups of women who had Lippes C IUD removed or discontinued the use of DMPA for planning pregnancy served as control and were followed-up for equal length of time. The cumulative conception rate for ex-Norplant users, ex-IUD users and ex-DMPA users at one year was 76.5, 74.7 and 70.2 per 100 women, respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups (p greater than 0.05). The present study, along with other studies, indicate that the prolonged use of Norplant do not impair the return of fertility.

Adult↗

Actinomyces species associated with intrauterine contraceptive devices and pelvic inflammatory disease.

Swabs from 112 removed intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCD), endocervical swabs from these women and from 65 women with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) were studied for actinomyces, using direct fluorescent antibody test and culture. Endocervical swabs from 50 control subjects were also studied. Actinomyces species could be detected in 23 (20.5 percent) of IUCD wearers and 8 (12.3 percent) of patients with PID. In control cases, no actinomyces were detected. The isolation rate using a selective medium (Actino Blood Agar) was 71.4 percent. Actinomyces israelii, Actinomyces naeslundii and Actinomyces viscosus were isolated.

Actinomyces↗

Restoration of reproductive potential following expiration or removal of melengestrol acetate contraceptive implants in golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia).

Although reversible contraception is important to successful management of small populations, there are concerns about the reversibility of melengestrol acetate (MGA), the most commonly used implant in captive animals. Female golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia) placed in potential breeding situations after surgical MGA implant removal showed a 75% return to reproduction within 2 yr, unlike golden-headed tamarins (Leontopithecus chrysomelas), which have had a 29% return to reproduction following implant removal. This rate was indistinguishable from the breeding probability for newly formed pairs involving nonimplanted females. Litter size, stillbirth rate, and infant survival rate were not significantly different between nonimplanted and implant-removed female golden lion tamarins. However, females with implants left in (and assumed to have expired) showed higher stillbirth and infant mortality rates than did females with implants removed. For seven female golden lion tamarins for which reproductive histories before and after MGA implantation were available, litter size was unaffected by MGA implantation and subsequent removal. Infant survival rate for these females appeared to be lower after removal but was indistinguishable from rates in the nonimplanted females. Prior reproductive experience, length of time with an implant, and age of the females did not affect the probability of breeding for females after removal of the implants. Overall, breeding probability of nonimplanted females declined with age. Although the results of this study confirm the reversibility of MGA implants in golden lion tamarins, there appear to be some effects on viability of offspring, particularly offspring born to females with implants left in and presumed expired.

Age Factors↗

Benefit-risk assessment of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in contraception.

The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (IUS) is a long-acting, fully reversible method of contraception. It is one of the most effective forms of contraception available, and combines the advantages of both hormonal and intrauterine contraception. The levonorgestrel-releasing IUS also gives the users many non-contraceptive benefits: the amount of menstrual bleeding and the number of days of menstrual bleeding are reduced, which makes it suitable for the treatment of menorrhagia (heavy menstrual blood loss). Dysmenorrhoea (painful menstruation) and premenstrual symptoms are also relieved. In addition, the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS provides protection for the endometrium during hormone replacement therapy. The local release of levonorgestrel into the uterine cavity results in a strong uniform suppression of the endometrial epithelium as the epithelium becomes insensitive to estradiol released from the ovaries. This accounts for the reduction in menstrual blood loss. All possible patterns of bleeding are seen among users of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS; however, most of the women who experience total amenorrhoea continue to ovulate. The first months of use are often characterised by irregular, scanty bleeding, which in most cases resolves spontaneously. The menstrual pattern and fertility return to normal soon after the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS is removed. The contraceptive efficacy is high with 5-year failure rates of 0.5-1.1 per 100 users. The absolute number of ectopic pregnancies is low, as is the rate per 1000 users. The levonorgestrel-releasing IUS is equally effective in all age groups and the bodyweight of the user is not associated with failure of the method. In Western cultures continuance rates among users of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS are comparable with those of other long-term methods of contraception. Premature removal of the device is most often associated with heavy menstrual bleeding and pain, as with other long-term methods of contraception, and is most common in the youngest age group. When adequately counselled about the benign nature of oligo- or amenorrhoea, most women are very willing to accept life without menstruation. The risk of premature removal can be markedly diminished with good pre-insertion counselling, which also markedly increases user satisfaction. User satisfaction is strongly associated with the information given at the time of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS insertion. Thus, the benefits of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS make it a very suitable method of contraception for most women.

Administration, Intravaginal↗

Return to fertility in nulliparous and parous women after removal of the GyneFix intrauterine contraceptive system.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the return to fertility following removal of the GyneFix intrauterine implant system in women wishing to conceive. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was performed on a sample of healthy, sexually active nulligravid/nulliparous and parous women. The participants were 18-41 years of age, with no apparent infertility problem, living in a stable relationship and planning to become pregnant. Women who changed their mind and did not wish to become pregnant immediately after intrauterine device (IUD) removal were excluded from the study. Women were evaluated in terms of rates of conception and fertility outcome. A total of 128 women were evaluated. RESULTS: The study shows that 119 out of 128 (93%) past users of GyneFix have conceived, accounting for a net cumulative pregnancy rate of 88% at 12 months and 99% after 2 years' observation. No statistical differences in pregnancy rates were found for age and duration of use of the IUD. A strong significant difference in pregnancy rate was shown (p = 0.007) between parous and nulligravid/nulliparous women. Seventy-seven women (66.9%) gave birth to a term infant. There were no stillbirths. Twenty-five women (21.8%) are pregnant at the time of writing. Five (4.4%) spontaneous abortions occurred and in eight women (6.9%) the pregnancy was terminated. There were no ectopic pregnancies. CONCLUSION: The results obtained compare favorably with those obtained in previous studies conducted following the removal of copper IUDs. The use of the frameless IUD does not affect future fertility in nulligravid/nulliparous and parous women wishing to become pregnant following removal of the device. Nulliparous women conceive significantly earlier than parous women.

Abortion, Induced↗

[Adhesion lysis and removal of an intraperitoneal contraceptive device by celioscopy].

The intra-peritoneal location of an I.U.D. immediately after its insertion is not an unusual situation. In the context of a case of immediate migration followed by intra-uterine pregnancy, which was dealt with by diagnostic coelio-surgery and therapeutic coelio-surgery, we suggest a diagnostic and therapeutic sequence. The incidence of uterine perforation decreases with the experience of the operator. The diagnosis is clinical, ultrasonic, radiological and coelioscopic. Coelioscopic diagnosis makes it possible to choose the method of treatment. Coeliosurgery is feasible in virtually all cases. In experienced hands, this method is rapid, the hospitalization required short and the sequelae simple.

Adult↗

[Ability to conceive after intentional interruption of intrauterine contraception].

Out of 3415 first insertions, the intrauterine contraceptive device was removed in 152 women (4.45%) owing to planned pregnancy. Nineteen cases dropped out of evidence, so that 133 remained for further analysis. Out of these 133 women, 120 (90.23%) became pregnant, the reamining 13 (9.77%) did not. In the first three months following the removal of the intrauterine contraceptive device, 77 women 57.89% conceived, 3--6 months after the removal 22 (16.54%), 6--12 months 18 (13.53%), and after one year 3 women (2.26%) were recorded pregnant. The ability to conceive is analysed according to the age of the women surveyed, the length of the use of intrauterine contraceptive devices, and the number of previous births and abortions. It is concluded that the use of intrauterine contraception has no influence on the later ability and speed of conception and that, for this reason, this contraception method could be considered fully reversible.

Abortion, Induced↗

Pseudo-sulfur granules associated with intrauterine contraceptive devices.

A structure resembling a sulfur granule found in histologic sections of endometrium from patients with intrauterine contraceptive devices is described. It is distinguished from a true sulfur granule on morphologic grounds and is further characterized as a foreign substance, most probably fragments of the synthetic contraceptive device. It is not associated with clinical disease. Microbiologic cultures of removed intrauterine contraceptive devices show no consistent or predominant growth pattern.

Actinomyces↗

Usefulness of a clinical scoring system to anticipate difficulty of Norplant removal.

OBJECTIVES: Removal of contraceptive implants (e.g. Norplant) is an issue affecting its worldwide acceptability. Reports of difficult, painful removals have resulted in lawsuits and reduced demand. To improve quality of care, we developed a scoring system to anticipate difficult removals. We report on the usefulness of such a system and present client perspectives about the removal experience. METHODS: A 9-point scoring system based on the visibility, arrangement, and position (VAP) of Norplant capsules was used to assess the anticipated difficulty of removal in 53 consecutive patients. The VAP score was then correlated with removal time and related parameters. RESULTS: Mean removal time was 14.74 min (range 4.75-47). In 20% of patients, the VAP score indicated a potentially difficult removal and the VAP score correlated significantly with removal time (r = 0.3, p = 0.05). Patients expected removal to be moderately difficult (mean visual analog score 4.7 out of a possible 10), but after removal they rated the actual removal experience as relatively easy (mean score 2.6/10). Before the removal, only 48% of patients said they would recommend Norplant to a friend but after removal, 70% said they would do so. CONCLUSIONS: A scoring system such as the VAP score can help identify potentially difficult removals so that an experienced remover can be present at the time of removal or an appropriate referral made. However, the VAP score cannot predict variables such as the density of the subcutaneous fibrous tissue "envelope". Although patient anxiety concerning removal may be high, the presence of a competent remover and an easy removal experience reduces this anxiety and encourages patients to be more positive about this method. The value of having properly trained, competent personnel available to perform removals cannot be over-emphasized.

Anesthetics, Local↗