SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Critical Pathways”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed1995

Role of the clinical nurse coordinator in successful implementation of critical pathways in pediatric cardiovascular surgery patients.

Critical pathways reduce variations in clinical management and achieve quality patient outcomes within a defined time while reducing the average length of stay (ALOS). The critical path is a day-by-day plan that specifies the use and timing of procedures in relation to the stage in the patient's recovery. Variations from that plan are identified and aggressively approached. This article outlines the clinical nurse coordinator's role in utilizing critical pathways for the congenital heart surgery patients. Successful implementation of the pathways using the clinical nurse coordinator's role is supported by analysis of ALOS in 286 patients.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗

PubMed1999

Use of a critical pathway to move laparoscopic cholecystectomy to the ambulatory surgery arena.

Critical pathways are being implemented in health care facilities across the nation as a cost-containment tool. When developed using best practice based on a literature review and the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team, critical pathways can be very successful in maintaining or increasing the quality of care while controlling the cost of the care provided. The Department of Defense Utilization Management Plan strongly encourages the use of pathways. Here we discuss the development and implementation of a critical pathway for laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients, with the goal being to transfer the medical care from the inpatient setting to the ambulatory surgery arena. The use of this pathway resulted in almost a 50% increase in patients treated in the ambulatory surgery arena.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗

PubMed2002

Quality of care and development of a critical pathway.

BACKGROUND: The current study reports on the first step towards developing quality of care for stroke patients at a hospital in western Sweden. A general critical pathway from the patient's perspective was developed by a multidisciplinary group. AIM: The aim was to investigate quality of care and the effectiveness of a critical pathway. METHOD: The study should be classified as a case study. Patients (n = 22), next of kin (n = 63) and staff (n = 91) make up the research group. Data collection was carried out through questionnaires on quality of care before testing the critical pathway. Data on the critical pathway were collected during the testing period. FINDINGS: The respondents valued some aspects of care as good, but there were some deficiencies as regards patient information and the patient's participation in his/her own care. Next of kin were less positive than the patients. The analyses of the critical pathway showed that the key events need to be more specific and that the number of key events should be reduced. CONCLUSION: By additionally developing the critical pathway, it should be possible to further improve the quality of care for stroke patients.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Critical pathways as an effective tool to reduce cardiac transplantation hospitalization and charges.

A critical pathway is a component of managed care focusing on outcome-oriented, cost-effective care. This retrospective review of 74 cardiac transplants in 72 patients evaluated the influence of critical pathways on clinical management, length of hospitalization, and hospital charges. Transplant patients were divided into group 1 (n = 51), which received standard primary nursing care, and group 2 (n = 23), which received nursing case management using a critical pathway. The number of intensive care unit days for group 2 was significantly smaller than for group 1, as were duration of hospitalization and hospital charges. The critical pathway provided for systematic delivery of care and decreased length of hospitalization and charges without compromising safety or quality.

Case Management↗

PubMed1995

Nursing case management in the neonatal intensive care unit, Part 2: Developing critical pathways.

Nursing case management is a model of care delivery that focuses on achieving optimal patient outcomes in expected time frames while containing costs. The critical pathway is a tool used to help the team achieve the goals of nursing care management. The critical pathway serves as a multidisciplinary plan of care, based on time. Few neonatal critical pathways are available in the literature. They can be easily developed through a collaborative process. This article presents the author's recommendations on how to develop critical pathways. Once developed, they can serve as an important source of communication among disciplines and as a source of information regarding patient outcomes. Critical pathways can also be used as a teaching tool. Two critical pathways are included in this article.

Humans↗

PubMed2001

Assessing the effectiveness of critical pathways on reducing resource utilization in the surgical intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of procedure-specific surgical critical pathways on reducing resource utilization in a university surgical intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort study in a university surgical ICU. PATIENTS: 194 patients, accounting for 255 patient days, sampled on randomly selected days over a 12-month period of time. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The primary outcomes of this study were pathway eligibility and laboratory utilization. Patients were eligible for a procedure-specific pathway in 34% of patient days identified, and the patient's clinical course was "on" pathway in 22% of patient days. Of those "on" the pathway, 54% had a pathway present in the chart and 32% of these included documentation of the patient's clinical course. Thus in 78% of the patient days the patient was either not eligible for a critical pathway or the patient's clinical course was "off" pathway. In those patients "on" the pathway 46 % did not have a pathway present in the chart. Being on a critical pathway did not reduce laboratory utilization. Laboratory utilization did not vary between patients "on" and "off" the pathway (19.1 +/- 11.3 laboratory tests/patient day versus 20.4 +/- 5.7 laboratory tests/patient day). Predicted laboratory utilization by the pathway was 5.6 laboratory tests/patient day. By reducing actual laboratory utilization to that predicted by the critical pathway we would reduce laboratory utilization at our institution by $1.2 million per year. CONCLUSIONS: Procedure-specific surgical critical pathways are not an effective tool for reducing resource utilization in our ICU. Most of our patients were not eligible for an available pathway, and those who were eligible and were "on" the pathway did not appear to have laboratory utilization guided by the pathway. Future initiatives need to explore other means such as ICU-specific care processes to reduce resource utilization in the ICU.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Coordinating initiatives in critical pathways and information systems.

Health care providers have begun to use critical pathways and order sets to standardize clinical care in order to improve clinical resource management. This article describes ways that critical pathways and order sets can be developed and implemented in a coordinated manner. This approach allows for a process that facilitates automation of critical pathways variance analysis and continuous feedback to clinicians.

Cost Control↗

PubMed1999

Critical pathways: a means of managing the operating room.

Critical pathways help institutions in efficient and appropriate resource use to increase the quality of health care and minimize health care costs. However, many opportunities for pathway development and implementation are unexplored. This article delineates the development process for critical pathways and discusses the outcomes realized from use of the total joint pathway at the Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA.

Critical Pathways↗

PubMed2004

Quality of care in relation to a critical pathway from the staff's perspective.

UNLABELLED: Specific groups with complex nursing requirements, such as patients suffering from stroke, are in greatest need of a critical pathway. AIM: To study how the critical pathway is reflected in caring work from the staff's perspective. METHOD: Personnel (n = 16): physicians, care developers, speech therapists, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, nurses, assistant nurses. Content analysis has been used. Two main categories were formed: function of the critical pathway and effects of the critical pathway. FINDINGS: The nurse in the stroke ward is seen as the "spider in the web". There is a need for more collaboration, both in and between hospitals and primary health care. Many of the staff members feel that they are working in a learning organization. Others say that they have low job satisfaction caused by low manning and, consequently, less time to spend with the patients. CONCLUSION: The critical care chain has not been fully developed in accordance with the care model. It emerges that patients spend a lot of time waiting while the staff have too little time to spend with patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed1998

Impact of a critical pathway on postoperative length of stay and outcomes after infrainguinal bypass.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of a critical pathway on postoperative length of stay and outcomes after infrainguinal bypass. METHODS: A critical pathway for care of patients after infrainguinal bypass was introduced in December 1995 to coordinate postoperative care at our institution. We compared care of 67 consecutively treated patients before institution of the pathway with care of 69 consecutively treated patients with the critical pathway in place. Data collection was done by means of chart review. Univariate analyses were used to identify differences between prepathway and postpathway patients and to identify factors influencing postoperative length of stay. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors that influenced length of stay and to examine the effect of use of the pathway after adjusting for other factors. RESULTS: Patients on the pathway were similar to prepathway controls with respect to comorbid illnesses, vascular risk factors, indications for surgical treatment, type of conduit, and type of operation. Factors associated with longer postoperative stays included distal anastomoses to tibial rather than popliteal vessels (p = 0.02), preexisting cardiac disease (p = 0.005), postoperative complications (p = 0.0003), lower preoperative hematocrit (p = 0.01), and elevated preoperative creatinine level (p = 0.006). Overall, pathway patients had somewhat shorter postoperative lengths of stay (median value 7 days; range 2 to 29 days) than prepathway patients (median value 6 days; range 2 to 35; p = 0.01), and the two groups had similar frequencies of postoperative complications, readmission, and 6-month mortality. However, patients on the pathway were more likely to be discharged to an intermediate-care facility rather than directly home. After 12 patients with extraordinarily prolonged postoperative stays were excluded, multivariate analysis indicated that pathway patients had significantly shorter postoperative stays (p = 0.001). However, the difference was not significant if patients with extraordinarily long postoperative stays were included in the analysis (p = 0.28). CONCLUSION: Use of a critical pathway was associated with a modest decrease in postoperative length of stay for most patients. This was accomplished without an adverse effect on readmission, complication, or mortality rates. However, the decrease in stay may have been achieved primarily by discharging more patients to intermediate-care facilities. The pathway did not appear to have any effect when the subset of patients with extraordinarily long stays because of complex medical problems was included.

Aged↗

PubMed1995

Enhancing patient care: case management and critical pathways.

This paper describes the processes involved in case management and in developing critical pathways as a mechanism to improve customer focused care. Critical pathways can be used to manage the care of patients in settings as varied as acute care hospitals, tertiary care facilities and primary health care areas. Advantages and disadvantages of case management and the critical pathways method of management are outlined from a nursing perspective.

Case Management↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Cost containment in cardiac surgery: results with a critical pathway for coronary bypass surgery at the New York hospital-Cornell Medical Center.

PURPOSE: A multidisciplinary project was undertaken at The New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center to develop critical pathways for open-heart surgery to help reduce cost, shorten hospital length of stay (LOS), and streamline patient care. METHODS: A critical pathway for elective coronary artery bypass grafting instituted on March 1, 1995, was developed through a cooperative effort involving surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, social workers, physical therapists, nutritionists, and patient case managers. Prospective data collected on consecutive patients forming a critical pathway group (n = 114) over a 6-month period were compared with retrospective data on consecutive patients forming a cohort group (n = 382) who underwent elective coronary artery bypass grafting in 1994. RESULTS: The critical pathway group of patients experienced a significantly shorter total hospital LOS (7.7 +/- 2.3 days vs 11.1 +/- 6 days, p < 0.0001) and shorter intensive care unit LOS (1.5 +/- 0.9 days vs 2.0 +/- 2.8 days, p < 0.0001). Direct costs were computed by use of hospital charges multiplied by the Medicare cost-to-charge ratio. Mean hospital direct cost (ancillary resources) was $1181 lower in the critical pathway group when compared with the control group (p < 0.0001). The postoperative mortality and readmission rates were similar for the two groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The ongoing analysis of cost, LOSs, and outcomes has made possible a process of continuous quality improvement on the cardiothoracic service in which further areas for improvement are identified and studied. The use of a critical pathway for elective coronary artery bypass grafting at our institution significantly reduced hospital LOS and direct costs while maintaining the overall quality of patient care.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗

PubMed1999

Emergency department thrombolysis critical pathway reduces door-to-drug times in acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Rapid time to treatment with thrombolytic therapy is an important determinant of survival in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that establishment of an AMI thrombolysis critical pathway in the Emergency Department could successfully reduce the "door-to-drug" time, the time between patient arrival and start of thrombolysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Before establishment of the AMI critical pathway, median door-to-drug time was 73 min, which was reduced to 37 min after critical pathway implementation (p < 0.05). The percentage of patients treated within 30 min rose from 0% prior to establishment of the pathway to 43% (p = 0.03). Similarly, the percentage treated in within 45 min rose from 0 to 67% (p = 0.0005). Door-to-drug times were longer for women than for men (median 105 min for women vs. 70 min for men before pathway implementation). The pathway reduced door-to-drug time for both genders, but the median door-to-drug times were higher for women than for men (Mann-Whitney p = 0.013). The difference between men and women was 35 min before establishment of the pathway to 10 min by the end of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Our critical pathway was successful in reducing door-to-drug times. We observed a "gender gap" in door-to-drug times, with longer mean times for women, which was reduced by the AMI critical pathway. Thus, our data provide support for the use of critical pathways to reduce door-to-drug times, as recommended by the National Heart Attack Alert Program.

Critical Care↗

PubMed2001

The implementation of critical pathways in gynecologic oncology in a managed care setting: a cost analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study is to determine whether critical pathways can be implemented at an academic institution to limit cost, without compromising patient satisfaction and quality of care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing a hysterectomy with either cervical or endometrial cancer were placed on specific critical pathways consecutively for an 18-month study period. Preoperative teaching was intensified to educate the patient regarding expectations during the postoperative period. All patients were started on early feeding and patients were also placed on separate care pathways addressing pain and deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis. Total direct costs and patient satisfaction were obtained throughout the study period. During the year prior to care pathway implementation, patient data and direct costs were obtained for the preintervention group utilized for comparison. Postintervention groups were summarized every 6 months during the study period. RESULTS: From January 1997 through June 1998, 63 patients with cervical carcinoma undergoing a radical hysterectomy (DRG 353) and 21 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent a hysterectomy and lymph node sampling (DRG 355) were utilized as the preintervention group. During the 18-month study period (July 1998-December 1999), 42 patients (DRG 353) and 25 patients (DRG 355) were accrued. The average length of stay was reduced from 5.2 (DRG 353) and 4.7 days (DRG 355) prior to implementation of pathways to 3.4 days in both groups. In addition, total direct costs were reduced by 29 (DRG 353) and 32% (DRG 355) after implementation of care pathways. Patient satisfaction data recorded during the study did not demonstrate any change throughout the study period nor were there any higher rates of readmission after implementation of the care pathways. CONCLUSIONS: Critical pathways in gynecologic oncology can be implemented in a managed care environment in order to maintain high quality of care, maintain outcomes, and help reduce costs.

Critical Pathways↗

PubMed2003

Impact of a critical pathway on inpatient management of diabetic ketoacidosis.

To assess the management of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and evaluate if introduction of a critical pathway improves management, we studied adults admitted with DKA to the Medicine and Critical Care Services in a US teaching hospital. Patients admitted with DKA in 1997 before implementation of the critical pathway were the control group (n=72). In 1998, housestaff and nurses in the emergency department (ED) and on the General Medicine and Critical Care Services were instructed in the use of the critical pathway. Patients admitted with DKA during 1998 (n=77) were the intervention group. Length of stay (LOS), hospital cost, adherence to guidelines, and medical outcomes to be avoided were compared, and regression analyses were performed to correlate processes and outcomes of care. Mean LOS and variability in LOS decreased during the intervention period, especially in patients treated without endocrinology consultation (EC) (5.2 +/- 10.6 vs. 2.4 +/- 2.1 days, P=0.01), and hospital cost and variability in cost tended to decrease ($6441 +/- 15,204 vs. $3625 +/- 3478, P=0.24). More intervention subjects received the recommended intravenous fluid volume (88 vs. 71%, P=0.013), education in sick-day management (77 vs. 54%, P=0.006), and EC (38 vs. 21%, P=0.03). Insulin management was not changed. We conclude that implementation of a DKA critical pathway reduced practice variation and was associated with shorter LOS and a trend toward decreased cost. Some processes of care were improved but many require additional interventions.

APACHE↗

PubMed1997

Critical pathways for head and neck surgery. Development and implementation.

OBJECTIVE: To design, implement, and study the effectiveness of 4 new critical pathways relevant to head and neck oncological care. DESIGN: Before-after trial. SETTING: Tertiary referral academic institution. PATIENTS: Sixty-eight patients admitted for head and neck oncological surgery or chemotherapy from December 1, 1995, through May 31, 1996; 30 patients with similar diagnoses and who underwent surgical procedures from December 1, 1994, to December 1, 1995, who served as historical controls. INTERVENTIONS: Implementation of 4 critical pathways: chemotherapy, clean head and neck surgery, clean contaminated head and neck surgery, clean contaminated head and neck surgery with reconstructive flap. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of stay, cost of hospitalization, and variance tracking (deviations from established standards). RESULTS: The length of stay for the clean contaminated group without flap reconstruction decreased by 1.5 days, and costs decreased by $7407 per patient (P < .05, Student t test). The length of stay decreased 1.6 days in the clean contaminated group with flap reconstruction, and costs decreased $9845 per patient (P < .05, Student t test). Nine patients (13%) experienced a prolonged length of stay while on a critical pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of critical pathways has resulted in a decreased overall length of stay and cost of hospitalization. It has also allowed for better coordination and documentation of patient care, while the tracking of variances has simplified problem identification and correction.

Critical Pathways↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Thoracotomy, critical pathway, and clinical outcomes.

Using a multidisciplinary critical pathway for chest surgery, the staff of Saint Joseph Medical Center (Burbank, California) and its physicians developed a strategy leading to improved patient outcomes with reduced overall costs. On referral from the surgeon's office, the multidisciplinary team, consisting of a clinical nurse specialist, physical therapist, and respiratory therapist, meet with the patient. The education that follows includes discussion of the surgical procedure, intubation, incentive spirometry, coughing, deep breathing, early ambulation, use of patient-controlled analgesia, chest physiotherapy, transfusion options, and evaluation of health status. A few days later, the patient undergoes the thoracoscopy-assisted thoracotomy. The success of the outcome-driven critical pathway can be related to several factors: (1) close coordination between the surgeon's office and hospital; (2) intensive preoperative education that decreases patient's anxiety and increases his or her ability to participate in recovery; (3) patient-controlled analgesia, nerve blocks, non-narcotic analgesia, and preemptive rehabilitation, which limit the risk for complication; and (4) thoracoscopy, which limits the surgical morbidity commonly affiliated with thoracotomy. The pathway, used for 160 patients during the past 2 years, has shown dramatic results related to reducing morbidity, practice variation, delay, and total overall cost.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Design, development, and implementation of a critical pathway in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients.

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of implementation of a critical pathway after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation on length of stay and hospital charges. Two well-matched groups were compared: 10 patients who received transplants in 1991 (before implementation of the critical pathway) and 10 patients who received transplants in 1995 (after implementation). For the initial transplant hospitalization, the critical pathway was associated with significant reductions in length of stay, total number of laboratory tests, clinical laboratory charges, and total inpatient charges with organ acquisition charges excluded. Despite the rising costs of medical care, we have designed and implemented a critical pathway for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation that has stabilized hospital charges by decreasing length of stay and the number of clinical laboratory tests.

Adult↗