PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DNA Contamination”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Ancient specimens and DNA contamination: a case study from the 12S rRNA gene sequence of the "Linh Duong" bovid (Pseudonovibos spiralis).

In 1993, several unusual horn sheaths, collected in the South of Vietnam, were regarded as evidence for a new mammal species, Pseudonovibos spiralis. However, the taxonomic status of P. spiralis remains a highly controversial subject: firstly, it has been related to three different groups of the family Bovidae: Antilopini (gazelles), Bovini (oxen, bisons, and buffaloes), and Caprini sensu lato (goats, sheep and allies). Secondly, certain horns have been shown to be faked. Most recently, it has been suggested, on the basis of 12S rRNA gene sequences, that P. spiralis was a new species of buffalo. I demonstrate here that this conclusion was inaccurate, and base this on the grounds that: (1) the putative sequence of P. spiralis is shown to be a chimera obtained from three different species: Bos taurus, Bubalus bubalis and Saiga tatarica, and (2) several factors indicate that the specimen used was not authentic. This new study confirms earlier suggestions that the horns used to formally describe P. spiralis were bogus and were in fact derived from the horns of domesticated cattle (Bos taurus). The data suggest that P. spiralis never existed.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Packaging cell line DNA contamination of vector supernatants: implication for laboratory and clinical research.

Investigators conducting retroviral gene therapy trials are required to monitor for the presence of replication-competent retrovirus (RCR). The required testing utilizes a combination of biologic assays and molecular tests using PCR. In the course of a human clinical gene therapy trial, we detected 4070A viral envelope sequences in CD34(+) peripheral blood stem cells 2 days after transduction using a PCR-based assay, suggesting the presence of RCR. The supernatant and producer cells used for vector generation had been negative in extensive screening using the extended S(+)/L(-) assay. The presence of a replication-competent virus was subsequently excluded by a combination of biologic and PCR analyses. The source of the 4070A viral envelope sequences was determined to be packaging cell line DNA in the vector supernatant. The analysis of a variety of vector supernatants by quantitative real-time PCR revealed 4070A envelope DNA sequences from the packaging cell line in concentrations equivalent to approximately 50-500 focus-forming units per milliliter of wild-type 4070A virus. When PCR was performed after reverse transcriptase treatment of supernatant (i.e., assessing both RNA and DNA content), 4070A envelope sequence concentrations ranged from 10(2) to 3.5 x 10(3) focus-forming units per milliliter of wild-type 4070A virus. Our data indicate that PCR should not be used to analyze transduced cells for RCR within the first 2 weeks of vector exposure. Furthermore, investigators using PCR to analyze transduction efficiency shortly after vector exposure may experience false-positive findings.

Cell Line↗
PubMed2006

Gel purification of genomic DNA removes contaminating small DNA fragments interfering with polymerase chain reaction analysis of small fragment homologous replacement.

Oligonucleotides can mediate sequence-specific gene modification that results in the correction and/or alteration of genomic DNA. There is evidence to suggest that the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based analytical methods usually used to analyze oligonucleotide-mediated modification can generate artifacts. To investigate the conditions under which a PCR artifact can be generated and eliminated when analyzing small fragment homologous replacement (SHFR)-mediated modification, cells homozygous for the DeltaF508 mutation (CFBE41o-) were mixed with small DNA fragments (SDFs) containing the wild-type CFTR (wt-CFTR) sequence. An artifact could be generated after wild-type allele-specific PCR (wtAS-PCR) if the genomic DNA was not gel purified. Without gel purification, the amount of SDF/cell required to generate the artifact was dependent to the AS primer pairs used. When the genomic DNA was gel purified, no artifact could be detected with any of the wtAS-PCR primers whether the SDF was mixed with the cells or transfected into the cells. Furthermore, treatment of cellular mRNA with DNase was sufficient to eliminate potential artifacts in the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. Thus, it is critical to gel purify genomic DNA and DNase treat mRNA when analyzing SFHR-mediated modification by PCR.

Base Sequence↗