PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DNA damage response”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Structural basis for phosphorylation-dependent signaling in the DNA-damage response.

The response of eukaryotic cells to DNA damage requires a multitude of protein-protein interactions that mediate the ordered repair of the damage and the arrest of the cell cycle until repair is complete. Two conserved protein modules, BRCT and forkhead-associated (FHA) domains, play key roles in the DNA-damage response as recognition elements for nuclear Ser/Thr phosphorylation induced by DNA-damage-responsive kinases. BRCT domains, first identified at the C-terminus of BRCA1, often occur as multiple tandem repeats of individual BRCT modules. Our recent structural and functional work has revealed how BRCT repeats recognize phosphoserine protein targets. It has also revealed a secondary binding pocket at the interface between tandem repeats, which recognizes the amino-acid 3 residues C-terminal to the phosphoserine. We have also studied the molecular function of the FHA domain of the DNA repair enzyme, polynucleotide kinase (PNK). This domain interacts with threonine-phosphorylated XRCC1 and XRCC4, proteins responsible for the recruitment of PNK to sites of DNA-strand-break repair. Our studies have revealed a flexible mode of recognition that allows PNK to interact with numerous negatively charged substrates.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Retroviral DNA integration and the DNA damage response.

Retroviral DNA integration creates a discontinuity in the host cell chromatin and repair of this damage is required to complete the integration process. As integration and repair are essential for both viral replication and cell survival, it is possible that specific interactions with the host DNA repair systems might provide new cellular targets for human immunodeficiency virus therapy. Various genetic, pharmacological, and biochemical studies have provided strong evidence that postintegration DNA repair depends on components of the nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway (DNA-PK (DNA-dependent protein kinase), Ku, Xrcc4, DNA ligase IV) and DNA damage-sensing pathways (Atr (Atm and Rad related), gamma-H2AX). Furthermore, deficiencies in NHEJ components result in susceptibility to apoptotic cell death following retroviral infection. Here, we review these findings and discuss other ways that retroviral DNA intermediates may interact with the host DNA damage signaling and repair pathways.

Animals↗

Analysis of the ataxia telangiectasia mutated-mediated DNA damage response in murine cerebellar neurons.

The DNA damage response is a network of signaling pathways that affects many aspects of cellular metabolism after the induction of DNA damage. The primary transducer of the cellular response to the double-strand break, a highly cytotoxic DNA lesion, is the nuclear protein kinase ataxia telangiectasia (A-T) mutated (ATM), which phosphorylates numerous effectors that play key roles in the damage response pathways. Loss or inactivation of ATM leads to A-T, an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by neuronal degeneration, particularly the loss of cerebellar granule and Purkinje cells, immunodeficiency, genomic instability, radiosensitivity, and cancer predisposition. The reason for the cerebellar degeneration in A-T is not clear. It has been ascribed by several investigators to cytoplasmic functions of ATM that may not be relevant to the DNA damage response. We set out to examine the subcellular localization of ATM and characterize the ATM-mediated damage response in mouse cerebellar neurons. We found that ATM is essentially nuclear in these cells and that various readouts of the ATM-mediated damage response are similar to those seen in commonly used cell lines. These include the autophosphorylation of ATM, which marks its activation, and phosphorylation of several of its downstream substrates. Importantly, all of these responses are detected in the nuclei of granule and Purkinje cells, suggesting that nuclear ATM functions in these cells similar to other cell types. These results support the notion that the cerebellar degeneration in A-T patients results from defective DNA damage response.

Animals↗

The DNA damage response, immunity and cancer.

The genome is constantly exposed to exogenous DNA damaging events in the form of radiation, viral infection and chemicals. Endogenous processes such as DNA replication and free radical formation also threaten the integrity of the genome. DNA damage is directly deleterious to cells and also promotes tumorigenesis. Eukaryotic organisms have evolved a signaling pathway, called the DNA damage response, to protect against genomic insults. Sensor proteins detect various forms of damage, and convey signals via a complex pathway regulated by protein phosphorylation, stabilization and transcriptional regulation. The DNA damage response causes cell cycle arrest and induction of DNA repair functions, such that cells with modest damage may survive. However, cells with more severe damage are induced to undergo apoptosis. Two compelling studies show that the DNA damage response is activated very early during tumorigenesis, providing evidence that the DNA damage response could function as a barrier in early tumorigenesis. We recently demonstrated that the DNA damage response alerts the immune system by inducing expression of cell surface ligands for the activating immune receptor NKG2D, which is expressed by natural killer cells (NK cells) and some T cells. In this review we discuss the DNA damage response and its link to the innate immune system and tumor surveillance. These findings might have important implications for the understanding of cancer therapies and for drug development.

Animals↗

DNA-damage response pathways triggered by viral replication.

Many viruses, with distinct replication strategies, activate DNA-damage response pathways, including the lentivirus human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the DNA viruses Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), herpes simplex virus 1, adenovirus and SV40. DNA-damage response pathways involving DNA-dependent protein kinase, ataxia-telengiectasia mutated (ATM) and 'ataxia-telengiectasia and Rad3-related' (ATR) have all been implicated. This review focuses on the effects of HIV and EBV replication on DNA repair pathways. It has been suggested that activation of cellular DNA repair and recombination enzymes is beneficial for viral replication, as illustrated by the ability of suppressors of the ATM and ATR family to inhibit HIV replication. However, activation of DNA-damage response pathways can also promote apoptosis. Viruses can tailor the cellular response by suppressing downstream signalling from DNA-damage sensors, as exemplified by EBV. New small-molecule inhibitors of the DNA-damage response pathways could therefore be of value to treat viral infections.

Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins↗

Chromatin and the DNA damage response.

The impact of chromatin structure upon the DNA damage response is becoming increasingly apparent. We can reasonably expect many more papers showing how chromatin and chromatin modifications impact upon aspects of the DNA damage response. Here, we present our perspective on some recent developments in this exciting area of cell biology. We aim that this review will be of interest to those who study the DNA damage response, but not usually in the context of chromatin, and equally to those who study chromatin, but not the DNA damage response. It seems likely that these two communities will increasingly share common questions and interests.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗

The radiomimetic enediyne C-1027 induces unusual DNA damage responses to double-strand breaks.

Cells lacking the protein kinase ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) have defective responses to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), including an inability to activate damage response proteins such as p53. However, we previously showed that cells lacking ATM robustly activate p53 in response to DNA strand breaks induced by the radiomimetic enediyne C-1027. To gain insight into the nature of C-1027-induced ATM-independent damage responses to DNA DSBs, we further examined the molecular mechanisms underlying the cellular response to this unique radiomimetic agent. Like ionizing radiation (IR) and other radiomimetics, breaks induced by C-1027 efficiently activate ATM by phosphorylation at Ser1981, yet unlike other radiomimetics and IR, DNA breaks induced by C-1027 result in normal phosphorylation of p53 and the cell cycle checkpoint kinases (Chk1 and Chk2) in the absence of ATM. In the presence of ATM, but under ATM and Rad3-related kinase (ATR) deficient conditions, C-1027 treatment resulted in a decrease in the level of Chk1 phosphorylation but not in the level of p53 and Chk2 phosphorylation. Only when cells were deficient in both ATM and ATR was there a reduction in the level of phosphorylation of each of these DNA damage response proteins. This reduction was also accompanied by an increased level of cell death in comparison to that of wild-type cells or cells lacking either ATM or ATR. Our findings demonstrate a unique cellular response to C-1027-induced DNA DSBs in that DNA damage response proteins are unaffected by the absence of ATM, as long as ATR is present.

Amino Acids, Cyclic↗

Loss of Gst1 enhances resistance to MMS by reprogramming the transcription of DNA damage response genes in a Rad53-dependent manner in Candida albicans.

The DNA damage response is a highly conserved protective mechanism that enables cells to cope with various lesions in the genome. Extensive studies across different eukaryotic cells have identified the crucial roles played by components required for response to DNA damage. When compared to the essential signal transducers and repair factors in the DNA damage response circuitry, the negative regulators and underlying mechanisms of this circuitry have been relatively under-examined. In this study, we investigated Gst1, a putative glutathione transferase in the fungal pathogen Candida albicans. We found that under stress caused by the DNA damage agent MMS, GST1 expression was significantly upregulated, and this upregulation was further enhanced by the loss of the checkpoint kinases and DNA repair factors. Somewhat counterintuitively, deletion of GST1 conferred increased resistance to MMS, potentially via enhancing the phosphorylation of Rad53. Furthermore, overexpression of RAD53 or deletion of GST1 resulted in upregulated transcription of DNA damage repair genes, including CAS1, RAD7, and RAD30, while repression of RAD7 transcription in the GST1 deletion reversed the strain's heightened resistance to MMS. Finally, Gst1 physically interacted with Rad53, and their interaction weakened in response to MMS-induced stress. Overall, our findings suggest a negative regulatory role for GST1 in DNA damage response in C. albicans, and position Gst1 within the Rad53-mediated signaling pathway. These findings hold significant implications for understanding the mechanisms underlying the DNA damage response in this fungal pathogen and supply new potential targets for therapeutic intervention.

Candida albicans↗

DNA damage response of cloned DNA beta-polymerase promoter is blocked in mutant cell lines deficient in protein kinase A.

DNA beta-polymerase (beta-pol), one of the recognized DNA polymerizing enzymes in vertebrates, has a role in 'very short patch' gap-filling synthesis during nucleotide excision DNA repair. In human and mouse, the enzyme is encoded by a single-copy gene located on the short arm of chromosome 8 near the centromere. In a series of studies, we have found that the cloned human beta-pol promoter is regulated by signals acting through the single ATF/CRE palindrome in the core promoter. These signals include transactivation by: adenovirus E1a/E1b proteins; activated p21ras; and in CHO cells, treatment with the DNA damaging agent MNNG. Hence, several types of stimulatory signals are mediated through the single ATF/CRE site, including DNA damage induction. To understand the mechanism of beta-pol promoter activation by MNNG in CHO cells, we asked whether induction of the cAMP/protein kinase A pathway can increase transcription of the cloned promoter in this system. Agents that increase cellular cAMP levels (8-BrcAMP; forskolin and IBMx) activated the beta-pol promoter fusion gene in transient expression experiments, and a mutation in the ATF/CRE palindrome blocked this response. Thus, the ATF/CRE site appears to be cAMP responsive in the CHO cell system. We found that the activation of the cloned beta-pol promoter by MNNG does not occur with two mutant CHO cell lines that are deficient in protein kinase A activity. Further, simultaneous treatment of wild-type CHO cells, with MNNG and to elevate cAMP, failed to result in an additive effect for activation of the beta-pol promoter. Thus, these effectors may act through a common pathway. These results suggest that the activation of the cloned beta-pol promoter in CHO cells following MNNG treatment is mediated through the cAMP/protein kinase A signal transduction pathway.

Animals↗

Analysis of p21CDKN1A recruitment to DNA excision repair foci in the UV-induced DNA damage response.

The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor p21CDKN1A (also known as p21(waf1/cip1)) is a well known player of the G1 and G2 phase cell cycle checkpoints, which are activated in response to DNA damage. In addition, p21 interacts directly with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), thereby inhibiting DNA replication. More controversial is the role of p21 in DNA repair, since both inhibition of and requirement for nucleotide excision repair have been suggested. Since the DNA repair process occurs at discrete nuclear foci in a chromatin-bound compartment, a suitable extraction procedure is necessary to investigate the association of p21 with PCNA in these structures. This chapter focuses on biochemical and immunofluorescence methods to analyze the recruitment of p21 protein to DNA repair foci. Cellular fractionation and subsequent nuclear extraction procedures are described for Western blot analysis of p21 recruitment, as well as for protein-protein interaction studies. An in situ extraction protocol is also described for immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometric analyses of nuclear localization and cell cycle distribution of p21 recruited to DNA repair foci. The combination of these methodologies is extremely powerful to investigate in more detail the role of p21 in the UV-induced DNA damage response.

Cell Cycle↗

Recruitment of cellular recombination and repair proteins to sites of herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA replication is dependent on the composition of viral proteins within prereplicative sites and correlates with the induction of the DNA damage response.

Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) DNA replication is associated with nuclear domains called ND10, which contain host recombination proteins such as RPA, RAD51, and NBS1 and participate in the cell's response to DNA damage. The stages of HSV-1 infection have been described previously. Infected cells at stage IIIa are observed after the initial disruption of ND10 and display nuclear foci, or prereplicative sites, containing the viral single-stranded-DNA-binding protein (UL29), the origin-binding protein (UL9), and the heterotrimeric helicase-primase. At stage IIIb, the viral polymerase, its processivity factor, and the ND10, protein PML, are also recruited to these sites. In this work, RPA, RAD51, and NBS1 were observed predominantly in stage IIIb but not stage IIIa prereplicative sites, suggesting that the efficient recruitment of these recombination proteins is dependent on the presence of the viral polymerase and other replication proteins within these sites. On the other hand, Ku86 was not found in any of the precursors to replication compartments, suggesting that it is excluded from the early stages of HSV-1 replication. Western blot analysis showed that RPA and NBS1 were (hyper)phosphorylated during infection, indicating that infection induces the host response to DNA damage. Finally, RPA, RAD51, and NBS1 were found to be associated with UL29 foci observed in transfected cells expressing UL29 and the helicase-primase heterotrimer and containing intact ND10. The ability to recruit recombination and repair proteins to various subassemblies of viral replication proteins thus appears to depend on several factors, including the presence of the viral polymerase and/or UL9 within prereplicative sites and the integrity of ND10.

Animals↗

Early events in the DNA damage response.

The ability to sense DNA damage and activate response pathways that coordinate cell cycle progression and DNA repair is essential for the maintenance of genomic integrity and the viability of organisms. During the last couple of years, several proteins have been identified that participate very early in the DNA damage response. Here we review the current understanding of the mechanisms by which mammalian cells detect DNA lesions, especially double-strand breaks, and mediate the signal to downstream transducers.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

BubR1 is involved in regulation of DNA damage responses.

Defective mitotic spindles or an impaired spindle-kinetochore interaction activates the spindle checkpoint. We have previously shown that BubR1 haplo-insufficiency results in enhanced genomic instability and tumorigenesis in mice. Here we report that BubR1 deficiency also leads to a compromised response to DNA damage. Following treatment with doxorubicin, BubR1(+/-) murine fibroblast cells (MEF) were defective in undergoing G(2)/M arrest. Thus, whereas in the presence of DNA damage BubR1(+/+) MEF cells remained arrested in mitosis, BubR1(+/-) MEFs rapidly exited from mitosis and divided. The impaired mitotic arrest of BubR1(+/-) MEFs was associated with low levels of phospho-histone H2AX, p53, and p21 after DNA damage caused by treatment with both doxorubicin and ultraviolet light (UV). The impaired expression of p53 and p21 was also confirmed in human cell lines with BubR1 knockdown via RNA interference. Affinity pull-down coupled with mass spectrometry identified Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) as one of the proteins interacting with BubR1. Reciprocal co-immunoprecipitation analysis confirmed the physical interaction between BubR1 and PARP-1. Our further study revealed that the ability of retaining intact PARP-1 or its cleavage product p89 was compromised in BubR1(+/-) MEFs upon treatment with doxorubicin or UV. Given that PARP-1 mediates DNA damage responses and regulates the activity of p53, our studies suggest that there exists a cross-talk between the spindle checkpoint and the DNA damage checkpoint and that BubR1 may play an important role in mediating the cross-talk.

Animals↗

Kinetochore localisation of the DNA damage response component 53BP1 during mitosis.

53BP1 is a vertebrate BRCT motif protein, originally described as a direct interactor of p53, which has recently been shown to be implicated in the early response to DNA damage. Upon DNA damage, 53BP1 re-localises to discrete nuclear foci that are thought to represent sites of DNA lesions and becomes hyperphosphorylated. Several observations suggest that 53BP1 is a direct substrate for the ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase. So far, 53BP1 behaviour during mitosis has not been reported in detail. We have examined 53BP1 subcellular distribution in mitotic cells using several antibodies against 53BP1, and ectopic expression of GFP-tagged 53BP1. We found that 53BP1 significantly colocalised with CENP-E to kinetochores. 53BP1 is loaded to kinetochores in prophase, before CENP-E, and is released by mid-anaphase. By expressing various GFP-tagged 53BP1 truncations, the kinetochore binding domain has been mapped to a 380 residue portion of the protein that excludes the nuclear localisation signal and the BRCT motifs. Like many kinetochore-associated proteins involved in mitotic checkpoint signalling, more 53BP1 appears to accumulate on the kinetochores of chromosomes not aligned on the metaphase plate. Finally, we show that 53BP1 is hyperphosphorylated in mitotic cells, and undergoes an even higher level of phosphorylation in response to spindle disruption with colcemid. Our data suggest that 53BP1 may have a role in checkpoint signalling during mitosis and provide the evidence that DNA damage response machinery and mitotic checkpoint may share common molecular components.

3T3 Cells↗

Disruption of mechanisms that prevent rereplication triggers a DNA damage response.

Eukaryotes replicate DNA once and only once per cell cycle due to multiple, partially overlapping mechanisms efficiently preventing reinitiation. The consequences of reinitiation are unknown. Here we show that the induction of rereplication by mutations in components of the prereplicative complex (origin recognition complex [ORC], Cdc6, and minichromosome maintenance proteins) causes a cell cycle arrest with activated Rad53, a large-budded morphology, and an undivided nucleus. Combining a mutation disrupting the Clb5-Orc6 interaction (ORC6-rxl) and a mutation stabilizing Cdc6 (CDC6(Delta)NT) causes a cell cycle delay with a similar phenotype, although this background is only partially compromised for rereplication control and does not exhibit overreplication detectable by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. We conducted a systematic screen that identified genetic requirements for the viability of these cells. ORC6-rxl CDC6(Delta)NT cells depend heavily on genes required for the DNA damage response and for double-strand-break repair by homologous recombination. Our results implicate an Mre11-Mec1-dependent pathway in limiting the extent of rereplication.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated): expanding roles in the DNA damage response and cellular homeostasis.

DNA damage is one of the most acute threats to cellular homeostasis and life. The cell responds to such damage by activating a vast array of responses, ranging from DNA repair to numerous signalling pathways, which temporarily slow down the cellular life cycle while the damage is being repaired. Sophisticated relays convey the DNA damage alarm to all these systems immediately after damage infliction. Such relays must be capable of sensing the damage and rapidly creating functional contact with many signalling networks. The ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) protein is a prominent example of such a relay. It responds swiftly to a critical DNA damage - the double strand break (DSB) - by phosphorylating key proteins in numerous signalling pathways. Evidence is emerging, however, that the ATM protein might also be involved in other processes related to cellular homeostasis, which are not directly associated with the damage response. ATM is the protein product of the gene mutated in the multisystem disorder ataxia-telangiectasia (AT), which is characterized by neuronal degeneration, immunodeficiency, chromosomal instability and cancer predisposition. The AT phenotype and the functions of the ATM protein revealed to date demonstrate the exceptionally multifaceted nature of this protein.

Animals↗

Alterations in gene expression profiles and the DNA-damage response in ionizing radiation-exposed TK6 cells.

Identifying genes that are differentially expressed in response to DNA damage may help elucidate markers for genetic damage and provide insight into the cellular responses to specific genotoxic agents. We utilized cDNA microarrays to develop gene expression profiles for ionizing radiation-exposed human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells. In order to relate changes in the expression profiles to biological responses, the effects of ionizing radiation on cell viability, cloning efficiency, and micronucleus formation were measured. TK6 cells were exposed to 0.5, 1, 5, 10, and 20 Gy ionizing radiation and cultured for 4 or 24 hr. A significant (P < 0.0001) decrease in cloning efficiency was observed at all doses at 4 and 24 hr after exposure. Flow cytometry revealed significant decreases in cell viability at 24 hr in cells exposed to 5 (P < 0.001), 10 (P < 0.0001), and 20 Gy (P < 0.0001). An increase in micronucleus frequency occurred at both 4 and 24 hr at 0.5 and 1 Gy; however, insufficient binucleated cells were present for analysis at the higher doses. Gene expression profiles were developed from mRNA isolated from cells exposed to 5, 10, and 20 Gy using a 350 gene human cDNA array platform. Overall, more genes were differentially expressed at 24-hr than at the 4-hr time point. The genes upregulated (> 1.5-fold) or downregulated (< 0.67-fold) at 4 hr were those primarily involved in the cessation of the cell cycle, cellular detoxification pathways, DNA repair, and apoptosis. At 24 hr, glutathione-associated genes were induced in addition to genes involved in apoptosis. Genes involved in cell cycle progression and mitosis were downregulated at 24 hr. Real-time quantitative PCR was used to confirm the microarray results and to evaluate expression levels of selected genes at the low doses (0.5 and 1.0 Gy). The expression profiles reflect the cellular and molecular responses to ionizing radiation related to the recognition of DNA damage, a halt in progression through the cell cycle, activation of DNA-repair pathways, and the promotion of apoptosis.

Analysis of Variance↗

Interaction with BRCA2 suggests a role for filamin-1 (hsFLNa) in DNA damage response.

The BRCA2 tumor suppressor plays significant roles in DNA damage response. The human actin binding protein filamin-1 (hsFLNa, also known as ABP-280) participates in orthogonal actin network, cellular stress responses, signal transduction, and cell migration. Through a yeast two-hybrid system, an in vitro binding assay, and in vivo co-immunoprecipitations, we identified an interaction between BRCA2 and hsFLNa. The hsFLNa binding domain of BRCA2 was mapped to an internal conserved region, and the BRCA2-interacting domain of hsFLNa was mapped to its C terminus. Although hsFLNa is known for its cytoplasmic functions in cell migration and signal transduction, some hsFLNa resides in the nucleus, raising the possibility that it participates in DNA damage response through a nuclear interaction with BRCA2. Lack of hsFLNa renders a human melanoma cell line (M2) more sensitive to several genotoxic agents including gamma irradiation, bleomycin, and ultraviolet-c light. These results suggest that BRCA2/hsFLNa interaction may serve to connect cytoskeletal signal transduction to DNA damage response pathways.

BRCA2 Protein↗