PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Gastrointestinal bleeding”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

[Recurrent lower gastrointestinal bleeding due to a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the small intestine].

Gastrointestinal bleeding is a common cause of hospitalisation. In most patients, the origin and location of bleeding can be established in routine endoscopic and radiological examinations. The undiagnosed cases of so-called gastrointestinal bleeding of unknown origin require more sophisticated diagnostic methods. We present a case of 35-year old man with recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding due to a gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the jejunum that was revealed in the visceral angiography.

Adult↗

Selective visceral angiography in obscure postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding.

Postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding may be difficult to diagnose and treat. Selective visceral angiography localised the bleeding site in seven out of ten episodes of obscure postoperative gastrointestinal haemorrhage, and in two cases radiological embolisation was used successfully to control the bleeding. Angiography, preferably during an episode of haemorrhage, is recommended whenever possible for patients with undiagnosed postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding.

Aged↗

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in relation to previous use of analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Catalan Countries Study on Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

To assess the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding associated with the use of individual non-narcotic analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), a multicentre study of 875 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and 2682 hospital controls was done. With control for confounding factors, the overall odds ratio estimate for aspirin taken at least once during the week before the first symptom was 7.2 (95% confidence interval 5.4-9.6). Non-aspirin NSAIDs associated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding were diclofenac (7.9 [4.3-14.6]), indomethacin (4.9 [2.0-12.2]), naproxen (6.5 [2.2-19.6]), and piroxicam (19.1 [8.2-44.3]). Paracetamol, propyphenazone, and dipyrone did not increase the risk. A previous history of gastrointestinal bleeding or peptic ulcer did not greatly affect odds ratio estimates, which differed according to sex and were higher for younger than for older patients. However, the incidence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding was higher among the elderly.

Adult↗

Risks of gastrointestinal bleeding during secondary prevention of vascular events with aspirin--analysis of gastrointestinal bleeding during the UK-TIA trial.

From 1979 to 1985 2435 patients having had transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs) or minor ischaemic strokes, were enrolled in the UK TIA trial and were randomised to receive either aspirin 300 mg, daily or aspirin 1200 mg or placebo. Analysis of reported upper gastrointestinal bleeding events (defined as haematemesis or melaena, or both) showed a risk of bleeding in a dose dependent manner, odds ratios (95% CI) for 300 mg of aspirin = 3.3 (1.2 to 9.0) and for 1200 mg = 6.4 (2.5 to 16.5) and, as would be expected, an increased risk of hospitalisation because of bleeding also in a dose dependent manner, odds ratio = 3.6 (0.7 to 17.2) for 300 mg and 8.7 (2.0 to 37.6) for 1200 mg. Further analysis suggested greater risks of bleeding from duodenal ulcers than gastric ulcers and that bleeding is more likely early in the course of treatment with aspirin used as secondary prevention. There was also an increased risk of lower gastrointestinal bleeding, defined as fresh blood per rectum for both doses of aspirin, odds ratio 1.8 (0.5 to 6.1) for 300 mg of aspirin, and 1.5 (0.4 to 5.3) for 1200 mg of aspirin.

Aspirin↗

Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NUGB) remains a major medical problem even after advances in medical therapy with gastric acid suppression and cyclooxygenase (COX-2) inhibitors. Although the incidence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding presenting to the emergency room has slightly decreased, similar decreases in overall mortality and rebleeding rate have not been experienced over the last few decades. Many causes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding have been identified and will be reviewed. Endoscopic, radiographic and angiographic modalities continue to form the basis of the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal bleeding with new research in the field of CT angiography to diagnose gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopic and angiographic treatment modalities will be highlighted, emphasizing a multi-modality treatment plan for upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Angiography↗

Laparoscopic-assisted resection of a bleeding gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

The authors report a case of a 29-year-old male patient with a severe lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage in whom a successful laparoscopic diagnosis and resection (assisted) of an ileal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) was performed. Laparoscopy can be very useful in the diagnosis and treatment of selected cases of lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

Adult↗

[Fiberendoscopic injection therapy of bleeding gastrointestinal lesions (author's transl)].

In 28 patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding emergency fiberendoscopy was combined with aethoxysclerole (1%) injection of the bleeding lesion with purpose to controll haemorrhage. In 61% of 31 proceudres done in patients with oesophageal varices (n = 19) haemorrhage was controlled, and in further 16% deminuation of bleeding intensity was noted. In the remaining cases (n = 7) the procedure was ineffective. Only patients with Child C liver cirrhosis having oesophageal varices stages III and IV finally died because of uncontrolled haemorrhage. In 9 patients with bleeding from other lesions (gastric erosions and ulcers, Mallory-Weiss-Syndrome, erosio simplex Dieulafoy) haemorrhage was controlled in 8 patients. The method is practicable and efficient, but does not determine better the final outcome of patients with livercirrhosis Child C having oesophageal varices stages III and IV. In other cases tube treatment was avoided. The operation lethality within the series was 1,5%.

Endoscopy↗

Small-bowel investigation in occult gastrointestinal bleeding.

Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after careful endoscopy of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract is predominantly of small-bowel origin. Patients presenting with overt blood loss account for a select subpopulation of those with small-bowel bleeding. Although relatively rare, these patients often require repeated blood transfusions, investigation, and hospitalization before a diagnosis is reached. These events have a considerable negative impact on the patient's quality of life. Standard evaluation using enteroclysis, tagged red cell studies, and angiography are proven to be of limited value in this context. Push enteroscopy has significant advantages in this patient group, with the ability to deliver endoscopic therapy. Sonde enteroscopy is now reserved for a few patients to guide decisions on surgery, particularly in those with significant medical comorbidity. Definitive evaluation may require perioperative enteroscopy, but many patients can be managed without the need for surgery. A team approach by physician, radiologist, and surgeon following locally agreed algorithms is essential for the successful management of this challenging clinical problem.

Aged↗

Occult gastrointestinal bleeding.

Occult gastrointestinal bleeding is loss of blood into the digestive tract that is not apparent to the patient or physician by physical examination. It is detected by examination of the stool for chemical evidence of blood by laboratory techniques or by the observation of iron deficiency. The presence of occult blood is important because it may indicate otherwise asymptomatic gastrointestinal neoplasia, assist with the evaluation of gastrointestinal symptoms in the absence of visible bleeding, and point toward a digestive tract source of blood loss in the patient with iron-deficiency anemia.

Child, Preschool↗

Bleeding time does not predict gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. The CALC Group. Coagulation Abnormalities in Liver Cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Bleeding time, a laboratory test which explores primary hemostasis, may be prolonged in cirrhosis, but whether abnormal bleeding time identifies patients with cirrhosis who are at risk of bleeding has never been investigated. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between bleeding time and the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. METHODS: Eighty consecutive patients with liver cirrhosis (47 males, 33 females; age, 60 +/- 9 years; range 31 to 83 years) and esophageal varices were enrolled in the study. RESULTS: In the whole series of patients bleeding time was 11 +/- 6 min; it increased as the degree of liver deficiency increased, from low to severe (p = 0.007). During 14 +/- 9 (median (range): 12 (1-34) months of follow-up, 28 (35%) patients experienced gastrointestinal bleeding. They had a longer bleeding time, higher incidence of previous bleeding, more severe liver failure and larger variceal size than patients who did not bleed. However, multivariate analysis (Cox's model) showed that only previous bleeding, liver failure and variceal size were independently associated with bleeding. Similar data were obtained in patients with moderate-severe liver insufficiency (B and C degree according to Child-Pugh's classification). In patients who had never bled (n = 54), the severity of liver failure and variceal size were independent predictors of bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that bleeding time is not a predictor of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis.

Adult↗

The role of intravenous proton pump inhibitors in the modern management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a common cause of hospitalization and despite effective endoscopic treatments, it is responsible for a significant societal burden due to the associated morbidity, mortality and financial implications. As it has long been hypothesized that acid suppression may help to improve outcomes of patients with gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding, acid-suppressing agents such as histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H(2)RAs) and intravenous (i.v.) proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been the subject of study. However, results for H(2)RAs show little if any improvement in outcomes, which may be explained by their insufficient acid suppression and the existence of rapid drug tolerance. The advent of i.v. proton pump inhibition has made possible a more profound and sustained, predictable acid suppression without the development of tolerance to the drug. Recently published studies on the use of i.v. PPIs in over 1,500 patients have shown that they have an excellent safety profile. Cost-effectiveness decision models have also suggested, in a preliminary fashion, their cost- effectiveness for use following endoscopic hemostasis in patients with bleeding ulcers. The Canadian Registry of Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Undergoing Endoscopy (RUGBE) recorded information on patient characteristics, diagnosis and treatment from 1999-2002 and preliminary data indicate protective effects of endoscopic treatment and PPI use in specific patient subgroups. Randomized trials and meta-analyses have shown that acute high-dose i.v. PPI administration leads to improvements in patients undergoing endoscopic hemostasis for bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers and who also show high risk for rebleeding. However, the optimum dose, timing of administration and subgroups of patients who will benefit most from such treatment need to be further characterized.

Anti-Ulcer Agents↗

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding.

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Recent diagnostic and therapeutic advances may play a significant role in the care of the bleeding patient.

Angiography↗

Intraoperative gastrointestinal endoscopy in the management of occult gastrointestinal bleeding.

Intraoperative gastrointestinal endoscopy has become an increasingly valuable diagnostic and therapeutic adjunct in the management of a variety of complicated problems in surgical patients. At the Medical College of Georgia, intraoperative gastrointestinal endoscopic technics have been successfully used to locate the site and cause of occult gastrointestinal bleeding; to diagnose, biopsy, and, when appropriate, resect lesions during operations conducted for other pathologic processes; to gain endoscopic access for resection of lesions otherwise inaccessible (endoscopically) by virtue of intestinal distortion caused by adhesions; to guide the operating surgeon to an area of resectable disease through dense adhesions secondary to multiple previous laparotomies; and to enhance diagnosis at laparotomy. The value of intraoperative gastrointestinal endoscopy in lesions resulting in occult gastrointestinal hemorrhage and the value of combined radiographic and intraoperative endoscopic technics in diagnosing and managing occult GI bleeding are discussed.

Adult↗

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding.

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding is responsible for 1% to 2% of all hospital admissions in the United States annually. An awareness of common and uncommon pathologies will allow the clinician to develop a plan for the diagnostic evaluation that will lead to a diagnosis and localization of the bleeding site. Successful diagnosis and subsequent treatment are dependent on selecting the diagnostic tests that pinpoint the bleeding source accurately and in the most cost-effective manner.

Acute Disease↗

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding is very common. In this article the causes are explained and management is discussed. Diagnostic tools are described.

Angiography↗

Jejunal diverticulosis and gastrointestinal bleeding.

Occult gastrointestinal bleeding frequently frustrates clinicians' attempts to locate the source. Foci of hemorrhage within the small bowel are often found only at laparotomy and can be attributed to Meckel's diverticula, carcinomas, or less frequently, pulsion-type diverticula. We report our experience with two patients whose jejunal diverticula resulted in recurrent episodes of massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

Aged↗