PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “General Practice”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1984

Screening for asymptomatic bowel cancer in general practice.

General practitioners screened 4284 asymptomatic people aged over 40 to compare the incidence of large bowel cancer and polyps with a control general practice (4288 patients). Compliance was best in young women (60%), and overall it was 42%. Twenty six patients who had a positive Haemoccult test result (1.5% of those screened) were examined by colonoscopy and 10 had polyps. The incidence of cancers in the two groups was similar but in the control (unscreened patients) practice no polyps were found.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

HIV prevention in general practice.

General practice provides many opportunities for health education and for giving advice that may help prevent the spread of HIV infection. This article looks at some of the opportunities and problems.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1987

Use of the objective structured clinical examination for assessment of vocational trainees for general practice.

General practice training schemes currently have no structured methods of assessment and most rely on a variety of subjective ratings of performance. In West Cumbria the ;objective structured clinical examination' has been used to assess training performance in areas covered by small group teaching during the preceding terms. Consultation skills, interpretation of clinical data and a number of aspects of practice management were tested. The examination was conducted in the local postgraduate centre and assessed 20 trainees. Each trainee received feedback of his performance on each problem set and also an overall comparison with his peers.This method of assessment appeared to be well received by trainees and was practicable within the limited resources available. In addition, the variety of problems set allowed for a broad range of trainees' performances to be assessed.

Education, Medical, Graduate↗
PubMed1952

The management of ureteral stone; a guide for physicians in general practice.

General practitioners are usually the first to observe a patient with ureteral stone, and often they practice in communities where consultation with a urologist is not immediately available. Study of the records of 423 patients with ureteral stone observed in private practice indicates that by following a definite system for diagnosis, relief of pain, determination of contralateral function, control of infection, and prophylaxis, general practitioners can manage the disease in the great majority of cases, and can determine when treatment by a specialist is imperative.

Calculi↗
PubMed1995

Care of schizophrenia in general practice: the general practitioner and the patient.

BACKGROUND: The transfer of patients with chronic schizophrenia from large mental hospitals into the community has had an impact on the role of the general practitioner in the effective delivery of primary care services to these patients. AIM: A study was undertaken to assess the care available in general practice for patients with schizophrenia, the attitudes of general practitioners and patients to the care provided and the factors influencing patients' use of services. METHOD: Eighty three patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and 26 doctors in 13 London practices registered on the VAMP research bank took part in a series of structured and semi-structured interviews. This was followed by a systematic examination of the patients' case notes. RESULTS: Only 14 patients (17%) had no active symptoms according to the present state examination interview and 52 (63%) were currently taking antipsychotic medication. Fifty three patients were in contact with a psychiatrist. Approximately one quarter of patients were visited by a community psychiatric nurse; in 18 of these 19 cases, the main reason for contact was reported to be for administration of medication by depot injection. In all but one case, patients seeing a community psychiatric nurse were also being seen by a psychiatrist. Sixteen doctors reported having had a consultation in the previous month with a patient's relative, friend or member of hostel staff. There were considerable differences between patients and their doctors in their attitudes to the use of services. Of the 26 general practitioners, 23 were enthusiastic about the possibility of introducing shared care records. Of the 54 patients in contact with a mental health professional, only 18 favoured the use of shared care records. Most of the doctors (19, 73%) reported they would welcome a psychiatric liaison service in their practice; 40% of 53 patients said they would not. Patients receiving antipsychotic drugs and patients registered with inner city practices attended their general practitioners more frequently than those not taking antipsychotic medication and those registered with suburban practices. Use of antipsychotic medication (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 8.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 30.7, P < 0.01), male sex (OR 5.8, 95% CI 1.5 to 22.1, P < 0.01) and active symptoms on the present state examination (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 17.5, P = 0.06) were all predictive of current contact with mental health professionals. CONCLUSION: Family doctors were closely involved with the care of patients with schizophrenia and their relatives and were eager for increased liaison with secondary care services. Although patients were more resistant than doctors to management innovations this may reflect lack of familiarity with changes in community services. Greater input is needed by mental health professionals, particularly community psychiatric nurses, and some consideration of the burden of care in inner city practices is necessary in health service planning.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Access to the evidence base from general practice: a survey of general practice staff in Northern and Yorkshire Region.

AIM: To identify and describe current methods of making health related research evidence accessible to general practice staff in the Northern and Yorkshire Region. METHOD: A postal survey questionnaire of general practice staff in the Northern and Yorkshire Region. RESULTS: At least one completed questionnaire was obtained from 70% of the general practices surveyed, and the individual response rate to the survey was 45%. Just under 60% of all respondents reported having no access to the NHS internet and just under 50% also reported having no access to the internet. All respondents in this survey reported greater access to paper based information than to electronic databases. However, this research provides evidence of differential access to information resources between different professions in general practice with GPs clearly having easier access than other professions to both paper based resources and electronic databases. 70% of all respondents said that they would need to be trained to use either a computer, the internet, or to search databases if the opportunity for easy access to any of these information services was available. CONCLUSIONS: At the time of this survey, general practices seemed to be struggling to set up the infrastructure and develop the skills that are necessary to make best use of available research evidence. In addition, there is a need for further investigation into the reasons why different professions working in the same practice setting have differential access to information resources available in primary care.

Computer User Training↗
PubMed1987

Screening for psychiatric illness in general practice: the general practitioner versus the screening questionnaire.

This study compares the characteristics of general practitioners and a pen and paper test in the detection of psychiatric disorder in primary care settings. A psychiatrist interviewed a stratified sample of 283 patients drawn from 590 consecutive new illnesses seen in 15 general practices. Research diagnoses could be made in between one-quarter and one-third of the consecutive new illnesses. Two different research diagnostic systems agreed quite well with one another about who should be regarded as a psychiatric 'case' - although agreement between them for individual diagnoses was less impressive. Research diagnoses of psychiatric illnesses could be made in approximately 30% of new episodes of illnesses seen. If the DSM-3 system was used as a criterion of 'caseness', the specificity of the general health questionnaire was 75.4%, and the sensitivity was 87.1%. The general practitioners had fewer false positives than the questionnaire, but they were much more likely to miss psychiatric cases. Use of the general health questionnaire could increase their sensitivity from about 50% to 95%.

Family Practice↗
PubMed1996

What do deans of medical schools and heads of departments of general practice think of preregistration rotations in general practice?

BACKGROUND: One general practice has offered preregistration rotations in general practice since 1981. Although popular with doctors who participate in the scheme, and considered a success by the associated teaching hospital, it remains the only established general practice rotation in the United Kingdom. AIM: A study was undertaken to assess the degree of interest in preregistration rotations in general practice expressed by medical school deans and heads of departments of general practice. METHOD: A questionnaire was sent to all 26 deans of medical schools and all 25 heads of departments of general practice of teaching hospitals in the UK that undertook clinical training. RESULTS: A total of 24 deans (92%) and 24 heads of departments of general practice (96%) replied to the questionnaire. The scheme was thought to be of value by 58% of deans and 79% of heads of departments of general practice. Half of the teaching hospitals thought that they might consider such a rotation in the next 3-5 years. The most frequently cited problem initiating such a scheme was financial. CONCLUSION: Given the current interest in medical teaching in the community, preregistration rotations in general practice deserve more attention.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1996

Anti-smoking advice in general practice consultations: general practitioners' attitudes, reported practice and perceived problems.

BACKGROUND: Anti-smoking advice from general practitioners has proven efficacy. However, general practitioners do not exploit a large proportion of opportunities to discuss smoking with patients. AIM: A study aimed to explore general practitioners attitudes towards discussing smoking with patients and to assess how these influence the quantity of anti-smoking advice that general practitioners report giving during routine consultations. It also aimed to determine the extent to which general practitioners report using evidence-based interventions against smoking and to discover the problems they experience when discussing smoking with patients. METHOD: A postal survey of all 468 general practitioners on the Leicestershire Family Health Services Authority list was conducted. General practitioners' attitudes were assessed by scoring 13 attitude statements using a six-point Likert-type scale. They were also asked to rank (from a list of 12 items) the five approaches that they found most productive and (from a list of 11 items) the five problems that they most commonly encountered when giving anti-smoking advice to patients. RESULTS: A total of 327 questionnaires (70%) were returned. Most respondents (97%) thought that their advice was more effective when linked to patients' presenting problems and 65% reported that linking their anti-smoking advice to patients' presenting complaints was one of their three most preferred approaches to discussing smoking. Advising all presenting smokers to quit was considered by 40% of respondents to be an appropriate use of time but 76% reported that patients' lack of motivation was one of the three most commonly encountered problems. An analysis of the ratings of the 13 statements suggested that general practitioners who reported the greatest smoking cessation activity during routine consultations held more positive attitudes towards discussing smoking with patients. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that general practitioners believe that their anti-smoking advice is more effective when linked to patients' presenting complaints, and this belief appears to be reflected in the way in which general practitioners approach smoking cessation with patients. The findings may indicate that general practitioners are unlikely to accept a role in a population-based anti-smoking strategy which demands that they discuss smoking with all presenting smokers.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1998

Clinical uroselectivity: a 3-year follow-up in general practice. BPH Group in General Practice.

The objectives of this open-labeled study were to assess the clinical uroselectivity of alfuzosin in a long-term follow-up study in general practice. A total of 3,228 patients with clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) from 812 centers were included in a prospective 3-year open-labeled study and treated with alfuzosin (immediate-release formulation) at the recommended dosage. Symptom score (Boyarsky, modified) and a 20-item BPH-specific health related quality of life (HRQL) score (Urolife BPH QoL 20), which included three questions on sexuality, were self-administered at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months. Symptom score was significantly reduced by 54% at 3 months and this reduction was maintained up to 36 months; the HRQL score was significantly improved by 45.4% at 12 months and this improvement was also maintained up to 36 months. Alfuzosin was well tolerated: the quantitative and qualitative distribution of adverse events (AEs) was similar to that previously observed in placebo-controlled studies. 4.2% of the patients dropped out due to AEs. This study confirms the long-term safety profile of alfuzosin in general practice and highlights the need to measure HRQL in the context of clinical uroselectivity.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗
PubMed1979

Self-audit of prescribing habits and clinical care in general practice.

General practitioners' prescribing habits were studied using encounter forms during a period of three years. Analysis of the first year's forms revealed examples of inappropriate prescribing, so an audit was undertaken on the treatment of fungal skin infections and coughs and colds in children. Data collection was continued for a further year to measure any changes in prescribing. Analysis after audit showed that more appropriate prescribing had reduced the number of drugs prescribed as well as the number of repeat consultations needed before resolution of the problem. These findings suggest that the continuous use of encounter forms can accurately reveal the prescribing habits of general practitioners. Self-audit can then be performed on a continuing basis with little disruption of the general practitioner's normal routine.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Childhood immunisation in general practice.

General practitioners provide 50% of childhood vaccination services in Australia. The routine schedule has been relatively stable for over 20 years, but new vaccine developments and an improved understanding of the epidemiology of the vaccine-preventable diseases will soon result in several major changes. General practitioners should review vaccination documentation and storage of vaccines, to ensure that the service they provide is of the highest standard. National targets for "age-appropriate" vaccination could be the basis for individual practices to assess their own performance.

Australia↗