PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Generalization, Stimulus”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1976

Stimulus generalization: some predictions from a model of Pavlovian conditioning.

Three experiments examined predictions generated by incorporating a common-elements account of stimulus generalization within the Rescorla-Wagner model of conditioning. All experiments employed rats in a conditioned suppression situation. Experiments 1 and 2 found that conditioning of a similar stimulus augmented the excitation controlled by a near-asymptotic target stimulus more than did further conditioning of the target itself. Prior discrimination training between the target and the similar stimulus enlarged this effect, compared with prior discrimination between the target and another dissimilar stimulus. Nonreinforced exposure of the similar stimulus prior to its reinforcement also increased the effect. Experiment 3 examined a related prediction for inhibition. After discrimination training, extinction of the previously reinforced stimulus revealed more inhibition to the previously nonreinforced stimulus when those two stimuli were more similar. These outcomes are consistent with deductions from the present model and encourage further testing of its expansion to the case of stimulus generalization.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1975

Stimulus generalization and anxiety in schizophrenic and normal subjects.

Sixty schizophrenics and 60 normal subjects were compared on a test of stimulus generalization. The generalization stimuli were lines differing in length. Both schizophrenics and normals were divided into two groups (30 subjects each) and trained either on a short line or on a long line. In addition to the generalization stimuli, subjects were presented with an irrelevant stimulus (circle). Although there was a significant difference between the generalization gradients of the groups, this difference was limited to generalization stimuli away from the negative training stimulus. The concept of peak shift was invoked to interpret these data. That the groups did not respond to the irrelevant stimulus is inconsistent with interference theory and gives some support to the differentiation between conceptual overinclusion and perceptual overinclusion. The relationship between stimulus generalization and scores on the Manifest Anxiety Scale was inconsistent.

Anxiety↗
PubMed1975

Latent inhibition and stimulus generalization of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) following dorsal hippocampal ablation.

Rabbits received 0 to 450 exposures of a tone conditioned stimulus (CS) prior to classical defensive conditioning of the nicitating membrane response based on an infraorbital eye shock unconditioned stimulus. Tone preexposure resulted in retarded conditioning in normal rabbits. This latent inhibition effect was not present in animals with bilateral dorsal hippocampectomy produced by aspiration. Control animals with bilateral neocortical and callosal aspiration lesions demonstrated a latent inhibition effect similar to that shown by normal nonoperated animals. The failure of CS preexposure to retard conditioning in hippocampal rabbits was not due to differences in threshold of the conditioned response to the CS or to differences in response mechanisms as determined by tests of habituation and dishabituation of the unconditioned response. A subsequent experiment employed combined-cue summation tests to confirm the fact that preexposure did not endow the tone with conditioned as well as latent inhibitiory properties. Finally, tests of stimulus generalization along the auditory frequency dimension indicated flatter relative gradients for hippocampals than for nonoperated controls, with cortical controls in between. These findings were discussed in terms of Douglas' model of hippocampal function.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1975

"Stimulus generalization" between differentiated visual, auditory, and central stimuli.

Cats were trained to discriminate between two different repetition rates of flicker and of click. Both approach-approach and avoidance-avoidance discriminations were used. After substantial overtraining, transfer of frequency discrimination was initiated to stimulation of the reticular formation using bursts of electrical pulses at the same two repetition rates. Significant levels of discriminated performance were obtained in all cats very quickly, indicating good cross-modal transfer between the peripheral discriminanda and the central stimuli. The literature on stimulus generalization and cross-modal transfer is reviewed and the findings of this experiment are discussed in that context. Certain conditions are defined which, if satisfied, justify the interpretation that stimulus generalization or rapid cross-modal transfer indicate that facilitation of subsequent tasks in a training sequence can be attributed to mediation by a specific neuronal mechanism established by training on a previous task. The present experiment was designed in view of such criteria. The evidence of good cross-modal transfer is interpreted to mean that brain mechanisms storing memories about discriminations between visual or auditory stimuli with different repetition rates can be effectively activated by gross electrical stimuli at the same repetition rates. Conflict trials were then carried out in which flicker or click at either frequency was contradicted by concurrent RF stimuli at the other frequency. As the current level of RF stimuli was parametrically increased, it was found that the central stimuli achieved almost complete control over the behavioral outcome in most cases. Concurrent transfer of training, using a counterbalanced training sequence, was then carried out to stimulation of the visual cortex, lateral geniculate, medial geniculate, and the intralaminar nuclei of the thalamus. In each case, rapid transfer was displayed by at least one animal. Once performance to brain stimulation at a given repition rate was established, little change was observed when the fine structure of the stimulus was altered by changing parameters of the stimulus burst. These findings are interpreted as providing support for a statistical theory of memory, since they constitute evidence that previously learned discriminative behavior can readily be elicited by compelling large ensembles of neurons in various brain regions to discharge with particular temporal patterns. It is difficult to reconcile these results with theories which postulate that learning establishes new synaptic pathways in which discharge must occur for memories to be retrieved.

Animals↗
PubMed1977

Subcutaneous injections of apomorphine, stimulus generalization and conditioning: serious pitfalls for the examiner using apomorphine as a tool.

This report shows that stimulus generalization occurs in rats conditioned by a single injection of apomorphine. The data suggest that apomorphine initially acts as an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) of an unconditioned response (UCR) that, in turn, produces stimuli which become conditioned stimuli (CS) of a conditioned response (CR) having a nature identical to that of the UCR. The study also shows that behaviour elicited by a subcutaneous injection of apomorphine depends on the part of the body selected for administration. The mentioned properties should be taken into account when apomorphine is used as a tool in studies on brain and behaviour.

Animals↗
PubMed1985

Visual discrimination learning in mentally handicapped adults: comparative effects of two-choice and multiple-choice training methods on stimulus generalization performance.

The hypothesis that in mentally handicapped subjects a multi-choice discrimination learning method would result in superior generalization performance to the traditional two-choice method was investigated experimentally. Twenty-four mentally handicapped adults matched for age, intelligence and duration of institutionalization were divided into two equal groups and given visual discrimination training using a differential reinforcement, prompt-fading procedure. The groups were allocated separately to a two-choice and four-choice training condition in which the discriminative stimulus was associated with one and three non-discriminative stimuli respectively. Following training, stimulus discrimination performance was compared on a generalization test comprising increasing levels of distraction. The results showed a clear advantage for multi-choice training over two-choice. However, it was found that during generalization testing discriminative performance deteriorated as a function of increasing distraction in both groups, suggesting an underlying selective attention defect. Such a defect may be characteristic of stimulus generalization performance in the mentally retarded. Multi-choice discrimination learning appeared partly to counteract major generalization failure when the ratio of non-discriminative to discriminative stimuli was high.

Adult↗
PubMed1971

On the form of stimulus generalization curves for visual intensity.

Twelve pigeons were given successive discrimination training involving variable-interval reinforcement for key pecking in the presence of one intensity of monochromatic light randomly alternated with extinction for pecking during another intensity. All of the pigeons were then tested in extinction for generalization along the intensity dimension, and all showed a displacement of maximal responding from the positive stimulus in the direction opposite the negative stimulus. For six of the pigeons, for which the test included only three values beyond the positive stimulus, four showed peaked gradients but two did not, showing monotonic gradients with maximal responding to the most extreme test value. For another six pigeons tested over a wider range, all showed peaked gradients. Thus, when a sufficiently wide range of test values is employed, generalization gradients for visual intensity have the same peaked form as do gradients for qualitative visual dimensions such as wavelength or line angle.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

A role for stimulus generalization in conditional discrimination learning.

In each of three experiments on discrimination learning by rats, whether or not a 10-sec target stimulus was followed by food was determined by the nature of a 2-min background stimulus that accompanied it. A conditional discrimination was employed in Experiment 1 such that background A indicated food would follow one target but not the other, whereas this relationship between the targets and food was reversed in the presence of background B. Experiment 2 employed two feature-positive discriminations. Subsequent test trials revealed that the background for one discrimination was able to enhance responding during the target for the other discrimination. Experiment 3 employed a feature-positive and a feature-negative discrimination prior to test trials in which each target was presented separately during a compound of both background stimuli. The compound enhanced responding to the target from the feature-positive discrimination and reduced it to the target from the feature-negative discrimination. We suggest that to accommodate all these findings, the best explanation is provided by a configural model of Pavlovian conditioning.

Animals↗
PubMed1969

Stimulus generalization of gravity.

In two experiments, squirrel monkeys were exposed to centrifugally generated, artificial gravity and trained to respond for food reinforcement at selected gravity (g) levels. Experiment I involved a single g value; in Exp. II, subjects were trained to discriminate among two or three g values. After training, generalization tests were administered over a 1.1-g to 2.1-g range. The major findings were as follows: (a) single-stimulus training yielded a linear relationship between percentage of responding and magnitude of gravity. (b) Two-valued discrimination training produced gradient peaks which were shifted from S(D) in a direction away from S(Delta). This effect was cancelled when S(D) was located equidistant between two S(Delta) stimuli. (c) Gradient form was independent of the S(D)-S(Delta) difference, but related to continuum location and/or intensity of discriminative stimuli.

Animals↗
PubMed1978

The central tendency effect in stimulus generalization: the effect of sex of subject.

Eighty male and 80 female college students were shown a stimulus light of 525 nm, following instructions to remember it, and then were immediately tested for generalization (recognition) with a successively presented set of stimuli including 525 nm and six longer wavelength values. Subjects rated each test stimulus on a 6-point scale ranging from "surely same" as the original stimulus to "surely different." Both men and women showed a central tendency shift. Although the stimulus perceived as most likely to be the original (the mode) shifted to 545 nm in both groups, the men showed a greater mean shift than the women. Shifting was nearly complete in both groups within the first series of test stimuli with the men shifting faster. These findings replicate a 1972 report by Giurintano of greater central tendency shift in men than in women in a line angle generalization task, challenging an assumed analogy between our generalization task and the rod-and-frame test, in which women typically show the greater distortion. The analysis of central tendency shift within the first test series reveals that it occurs much earlier than previously believed.

Discrimination, Psychological↗
PubMed1988

Limited stimulus generalization between delta 9-THC and diazepam in pigeons and gerbils.

Pigeons trained to discriminate between the presence and absence of delta 9-THC (0.56 mg/kg, IM, intramuscularly) were tested with diazepam (5.6-30 mg/kg), administered IG (intragastrically), and were found to generalize the response associated with the THC training to the diazepam treatment only to a limited extent. Two groups of gerbils trained to discriminate between the presence and absence of IP (intraperitoneally) injected benzodiazepine agonists (5.6 mg/kg of diazepam and Ro 11-3128, respectively) generally did not generalize the drug response to IP administered THC (5.6 and 17.5 mg/kg). In addition, substitution testing with the dopamine autoreceptor blocker (+)-3PPP yielded non-drug responding in the pigeons. Hence neither proposed structural similarity between 3-PPP and THC, nor purported anxiolytic activity by 3-PPP (see Introduction) matched the THC-induced stimulus effects. The data are discussed with reference to the specificity of the THC cue or stimulus.

Animals↗
PubMed1975

Stimulus generalization of suppression in rats following aversively motivated instrumental or Pavlovian training.

Following 100 or 300 avoidance training trials, instrumental subjects and their yoked Pavlovian counterparts were tested for generalization of lick suppression along the frequency dimension of the avoidance conditioned stimulus. Gradients of stimulus control were evident after 300 instrumental avoidance training trials, and additional intradimensional Pavlovian discrimination training further sharpened the gradients. After 100 trials, the yoked Pavlovian subjects suppressed more than their instrumental counterparts. However, with increased Pavlovian training, flatter gradients with decreased suppression were obtained. Results from a second experiment revealed that, whereas Pavlovian experience decreased suppression to the tone, subjects suppressed drinking in the presence of static, environmental cues. Data from both experiments supported interpretations that stress the role of response control over environmental events.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1989

Evidence for perceptual masking of the discriminative morphine stimulus.

Morphine-amphetamine and morphine-naltrexone interactions were examined in three groups of White Carneaux pigeons (n = 3), which were trained in a two-choice drug discrimination procedure under a FR-30 schedule of food reinforcement using 3.2 mg/kg morphine and saline as discriminative stimuli. Once stimulus control was acquired by these initial training stimuli, the training doses of morphine were gradually changed to 1.0 mg/kg for group A and to 10 mg/kg for group C. The three groups differed in the minimum dose required for stimulus control and the drugs to which the training stimulus generalized. Stimulus generalization to amphetamine was inversely related to training dose. Amphetamine potentiated the discriminative stimulus properties of morphine. Naltrexone blocked the discriminative stimulus properties of morphine to varying degrees, which appeared to be limited by the training dose and the rate-suppressing effects of naltrexone when administered alone. Challenging the morphine stimulus with amphetamine resulted in a qualitatively similar blockade. This blockade was a direct function of the morphine training dose. It is argued that MS-AMP interactions result in perceptual masking of the MS stimulus, which can be differentiated from pharmacological antagonism by NTX. Two other challenge drugs, ketamine and sodium pentobarbital, did not alter stimulus control by morphine.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Time-dependent generalization of morphine stimulus properties to meperidine: antagonism by naloxone.

The time course of the stimulus generalization to morphine by meperidine (20 mg/kg) was determined in rats trained to discriminate morphine (10 mg/kg) from saline in a standard two-lever procedure with food reinforcement. It was found that morphine lever selection following meperidine was a strictly time-dependent phenomenon. Naloxone (0.3 mg/kg) antagonized the stimulus properties of both morphine and meperidine; however, the antagonism was significantly more pronounced against morphine. The results suggest that there may be certain differences in the neuropharmacology of the stimulus properties of morphine and meperidine.

Animals↗