PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Geriatric Assessment”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Outpatient geriatric assessment: associations between referral sources and assessment findings.

A review of 431 outpatient geriatric assessments conducted over 2 years examined the associations of referral problems, assessment diagnoses, and therapeutic recommendations with the source of patient referral, as well as that referral source's diagnostic accuracy in identifying the referral problems. Families referred 52% of patients, primarily for problems of memory and behavior, whereas social service agencies made 32.9% of all referrals, primarily for bladder control problems or safety-related concerns. Physicians made only 6% of referrals in this setting. Referral source was found not to be associated with any of the seven categories of medical diagnoses resulting from the assessment process and was associated with only two of the functional diagnostic categories. Therapeutic recommendations were also broadly distributed among referral sources, though social service agencies did refer more patients who required urgent nursing home placement, financial representation, or adult protective service involvement. The performance of family referral sources in accurately referring patients with dementia and psychiatric impairment was comparable to that of physicians, though all referral sources frequently missed patients with incontinence. Non-physician referral sources appear to serve as important and quite valid case-finders for outpatient geriatric assessment.

Aged↗

Compliance with social and safety recommendations in an outpatient comprehensive geriatric assessment program.

BACKGROUND: A unique contribution of a comprehensive outpatient geriatric assessment is its focus on social and safety issues in the frail elderly. The impact of such programs depends on the caregiver and/or patient complying with safety and social recommendations offered by the assessment team. Compliance in this setting has not been previously described. METHODS: A telephone survey was conducted of self-reported compliance in 124 frail geriatric patients with a high prevalence of dementia 3-21 months after completing a comprehensive geriatric assessment program at the University of California, San Diego, Medical Center. RESULTS: The social and safety recommendations constituted 52.8% of all the recommendations offered. The overall compliance rate (total number of safety and social recommendations followed/total number offered x 100) was 50.2% (95% CI: 43.7-56.6). Highest compliance was achieved with recommendations to complete a prior directive for health care (80.6%) and to wear a medic-alert bracelet (57.5%). Patients complied poorly with recommendations to change a living situation (36.2%). Analysis of variance showed compliance to increase with time between the assessment and survey. Stratifying for time, we found higher compliance in patients with greater impairment in functional or cognitive status. Most noncompliance was due to disagreement with the recommendations offered or failure to implement acceptable recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with social and safety recommendations offered in a comprehensive geriatric assessment program approximates compliance observed in other clinical settings. In this setting compliance increases over time. When controlled for time, impairment in functional or cognitive status is associated with greater compliance.

Accidents, Home↗

State of the art in geriatric rehabilitation. Part I: review of frailty and comprehensive geriatric assessment.

OBJECTIVES: To increase recognition of geriatric rehabilitation and to provide recommendations for practice and future research. DATA SOURCES: A CINAHL and 2 MEDLINE searches were conducted for 1980 to 2001. A fourth search used the Cochrane database. STUDY SELECTION: One author reviewed the reference for relevance and another for quality. A total of 336 articles were selected. Excluded articles were unrelated to geriatric rehabilitation or were anecdotal or descriptive reports. DATA EXTRACTION: The following major geriatric rehabilitation subtopics were identified: frailty, comprehensive geriatric assessment, admission screening, assessment tools, interdisciplinary teams, hip fracture, stroke, nutrition, dementia, and depression. Part I describes the first 5 subtopics on concepts and processes in geriatric rehabilitation. Part II focuses on the latter 5 subtopics of common clinical problems in frail older persons. A level-of-evidence framework was used to review the literature. Level 1 evidence was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) or a meta-analysis or systematic review of RCTs. Level 2 evidence included controlled trials without randomization, cohort, or case-control studies. Level 3 evidence involved consensus statements from experts or descriptive studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of the 336 articles evaluated, 108 were level 1, 39 were level 2, and 189 were level 3. Recommendations were made for each subtopic. In cases in which several articles were written on the same topic and drew similar conclusions, the authors chose those articles with the strongest level of evidence, reducing the total number of references. CONCLUSIONS: Frail elderly patients should be screened for rehabilitation potential. Standardized tools are recommended to aid diagnosis, assessment, and outcome measurement. The team approach to geriatric rehabilitation should be interdisciplinary and use a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Medication reviews and self-medication programs may be beneficial. Future research should address cost effectiveness, consensus on outcome measures, which components of geriatric rehabilitation are most effective, screening, and what outcomes are sustainable.

Aged↗

[Method and organization of geriatric assessment].

The intention of a Geriatric Assessment (GA) is a more systematic and exact way to examine a wide range of activities of daily life. This can be achieved by the help of scientifically proved and standardized investigations which complete the medical judgment with objective and comparable results. This type of examination controls the selective observation of the investigator and makes reexamination easier. Moreover, this way of gaining information gives reliable hints about non-apparent or difficult-to-estimate risks of a patient. The methods of GA have to be adapted to different qualities of resources which will be assessed: physical resources should be assessed by standardized ways of observation; the patient's subjective well-being should be examined by standardized interviews. The standardized instruments of measurement are fairly independent from personal qualifications of the investigator.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Use of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: recommendations from the task force on CGA of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG).

BACKGROUND: As more and more cancers occur in elderly people, oncologists are increasingly confronted with the necessity of integrating geriatric parameters in the treatment of their patients. METHODS: The International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) created a task force to review the evidence on the use of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in cancer patients. A systematic review of the evidence was conducted. RESULTS: Several biological and clinical correlates of aging have been identified. Their relative weight and clinical usefulness is still poorly defined. There is strong evidence that a CGA detects many problems missed by a regular assessment in general geriatric and in cancer patients. There is also strong evidence that a CGA improves function and reduces hospitalization in the elderly. There is heterogeneous evidence that it improves survival and that it is cost-effective. There is corroborative evidence from a few studies conducted in cancer patients. Screening tools exist and were successfully used in settings such as the emergency room, but globally were poorly tested. The article contains recommendations for the use of CGA in research and clinical care for older cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: A CGA, with or without screening, and with follow-up, should be used in older cancer patients, in order to detect unaddressed problems, improve their functional status, and possibly their survival. The task force cannot recommend any specific tool or approach above others at this point and general geriatric experience should be used.

Advisory Committees↗

[The "Geriatric Assessment" Study Group (AGAST): recommendations for the use of assessment procedures].

This work presents preliminary recommendations for a three-step geriatric assessment approach developed by a newly created working group consisting of members from nine geriatric departments in Germany and Switzerland. The recommendations were based on a literature review, expert consultation, and a consensus meeting. As part of this effort, instruments and guidelines for selected geriatric assessment instruments were translated and will be tested in German language. Further research is planned for refining the recommended method. Currently, these recommendations might help to stimulate the spread of geriatric assessment method in German-speaking areas and facilitate joint research projects among geriatric institutions.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Studies of comprehensive geriatric assessment in patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: The comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has been developed to individually assess the health status of older patients. METHODS: This article reviews the findings regarding the impact of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) on treatment and outcomes in patients with cancer. RESULTS: Several geriatric variables have been linked with the prognosis of older cancer patients, thus challenging the role of ECOG performance status in this population. A CGA may detect multiple untreated or undertreated problems in cancer patients. Although results are preliminary, some studies suggest that CGA may influence cancer treatment decisions and have a prognostic impact on patients with this disease. CONCLUSIONS: More work is needed to simplify such assessments to make them more feasible and to determine when they should be used during a patient's clinical course.

Aged↗

Methodologic challenges of randomized controlled studies on in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment: the EIGER project. Evaluation of In-Home Geriatric Health Visits in Elderly Residents.

Previous controlled studies have shown that preventive home visits are a promising method for disability prevention in elderly persons; however, due to the lack of data on cost effectiveness and optimal intervention methods, there is still debate on their usefulness. Therefore, additional controlled studies must use new methods to resolve these unanswered issues. We present a novel approach used in the project EIGER (Evaluation of In-Home Geriatric Health Visits in Elderly Residents), an ongoing randomized controlled trial of preventive home visits in community-residing persons aged 75 years and older in Bern, Switzerland. The intervention consists of in-home visits with structured comprehensive geriatric assessment and follow-up by specially trained nurses who collaborate with geriatricians and an interdisciplinary team. Special methods were used to optimize the sample size, to improve the health care cost analysis, to minimize and explore refusal to participate, to apply stratified randomization for subgroup analysis, and to evaluate the intervention process with a tracer method. Selected baseline findings (N = 791, mean age 82 years, 73% female) include uncontrolled systolic hypertension (54%), balance/gait disorder (9%), cognitive impairment (7%), 6 or more medications (21%), depressive symptoms (10%), and impaired basic ADL (15%). Baseline findings demonstrate that this study is likely to contribute to some of the unresolved issues of in-home prevention for older persons.

Aged↗

Cost-effectiveness of outpatient geriatric assessment with an intervention to increase adherence.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can be effective in inpatient units, but such inpatient settings are prohibitively expensive. If similar benefits could be obtained in outpatient settings, CGA might be a more attractive option. OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness (CE) of an outpatient geriatric assessment with an intervention to increase adherence. SUBJECTS: Three hundred fifty-one community-dwelling, elderly subjects with at least one of four geriatric conditions. MEASURES: In addition to the measures of functioning, we collected data on the costs of the intervention itself and on the use of medical services in the 64 weeks after the intervention. RESULTS: The intervention, which prevented functional decline, cost $273 per participant. The intervention group averaged three more visits than the control group in the first 32 weeks after the intervention, but only 1.2 extra visits in the next 32 weeks. We estimate that the costs of these additional medical services would be $473 for the 5 years after the intervention, leading to a total cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) of $10,600. CONCLUSIONS: The CE of this program compares favorably with many common medical interventions. Whether investments should be made in health care resources on treatments that lead to modest improvements in the functioning of community-dwelling elderly people remains a societal decision.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Geriatric assessment: making it work in primary care practice.

Geriatric assessment has become an established part of medical practice, a trend driven by the growing population of older patients, positive patient outcomes, and increase interest in controlling healthcare cost. Geriatric assessment is a diagnostic process that can be performed in a variety of clinical settings, including the primary care office. The interdisciplinary assessment team usually includes at least three members: a physician, a nurse,and a social worker. Patients who appear to derive the greatest benefit are over age 75, have mild to moderate disabilities, may be at risk of nursing home placement, and may have a poor social network. For optimal effectiveness, assessment must be coupled with a comprehensive therapeutic plan and long-term follow-up.

Age Factors↗

The Senior Care Study. Does inpatient interdisciplinary geriatric assessment help the family caregivers of acutely ill older patients?

Comprehensive geriatric assessment has emerged as an effective strategy for improving outcomes for frail older patients in the hospital setting. Attention, however, has not been given to determining whether this process has any effect on their family caregivers. As part of a randomized controlled clinical trial designed to test the efficacy of early interdisciplinary geriatric assessment for acutely ill hospitalized patients 75 years of age or older, their family caregivers were studied to determine if the process had a positive effect on caregivers' self-reported health and emotional well-being. One hundred forty-two caregivers were approximately evenly distributed between experimentals (n = 69) and controls (n = 73). By three months after the patients' hospitalization, experimental caregivers were more likely to report good general health (81% vs 63%, P = .049) than were controls. The positive effect persisted after statistical adjustment for confounding variables. Experimental caregivers were not significantly more likely to have good emotional health at follow-up than were controls (65% vs 58%, P = .43), even after statistical adjustment. Although the findings are modest, they suggest that the acute hospital setting may be an ideal place to develop interventions designed to enhance family caregivers' well-being during the early months following hospitalization. This may be particularly true when the interventions with caregivers are coupled with a geriatric assessment and care plan process.

Aged↗

Geriatric assessment unit in a teaching hospital.

A geriatric assessment unit has been in operation in a Canadian teaching hospital since October 1979. In the first 15 months of operation there were 203 admissions involving 153 persons aged 65 years or older, many of whom were impaired both physically and mentally. In many cases these patients could be discharged back to the community following assessment and rehabilitation. Only a few had to be placed immediately in extended care facilities. The mean stay in the unit was less than 3 weeks. There was a mortality of 3% among patients in the unit. For older persons who present with complex health problems a geriatric assessment unit provides an environment for comprehensive assessment, treatment and rehabilitation. A thorough assessment at, or preferably before, the point at which their health breaks down enables older people to return to and remain in the community and helps to prevent them from being admitted to an institution while they are still able to function with reasonable independence.

Aged↗

A randomized, controlled trial of a geriatric assessment unit in a community rehabilitation hospital.

We conducted a randomized trial in a community rehabilitation hospital to determine the effect of treatment in a geriatric assessment unit on the physical function, institutionalization rate, and mortality of elderly patients. Functionally impaired elderly patients (mean age, 78.8 years) who were recovering from acute medical or surgical illnesses and were considered at risk for nursing home placement were randomly assigned either to the geriatric assessment unit (n = 78) or to a control group that received usual care (n = 77). The two groups were similar at entry and were stratified according to the perceived risk of an immediate nursing home placement. After six months, the patients treated in the geriatric assessment unit had significantly more functional improvement in three of eight basic self-care activities (P less than 0.05). Those in the lower-risk stratum had significantly more improvement in seven of eight self-care activities. Both six weeks and six months after randomization, significantly more patients treated in the geriatric assessment unit than controls (79 vs. 61 percent after six months) were residing in the community. During the year of follow-up, the control patients had more nursing home stays of six months or longer (10 vs. 3; P less than 0.05). However, there was no difference between the groups in the mean number of days spent in health care facilities (acute care hospital, nursing home, or rehabilitation hospital). Survival analysis showed a trend toward fewer deaths among the patients treated in the geriatric assessment unit, and mortality was significantly reduced in the patients considered to be at lower risk of immediate nursing home placement (P less than 0.05). We conclude that the treatment of selected elderly patients in a specialized geriatric rehabilitation unit improves function, decreases the risk of nursing home placement, and may reduce mortality. The beneficial effects on mortality and function appear greatest for patients at a moderate rather than high risk of nursing home placement.

Follow-Up Studies↗

A randomized trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment in the care of hospitalized patients.

BACKGROUND: Although many studies describe benefits from the comprehensive assessment of elderly patients by an interdisciplinary team (comprehensive geriatric assessment), the most supportive evidence for the process has come from programs that rely on specialized inpatient units and long hospital stays. We examined whether an inpatient geriatric consultation service might also be beneficial in a trial involving four medical centers of a group-practice health maintenance organization (HMO). METHODS: We conducted a randomized clinical trial with 2353 hospitalized patients 65 years of age or older in whom at least 1 of 13 screening criteria were present: stroke, immobility, impairment in any basic activity of daily living, malnutrition, incontinence, confusion or dementia, prolonged bed rest, recent falls, depression, social or family problems, an unplanned readmission to the hospital within three months of a previous hospital stay, a new fracture, and age of 80 years or older. Of the 1337 patients assigned to the experimental group, 1261 (94 percent) received a comprehensive geriatric assessment in the form of a consultation, with limited follow-up; the 1016 patients assigned to the control group received usual care. The functional and health status of the patients was measured at base line and 3 and 12 months later; survival was assessed at 12 months. Subgroups of patients who might be presumed to benefit from comprehensive assessment were also studied. RESULTS: The survival rate at 12 months was 74 percent in the experimental group and 75 percent in the control group. At base line, 3 months, and 12 months the scores of the two groups on measures of functional and health status were similar. The analysis of 16 subgroups did not identify any with either clearly improved functional status or improved survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this HMO, comprehensive geriatric assessment by a consultation team, with limited follow-up, did not improve the health or survival of hospitalized patients selected on the basis of screening criteria.

Activities of Daily Living↗

[Diagnostic house call within the scope of inpatient geriatric assessment].

The value of a diagnostic home visit as part of hospital-based geriatric assessment was examined in a prospective study. 141 subjects admitted from home to the geriatric hospital and showing functional decline with risk of nursing home placement underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment and a diagnostic home visit. In 19.1% of the patients, the diagnostic visit resulted in a change of time, and in 14.9% in a change of location of discharge. Up to seven problems were newly discovered (mean 2.1). To maintain independence up to six technical aids were prescribed (mean 2.3). The most common recommendations were related to safety (59.2% of all cases). In 89.3% the diagnostic home visit was judged necessary by the home intervention team. A follow-up visit after 3 months revealed that about 80% of all recommendations were implemented and approximately the same amount of technical aids were still used. The diagnostic home visit allows individual prescription of technical aids, when necessary. It contributes meaningful information to the geriatric assessment process and helps to achieve successful in-hospital therapy and discharge planning. It can be recommended especially for elderly patients at risk for losing their independence.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Geriatric assessment programs in the United States. Their growing role and impact.

Geriatric assessment programs have become a growing component of the health care delivery system for the elderly in the United States. They generally provide interdisciplinary assessment, treatment planning, case management, and often rehabilitation for frail elderly persons and are especially important for persons suspected of needing long-term institutional care. Their development here stems from long experience with geriatric assessment in the United Kingdom and increasing evidence of their effectiveness in North American settings. Among their demonstrated benefits are better diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning, more appropriate placement decisions with less referral to nursing homes, and improved patient functional status, general well-being, and survival. This article provides, in addition to an overview of geriatric assessment programs and their effectiveness, practical guidelines for their establishment in the hospital setting.

Aged↗

Achieving goals in geriatric assessment: role of caregiver agreement and adherence to recommendations.

OBJECTIVES: To determine predictors of recommendation adherence and goal attainment of family caregivers of patients at a geriatric assessment center. DESIGN: One-year prospective cohort study. SETTING: Outpatient geriatric assessment center in Connecticut. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred consecutive new patients and their family caregivers. MEASUREMENTS: : Family caregivers were interviewed after geriatric assessment to ascertain their treatment goals for the patient. Medical records were reviewed to identify treatment recommendations. Family caregivers were interviewed 1 year later to assess adherence to recommendations and attainment of goals. RESULTS: Follow-up interviews were completed with 176 (88%) family caregivers. Common recommendations pertained to physician referral (71%), medications (46%), counseling/education (31%), diagnostic tests (30%), residential planning (26%), healthcare planning (21%), and community services (21%). Goal attainment was reported in 44% to 67% of the patient cases, depending on goal category. Caregiver agreement with recommendations predicted adherence to recommendations (adjusted relative risk (ARR)=1.99, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.04-5.92) after adjusting for available clinical and demographic factors. In addition, adherence to recommendations predicted goal attainment in adjusted analyses (ARR=1.70, 95% CI=1.09-2.64). CONCLUSION: This study revealed a broad range of treatment recommendations in geriatric assessment and suggests that agreeing with recommendations can promote adherence and that adherence can promote goal attainment. Taken together, the results imply that articulating shared treatment recommendations may improve the quality of health care.

Aged↗

[The establishment of geriatric intervention group and geriatric assessment at emergency of Henri-Mondor hospital].

BACKGROUND: The official French demographic previsions are a growing number of the older than 75 years elderly people. The Emergency services face this demographic evolution. We describe the establishment of the geriatric intervention group at the emergency of the Henri-Mondor university hospital at Creteil (France) and analyse the results of the geriatric assessment at the short unit care during the first four months. METHODS: We analysed the results of the geriatric assessment of 206 patients during the first four months, by considering the final unit care. The geriatric assessment evaluates functional abilities, cognitive status and thymic function with elderly people validated tests and subjective assessment of nutrition status and the sensorial functions. RESULTS: The statistical analysis of the geriatric assessment results was significant among the different hospitalized groups of patients, for the cognitive status, the nutritional risk and the walk and standing evaluation. CONCLUSION: The results of the geriatric assessment at emergency showed cognitive impairment and gait abnormality in elderly patients were at risk of hospitalization.

Aged↗