PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Further evaluation of the split ejaculate for artificial insemination.

The role of artificial insemination with husband semen (AIH) in solving fertility problems has been studied by many investigators. Different conclusions have been made due to the variety of indications for AIH. This communication attempts to evaluate the use of the best split ejaculate fraction for AIH in 55 couples in which the only pathological condition was oligozoospermia or oligoasthenozoospermia. Couples in which the women had a known history of anatomical abnormalities were excluded. Although the seminal parameters of spermatozoal density and/or motility in the best split fractions were frequently found to be in the fertile range, the pregnancy rate achieved was only 18% (n = 10). This was comparable to the results obtained by others using whole ejaculates for AIH. The spontaneous pregnancy rate in the present study after termination of treatment was 13% (n = 6). The observations suggest that men with a long-standing history of seminal deficiency produce spermatozoa with a pathology that cannot be microscopically recognized.

Adult↗

[Genetic aspects of artificial insemination. Choice of donors].

Artificial insemination with donors has genetic repercussions which increase with its impact on demography. Genetic control of semen donors offers a possibility of preventing the main genetic handicaps. The French Federation of Human Semen Study and Preservation Centres (CECOS) is currently organizing such a control system. The reasons for this and the modalities of the system are given in this article.

Female↗

[The results of two years of artificial insemination (author's transl)].

Artificial insemination donor (AID) is the solution for the sterility of many couples where the man is irreversibly sterile. We present the results of AID using frozen sperm in the two first years of work at the Centre d'Etudes et de Conservation du Sperme (C.E.C.O.S.), which is situated in the Midi-Pyrénées region of France. The results that have been obtained are satisfactory and prove the value of this method, but the means at present at the disposal of the Center do not always meet the demands made on it.

Adult↗

Artificial insemination with donor semen mixed with semen of the infertile husband.

Mixing an oligoasthenospermic husband's semen with that of a donor prior to insemination (AIM) has been criticized, since such semen may contain antibodies which could interfere with normal sperm function. The efficacy of AIM was reviewed in 227 patients who underwent AI with frozen donor semen. Thirty-four patients requested AIM and thirteen conceived (38.2%). Seven who failed to conceive after AIM changed to donor insemination (AID), and two conceived. One hundred and ninety-three patients had AID alone, and eighty conceived. Thus, 200 patients had AID, with 82 pregnancies (41%). There were no significant differences between the AIM and AID groups with regard to age, prior fertility, and additional infertility factors. The conception rates between groups were not significantly different. Pregnancy rates per cycle of AI and dropout rates were also similar. Postinsemination testing after AIM did not reveal any effect of husband's semen upon donor spermatozoa. This study failed to show a deleterious effect of semen from azoospermic or oligoasthenospermic, infertile men upon normal semen, as used in AIM.

Female↗