PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “International Normalized Ratio”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Raised international normalized ratio: an early warning for a late cardiac tamponade?

Seven consecutive cases of late cardiac tamponade after valvular surgery are reported; all were postoperatively treated with acenocoumarol and 6 had an international normalized ratio peak greater than 6.0 within 3 days preceding tamponade. It is suggested that during this excessive anticoagulation state a hemorrhagic event within the pericardial space precipitates the tamponade. In addition, it is proposed that all valve patients with a postoperative international normalized ratio peak greater than 5.0 within 6 weeks postoperatively should be considered for a transthoracic echocardiogram.

Acenocoumarol↗
PubMed1997

International Normalized Ratio determination using calibrated reference plasmas.

We have compared the conventional method of International Normalized Ratio (INR) determination with an alternative method involving extrapolation from a calibration curve using freeze-dried 'reference' plasmas. The latter approach does not require the determination of a mean normal prothrombin time (MNPT) or local system International Sensitivity Index (ISI). Calibration curves were constructed by plotting local prothrombin time (PT) against assigned INR values for a normal plasma and either two plasma pools from patients on oral anticoagulants or two artificially depleted plasmas. Six laboratories determined the INR of a freeze-dried test plasma and frozen patient plasma samples using the conventional method and by extrapolation. Similarities in the results with the freeze-dried test plasma and the frozen plasmas were encouraging for the projected use with fresh plasma samples. INR values by the conventional method for the test plasma gave an overall mean of 2.73 and inter-laboratory variability (gcv%) of 8.92%, whereas estimates by extrapolation against the normal and patient plasmas or the normal and artificially depleted plasmas gave identical overall mean INR values of 2.70 with inter-laboratory variability (gcv%) of 3.44% and 4.92% respectively. The results indicate that INR determination by extrapolation is associated with reduced interlaboratory variability.

Blood Coagulation Tests↗
PubMed2003

Whole blood international normalization ratio measurements in children using near-patient monitors.

PURPOSE: To report a comparison of international normalization ratio (INR) measurements on four near-patient (point-of-care or bedside) whole blood INR monitors in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The INR results from 19 ambulatory pediatric subjects (30 hospital visits) receiving warfarin sodium were analyzed on four near-patient monitors and compared with plasma INR measurements on the laboratory CA-1000 Analyze. The instruments evaluated were CoaguChek, Hemochron Jr. Signature, ProTime Microcoagulation System, and RapidpointCoag. RESULTS: The INR measurements ranged from 1.05 to 5.25. Over the entire INR range, the near-patient instrument with the least bias relative to the CA-1000 was the RapidpointCoag (r(2) = 0.923). The correlations (r(2)) of the CoaguCheck, Hemochron Jr., and ProTime were 0.877, 0.834, and 0.885, respectively. Precision studies involved repeated analysis of one nonmedicated adult (mean CA-1000 INR = 0.908) and one adult receiving oral anticoagulation therapy (mean CA-1000 INR = 2.42). The coefficient of variation on the near-patient monitors for both adult volunteers ranged from 4.9% to 22.3%. Bilirubin levels up to 20 mg/dL did not interfere in any of the methods. CONCLUSIONS: Near-patient testing whole blood INR monitors offer acceptably accurate and precise measurements. Values obtained on near-patient monitors may vary considerably from the reference method, and data obtained should serve as a supplement to, but not a replacement for, routine clinical laboratory measurements.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Effect of levofloxacin coadministration on the international normalized ratios during warfarin therapy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of levofloxacin coadministration on the international normalized ratio (INR) in patients receiving warfarin therapy. DESIGN: Prospective analysis. SETTING: Outpatient clinic at a Veterans Affairs medical center. PATIENTS: Eighteen adult patients receiving warfarin. INTERVENTION: On the basis of clinical diagnosis and judgment, levofloxacin was prescribed to the 18 patients for treatment of various types of infection. The INR was measured before and at 2-8-day intervals after the coadministration of levofloxacin therapy, and once after completing therapy. Warfarin dosages were adjusted when necessary. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Warfarin dosages were changed in seven patients as a result of the first nontherapeutic INR values obtained after start of levofloxacin therapy. Owing to a concern regarding noncompliance and the adverse effect of bleeding, warfarin dosage was adjusted in one patient even though his first INR value was in the high end of the therapeutic range (2.98, therapeutic range 2-3). One patient withdrew from the study after the first INR measurement after levofloxacin coadministration. Because of a concern about the possible bleeding complication, warfarin dosage was also adjusted in this patient after obtaining his first INR value. Therefore, only the INR values obtained before and the first INR values obtained after levofloxacin administration were compared to evaluate the effect of levofloxacin on INR determination of warfarin therapy. The INR values obtained before levofloxacin administration did not differ significantly from the first INR values obtained after levofloxacin coadministration (mean +/- SD 2.61 +/- 0.44 vs 2.74 +/- 0.83, 95% confidence interval -0.449-0.196, p=0.419). CONCLUSION: The INR values measured before and after concomitant levofloxacin therapy were not significantly different. However, the ability to detect a significant difference may be affected by the small number of patients studied. Further studies with a larger sample are required to better determine the effect of levofloxacin coadministration on INR monitoring during warfarin therapy

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Prolonged international normalized ratio correlates with a large intravascular fluid balance after major abdominal surgery.

We performed a prospective randomized study of 32 patients who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy and did not receive blood during and after surgery. The patients were prospectively assigned to two groups related to fluid balance in the immediate postoperative period. Group 1 (14 patients) were maintained at a positive intravascular fluid balance of 0-1000 mL; Group 2 (18 patients) were maintained at a positive balance of 1000-2000 mL. Complete blood counts and coagulation tests (International Normalized Ratio) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were performed at three time points: the day before surgery, on arrival at the postanesthesia care unit, and on leaving the postanesthesia care unit (16 h later). There were significant differences in International Normalized Ratio values between the groups with deterioration during the time they were in the postanesthesia care unit but not in aPTT values. Positive correlation was found between the amount of positive fluid balance and International Normalized Ratio prolongation, but not with aPTT, suggesting that restricted intravascular fluid balance is beneficial for preservation of coagulation after major abdominal surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed1988

The reliability of international normalized ratios during short-term oral anticoagulant treatment.

The reliability of the international normalized ratios (INR) system in the induction phase of coumarin administration has been studied in 15 serial patients over the first 7-40 days of treatment (mean 13.1). The INR results obtained with a variety of thromboplastin reagents have been compared with those obtained with the WHO second primary IRP, BCT/253. A wide divergence of INR values was observed with the various thromboplastins on each day of testing. INR values cannot therefore be relied upon with some of these reagents in the early days of anticoagulant treatment. This probably arises from the difference in responses of the thromboplastins to depression of vitamin K-dependent clotting factors. Consistent deviations from the IRP suggested that additional error may be due to inaccurate calibration of their products by the manufacturers. When the slopes of the sensitivity of the individual reagents to clotting factors II, VII and X were compared, however, results overall more closely approximated to those of the IRP when the INR were substituted for simple prothrombin ratios.

Acenocoumarol↗
PubMed1991

Determination of the mean normal prothrombin time for assessment of international normalized ratios. Usefulness of lyophilized plasma.

To report a Prothrombin Time (PT) as International Normalized Ratio in controlling oral anticoagulant therapy, the Mean Normal PT (MNPT) is required. To correct for methodological differences in performing the PT test, each laboratory should determine its own MNPT for each batch of reagent using fresh blood samples from a large number of normal individuals. This would be a laborious procedure. Two models for simplified assessment of MNPT were investigated by two laboratories in a collaborative study. According to the models, the MNPT of a new batch of reagent is calculated, using the PT of a lyophilized control plasma measured with the new batch and a reference batch, as well as the MNPT of the reference batch obtained with fresh samples. Experimental results were obtained with 19 batches of bovine thromboplastin, 4 lyophilized normal control plasmas and fresh blood samples of 40 normal individuals. The PTs of the 4 lyophilized normal control plasmas were not identical to the MNPT of the fresh normal samples and also different from each other. Therefore, the uncorrected PTs of these control plasmas cannot be used as MNPT. In general, there was good agreement between measured and calculated MNPT, although some control plasmas gave better results than others. There were no significant differences between the results obtained by both calculation models.

Freeze Drying↗
PubMed1999

A study of the variability seen in the international normalized ratio obtained using different sensitivity thromboplastin reagents on different instrument types.

We performed an extensive study to check international normalized ratio (INR) recovery using three different rabbit thromboplastin reagents of different sensitivities [international sensitivity index (ISI) circa 1.1, 1.3 and 2.0] on two different instrument types. Both instrument types used an optical end point: one nephelometric at 660 nm, one photometric at 880 nm. Each thromboplastin reagent in the study had an instrument-specific ISI value assigned to it by the reagent manufacturer. Samples obtained from stable orally anticoagulated patients were tested on four different instruments of each type with the three different sensitivity reagents. Excellent correlation between INR values was seen between all results (r values between 0.97 and 0.99). Regression analysis gave slopes between 0.92 and 1.07, and a maximum deviation of intercept from zero of 0.21. Variations in CV of less than 2% were seen within each instrument type. This study shows that if instrument-specific ISI values are used, comparable INR values can be obtained using reagents of different sensitivity on multiple instruments of the same or different types. This study demonstrates the validity of the INR/ISI system.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Subcutaneous phytonadione for reversal of warfarin-induced elevation of the International Normalized Ratio.

The efficacy and safety of subcutaneous phytonadione in the treatment of patients with asymptomatic excessive International Normalized Ratio (INR) values secondary to warfarin therapy were evaluated. Patients at an outpatient anticoagulation clinic with an INR of 8 or more but less than 14 were given 1 mg of subcutaneous phytonadione, and patients with an INR of 14 or more but less than 20 received 2 mg. The patients were instructed to withhold warfarin therapy for the next 24 hours and to immediately report any bleeding complications. At subsequent visits, patients with an INR of 8 or more but less than 14 were given an additional 1 mg of subcutaneous phytonadione. Patients with an INR above 4.5 were instructed to withhold warfarin therapy for an additional 24 hours. Seventeen patients received the 1-mg dose (group 1), and four patients received the 2mg dose (group 2). In group 1, the mean INR reduction was 49% at 24 hours and 72% at 48 hours and the INR was below 4.5 in 93% of patients at 48 hours. In group 2, the mean INR reduction was 67% at 24 hours and 85% at 48 hours and the INR was below 4.5 in 100% of patients at 48 hours. In four group-1 patients and one group-2 patient, the INR fell below 2.0 at 48 hours. No patients reported hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications. Subcutaneous phytonadione safely lowered excessively high INR values caused by warfarin therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

International normalized ratio increase before warfarin-associated hemorrhage: brief and subtle.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between serial international normalized ratios (INRs) in patients who have been undergoing long-term anticoagulation and the onset of warfarin-associated bleeding complications. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 2391 patients treated in the Anticoagulation Service at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass, from April 1999 through July 2003. For each patient with a bleeding event, we selected 2 controls who were matched for age, sex, indication for warfarin therapy, and duration of enrollment in our Anticoagulation Service. RESULTS: Warfarin-related hemorrhage occurred in 32 patients (1.3%). The mean +/- SD INRs at the time of the bleeding event or matched patient's event date (5.9 +/- 5.9 vs 2.3 +/- 0.7; P<.001) and the mean+/-SD last INRs before the bleeding event or matched patient's event date (3.0 +/- 1.2 vs 2.1 +/- 0.8; P<.001) were higher in the patients than in the controls. The last INRs before the bleeding event were obtained an average of 11.6 +/- 17.8 (mean +/- SD) days before the event in the patients and 18.3 +/- 28.0 (mean +/- SD) days before the matched date in the controls (P = .22). The mean second-to-last INRs were similar in both groups (2.8 +/- 2.1 vs 2.3 +/- 0.8; P = .11). When the INRs were plotted in relation to the time before the onset of bleeding, a marked increase in the patients' INRs was observed shortly before the bleeding began. CONCLUSIONS: Serial INRs are poor predictors of hemorrhagic events. There appears to be only a brief warning period during which a slightly elevated INR predicts an imminent bleeding event.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Low interinstrument variability of the international normalized ratio with the coagamate X2/Simplastin excel system.

Minimizing the interlaboratory variability of the International Normalized Ratio (INR) for patients receiving coumarin therapy will require local laboratory calibration of individual coagulation instrument/reagent systems. However, some laboratories possess multiple coagulation instruments of the same model, and it is unclear if each instrument would require separate calibration. To address this question, a controlled study was performed that examined the interinstrument variability of the INR on three separate Coagamate X2 coagulometers (Organon Teknika, Durham, NC) using the Simplastin Excel reagent (Organon Teknika) (International Sensitivity Index = 2.14). The interinstrument coefficient of variation (CV) of the INR among the three instruments was 3.4% and 3.5% for patient control plasmas (n = 20) and coumarin plasmas (n = 40, INR range 1.5-4.6), respectively. The number of discordant INRs between paired instruments (one INR within and one INR out of the therapeutic range, plus a difference of at lest 0.4 INR units) was very low (0%). The interinstrument INR CVs for three commercial quality control plasmas were 2.6% (INR = 0.92), 4.1% (INR = 2.1), and 6.3% (INR = 4.5), and correlated well with the low CVs for patient samples. This study showed that the Coagamate X2/Simplastin Excel system is capable of very low interinstrument INR variability, and surpasses the interlaboratory CVs reported in the literature. Formal calibration of a single instrument may be adequate for laboratories possessing multiple instruments of the same model.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2003

European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation. Correction of displayed international normalized ratio on two point-of-care test whole-blood prothrombin time monitors (CoaguChek Mini and TAS PT-NC) by independent international sensitivity index calibration.

The international normalized ratio (INR) on two widely used point-of-care test (POCT) prothrombin time (PT) monitors (CoaguChek Mini and TAS PT-NC) differed considerably and also differed from the 'true' INR obtained on the same samples using a manual PT and the same species thromboplastin international reference preparation. Agreement between the displayed INR and difference from 'true' INR has been reassessed following an independent international sensitivity index (ISI) calibration of the two systems. The displayed INRs taken at seven centres were compared with 'true' INRs from the same blood donations and INRs based on the resulting ISI. The overall difference between the displayed INRs on the two monitor systems was reduced from 21.0% to 3.5%. The overall difference in mean INR of system A from the 'true' INR was reduced from 19.0% to 9.5% and of system B from 6.8% to 0.3%, but individual centre's results still showed considerable mean INR variability. Differences between overall displayed INR with the two monitor systems have been reduced by an independent multicentre calibration, and agreement with 'true' INR on the same blood samples improved. However, marked variability in mean INR at individual centres remained after ISI correction, which demonstrates the need for external quality control of individual POCT whole-blood PT monitors.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed1993

Failure of the International Normalized Ratio to generate consistent results within a local medical community.

Use of the International Normalized Ratio (INR) has been recommended as a means of standardizing prothrombin time (PT) results for management of oral anticoagulant therapy. During the evaluation of a new lot of thromboplastin reagent, however, INR values were obtained that were inconsistent with results obtained with the prior lot of reagent from the same manufacturer. A local normalized ratio (LNR) was substituted for the INR for the new reagent, based on a calculated local sensitivity index (LSI). Validation of the LSI was performed at the three hospitals in the medical community by testing an identical panel of aliquots from 64 plasmas obtained from patients who were chronically receiving oral anticoagulants. Each test result was classified according to the INR value as low, low therapeutic, high therapeutic, or high. Local normalized ratio values obtained at one hospital in the community were in reasonable agreement with INR determinations in the other two hospital laboratories. Classification mismatches occurred using the INR, however, in 84 of 280 (30%) of the paired samples. Thus, the inability to generate consistent INR values within a local medical community raises serious concern about the reliability of the INR concept in its current form.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2001

Interpreting the International Normalized Ratio (INR) in individuals receiving argatroban and warfarin.

The effects of argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, on the International Normalized Ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and functional factor X during warfarin co-administration were established to provide means to interpret INRs during argatroban/warfarin co-therapy. Twenty-four subjects receiving warfarin (7.5 mg, day 1; 3-6 mg/day, days 2-10) and argatroban (1-4 microg/kg/min over 5 h, days 1-11) were assessed daily for these coagulation parameters prior to argatroban infusion (warfarin "monotherapy") and at its conclusion ("co-therapy"). Argatroban increased aPTTs dose-dependently. Co-therapy INR increased linearly with monotherapy INR, with slope sensitive to argatroban dose and thromboplastin used. Prediction errors for monotherapy INRs were < or =+/- 0.4 for argatroban 1-2 microg/kg/min but > or = +/-1.0 for higher doses. Despite co-therapy INRs >7, no major bleeding occurred. Factor X remained > or =37% of normal. Therefore, the predictable effect of argatroban (< or =2 microg/kg/min only) [corrected] on INRs during warfarin co-therapy allows for reliable prediction of the level of oral anticoagulation.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Low-dose international normalized ratio self-management: a promising tool to achieve low complication rates after mechanical heart valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: International normalized ratio (INR) self-management can significantly reduce INR fluctuations, bleeding, and thromboembolic events compared with INR control managed by general practitioners. However, even patients with INR self-management may have an increased risk of bleeding if their INR value is above 3.5. This study evaluated the compliance, clinical complications, and survival of patients after mechanical heart valve replacement with low-dose INR self-management compared with conventional-dose anticoagulation. METHODS: Group 1 (n = 908) received low-dose anticoagulation with a target INR range of 1.8 to 2.8 for aortic valve replacement and 2.5 to 3.5 for mitral or double valve replacement. Group 2 (n = 910) received conventional-dose anticoagulation with a target INR range of 2.5 to 4.5 for all heart valve prostheses. RESULTS: In groups 1 and 2, 76% and 75% of INR values, respectively, were in the target range. Results did not differ according to schooling and age. The rate of thromboembolic events per patient year was 0.18% in group 1 and 0.40% in group 2 (p = 0.210). The rate of bleeding complications was 0.74% for group 1 and 1.20% for group 2 (p = 0.502). In most patients with clinically relevant bleeding, these complications occurred although their measured INR values were below 3.5. The survival rate did not differ between the study groups (p = 0.495). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose INR self-management is a promising tool to achieve low hemorrhagic complications without increasing the risk of thromboembolic complications. INR self-management is applicable for all patients in whom permanent anticoagulation therapy is indicated. Even INR values below 3.5 can bear the risk of bleeding complications.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Warfarin dose reduction vs watchful waiting for mild elevations in the international normalized ratio.

BACKGROUND: Whether clinicians should decrease the warfarin dose in response to a mild, asymptomatic elevation in the international normalized ratio (INR) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The study objectives were as follows: (1) to evaluate the safety of an anticoagulation service (ACS) policy advocating that the warfarin dose not be changed for isolated, asymptomatic INRs of < or = 3.4; (2) to compare the dosing strategies of an ACS and primary care providers (PCPs); and (3) to quantify the relationship between reduction of the warfarin dose and the subsequent fall in the INR. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized controlled study of health maintenance organization outpatients who were receiving warfarin. PATIENTS: We identified 231 patients with a target INR of 2.5 and an isolated, asymptomatic INR between 3.2 and 3.4. Our ACS monitored 103 of the patients; PCPs monitored the remaining 128 patients. MEASUREMENTS: From all 231 patients, we obtained INRs and warfarin dosing history. From the 103 ACS enrollees, we also recorded adverse events. RESULTS: One ACS patient had epistaxis in the 30 days after the elevated INR. Twenty-three percent of ACS enrollees and 47% of PCP patients reduced their warfarin dose (p < 0.001). The median follow-up INRs were similar in both cohorts: 2.7 in the ACS enrollees and 2.6 in the PCP patients. However, in a subgroup analysis of 190 patients who presented with an INR of 3.2 or 3.3, ACS enrollees were more likely to have a follow-up INR in the range of 2 to 3 (p = 0.03). The median follow-up INR was 2.7 in 148 patients who maintained their warfarin dose, 2.5 in 77 patients who decreased their dose by 1 to 20%, and 1.7 in 6 patients who decreased their dose by 21 to 43% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support maintaining the same warfarin dose in asymptomatic patients with an INR of < or = 3.3, and reducing the dose for patients who have a greater INR or an increased risk of hemorrhage. Warfarin dose reductions > 20% should be avoided for mildly elevated INRs.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Dietary vitamin K variability affects International Normalized Ratio (INR) coagulation indices.

BACKGROUND: Changes in daily vitamin K intake may contribute to marked variations in the International Normalized Ratio (INR) coagulation index in patients receiving oral warfarin anticoagulant therapy, with potentially serious adverse outcomes. Thus, patients receiving warfarin therapy are routinely counseled regarding this drug-nutrient interaction and are instructed to maintain consistent vitamin K intakes, though little quantitative information about this relationship is available. OBJECTIVE: To determine the quantitative impact of variability in dietary vitamin K(1) (phylloquinone) intake, assessed by a validated patient self-monitoring instrument, on weekly INR in patients receiving warfarin anticoagulant therapy. METHODS: A prospective dietary assessment study was conducted at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. Sixty outpatients (37 males and 23 females) were selected with a mean age 60.3 +/- 16.8 years, who began oral warfarin anticoagulant therapy within 14 days prior to their first clinic visit to an outpatient anticoagulation therapy unit. Exclusion criteria included more than 2 drinks of alcohol per day, inability to speak English, and concurrent disease states affecting warfarin therapy such as liver disease and terminal illness. Over the five-week study period, participants recorded daily intakes in specified amounts of all food items appearing on a validated dietary self-assessment tool. Concomitant use of prescription and/or non-prescription medications was also obtained. Concurrent daily warfarin dose and adherence to the drug regimen, concomitant use of prescription and/or non-prescription medications known to interact with warfarin, and weekly INR were obtained. Week-to-week changes in vitamin K intake, warfarin dose, and INR were determined and cross-correlated. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (28 males and 15 females) completed the study and 17 dropped out. Pearson's correlation coefficient revealed the variability in INR and changes in vitamin K intake were inversely correlated (r = -0.600, p < 0.01). Multiple regression analysis (r = 0.848) indicated that a weekly change of 714 mug dietary vitamin K significantly altered weekly INR by 1 unit (p < 0.01) and a weekly change of 14.5 mg warfarin significantly altered weekly INR by 1 unit (p < 0.01) after adjustment for age, sex, weight, height, and concomitant use of medications known to interact with warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: Patients taking warfarin and consuming markedly changing amounts of vitamin K may have a variable weekly INR with potentially unstable anticoagulant outcomes.

Aged↗