SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Manometry”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

Selective use of esophageal manometry and 24-Hour pH monitoring before laparoscopic fundoplication.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring commonly are used in preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing fundoplication. Here we review our experience with the selective preoperative workup of patients undergoing fundoplication to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease. STUDY DESIGN: A series of 628 consecutive antireflux procedures was reviewed. History and physical examination, upper endoscopy, and upper gastrointestinal videofluoroscopy were obtained preoperatively on all patients; the first 30 patients also underwent esophageal manometry and pH monitoring (routine evaluation group). Thereafter, pH monitoring only was performed for atypical reflux symptoms, and manometry only was performed for a history of dysphagia, odynophagia, or for abnormal motility on videofluoroscopy (selective evaluation group). All patients underwent a laparoscopic floppy Nissen fundoplication, and then endoscopy and fluoroscopy at 3 months and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Eighty-five of the patients in the selective evaluation group (14%) required manometry, and 88 (15%) underwent pH monitoring. Eighteen of the 115 patients who underwent manometry (16%) had evidence of dysmotility. None of these 18 patients had increased dysphagia postoperatively; 8 of 18 reported improvement with swallowing. Five patients in the selective group (0.8%) had persistent postoperative dysphagia caused by technical error (four patients) or with no identifiable cause (one patient). The estimated charge or collection reduction with use of the selective evaluation was 1,253,100 US dollars or 395,000 US dollars, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Selective use of manometry and pH monitoring was cost effective and safe in this series. Although esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring might be necessary with abnormal findings on videofluoroscopy or atypical symptoms, in our experience, their routine use is not essential in preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Perception of esophageal manometry.

Esophageal manometry is an important investigation method but its direct impact on patients' well-being has not been studied. A structured questionnaire was given to all patients (n=92) after the manometry during one calendar year. The response rate was 91%. A total of seventy-one patients also reported their health status during the next 24 h. No serious side-effects were recorded. About half of the respondents regarded manometry as an easy or fairly easy investigation. The most common problems were irritation of nose and throat. In total, 48% of the respondents had mild to moderate late symptoms after manometry, usually soreness of the throat or nose lasting for some hours. The manometry was more troublesome to women than to men. It is concluded that esophageal manometry is generally a benign and fairly tolerated investigation, and the high level of anxiety that many patients show before the manometry is not well justified.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Colonic manometry in children with defecatory disorders. role in diagnosis and management.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of colonic manometry in clarifying pathophysiology of childhood defecatory disorders and to evaluate its impact on management. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records of children referred to undergo colonic manometry to a tertiary care Motility Center from 1996 to 2001. Families were followed up a median of 20 months after evaluation (range 3-60 months). RESULTS: A total of 150 colonic manometries were performed in 146 children (74 male, median age 79 months, range 4-225 months). Colonic manometry had been requested to clarify the pathophysiology of lower GI symptoms in 68%; as part of diagnostic workup for chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction in 11%; to decide about reanastomosis of a diverted colon in 7%; and to clarify the pathophysiology of persisting symptoms after surgery for Hirschsprung's disease in 14%. Normal motility was found in the entire colon in 38% of children. In 17%, there was normal motility in the proximal colon with abnormality limited to the dilated distal colon. Abnormal motility was found in 45% of children. After colonic manometry, treatment changes were recommended in 93% of patients. We were able to follow up 65% of the families. When recommendations were followed (96% of the contacted patients), the symptoms improved in 78%, were unchanged in 18%, and were worse in 4% of patients. Among the parents, 88% believed that the suggestions given after colonic manometry had been helpful in improving their children's health. CONCLUSIONS: Colonic manometry may provide information useful in guiding therapy in a subgroup of patients with defecatory disorders.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1990

Pancreatitis after sphincter of Oddi manometry.

The nature, frequency, severity, and possible causes of complications after 207 sphincter of Oddi manometry measurements were studied in 146 patients. Acute pancreatitis was diagnosed in 6% (12 of 207) of the investigations and in 8% (12 of 146) of the patients examined. The pancreatitis was mild in all patients. After cannulation of the pancreatic duct, acute pancreatitis occurred in 10 of 95 (11%) patients compared with one of 93 (1%) when the manometry catheter entered the bile duct only (p less than 0.02). Seven (58%) of the patients who developed acute pancreatitis, however, were found to be suffering from chronic pancreatitis. Some 26% of all sphincter of Oddi manometry measurements on patients with this diagnosis were complicated by an acute attack of pancreatitis compared with 3% (p less than 0.001) in patients without signs of chronic pancreatitis. In all patients the pancreatitis developed within three hours of manometry. We conclude that pancreatitis may occasionally follow sphincter of Oddi manometry measurement, even in patients without pancreaticobiliary disease, and that underlying chronic pancreatitis constitutes a definite risk. Sphincter of Oddi manometry measurement in control subjects should therefore be performed only in centres where the safety of the procedure has been established, and the presence of chronic pancreatitis should be excluded beforehand. Cannulation of the pancreatic duct should be avoided. Manometry can be safely performed, however, as an outpatient procedure.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1998

Can digital examination substitute anorectal manometry for the evaluation of anal canal pressures?

INTRODUCTION: Anorectal manometry provides objective information on the sphincter function of the anal canal. However, in many centers sphincter function is evaluated by digital examination, due to the unavailability of manometry. OBJECTIVE: A study is made to correlate the sensitivity and specificity of a quantitative digital examination in the analysis of sphincter tone with the pressures recorded by manometry, and to examine the capacity of both techniques to discriminate continent subjects and incontinent patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 191 patients were divided into three groups: control (C), obstructive defecation (OD) and fecal incontinence (FI). Subjective quantitative digital evaluation of anal tone was performed on a scale of 0 to 5 points at rest, and 0 to 10 points at squeeze. A correlation analysis was performed, and the sensitivity and specificity of each fecal incontinence diagnostic test was determined. RESULTS: Digital examination found rectal tone to be diminished in elderly patients. A significant correlation was established between the digital and manometric tone readings, both at rest and at squeeze. Both techniques showed a low anal sphincter pressure in the FI group versus the C and OD groups. Differences in tone were recorded between the C and OD groups with manometry, but not with digital examination. The latter was in turn found to be more sensitive but less specific than manometry in differentiating between fecal continence and incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: Although digital examination does not substitute anorectal manometry, a good correlation exists between the two techniques. In this sense, digital examination may afford an approximate clinical evaluation of some fecal continence mechanisms in those centers where manometry is not available.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Randomized, controlled trial of biofeedback with anal manometry, transanal ultrasound, or pelvic floor retraining with digital guidance alone in the treatment of mild to moderate fecal incontinence.

BACKGROUND: A prospective, three-armed, randomized, controlled trial was performed to assess whether pelvic floor exercises with biofeedback using anal manometry or transanal ultrasound are superior to pelvic floor exercises with feedback from digital examination alone in terms of continence, quality of life, physiologic sphincter strength, and compliance. Its secondary objectives were to assess whether there are any differences in these outcomes between biofeedback with transanal ultrasound vs. anal manometry and to correlate the physiologic measures with clinical outcome. METHODS: One hundred twenty patients with mild to moderate fecal incontinence were randomized into one of three treatment groups: biofeedback with anal manometry, biofeedback with transanal ultrasound, or pelvic floor exercises with feedback from digital examination alone. Commencing one week after an initial 45-minute assessment session, patients attended monthly treatments for a total of five sessions. Each session lasted 30 minutes and involved sphincter exercises with biofeedback that involved instrumentation or digital examination alone, and patients were encouraged to perform identical exercises twice per day between outpatient visits. RESULTS: One hundred two patients (85 percent) completed the four-month treatment program. Across all treatment allocations, patients experienced modest but highly significant improvements in all nine outcome measures during treatment, with 70 percent of all patients perceiving improvement in symptom severity and 69 percent of patients reporting improved quality of life. With the possible exception of isotonic fatigue time, there were no significant differences between the three treatment groups in compliance, physiologic sphincter strength, and clinical or quality-of-life measures. Correlations between physiologic measures and clinical outcomes were much stronger with ultrasound-based measures than with manometry. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients in this study who completed pelvic floor exercises with feedback from digital examination achieved no additional benefit from biofeedback and measurement with transanal ultrasound or manometry, it may be that the guidance received through digital examination alone offered patients in the pelvic floor exercise group an effective biofeedback mechanism. Contrary to our hypothesis, the use of transanal ultrasound offered no benefit over manometry, but the use of ultrasound for isotonic fatigue time and isometric fatigue contractions provided potentially important physiologic measures that require further study. This study has confirmed, through a large sample of patients, that pelvic floor retraining programs are an effective treatment for improving physiologic, clinical, and quality-of-life parameters in the short term.

Aged↗

PubMed1992

Dynamic anal manometry: physiological variations and pathophysiological findings in fecal incontinence.

A recently developed technique for dynamic anal manometry was used to study 40 healthy volunteers and 23 patients with fecal incontinence. Seven parameters of anal function were measured. Intraindividual variation of the parameters was studied in 5 females and 5 males. The results of dynamic anal manometry were compared with standard pull-through static anal manometry and correlated well. During opening of the anal sphincter at rest, compliance increased with increasing distension. Males had higher maximal closing pressures during squeeze and lower anal compliance during squeeze than females. There was no sex differences of the sphincter measurements at rest. Age had little effect, and gender had no effect on the measurements. With standard anal manometry, 6 of 23 patients with fecal incontinence both had maximal resting pressure and maximal squeeze pressure within the normal range. When dynamic anal manometry was used, all 23 patients showed one or more abnormal values. The method of dynamic anal manometry provides an opportunity for a more thorough assessment of anal sphincter function than previous manometric methods.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Meperidine need not be proscribed during sphincter of Oddi manometry.

Meperidine is routinely proscribed during sphincter of Oddi manometry because narcotics have been associated with spasm of the sphincter of Oddi. We have performed a prospective study of the effect of meperidine on sphincter of Oddi manometry in 18 patients undergoing manometry for suspected sphincter dysfunction. After diagnostic manometry using only intravenous diazepam sedation, the endoscope remained in the duodenum while 1 mg/kg intravenous meperidine was given. Five minutes later sphincter manometry was repeated. There was no difference in the baseline sphincter pressure before and after meperidine in all patients. The frequency of phasic contractions increased after meperidine (p = 0.001). Baseline sphincter pressure is generally the only manometric criteria used to diagnose sphincter dysfunction and this did not change after meperidine. We conclude that meperidine may be used for additional analgesia during sphincter manometry. This may improve patient tolerance and the success rate of this procedure.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

[Utility of anorectal manometry in the diagnosis and treatment of encopresis].

BACKGROUND: Biofeedback based on anomanometric techniques has been shown to be effective in the treatment of children with encopresis. The long-term efficacy of biofeedback and which variables of anorectal manometry (anorectal manometry) could help to establish biofeedback indications are currently the subject of debate. OBJECTIVES: To identify which variables of anorectal manometry, in addition to symptoms, could be useful in deciding which patients could benefit from biofeedback therapy and to assess the outcome of this treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Anorectal manometry was performed in 88 patients, who were referred to our service complaining of soiling at least once a month for a minimum of 6 months after a period of normal continence of 1 year or more. The chronological and mental age of the patients was 4 years. All patients were otherwise in good health and had shown no response to medical treatment. The following variables were studied: anal canal profile, rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR), continence reflex, rectal sensitivity, external anal sphincter (EAS) activity and defecatory maneuver. The patients were divided into two groups, according to clinical and anomanometric impairment, and the most affected patients (n = 41) underwent biofeedback therapy. The indications and outcome of biofeedback were assessed through clinical course and anorectal manometry. In the statistical analysis, the mean and standard deviation were calculated. The chi-squared test with Yates' correction was used to compare clinical and manometric qualitative parameters; Student's t-test was used to compare quantitative parameters; nonparametric tests consisted of the Mann-Whitney test and the Wilcoxon test was used for paired data. RESULTS: Patients treated with biofeedback therapy presented shorter anal canal, greater pressure in the rectal ampulla (P < 0.001), decreased pressure in the anal canal (P < 0.05), lesser distension of the EAS on provoking RAIR, lower presence of the continence reflex (P < 0.01), lower rectal sensitivity, and a worse response of the striated sphincteric muscle and of the defecatory maneuver (P < 0.001). Seventy-eight percent of the patients had a good response to biofeedback therapy. Pressure in the anal canal and rectal sensitivity improved (P < 0.001) with normality on straining in 11 out of 15 patients. These good results persisted in a long-term follow-up of 10 patients. Eight of 10 patients who did not undergo biofeedback therapy showed persistent encopresis (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Anorectal manometry detected disturbances, chiefly in the activity of the EAS, which are useful in indicating biofeedback therapy in children with secondary encopresis. Biofeedback therapy seems to produce favorable long-term results in the majority of the most severely affected patients.

Biofeedback, Psychology↗

PubMed1999

Role of oesophageal manometry in clinical practice.

The present study evaluates the role of oesophageal manometry in clinical practice. Over 5 years, 347 consecutive patients were evaluated in our oesophageal laboratory. The reasons for referral were: dysphagia (11.5%), gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) (46.7%), non-cardiac chest pain (28.5%), connective tissue disease (6.9%) and other symptomatology (6.3%). Patients were classified into the following five groups according to the referral diagnosis: dysphagia (40 patients), gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) (162 patients), non-cardiac chest pain (99 patients), connective tissue disease (24 patients) and other symptomatology (22 patients). Abnormalities in oesophageal motility were detected in 90% of patients with dysphagia, in 40.1% of patients with GORD, in 47.5% of subjects with non-cardiac chest pain, in 45.8% of patients with connective tissue disease and in 18.2% of subjects with other symptomatology. The high prevalence of abnormalities in the dysphagia group was statistically significant (p < 0.001), and the range of 95% confidence intervals (0.81-0.99) suggests that the value found may be a reasonably good estimate of percentage of anomalies detectable in the dysphagia patient population. In the dysphagia group, the initial diagnosis was confirmed in 40% of patients and changed in 52.5%; in only 7.5% of cases were the manometry results not relevant for determining an appropriate diagnosis. Manometry substantially contributed to patients receiving the correct treatment in 82.5% of cases (p < 0.001 among all groups). In the GORD group and in the non-cardiac chest pain group, the results of manometry were not relevant for confirming or changing a diagnosis in 59.8% and 53.5% of cases respectively; nevertheless, in both groups, on the basis of manometry results, the treatment was changed in 42.5% of patients (p < 0.01 vs. other symptomatology group). In conclusion, on the basis of the present data, we can emphasize the usefulness of oesophageal manometry assessment in patients with dysphagia or non-cardiac chest pain, with negative routine examinations, and also in patients with refractory GORD who have been considered for antireflux surgery.

Aged↗

PubMed1997

[Risk factors in endoscopic manometry for suspected dysfunction of Oddi's sphincter].

OBJECTIVE: An increased incidence of pancreatitis having been reported after endoscopic manometry (EM) of the sphincter of Oddi, its incidence and severity as well as potential risk factors were investigated prospectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 1988 and June 1996, standardised manometry was performed in 207 patients with suspected biliary and 23 with suspected pancreatic sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD). All patients had been observed in hospital for at least 24 hours before the test. The diagnostic criteria of post-manometric pancreatitis (PMP) were epigastric pain and a rise in the concentration of serum amylase to at least three times normal. Potential risk factors for PMP were elucidated by uni- and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Pancreatitis occurred in 19 patients (9%) with suspected biliary and in 6 (26%) with suspected pancreatic SOD (P < 0.01), 17 of mild and 8 of moderate degree. There were no deaths and no lasting sequelae. Previous pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and the presence of SOD were identified as patient-associated risk factors (P < 0.01 for each). Method-associated risk factors were duration of manometry of more than 5 min (P < 0.05) and manometry in the pancreatic duct system (P < 0.05). The risk of pancreatitis was reduced by simultaneous endoscopic sphincterotomy for SOD (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Specific and often avoidable risk factors for postmanometric pancreatitis were identified: technical procedure, pancreatitis, SOD. With short duration of manometry, avoiding of manometry in the pancreatic duct system and with patient's informed consent for simultaneous endoscopic sphincterotomy risk of pancreatitis may be lowered.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Manometry of the gastrointestinal tract: toy or tool?

In the eyes of scientific researchers, there are various manometric techniques that are useful tools for studying the motility of the gastrointestinal tract. Clinicians, however, regard most of these techniques as toys, either because they do not lead to clinically relevant results, or because they are too cumbersome in clinical practice. Nevertheless, a number of manometric techniques have reached the status of clinically relevant diagnostic procedure in gastroenterology. Among these, oesophageal manometry is the most important. Not only has conventional oesophageal manometry been added to the diagnostic armamentarium of many hospitals, but also prolonged ambulatory recording of oesophageal pressures (usually combined with pH monitoring). Small intestinal manometry has also gained the status of a diagnostic tool, in particular in patients in whom the existence of pseudo-obstruction syndrome is suspected and in patients in whom total colectomy is considered because of intractable constipation. Sphincter of Oddi manometry is another example of a clinically relevant manometric technique to be used in particular in patients with suspected dyskinesia of the sphincter of Oddi. The value of anorectal manometry may have been overestimated in the past. The most important indication is the exclusion of Hirschsprung disease. The contribution of anorectal manometry to the diagnosis of anismus and to the work-up of patients with faecal incontinence is limited.

Digestive System Physiological Phenomena↗

PubMed1992

Anorectal manometry.

Anorectal manometry is used in the treatment of complex anorectal disorders, such as fecal incontinence and intractable constipation. In a 3-year period at one institution 308 anorectal manometries were performed. A total of 168 procedures were performed for complaints of fecal incontinence, 77 for constipation, and the remainder for a variety of anorectal disorders. Anorectal manometry in those under 20 years of age was performed most often to differentiate Hirschsprung disease from functional constipation, as well as to provide a differential diagnosis related to congenital anorectal anomalies. In patients between the ages of 21 and 40 years, evaluation of fecal incontinence (especially obstetrical injuries) was most significant. Fecal incontinence accounted for twice the number of anorectal manometries for those between the ages of 41 and 60. For those over 60 years of age, the majority of anorectal manometries were done for fecal incontinence rather than for constipation (nearly a 4:1 ratio). Anorectal manometry is a valuable physiologic adjunct in the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of organic and functional disorders of the anorectum.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter manometry in the evaluation of dysphagia.

The use of esophageal manometry seems to be increasing, but the utility of pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) manometry is not widely recognized. This article is intended to clarify this subject. Initially, we review the anatomy and physiology of this area. Most studies indicate that the manometry of the UES and pharynx provides useful information primarily in patients that have symptoms of oropharyngeal dysfunction. Oropharyngeal dysphagia has high morbidity, mortality, and cost. It occurs in one third of all stroke patients and is common in the chronic care setting; up to 60% of nursing home occupants have feeding difficulties, of whom a substantial portion have dysphagia. For patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia, as for those with esophageal dysphagia, barium swallow study and manometry are complimentary. Their combined use permits us to enhance the understanding of the pathophysiologic process that causes the patient's symptoms. Abnormalities have been noted in a variety of diseases, such as Parkinson's disease, oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy, achalasia, and scleroderma. Thus, it is possible to determine the primary pathology that is causing the patient's dysphagia by analyzing the manometry results. Pharyngeal and UES manometry also has a value in evaluating patients who are candidates for myotomy or dilatation, as it can help identify patients with a prospective good outcome.

Deglutition Disorders↗

PubMed1998

Role of videoendoscopy in assessment of pharyngeal function in oropharyngeal dysphagia: comparison with videofluoroscopy and manometry.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current report is to evaluate the ability of videoendoscopic swallowing study in assessing pharyngeal propulsion and aspiration episodes when compared with videofluoroscopy and manometry. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia underwent videoendoscopy of swallowing to assess pharyngeal propulsion as pathologic or nonpathologic, and aspiration. These features were compared with those found on manometry and videofluoroscopy, which were considered as the reference examinations. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of videoendoscopy were estimated, with their 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: A total agreement between videoendoscopy and videofluoroscopy was found in 76.4% of cases for pharyngeal propulsion and in 82.3% for aspiration. This rate for pharyngeal propulsion reached 82.3% between videoendoscopy and manometry. Moreover, in 24 cases (70.5%) in which videofluoroscopy and manometry agreed for pharyngeal propulsion, 22 were assessed similarly through fiberoscopy. When using fluoroscopy and manometry as reference examinations, videoendoscopy detected nearly 90% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80, 1.0) of impaired pharyngeal propulsion. Concerning aspiration, 70% (95% CI = 0.54, 0.85) of events detected by videoendoscopy were also observed on videofluoroscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of videoendoscopy reached a higher rate (90% to 92.8%) when agreement was found between fluoroscopy and manometry. CONCLUSIONS: Videoendoscopy is an examination that can be used to detect inexpensively pharyngeal propulsion disorders and aspiration episodes.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Comorbidities associated with constipation in children referred for colon manometry may mask functional diagnoses.

BACKGROUND: In children with prolonged constipation of unclear pathogenesis or unresponsive to treatment, colon manometry can discriminate between functional fecal retention (FFR) and colon neuromuscular diseases. AIM: To identify the clinical features precipitating referral for colon manometry in children with functional constipation. METHOD: Retrospective medical record review of 173 constipated children (116 male, mean age 6.9 years, range 1-17 years) referred for colon manometry. RESULTS: Manometry was normal in 121 (70%). In those with normal manometry, FFR was identified in 96, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in 10, and functional constipation in 15. Of the 96 children FFR, 72 (76%) had comorbid conditions that might have interfered with the clinician's ability to diagnose FFR. Of 52 children with colon neuromuscular disease, only 12 (23%) had comorbid conditions (P < 0.001 compared with FFR). Of children more than 4 years, those with FFR were more likely to have fecal incontinence (44 of 62; 71%) than those with other functional disorders (2 of 19; 10%; P < 0.001) or neuromuscular disease (6 of 23; 26%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Two thirds of children referred for colon manometry had normal studies and met criteria for a functional diagnosis. Three quarters of those with functional constipation had a comorbid condition that might alter the history sufficiently to obscure the diagnosis.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Manometry of the upper esophageal sphincter and pharynx is not useful in unselected patients referred for esophageal testing.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether routinely performing upper esophageal sphincter/pharyngeal (UES/P) manometry in patients referred for esophageal testing alters clinical practice. METHODS: Clinical history along with radiography and manometry studies were reviewed in 470 patients referred for manometry. A total of 435 (92.6%) were found to have adequate evaluation of the UES/P and were included in the study. RESULTS: Of 435 studies, 80 (17.7%) had one or more UES/P abnormalities. Indications for these 80 studies were dysphagia in 30 cases (37.5%), chest pain in 26 (32.5%), both in four (5.0%), and other in 20 (25%). There were 85 manometric abnormalities in the 80 studies: hypertensive UES in 16 cases (18.8%), incomplete UES relaxation in 38 (44.7%), hypertensive pharynx in seven (8.2%), hypotensive pharynx in 15 (17.6%), and abnormal coordination in nine (10.6%). A total of 41 patients had a barium study, which was normal in 11 cases (26%), confirmed the problem in 16 (40%), and suggested another problem in 14 (34%). In 17 patients (21%), there was clinical suspicion for an oropharyngeal disorder before manometry, whereas in 58 cases it was an unexpected finding. Of the 58 patients with an unexpected finding, therapy based on this finding was offered in six (three esophageal dilations, two dietary changes, and one swallowing therapy). If patients with concomitant esophageal body disorders are excluded, in only three patients an unexpected UES finding led to change in management. CONCLUSIONS: An unexpected UES/P finding resulted in a change in therapy in only six of the manometries. Barium esophagogram was diagnostic of the oropharyngeal abnormality in nearly two-thirds of the patients in whom it was clinically suspected. These data, along with limited therapeutic options, suggest limited usefulness for routine UES/P manometry.

Barium↗

PubMed1991

Systematic comparison of conventional oesophageal manometry with oesophageal motility while eating bread.

Conventional oesophageal manometry is seldom accompanied by symptoms and may indeed be normal in patients with a history of dysphagia. We have recently shown that oesophageal manometry during eating may be helpful in the evaluation of patients with dysphagia but there has been little systematic comparison of fed oesophageal motor patterns with conventional clinical manometry. Oesophageal manometry in response to water swallows and during eating was therefore examined in 58 consecutive patients who had been referred for clinical oesophageal function studies. The patients were divided into three groups according to the percentage of peristaltic activity during conventional manometry: group 1 (n = 21) had 100% peristalsis; group 2 (n = 29) had 1-99% peristalsis and group 3 (n = 8) were aperistaltic. All the patients in group 3 had achalasia and remained aperistaltic during eating, however, was less than with water swallows in both group 1 (53% compared with 100%) and group 2 (49% compared with 82.3%) patients. Synchronous contractions and non-conducted swallows were correspondingly increased during eating. Although there was a significant correlation between the amplitude of peristaltic contractions with water and bread in groups 1 and 2, mean peristaltic amplitudes were less with bread than with water swallows. The data show that there are substantial differences in the distal oesophageal motility patterns produced by water swallows and by eating. Conventional manometry with water swallows does not allow prediction of the fed oesophageal motility pattern, except in patients with achalasia.

Bread↗