[Marked mesenteric neurofibromatosis in neurofibromatosis 1].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Benign spinal nerve sheath tumors (neurofibromas and schwannomas) often occur on dorsal nerve roots sporadically or in neurofibromatosis types 1 and 2. These are histologically benign tumors, and distinction between them is frequently not made by clinicians. To determine if there is a correlation between the histological pattern of benign spinal nerve sheath tumors and the type of neurofibromatosis, the clinical and pathological features of these tumors (86 surgical specimens and five autopsies) in 68 patients were reviewed. The patients were classified into one of four categories: neurofibromatosis type 1, neurofibromatosis type 2, uncertain, or sporadic. The diagnostic criteria used for neurofibromatosis types 1 and 2 were established by the National Institutes of Health. Patients who did not fulfill criteria for either neurofibromatosis type 1 or 2 but who had multiple nervous system tumors or other stigmata of neurofibromatosis were designated "uncertain." Spinal nerve sheath tumors were considered sporadic in 42 cases (40 schwannomas and two neurofibromas). In the 14 patients with neurofibromatosis type 1, all spinal nerve sheath tumors were neurofibromas. In six of the seven patients with neurofibromatosis type 2, all spinal nerve sheath tumors were schwannomas. One patient with neurofibromatosis type 2 had a spinal nerve sheath schwannoma and a tumor with features of both tumor types. The authors conclude that spinal nerve sheath tumors in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 are neurofibromas. In contrast, spinal nerve sheath tumors occurring in neurofibromatosis type 2 or sporadically are most frequently schwannomas. The distinct histological features of these tumors may reflect different pathogenetic mechanisms even though they arise at identical sites in neurofibromatosis types 1 and 2.
Optic pathway gliomas represent 2 to 5% of brain tumors in children. Frequently asymptomatic, sometimes they demonstrate rapid growth, causing considerable visual dysfunction, neurologic deficits, and endocrine disturbances. Most optic pathway gliomas are diagnosed in patients with neurofibromatosis 1. Little is known about their natural course; therefore, there are no clear and widely accepted guidelines for their treatment. This study compared the clinical manifestations and natural history of sporadic and neurofibromatosis 1-associated optic pathway gliomas with regard to age at diagnosis, gender, and findings on neurologic, ophthalmologic, and neuroradiologic examinations in 83 children with optic pathway gliomas: 51 children with neurofibromatosis 1 and 32 children without any symptoms or signs of neurofibromatosis 1. A prospective study was performed in 21 patients with neurofibromatosis 1. In the rest of the patients with neurofibromatosis 1 and in 32 children with sporadic tumors, the analysis was carried out retrospectively. There was an increased incidence of females in the group of patients with neurofibromatosis 1 with optic pathway gliomas compared with the entire group of patients with neurofibromatosis 1 remaining for follow-up (P = .013). All optic pathway gliomas were found in children below 10 years of age, slightly earlier in the group without neurofibromatosis 1 (median age 4.6 vs 4.8 years). Children with optic pathway gliomas associated with neurofibromatosis 1 had predominantly multifocal lesions (P = .0001), whereas in the group without neurofibromatosis 1, isolated chiasmal involvement was more common (P = .002). Children with sporadic gliomas had significantly more frequently increased intracranial pressure, decreased visual acuity, and abnormalities of fundus of the eye at the time of diagnosis. The radiologic progression, visual deterioration, and endocrinologic complications were documented on follow-up more commonly in children with sporadic tumors. Our findings support the concept that there is an earlier and more severe clinical presentation of optic pathway gliomas in children with sporadic tumors than in those associated with neurofibromatosis 1.
The association between neurofibromatosis and visual pathway gliomas is well documented. The introduction of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging has heralded a new era in the understanding of visual pathway gliomas. Both of these noninvasive neuroinvestigative techniques have demonstrated extensive abnormalities throughout the visual pathway in children with visual pathway gliomas, especially in those with neurofibromatosis. The clinical significance of these abnormal areas of brain, especially in asymptomatic patients, is unknown. In an attempt to clarify the incidence, natural history, and clinical course of patients with neurofibromatosis and visual pathway lesions, we reviewed our experience with 24 patients managed consecutively at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia over the past 12 years. The patients in this series were compared to 29 children with visual pathway gliomas without neurofibromatosis who were evaluated at our institution over the same period of time. Visual pathway gliomas in children with neurofibromatosis differ from those in children without neurofibromatosis. In general, lesions tended to be more extensive in patients with neurofibromatosis and the clinical course of these patients is more variable. Twelve of the 24 patients with neurofibromatosis in our series had symptoms of progressive disease at the time of diagnosis and underwent treatment with variable results. Twelve children with neurofibromatosis and visual pathway lesions had static lesions at the time of diagnosis and, to date, 3 have developed progressive disease. From our review we can make some recommendations concerning the management of children with neurofibromatosis and visual pathway gliomas, but many questions remain unanswered. Sequential follow-up of a large cohort of both asymptomatic and symptomatic children with neurofibromatosis and visual pathway lesions is needed to more definitively outline the best management approach for these patients.
Neurofibromatosis type 1 is a common autosomal dominant genetic disorder associated with numerous physical anomalies and an increased incidence of neuropsychological impairment. Tumors of the CNS occur in approximately 15% of children with neurofibromatosis, presenting additional risk for cognitive impairment. This study examines the impact of an additional diagnosis of brain tumor on the cognitive profile of children with neurofibromatosis. A comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tests was administered to 149 children with neurofibromatosis. Thirty-six of these children had a codiagnosis of brain tumor. A subset of 36 children with neurofibromatosis alone was matched with the group of children diagnosed with neurofibromatosis and brain tumor. Although mean scores of the neurofibromatosis plus brain tumor group were, in general, lower than those of the neurofibromatosis alone group, these differences were not statistically significant. Children in the neurofibromatosis plus brain tumor group who received cranial irradiation (n = 9) demonstrated weaker academic abilities than did children with brain tumor who had not received that treatment. These results suggest that neurofibromatosis is associated with impairments in cognitive functioning, but the severity of the problems is not significantly exacerbated by the codiagnosis of a brain tumor unless treatment includes cranial irradiation.
OBJECTIVE: To determine characteristics of brain morphology in children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1 and relate these characteristics to neuropsychological functioning. BACKGROUND: Neurofibromatosis type 1 is associated with numerous CNS abnormalities and cognitive impairment. Abnormal high signal intensity visible on brain MRI, brain tumors, and macrocephaly are common. Research into links between neuroanatomic and cognitive features has been inconclusive. METHODS: Fifty-two children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1 were compared with 19 control subjects on several quantitative neuroanatomic and neuropsychological measures. RESULTS: Total brain volume, especially gray matter, was significantly greater for neurofibromatosis type 1 subjects than the control subjects. Group differences in the ratio of gray matter to white matter were more prominent in younger than in older subjects. Volume of gray matter in the subjects with neurofibromatosis type 1 was related to their degree of learning disability. Corpus callosum size was significantly larger for subjects in the neurofibromatosis type 1 group, and diminished performance on measures of academic achievement and visual-spatial and motor skills were associated with greater regional corpus callosum size. CONCLUSIONS: Neuroanatomic morphology and the developmental pattern of gray matter and white matter in subjects with neurofibromatosis type 1 differed from in control subjects. Some of these differences are related to the neuropsychological status of the neurofibromatosis type 1 group. We propose that delayed developmental apoptosis results in macrocephaly and a delay in the development of appropriate neuronal connections in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. We further propose that these morphologic delays are related to the cognitive profile of neurofibromatosis type 1.
At least eight provisional categories of neurofibromatosis have been proposed. Among these, neurofibromatosis 1 (von Recklinghausen's disease or peripheral neurofibromatosis) and neurofibromatosis 2 (central or bilateral acoustic neurofibromatosis) have been established as distinct disorders. We studied 15 affected male and 8 affected female members of one large kindred with neurofibromatosis 2. None of the patients met the diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis 1. Between the ages of 15 and 53 years, the patients had multiple central nervous system tumors of various types--mainly, bilateral acoustic neuromas. Two or more tumors eventually developed in 20 of the patients; 9 had evidence of only bilateral acoustic neuromas. Meningiomas and ependymomas were more common among the young patients; those who initially presented with acoustic neuromas were nearly a decade older. Intracranial nontumoral calcifications were present in most patients and were also found in symptom-free children. The presence of such lesions is probably a prodromic feature of neurofibromatosis 2. Simultaneous analysis of D22S1 and IGLV DNA markers for coinheritance with neurofibromatosis 2 indicates that the locus for the disease is near the center of the long arm of chromosome 22 (22q11.1----22q13.1). The eventual isolation of this disease gene may reveal a cause of the most common intracranial tumors in humans.
Neurofibromatosis-1 is a common autosomal-dominant genetic disorder associated with numerous physical anomalies and an increased incidence of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Studies of children with idiopathic ADHD have suggested a link between corpus callosum size and symptom severity. This study examines the contribution of corpus callosum morphology to symptoms of ADHD in children with neurofibromatosis. Eighteen control subjects and 36 children with neurofibromatosis underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Twelve subjects with neurofibromatosis had evidence of ADHD and 24 did not. Subjects with neurofibromatosis had significantly larger total corpus callosum area and significantly larger regional measurements in three of seven areas. However, there were no differences between the neurofibromatosis alone and neurofibromatosis plus ADHD groups. Increased severity of attention problems was associated with smaller total callosal areas. These results suggest that some features of ADHD in children with neurofibromatosis could be linked to quantifiable differences in brain morphology, but the nature of the genetic mutation in neurofibromatosis suggests that neurochemical effects also could be important.