SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed1989

Early experience with percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Fifty-four percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) procedures were performed in 41 patients between May 1986 and December 1987. Six patients required more than one procedure and there was one failure which was treated by open ureterolithotomy. Most of the stones were initially found in the pelvicalyceal system, one in the lower third and nine in the middle or upper third of the ureter. There were five significant complications: one "steinstrasse" (accumulation of stone fragments in the distal ureter after the procedure), one massive perirenal haematoma, one intramural perforation by a ureteric catheter and two extravasations of irrigation fluid one of which necessitated intensive care. Most of the renal and upper ureteric stones have now been successfully removed percutaneously with good patient tolerance.

Female↗

PubMed2004

Laparoscopically guided transperitoneal percutaneous nephrolithotomy for calculi in pelvic ectopic kidneys.

Although percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a well-established endourological modality for the management of calculi in the normally placed kidney, it is not easy to apply in the management of calculi in pelvic ectopic kidneys. We report the cases of three patients who were found to have large calculi in pelvic ectopic kidneys and subsequently underwent laparoscopically guided transperitoneal percutaneous nephrolithotomy, all with successful outcome. In all patients, complete stone clearance was achieved in a single operation with no intraoperative or postoperative morbidity. They remain asymptomatic and recurrence-free at a follow-up ranging from 2 to 38 months. Laparoscopic guidance allows the transperitoneal route to be used safely for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with calculi in pelvic ectopic kidneys. We believe it to be a feasible, safe, and valid minimally invasive management option for this uncommon but challenging urological condition.

Abdominal Pain↗

PubMed1987

Local hemostasis of nephrostomy tract with fibrin adhesive sealing in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

In 26 patients percutaneous nephrolithotomy was carried out under local anesthesia with systemic sedation. Instead of the 25-French nephrostomy catheter used so far, a 5- or 10-French nephrostomy catheter prepared with a collagen-fibrin adhesive sealant was introduced into the nephrostomy tract. In all cases, excellent hemostasis was attained with the fibrin glue. In applying a fibrin glue, the danger of protracted venous or arterial hemorrhage from the parenchymal canal can be markedly reduced; the large-lumen nephrostomy catheter can also be dispensed with.

Aprotinin↗

PubMed2005

[Clinical value of percutaneous nephrolithotomy].

The introduction of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) marked a turning point in the interventional treatment of nephrolithiasis. For the first time, the minimally invasive removal of larger kidney stones, which had previously required open surgery, became possible. With the increasing use of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) during the 1980s, PNL lost clinical importance. However, since SWL has revealed its limitations, and both the patients' wishes and economic demand require a fast stone removal, the importance of PNL has risen again. Given the correct indications and performance, PNL is an efficient treatment modality reaching stone free rates of up to 100%. When PNL is performed by an experienced urologist, complications are low and can be managed conservatively in most cases. The most important step in the performance of a PNL is the anatomically correct puncture of the kidney gaining optimal access to the stone. To reach this, a lower calyx is punctured whenever possible, under combined sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance.

Equipment Design↗

PubMed2004

Bilateral renal calculi: assessment of staged v synchronous percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Percutaneous stone removal has replaced open renal surgery and has become the treatment of choice for large or complex renal calculi. However, patients with large bilateral stone burdens still present a challenge. Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been demonstrated to be a well-tolerated, safe, cost-effective, and expeditious treatment. We present what is, to our knowledge, the first large retrospective series comparing synchronous and asynchronous bilateral PCNL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A chart review was performed on 26 patients undergoing 57 PCNLs for bilateral renal calculi over a 7-year period. Seven patients received synchronous PCNL (same anesthesia; Group 1), and 19 patients underwent asynchronous PNL (procedures separated by 1-3 months; Group 2). Complete surgical and hospital records were available on all patients. The average stone burden for Group 1 was 8.03 cm(2) on the left and 9.18 cm(2) on the right v 10.1 cm(2) on the left and 14.23 cm(2) on the right for Group 2 (P> 0.05). Variables of interest included anesthesia time, operative time, blood loss, transfusion rates, length of hospital stay, and complication rates. Each variable was evaluated per operation and per renal unit. Follow-up imaging with stone assessment was available on 20 patients. RESULTS: Group 1 required 1.14 access tracts per renal unit to attempt complete clearance of the targeted stones v 1.88 tracts per renal unit in Group 2 (P> 0.05). The average operative time per renal unit was significantly less in Group 1 (83 minutes) than in Group 2 (168.5 minutes) (P< 0.0001), as was blood loss (178.5 mL v 307.4 mL, respectively; P= 0.02). However, blood loss per operation was similar at 357 mL in Group 1 and 282 mL in Group 2. Comparable transfusion rates of 28.6% and 36.8%, respectively, were noted. Forty percent of the patients in Group 1 were completely stone free compared with 36% of the patients in Group 2; however, an additional 50% and 57%, respectively, had residual stone burden <4 mm (P> 0.05). Complications occurred in 2 of 7 operations (28%) in Group 1 and 8 of 42 operations (19%) in Group 2. The total length of hospital stay was nearly doubled for patients undergoing staged PCNL (P= 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate similar stone-free rates, blood loss per operation, and transfusion rates for simultaneous and staged bilateral PCNL. The reduced total operative time, hospital stay, and total blood loss, along with the requirement for only one anesthesia, makes synchronous bilateral PCNL an attractive option for select individuals. However, in patients with larger, less easily accessible stones, excessive bleeding may be encountered more frequently on the first side, thereby delaying management of the second side to a later date. Synchronous bilateral PCNL should be considered in patients in whom the first stage of stone removal is accomplished quickly and safely.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1987

Procedures increasing the effectivity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

The advantages of percutaneous nephrolithotomy are reviewed and the difficulties are pointed out. During more than 100 successful nephrolithotomies it was found that stones or their fragments often drift away during manipulation into lateral or upper calices which cannot be visualized by a rigid nephroscope. Thus, removal of calculi was possible only by an auxiliary manipulation and so it took more time. To prevent this, an occlusive catheter was introduced, simultaneously with the ureteral catheter, into the renal cavital system and by blocking the balloon, the orifice of the calices was closed. In the case of multiple stones, two calices were simultaneously punctured and the two nephroscopes introduced were alternately applied during ultrasonic crushing of the stone, depending on which of the two instruments was closer. The modifications introduced by the author have significantly reduced the time of the operation and increased the effectivity of the procedure.

Humans↗

PubMed1985

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and the flyer.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PN) is a relatively new procedure that is coming in vogue for the removal of upper urinary tract stones. Although there are possible complications from the procedure--bleeding being the most common one--its advantages make it a desirable treatment modality vis-a-vis conventional surgery. This article describes the case of a pilot who underwent PN, but remained disqualified from flying status for 6 months because of an unfortunate complication.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Challenge of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with spinal neuropathy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the technical difficulties, associated complications and stone clearance rates in patients with spinal neuropathy undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with spinal neuropathy underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the two centers studied between October 1995 and January 2002. They were nine patients with traumatic spinal cord injury, 10 patients with spina bifida and 10 with other heterogeneous causes for their spinal neuropathy. The group included 12 men and 17 women, with an average age of 44 years (14-80). Patients' medical records were reviewed retrospectively for data relating to their renal lithiasis. RESULTS: A total of 39 percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures were undertaken on 32 kidneys. Thirteen procedures were for staghorn calculi. Preoperatively, eight kidneys required nephrostomy and 5 J stent decompression. The average American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was 3, and one patient had percutaneous nephrolithotomy performed under local anaesthetic as the risk of general anaesthetic was felt to be too high. The associated morbidity and mortality in this group is significant. There were two postoperative deaths. Major complications were associated with three procedures, and consisted of seizures, aspiration pneumonia and pressure necrosis. Nine patients experienced minor complications including fever, hypotension and nephrostomy site leakage. Nine patients required intensive therapy unit care postoperatively and the average hospital stay for the group was 13.32 days. Only 18 (62%) patients were rendered stone-free from their initial percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Seven patients required a further procedure for stone clearance: four underwent extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, two ureteroscopy and one nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with spinal neuropathy and renal lithiasis pose a significant operative challenge. Technical difficulties and potential complications should be considered carefully before undertaking percutaneous nephrolithotomy in these patients.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Comparison of 150 simultaneous bilateral and 300 unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomies.

PURPOSE: To compare the results, complications, efficiency, and safety of simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SBPN) and unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared the results and complications of 150 SBPNs with those of 300 unilateral PCNLs. All the procedures were performed by one surgeon which provides relatively constant parameters. The success rates, preoperative and postoperative laboratory results, and complications were compared on the basis of stone size and the number of nephrostomy tracks. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the results and complications of SBPN and PCNL. The SBPN itself did not cause more blood loss than unilateral PCNL. In both groups, the blood loss was in direct proportion to the size of the stones and the number of nephrostomy tracks. After SBPN, kidney function improved >20% in 12.2% of the patients and worsened for more than 3 days in only 4%. Temporary worsening of kidney function occurred in the unilateral procedure group as well (8%), mostly in cases of solitary kidneys or bilateral stones. The SBPN was not more hazardous than unilateral PCNL (complication rate 11.3% v 14.3%, respectively). In both groups, most of the complications were in proportion to the size and difficulties of the stones. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and advantageous procedure that is not more hazardous than the separate PCNL in cases of bilateral large stone burdens. To our knowledge, these are the largest reported series of these procedures and the only comparative analysis of SBPN and PCNL.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Holmium laser percutaneous nephrolithotomy using a unique suction device.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Most percutaneous nephrolithotomies are performed with electrohydraulic, ballistic, or ultrasonic lithotripsy, with holmium laser use reserved for ureteroscopy or ureterorenoscopy. We evaluated the feasibility of holmium laser use in percutaneous nephrolithotomy with the assistance of a unique suction device. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The charts of 71 consecutive patients undergoing 90 percutaneous procedures were reviewed. A unique suction device and the holmium laser were used in nearly half the patients. The average stone burden was 3.25 cm. Use of holmium laser, energy settings, stone burden, operative time, complications, and stone-free rate were evaluated. RESULTS: The average operative time was 167 minutes with a complication rate of 14%. A stone-free rate of 83% was achieved with the laser. CONCLUSIONS: With the assistance of a unique suction device, the holmium laser can, in the appropriate situation, be an efficient and successful lithotrite with percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Humans↗

PubMed1999

Percutaneous management of renal calculi: experience with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 60 children.

PURPOSE: We report our experience with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a pediatric population in which primary as well as recurrent stone episodes are frequent and the need for less invasive procedures is imperative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy was performed in 60 children 3 to 13 years old (average age 6), including 44 boys (73.3%) and 16 girls (26.7%). There was a single obstructing renal calculus in 43 patients, while 17 had multiple calculi. The procedure was performed in 1 stage in 49 patients, and it was staged with preliminary nephrostomy in 11 who presented with calculous anuria and elevated serum creatinine. Normal saline was used as an irrigant and perioperatively serum electrolytes were measured to monitor fluid absorption in 18 patients. Stones were extracted intact from 40 patients (66.6%) and ultrasonic lithotripsy was performed in 20 (33.3%). RESULTS: Of the 60 patients 50 (83.3%) were rendered stone-free at 1 session. Incomplete stone clearance at 1 session was due to intraoperative bleeding requiring blood transfusion, extravasation, multiple stones that were inaccessible via 1 tract, displacement of stone fragments into an inaccessible calix and insignificant residual fragments less than 3 mm. in 2 cases each. During followup of 3 months to 6 years (average 1 year) no late complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and relatively efficacious mode of managing pediatric renal calculi. Although higher success rates are achieved in adults, caution should be exercised in children, in whom diligent attempts at stone clearance in 1 session may be made at the expense of safety.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1994

Splenic injury: a rare complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Splenic injury in the course of percutaneous nephrolithotomy is extremely rare. We report on a splenic perforation and subcapsular haematoma of a female patient who was treated for staghorn stone in the left kidney by percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The splenic injury without external bleeding was diagnosed by ultrasonography and computed tomography. The patient was subjected to splenectomy.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its legacy.

OBJECTIVE: We review the indications of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PNL), its safety and efficacy when applied to various patient groups as well as the different points of technique, giving emphasis on new tips and ongoing debates. METHODS: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE database on PNL between 1980 and 2004. RESULTS: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) has been successfully and safely used to treat patients with renal stones for more than a quarter of a century. Still, the use of PNL in treating renal stones in different patient groups, such as children, obese patients, patients with renal congenital anomalies, patients who had previous open renal surgery and patients who have undergone renal transplantation are always of high interest. Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy seems to have a certain role in treating bilateral renal stones, especially when proficiency is achieved for unilateral PNL. Various aspects of the procedure such as patient positioning, renal access, the ideal dilating method, the type of nephrostomy tube used, as well as the actual need for drainage, have been debated. CONCLUSION: PNL is currently the procedure of choice for removal of large renal calculi. The need for well designed prospective randomized trials comparing PNL with alternative treatment modalities arises through the literature review.

Humans↗

PubMed2006

Regionalization of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: evidence for the increasing burden of care on tertiary centers.

PURPOSE: The regionalization of procedures to specialized medical centers has been suggested as a means to improve the quality of care for select high risk procedures. Prior work has demonstrated the spontaneous regionalization of high risk procedures to tertiary centers. Similar concentration of complex, low risk procedures (e.g. percutaneous nephrolithotomy) to these centers would underscore the increasing burden of care placed on these hospitals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to identify 12,948 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy for stones between 1988 and 2002. Regionalization was measured based on the 6 structural hospital qualities of teaching status, urban location, bed capacity, hospital throughput (all diagnoses), annual percutaneous nephrolithotomy volume and for-profit status. Logistic regression was used to determine the propensity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy to concentrate to these medical centers. RESULTS: Compared to procedures performed between 1988 and 1990, patients were more likely to undergo percutaneous nephrolithotomy at teaching (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-1.9), high percutaneous nephrolithotomy volume (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.6-1.9), large bed capacity (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3) and high throughput hospitals (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.3-1.4) in the years 2000 to 2002. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, a technically complex but low risk procedure, has spontaneously regionalized to tertiary centers, suggesting the migration of complex surgical care to these centers. The impact of this increasing burden of care on tertiary centers is unclear but may be problematic in the current reimbursement environment.

Adult↗

PubMed1986

Comparison of treatment of renal calculi by open surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

This study was designed to compare different methods of treating renal calculi in order to establish which was the most cost effective and successful. Of 1052 patients with renal calculi, 350 underwent open surgery, 350 percutaneous nephrolithotomy, 328 extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL), and 24 both percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ESWL. Treatment was defined as successful if stones were eliminated or reduced to less than 2 mm after three months. Success was achieved in 273 (78%) patients after open surgery, 289 (83%) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy, 301 (92%) after ESWL, and 15 (62%) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ESWL. Comparative total costs to the NHS were estimated as 3500 pounds for open surgery, 1861 pounds for percutaneous nephrolithotomy, 1789 pounds for ESWL, and 3210 pounds for both ESWL and nephrolithotomy. ESWL caused no blood loss and little morbidity and is the cheapest and quickest way of returning patients to normal life.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1992

Long-term comparison of renal function in patients with solitary kidneys and/or moderate renal insufficiency undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

We compared the long-term effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy on renal function in 31 patients with a solitary kidney and/or chronic renal insufficiency who were all more than 2 years after treatment (mean 41.5 months). The change in the reciprocal of serum creatinine was used as an index to estimate changes in the glomerular filtration rate. A change of 20% or greater in the glomerular filtration rate was considered a clinically significant deterioration of renal function. The rate of deterioration of renal function in patients with a solitary kidney and creatinine of less than 2 mg./dl. was 22% for ESWL and 29% for percutaneous nephrolithotomy, respectively. All patients with a creatinine between 2 and 3 mg./dl. demonstrated long-term improvement of renal function regardless of the treatment modality. All 4 patients with creatinine greater than 3 mg./dl. undergoing ESWL had short-term improvement but eventual long-term deterioration of renal function. Indeed, 3 of these patients required dialysis within 2 years from the treatment dates. One patient with creatinine greater than 3 mg./dl. who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy demonstrated stabilization of the renal function after treatment. From our data, no convincing evidence could be found to suggest that ESWL results in long-term deterioration of renal function in patients with chronic renal insufficiency or a solitary kidney. We conclude that the choice between ESWL and percutaneous nephrolithotomy should be based on the stone composition, stone location and stone burden, rather than on the preexisting renal function or presence of a solitary kidney.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

One-step percutaneous nephrolithotomy sheath versus standard two-step technique.

OBJECTIVES: Advances in technique and equipment have allowed urologists to perform percutaneous stone removal with increasing efficacy and decreasing complications. The procedure of choice for large renal calculi is percutaneous nephrolithotomy. At our institution, percutaneous access is achieved by a two-step process using either Amplatz dilators or placement of a high-pressure balloon catheter for tract dilation, followed by advancement of a sheath over the balloon. A novel device, the Pathway Access Sheath (PAS) has been developed that allows for balloon tract dilation and percutaneous access sheath placement in one simple step. METHODS: Our study population consisted of 21 patients, who were randomized to one of two arms. Of the 21 patients, 10 underwent standard two-step access using a high-pressure balloon catheter and 11 underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the novel PAS. We compared the insertion time, blood loss, and cost between the two techniques. RESULTS: The average insertion time was shorter in the PAS group (3 minutes) compared with the high-pressure balloon catheter (5 minutes, 42 seconds); a difference that was statistically significant (P <0.01). The estimated blood loss and cost were similar between the two groups. The increased sheath flexibility of the PAS was noted to be an advantage in some patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that a novel single-step renal access device is safe and efficacious and results in a shorter insertion time for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Blood loss was less in the PAS group as well, although the difference was not statistically significant. Additional studies will establish whether this device will provide a new standard of obtaining renal access.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1990

Criteria audit of percutaneous nephrolithotomies.

A criteria audit of percutaneous nephrolithotomy management is reported. One hundred consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous stone removal over a 3-year period were examined. An analysis of the cases of this relatively new surgical procedure are presented. The audit demonstrated the surgeons' learning curve, the current standards achieved and changes in patient admission rate. Criteria auditing was used and assessed as a quality assurance activity.

Adolescent↗