SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Neurologists”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed1986

Neurologists in the United States--past, present, and future.

Neurologists in the United States were enumerated for each year from 1935 to 1984 on two bases: board certification (including Child Neurology and Psychiatry and Neurology) and completion of PG4 neurology residency training. The annual incidence of new neurologists was calculated at less than 200 until 1970; then it rose steadily to 380 in 1980, and plateaued thereafter at 385. The estimated number of neurologists present at one time (prevalence) was 1,500 in 1950, 2,400 in 1970, 4,600 in 1980, 8,100 in 1990, and 11,000 in 2000. These numbers for total neurologists will plateau at 12,200 by about 2010, at which time the number of certified neurologists will also plateau at 9,900. Both numbers are notably less than our prior estimate of needs: 16,500 neurologists by 1990, 19,100 in 2010.

Certification↗

PubMed1993

Practices of epilepsy during pregnancy: a survey of Canadian neurologists.

The optimal management of epilepsy in epileptic pregnancies remains controversial. We surveyed all neurologists in Canada to determine their usual practice in managing epilepsy during pregnancy. We identified 436 neurologists in the 1990 edition of the Canadian Handbook of Medical and Surgical Specialists. We mailed a questionnaire enquiring with respect to details of management of epilepsy during pregnancy to all neurologists; in the case of nonrespondents, a follow-up questionnaire was mailed eight weeks later. We achieved a 65% response rate. We found that carbamazepine was the antiepileptic drug of first choice for the management of epilepsy during pregnancy among the majority of neurologists (75%), while phenobarbital (10%) and phenytoin (11%) were recommended much less frequently. Eight percent of respondents never used polytherapy during pregnancy. Despite recent controversy over the reproductive safety of carbamazepine, monotherapy with carbamazepine is regarded by the vast majority of Canadian neurologists as the therapy of first choice for epilepsy during pregnancy.

Anticonvulsants↗

PubMed2006

Developing a neurology training program in Honduras: a joint project of neurologists in Honduras and the World Federation of Neurology.

One of the major barriers to the provision of quality care for patients with neurological disorders in developing countries is a low ratio of neurologists per inhabitants, the World Health Organization recommends one neurologist per 100,000. In 1998 Honduras had one neurologist per 325,000 inhabitants and all the neurologists were trained outside the country. The Education Committee of the World Federation of Neurology (WFN), in collaboration with the Postgraduate Direction of the National Autonomous University of Honduras, the Honduran Neurological Association, and the Honduran Secretary of Health helped establish the country's first Neurology Training Program in 1998. This program was established using a problem- and epidemiological-oriented methodology with oversight by an external WFN review board. By 2006 the program has resulted in a 31% increase in the national neurologist ratio per inhabitant, significantly improved the quality of patient care and promoted research in the neurosciences. The Honduras Neurology Training Program has provided a valuable model for other developing countries with similar needs for neurological care. Based on this Honduras experience, members of the Education Committee of the WFN have established guidelines for neurology training programs in developing countries.

Curriculum↗

PubMed2000

Diagnosis and management of Alzheimer's disease and other disorders associated with dementia. The role of neurologists in Europe. European Federation of Neurological Societies.

In 1998 a task force to develop guidelines for diagnostic evaluation and treatment of dementia was initiated by the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) scientist panel on dementia. The aims of the task force were to provide evidence-based recommendations and to highlight the role of the neurologist in the management of patients with Alzheimer's disease and other disorders associated with dementia. We based our recommendations on a review of available evidence-based guidelines supplemented with further literature reviews. The recommendations were derived from consensus meetings and relate to individual patient management, as there are inadequate data on the cost-effectiveness of different diagnostic evaluations and treatments for dementia. Their specific applications will depend upon available resources. The particular contributions of the neurologist include: early identification and differential diagnosis of rare and common brain disorders causing cognitive and behavioural symptoms, referral for and interpretation of ancillary investigations, and identification and treatment of vascular and other concurrent diseases. A review of the management of dementia in Europe revealed considerable variation. In some countries neurologists have taken the lead in the management of patients with dementia, while in other countries the neurologist is rarely involved. We recommend that neurologists should have a clear role in the management of dementia in the whole of Europe. They should be involved in the diagnostic evaluation of dementia and facilitate the development of multidisciplinary teams for evaluation and management of patients with cognitive disturbances. The increasing role of neurology in the management of patients with dementia has important implications for training and education.

Alzheimer Disease↗

PubMed2001

Inter-rater reliability of stroke sub-type classification by neurologists and nurses within a community-based stroke incidence study.

The stroke classification developed for use in the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OCSP) is simple, clinically meaningful and requires no investigations. However, its inter-rater reliability in a community setting is unknown. We aimed to assess the inter-rater reliability of this classification among neurologists and nurses within a community-based stroke incidence study. Fifty-four stroke patients with cerebral infarction who were registered in the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS) were assigned OCSP classifications by two neurologists and one of seven research nurses. There was moderate agreement between neurologists (kappa = 0.53), fair agreement between neurologist 1 and nurse (kappa = 0.31) and moderate agreement between neurologist 2 and nurse (kappa = 0.45). Disagreement about the neurological signs was an important reason for classification differences. The OCSP classification can be easily applied in a community setting with moderate inter-rater reliability and is thus a useful instrument for commun ity-based epidemiological studies.

Australia↗

PubMed2006

The practice pattern of migraine management among neurologists in Taiwan.

To assess the prevalence of migraine and the attitudes and practice patterns of Taiwanese neurologists regarding migraine management, we mailed the survey questionnaire to all of the actively practicing board-certified neurologists from the membership list of the Taiwan Neurological Association. Of the targeted 531 neurologists, 123 (23.2%) participated in this study. Thirty of the participants (27.6%) reported having migraine. Most neurologists (88.5%) felt that headache was an important part of their practice. Many neurologists (65.0%) used neuroimaging to evaluate patients with severe headache and 44.7% used electroencephalography for headache evaluation. Many participants knew that combination analgesic was a common cause of medication-overuse headache, but did not know that ergotamine, acetaminophen and triptans were possible aetiologies of medication-overuse headache. Our study suggests that awareness of medication-overuse headache and the indications of neuroimaging should be stressed in Taiwan, and headache guidelines should be modified according to local factors.

Analgesics↗

PubMed1997

Reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) has been established through testing its use in live and videotaped patients. This reliability testing has primarily focused on the use of the scale by neurologists. We sought to determine the reliability of the NIHSS as used by non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial. METHODS: In anticipation of the initiation of a randomized trial of a new therapy for patients with acute ischemic stroke, 30 physician investigators (30% of whom were not neurologists) and 29 non-physician study coordinators were trained in the use of the NIHSS at an informational and training conference using standardized videotaped patient examinations. A series of 4 patients were rated initially. After 3 months, the same 4 patients were rerated, providing a measure of intraobserver reliability. An additional series of 4 new patients were also rated after 3 months and, with the initial 4 ratings, provided data for assessment of interobserver reliability. RESULTS: Overall, 28% of the raters had previous experience with the NIHSS, and 22% had previously used the videotapes as used in the present trial. The coefficients of determination (r2) were each greater than .95 when the means of the two ratings of the same 4 cases were compared between (1) neurologists and other types of physicians, (2) physicians and study coordinators, (3) raters who had prior experience with the NIHSS and those without prior experience, and (4) raters who had used the videotapes in the past and those who had never viewed the tapes. The calculated r2s were greater than .98 for the initial rating of the first 4 cases and for the later rating of the 4 new cases. The slopes of the regression lines were all near 1, indicating that the raters were similarly calibrated. The intraclass correlation coefficients were .93 and .95, reflecting high levels of intraobserver and interobserver reliability. CONCLUSIONS: These data extend the previously demonstrated reliability of the NIHSS to non-neurologists and show that both a variety of physician investigators and nurse study coordinators can be rapidly trained to reliably apply the scale in the context of an actual clinical trial.

Cerebrovascular Disorders↗

PubMed2005

Specialty care by child neurologists: a workforce analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a current profile of the practice of child neurology, report the attitudes of child neurologists toward practice, and analyze the supply of child neurologists. METHODS: In March 2002, a questionnaire was sent to all active members of the Child Neurology Society (n = 1,051) and to nonmember physicians under age 70 who listed child neurology as a primary or secondary specialty on the American Medical Association Masterfile (n = 433). The response rate was 65%. Eligibility criteria were then applied to arrive at the sample of main specialty in child neurology working at least 20 hours per week in patient care. The final population was 604. Differences in practice characteristics were tested by practice type, and the number of full-time patient care child neurologists was projected by extrapolating to nonrespondents. RESULTS: There are 904 full-time patient care child neurologists in the United States and 1.27 per 100,000 children. Career satisfaction is 90%, yet no growth in the supply is projected over the next 20 years. Wait times for an appointment average 53 and 44 days for a new and return visit, with longer wait times in university settings. Average annual income is 151,000 dollars. CONCLUSION: The practice characteristics of child neurologists suggest that the specialty will be challenged to meet patient demands.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Alzheimer's disease and the modified role of the neurologist in today's healthcare environment.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a global priority public health problem, such that health ministries worldwide and medical education sectors alike need to prioritize resources for dementia research, education, and treatment. Many American opinion leaders in neurology hold to the maxim that the rising incidence and prevalence of AD in an aging population will create an increasing demand for the services of neurologists. With managed care on the march, however, a declining workload for practicing neurologists is far more likely, because until 2010 the number of neurologists will continue to expand more rapidly than the increasing burden of illness. Reform of medical education in support of the World Health Organization "Health for All" initiative can provide all physicians with a population-based perspective and a sense of social mission that encourages appropriate utilization of specialized resources and personnel. In the era of managed care, neurologic education should be broadened into the domain of mental illness to increase practice opportunities for graduating residents as behavioral neuroscientists. The capacity of AD referral centers to thrive in a cost-conscious managed care environment is crucially dependent on the ability and willingness of office-based neurologists with managed care contracts to make appropriate patient referrals to such centers. Neurologists who question the capacity of primary care physicians to provide the full range of specialized services should likewise question the quality of tertiary care carried out in a community framework of service provision.

Alzheimer Disease↗

PubMed1999

End-of-life care: a survey of US neurologists' attitudes, behavior, and knowledge.

OBJECTIVE: The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) surveyed the attitudes, behavior, and knowledge of its members regarding care at the end of life. Three groups of AAN members were surveyed: neuro-oncologists, ALS specialists, and a representative sample of US neurologists. METHODS: The survey presented two clinical scenarios involving end-of-life care. Neurologists were asked a series of questions to assess their knowledge of existing medical, ethical, and legal guidelines; their willingness to participate in physician-assisted suicide (PAS) or carry out voluntary euthanasia (VE); and their general attitudes regarding end-of-life care. RESULTS: Neurologists support a patient's right to refuse life-sustaining treatment, but many believe that they are killing their patients in supporting such refusals. Thirty-seven percent think it is illegal to administer analgesics in doses that risk respiratory depression to the point of death. Forty percent believe they should obtain legal counsel when considering stopping life-sustaining treatment. One half believe that PAS should be made explicitly legal by statute for terminally ill patients. Under current law, 13% would participate in PAS and 4% would carry out VE; if those procedures were legalized, 44% would participate in PAS and 28% in VE. Approximately one third believe that physicians have the same ethical duty to honor a terminally ill patient's request for PAS as they do to honor a such a patient's refusal of life-sustaining therapy. CONCLUSIONS: There is a gap between established medical, legal, and ethical guidelines for the care of dying patients and the beliefs and practices of many neurologists, suggesting a need for graduate and postgraduate education programs in the principles and practices of palliative care medicine. Many neurologists would participate in PAS and carry out VE if legalized.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Racial variation in treatment for transient ischemic attacks: impact of participation by neurologists.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the role of neurologists in explaining African American-white differences in the use of diagnostic and therapeutic services for cerebrovascular disease. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Medicare inpatient hospital records were used to identify a random 20 percent sample of patients age 65 and over hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of TIA between January 1, 1991 and November 30, 1991 (n = 17,437). STUDY DESIGN: Medicare administrative data were used to identify five outcome measures: noninvasive cerebrovascular tests, cerebral angiography, carotid endarterectomy, anticoagulant therapy (as proxied by outpatient prothrombin time tests), and the specialty of the attending physician (neurologist versus other specialist). DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: All Medicare claims were extracted for a 30-day period beginning with the date of admission. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Even after adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidity, ability to pay, and provider characteristics, African American patients were significantly less likely to receive noninvasive cerebrovascular testing, cerebral angiography, or carotid endarterectomy, compared with white patients, and to have a neurologist as their attending physician. At the same time, patients treated by neurologists were more likely to undergo diagnostic testing and less likely to undergo carotid endarterectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that African American patients with TIA may have less access to services for cerebrovascular disease and that at least some of this may be attributed to less access to neurologists. More research is needed on how patients at risk for stroke are referred to specialists.

Black or African American↗

PubMed1994

Future role of neurologists.

Clinical neurologists in the health care system of the future should have a multifaceted role. Advances in the basic understanding of the nervous system and therapeutics of neurologic disease have created, for the first time in human history, an ethical imperative to correctly diagnose neurologic disease. In many situations, the neurologists may function as a consultant and principal physician for patients with primary nervous system disorders including Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, epilepsy, migraine, cerebrovascular disease, movement disorders, and neuromuscular disease. Other important roles for neurologists include the training of future physicians, both neurologists and primary care physicians, the application of cost-effective approaches to care, and the support of health care delivery research and academic programs that link basic research efforts to the development of new therapy. To be successful, future residency training programs should include joint certification opportunities in both neurology and general medicine, and training programs for clinical investigators should be expanded. Despite its threats to specialists, managed care should also provide opportunities for new alliances among neurologists, other specialists, and primary care physicians that will both improve patient care and increase efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Consultants↗

PubMed2026

Perspectives of participating neurologists and study nurses - Mixed-methods process evaluation of a web-based program for relapse management in multiple sclerosis (POWER@M2).

BACKGROUND: Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system and the leading cause of disability in young adults. In Germany, 90% of relapses are treated with high-dose intravenous glucocorticoids, despite limited evidence for long-term benefit and international preference for oral administration. Time constraints often hinder informed decision-making. The multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) POWER@MS2 (N = 160, 2020-2023), conducted at 18 German MS-centres, aimed to promote self-determined relapse management through a complex intervention (dialogue-based decision aid, nurse-led webinar, online-chat). OBJECTIVE: While RCTs demonstrate effectiveness, process evaluations are essential to understand implementation, mechanisms of impact and contextual factors. This study explored healthcare professionals' experiences and attitudes toward implementing relapse self-management and self-medication in clinical practice. METHODS: A mixed-methods process evaluation followed the UK Medical Research Council- framework. Quantitative data were collected via validated questionnaires at up to three time points and analysed descriptively. Interview guides were developed based on these results. Qualitative data from neurologist and study nurse interviews were thematically analysed. Results were triangulated using a joint display. RESULTS: Data were collected from 55 neurologists and 17 study nurses (quantitative) and from 7 neurologists and 4 nurses (qualitative) (2020-2024). Most neurologists opposed routine steroid use, reserving it for severe relapses. Some voiced concerns about self-management, but informed patients were generally viewed as capable of safe self-medication. Study nurses gave mixed feedback on the intervention, citing overload and improved guidance. CONCLUSION: Clinicians showed openness toward implementing the intervention. Enhancing accessibility and addressing specific concerns may support broader adoption.

Humans↗

PubMed2002

Practice variation among Michigan neurologists in the use of intravenous heparin.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The indications for intravenous (IV) heparin use in acute ischemic stroke are uncertain. We sought to determine the current practice patterns of neurologists in Michigan with regard to IV heparin use, in view of the fact that several major multi-center trials evaluating heparin and related compounds have been completed in the last decade. METHODS: A survey was conducted of 180 active, practicing neurologists in Michigan. Five clinical scenarios were included and factors influencing heparin use were also determined. RESULTS: The vast majority of neurologists in Michigan would use IV heparin for patients with atrial fibrillation-related stroke (91% of those with a defined opinion). Heparin use was also popular for stroke-in-evolution (77%). There was a lesser degree of heparin use for patients with more than one transient ischemic attack (49%) or for patients with stroke and normal cardiac rhythm. Medicolegal factors at least sometimes influenced the selection of heparin as a therapy for 41% of physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Despite recent clinical trial data on heparin and related compounds which for the most part has been negative, IV heparin use remains popular for certain clinical scenarios, especially acute stroke with atrial fibrillation. Further studies are necessary to determine whether negative clinical trials have the same impact on neurologist behavior as positive studies.

Atrial Fibrillation↗

PubMed1977

A community neurologist's personal viewpoint on neurological training.

A study of 200 patients referred to a community neurologist showed that 87.5% of the patients were seen in the office and only 12.5% in hospital. Neurological signs were present in 52% and 28.5% had neurological signs which materially affected the diagnosis. A questionnaire sent to several teaching centers showed that only one center sent students and residents to community neurologists' offices at all and in most centers the resident spent just 10 to 20% of his time seeing out-patients. It was felt that the balance of in-patient/out-patient teaching for students and residents was wrong, and that more emphasis should be placed on the neurological history than on the examination. Proposals are made to involve the community neurologist as well as the academic neurologist in the training of students and residents which would benefit all four groups.

Canada↗

PubMed1997

Epilepsy and driving: a survey of Canadian neurologists.

BACKGROUND: A seizure is the most common cause of loss of driving privileges for medical reasons but there is variability in how physicians and the authorities who regulate driving approach this issue. METHODS: A questionnaire regarding epilepsy and driving was sent to all adult neurologists in Canada (n = 494). RESULTS: Of 289 (59%) neurologists responding, 50% usually report patients with seizures to the department of motor vehicles compared to only 4% for stroke/TIA, 26% for dementia and 8% for other neurologic disorders (p < 0.0001). In the five provinces with mandatory reporting laws, seizures were reported most of the time by 84% compared to only 19% in the five provinces with discretionary reporting (p < 0.0001). Nationwide, 44% agreed with mandatory reporting but this also differed in provinces with and without mandatory reporting legislation (63% vs. 37%, p < 0.0001). Only 49% agreed with the current recommendation of at least one year seizure free interval before resuming driving. CONCLUSIONS: Seizures are disproportionately reported compared to other neurological conditions. Many neurologists disagree with the recommended Canadian standards for duration of driving restriction after seizures. Variability in the attitude and practice of neurologists in regard to reporting of seizures is confirmed.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Delivering the diagnosis of MS--results of a survey among patients and neurologists.

OBJECTIVES: The need for an early disclosure of the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) has become more pressing with the publication of two recent randomized trials which have indicated that very early treatment may favourably alter the disease course. We assessed the current status of diagnostic and therapeutic information on MS from the point of view of patients and neurologists. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire was sent out through the patients' self-help organization in Hamburg, Germany and to all neurologists. RESULTS: A total of 434 of 1300 patients and 80 of 250 neurologists replied. Neurologists gave 90% of the diagnoses but only 50% of patients reported them as the major aid helping to understand the disease. Fifty per cent of patients were not informed about any form of therapy at the time of diagnosis regardless of whether their MS diagnosis was disclosed within the last 5 years or earlier. In contrast to physicians, patients voted for information about a possible MS even if the diagnosis may not yet be clear. CONCLUSION: From the patients' perspective, information about the diagnosis of MS should be more straightforward, and more information about therapies should be provided.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Use of atraumatic spinal needles among neurologists in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate atraumatic spinal needle use among US neurologists. BACKGROUND: Postdural puncture headache following lumbar puncture may be dramatically reduced through the use of atraumatic pencil-point spinal needles. It was hypothesized that atraumatic spinal needles are rarely used by members of specialties outside of anesthesiology. To determine the extent to which atraumatic spinal needles are currently being used for lumbar puncture in the United States, American neurologists (one group of physicians who regularly perform lumbar punctures) were surveyed. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to all 7798 members of the American Academy of Neurology listed in the membership directory. The questionnaire included items pertaining to age, practice setting, knowledge of pencil-point (atraumatic) spinal needles, and lumbar puncture practices. RESULTS: Only a fraction (2%) of the neurologists surveyed routinely use atraumatic spinal needles. Almost half of the responding neurologists reported having no knowledge of pencil-point spinal needles. Among those who did have knowledge of these new spinal needles, the most common reasons given for not using them were nonavailability and expense. CONCLUSIONS: Atraumatic spinal needles for lumbar puncture have been shown to dramatically decrease the risk of postdural puncture headache. Although the use of these needles is standard practice among anesthesiologists, they have not been adopted by other medical specialties. This may lead to unnecessary morbidity among patients undergoing lumbar puncture.

Adult↗