SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “PRISMA”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed2001

Twenty-four-month clinical evaluation of different posterior composite resin materials.

BACKGROUND: In a 24-month clinical trial, the authors compared three brands of light-cured composite resins that were used to restore the posterior teeth of 38 patients. METHODS: A total of 88 Class I and 32 Class II restorations were made using Z100 (3M Dental Products Div.), Clearfil Ray-Posterior (Kuraray Co. Ltd.) and Prisma TPH (Caulk/Dentsply). Quadrant impressions were taken using a polyvinyl siloxane impression material, and stone casts were obtained every six months for indirect evaluations of anatomical form and marginal adaptation. The restorations were evaluated directly by three clinicians using the Ryge criteria. RESULTS: The authors statistically evaluated parameters at each recall period, using a chi 2 test; compared baseline scores with the recall scores, using a McNemar test; and evaluated changes in the parameters, using the Cochran Q test. Color match, cavosurface margin discoloration and secondary caries remained unchanged at the end of the 24-month recall period for all materials (P > or = .05). A total of 11.5 percent of the Z100 restorations and 16.7 percent of the Prisma TPH restorations showed a slight crevice along the margin (P < or = .05). The surface texture was scored as Bravo only for Clearfil Ray-Posterior restorations at the end of the study (P < or = .05). The authors found that the indirect evaluation results were different from the direct evaluations for Z100 and Prisma TPH. CONCLUSIONS: According to these findings, all the materials used are suitable for posterior restorations. The difference between the two evaluation methods can be attributed to the level of sensitivity. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: With the improvement in materials, careful case selection and application of the restorative techniques, posterior composites placed under appropriate conditions and monitored routinely can be expected to last 10 years or longer.

Bicuspid↗

PubMed1984

Curing depth of visible light-activated composites.

Three composites, two microfilled (Heliosit and Silux) and one macrofilled (Prisma-Fil), were exposed to visible light from three different light units. The depth of the cure was estimated by measuring the length of the test specimen after removing the uncured material. The macrofilled composite cured to a greater depth than the microfilled materials. The curing depth of Heliosit was lower, of Silux about the same, and of Prisma-Fil higher than the values of curing depth given by the manufacturers. The shade of the pastes influenced the curing depth of the macrofilled more than that of the microfilled composites. Doubling the exposure time increased the curing depth by about 1/3. Exposure through tooth substance reduced the curing depth by at least 1/3. The curing effectivity of Prisma-Lite was slightly greater than that of Heliomat and the 3M unit.

Color↗

PubMed1999

Water sorption of several bonding resins.

PURPOSES: To determine, over the period of 1 month, (a) the degree of water sorption, and (b) the change in dimension, of four bonding resins and one low viscosity resin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six specimens of bonding resin (Prisma Universal Bond 3, All-Bond 2, Bondwell LC, and LB Bond from the Clearfil Liner Bond II system) and a low viscosity resin (Protect Liner F) measuring 5 mm long, 5 mm wide and 3 mm thick were made. Each specimen was weighed immediately after curing and placed in distilled water at 37 degrees C. Weights at 1, 2, 3, 7 days and 2, 3 and 4 weeks were obtained. Specimens were measured initially and at the above times. After 4 weeks, specimens were dried for 2 weeks and remeasured for size and weight. Then, the specimens were placed in a vacuum for approximately 4 hours and the weights and dimensions were remeasured. Values were converted to a mean percentage of the original dry weight and dimension and analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Fisher's PLSD test. RESULTS: All materials absorbed most water in the first week. Prisma Universal Bond 3 stabilized within 2 days, LB Bond stabilized within the first week, whereas the remaining materials showed statistical increases in weight for 2-3 weeks (P < 0.05). After 4 weeks, LB Bond and All-Bond 2 resins demonstrated an approximate 8% weight increase, and the least increase was observed for Protect Liner F and Prisma Universal Bond 3 at about 3%. After desiccation, Protect Liner F and All-Bond 2 returned close to their original weight, and the remainder weighed less than initially. Dimensional changes were similar to changes in weight; LB Bond showed the greatest dimensional change over the 4 weeks (5%) and Protect Liner F the least change.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2000

Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness of resin-based composites (RBCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty specimens of each material were cured under Mylar strips and immersed in artificial saliva for 1 wk. Samples were tested with a profilometer to obtain baseline average surface roughness (Ra). Specimens of both RBCs were then finished and polished according to four techniques: (1) Sof-Lex disks; (2) Sof-Lex disks followed by Prisma Gloss; (3) Enhance points; (4) Enhance points followed by Prisma Gloss application. New readings of the roughness pattern were carried out and the difference of post-polishing and baseline values were analyzed. RESULTS: ANOVA test (alpha = 0.05) did not show differences between materials (P = 0.9393) nor interaction effects (P = 0.3094), but significant difference among the finishing/polishing techniques were detected (P = 0.0157). Tukey's test showed that the smoothest surface was obtained when the specimens were treated by Sof-Lex followed by Prisma Gloss polishing paste; and the worst results were obtained after using Enhance points alone.

Aluminum Oxide↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The effect of dentin primer on the tensile bond strength to human enamel.

Four third-generation dentin bonding products (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, Optibond, All-Bond 2, and Prisma Universal Bond 3) were tested to evaluate their tensile bond strength to enamel. Test enamel specimens were etched, primed, and polymerized according to each manufacturer's directions. Control specimens were treated identically except the primer application was eliminated. The results demonstrated that the dentin primer significantly increased the tensile bond strength of All-Bond 2, significantly decreased the tensile bond strength of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose and Optibond, and had no significant effect for Prisma Universal Bond 3. A one-way analysis of variance was run between the eight groups tested, and three significant subsets were found (P < .05). The subset with the highest mean tensile bond strengths consisted of Prisma Universal Bond 3 primed and nonprimed, All-Bond 2 primed, and Optibond nonprimed.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed1993

Quantitative microleakage of six dentin bonding systems.

This in vitro study evaluated the quantitative microleakage (ML) of (A) Gluma/Pekafill, (B) Tripton/Opalux, (C) Syntac/Heliomolar, (D) Prisma Universal Bond 2/Prisma AP.H., (E) Prisma Universal Bond 3/Prisma AP.H., and (F) Clearfil PhotoBond/Photo Clearfil Bright to cementum (dentin) by means of a dye-recovery spectrophotometric technique. Standardized cylindrical Class V preparations, 3 mm in diameter and 1.5 mm deep, were made on the facial surfaces of the roots of ninety extracted human maxillary and mandibular permanent canines and the teeth were restored with the recommended resin composite. The root apices were removed, Class V preparations made at the cut apices and restored with two coats of Copalite varnish and amalgam. The teeth were painted with two coats of nail varnish except for 1 mm surrounding the restorations prior to thermocycling x500 in 2% methylene blue solution. Root sections including the restorations were placed in 50% HNO3, the dye extracted and the dye concentrations determined spectrophotometrically. Standard solutions with known amounts of dye were prepared in 50% HNO3 and unrestored root sections placed in these. ML was expressed as micrograms dye/restoration and data analyzed by ANOVA and Duncan's test. The following results were obtained: (A) 3.67 +/- 2.18; (B) 2.76 +/- 1.71; (C) 2.57 +/- 0.97; (D) 2.56 +/- 2.51; (E) 1.21 +/- 0.24; (F) 0.49 +/- 0.20. Clearfil PhotoBond and Prisma Universal Bond 3 showed significantly less microleakage than other systems evaluated.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Microleakage of new dentin bonding systems using human and bovine teeth.

The objective of this study was twofold: to evaluate the microleakage behavior of three dentin bonding systems and to determine if bovine teeth are comparable substrates to human teeth when studying the microleakage of various materials. The materials evaluated were Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive, Prisma Universal Bond 3, and All-Bond 2. All three bonding systems were used in combination with Prisma APH hybrid composite for comparison of microleakage behavior. Sixty class 5 preparations were cut at the cementoenamel junction for groups containing 30 human and 30 bovine teeth. A 1 mm 45 degree bevel was placed at the enamel margin. Teeth were grouped according to the dentin bonding system used and then restored according to the manufacturer's directions. After restoration, the teeth from each group were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 3 days. The teeth were then thermocycled between 4 degrees C and 58 degrees C for 100 cycles and returned to distilled water at 37 degrees C for an additional 4 days. The teeth were then sealed with nail polish up to 1 mm from the margins of the restoration and placed in 45Ca isotope for 2 hours. The teeth were then sectioned and placed on x-ray film to produce autoradiographs. Microleakage was evaluated for the enamel and dentin margins separately using the following scale: 0 = no leakage, 1 = penetration of isotope to less than 1/2 the distance to the axial wall, 2 = penetration of isotope greater than 1/2 of the distance to the axial wall but short of the axial wall, and 3 = penetration of isotope to the axial wall or beyond. The materials were compared to each other using the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The gingival margins were compared to the incisal margins for all materials. No statistically significant differences in microleakage were revealed between the incisal and gingival location for human substrates, but there was statistically significant greater gingival microleakage for bovine substrates. All-Bond 2 leaked significantly more than Scotchbond Multi-Purpose for human substrates at the incisal margin. All-Bond 2 had significantly more microleakage than Prisma Universal Bond 3 at both dentin and enamel margins for the bovine substrate. There were no statistically significant differences in microleakage among the bonding systems for the human substrate. No statistically significant differences between the microleakage behavior of human and bovine substrates were found. These results support the use of bovine teeth for in vitro microleakage studies.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the in vitro microleakage, marginal morphology and resin tags configuration of a compomer restorative material (Dyract) alternatively used with two different bonding systems (Dyract-PSA and Prime & Bond 2.0). A hybrid resin composite (Prisma TPH) used with two different bonding systems (Universal Bond 3 and ProBond) was evaluated as control material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Class V non-retentive restorations were made in vitro at CEJ and divided at random in four groups: Dyract/PSA, Dyract/P&B 2.0, Prisma TPH/UB3, and Prisma TPH/ProBond. The latter two groups were as controls. After finishing the restorations, an impression material was used to obtain an epoxy resin replica for SEM analysis of margin alterations. Percentage of perfect margin was evaluated under SEM and calculated comparing it with the width/length of restoration margin. The presence of gaps, enamel fractures and other marginal alterations was also recorded inspecting under SEM replicas. Each tooth was then immersed for 24 hours in erythrosin B dye solution at room temperature and evaluated at superficial margins as marginal leakage (ML) for dye penetration. Each sample was then longitudinally sectioned, and leakage was expressed as % dye penetration of the total cavity wall, longitudinal leakage (LL). Finally, each tooth was dissolved (10%H3PO4 for 48 hours and NaOCl solution for additional 24 hours) to leave only the resin restoration. The internal walls of each restoration were then inspected by SEM at x1,000-15,000 to evaluate the presence of resin-dentin infiltrated layer (hybrid layer) and to calculate the ability of primer/bonding to infiltrate peritubular dentin and to form resin tags. RESULTS: Gap widths were 2-6 microns at dentin and lower at enamel. Several enamel fractures along the margin were observed. Resin tags were observed only in deeper dentin. Only Prime & Bond 2.0/Dyract formed resin tags at medium-superficial dentin. The length of resin tags ranged from 1-6 microns for Dyract-PSA primer to 100 microns for Prime & Bond 2.0. Marginal and longitudinal leakage was observed both at dentin and enamel levels. The best dentin seal was obtained with Prime & Bond 2.0/Dyract, while enamel seals were equivalent with both bonding systems (P > 0.05). No correlations were demonstrated between leakage and SEM observations.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Glutaraldehyde-containing dentin bonding agents are mutagens in mammalian cells in vitro.

The mutagenic potential of glutaraldehyde-containing dentin bonding agents was shown in previous studies using a bacterial gene mutation assay, the Ames test. However, current strategies of genotoxicity testing and regulatory requirements for the biological evaluation of medical devices recommend a battery of tests that indicate induced mutations in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Accordingly, the mutagenicity of three glutaraldehyde-containing bonding agents (Syntac adhesive, Prisma Universal Bond 3 adhesive, and Gluma 3) was investigated using a quantitative mammalian cell gene mutation assay (V79/HPRT test) in the present investigation. The materials were extracted in dimethyl sulfoxide (0.1 g/2 mL) for 24 h and original extracts were then serially diluted in cell culture medium before exposure to V79 cells. Cytotoxic and mutagenic effects were observed with identical concentrations of extracts of the different test materials. There was a moderate decrease of the number of surviving cells immediately after the end of exposure. Mutagenicity at the hprt locus in V79 cells was found with all materials tested, and the increases in the absolute numbers of mutants were dose dependent. The mutant frequencies were about 15- (Syntac adhesive and Gluma 3) to 20-fold (Prisma UB3 adhesive) higher than solvent control values. Since other substances than glutaraldehyde may be responsible for the mutagenic effects in mammalian cells in this study, work is currently in progress to identify the individual mutagenic compounds of dentin adhesives and related composite materials.

Animals↗

PubMed1994

Mutagenicity of dentin bonding agents.

Aside from the considerable number of reports on the physical and chemical properties of dental bonding agents, information concerning their biologic effects is sparse. Three dentin bonding agents (Prisma Universal Bond, Pertac Universal Bond, and Syntac) and the ingredients methylmethacrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate, and glutaraldehyde were investigated in the Salmonella typhimurium mutagenicity test system using five different bacterial strains (TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102, and TA104). The materials as well as the ingredients were eluted in both dimethyl sulfoxide and physiologic saline, and serially diluted eluates were used in the plate incorporation test. Pertac Universal Bond and Prisma Universal Bond did not elicit any mutagenic effects in any of the bacterial strains. In contrast, Syntac adhesive showed clear mutagenicity in S. typhimurium strain TA102. Dimethyl sulfoxide eluates, as well as physiologic saline eluates of the Syntac bonding agent, caused numbers of revertants that were about 6 times higher than control values. Reversion rates with other strains were moderately enhanced. Glutaraldehyde, an ingredient of Syntac adhesives, caused mutagenicity in a manner similar to Syntac adhesive eluates. Neither 2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate nor methylmethacrylate monomer was found to be mutagenic over a broad concentration range.

Carcinogenicity Tests↗

PubMed2026

Ibuprofen versus acetaminophen for acute mild-to-moderate pain management in pediatric populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of their efficacy.

UNLABELLED: Ibuprofen and acetaminophen are the most widely used analgesics in pediatric practice for the management of acute mild-to-moderate pain. Despite their widespread use, the comparative analgesic efficacy of these two agents in children remains a subject of ongoing debate, with existing evidence largely derived from heterogeneous clinical settings and small individual trials. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials comparing the analgesic efficacy of ibuprofen versus acetaminophen in pediatric populations with acute mild-to-moderate pain. A systematic literature search was conducted up to May 2026 in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The review was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-Children and Adolescents (PRISMA-C) 2026 reporting guideline. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials comparing ibuprofen with acetaminophen in children and adolescents (defined as individuals aged 0 to < 18 years) with acute pain, reporting at least one extractable efficacy outcome. Continuous outcomes were synthesized as standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) using random-effects models; dichotomous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. Eight randomized controlled trials enrolling 1325 participants were included. Three pediatric trials contributed to the primary continuous pain outcome meta-analysis (n = 196 analyzable participants), yielding a pooled SMD of - 0.28 (95% CI - 0.57 to 0.00; p = 0.052; I2 = 0%), indicating a small effect favoring ibuprofen that did not reach conventional statistical significance. Given the small number of contributing studies (k = 3), the I2 statistic should be interpreted with caution as it has limited power to detect heterogeneity in this context. For the dichotomous pain freedom outcome (2 trials, n = 114), no significant difference was observed (pooled RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.53-1.99; p = 0.93; I2 = 0%). A prespecified sensitivity analysis including an adult soft-tissue injury trial attenuated the pooled effect toward the null (SMD - 0.15, 95% CI - 0.38 to 0.09; p = 0.23; I2 = 36.6%). Narrative synthesis of additional studies generally demonstrated comparable analgesic efficacy between the two agents across postoperative and outpatient pediatric settings. The overall certainty of evidence was rated as low for both primary outcomes, primarily due to imprecision and indirectness. CONCLUSION: Current evidence from randomized controlled trials does not demonstrate a superiority of ibuprofen over acetaminophen for acute mild-to-moderate pain management in children. Both agents appear to provide clinically meaningful analgesia across heterogeneous pediatric pain settings. The clinical choice between agents should be guided by individual patient factors, including contraindications to NSAIDs, the inflammatory nature of the pain etiology, and patient-specific characteristics. The low certainty of evidence underscores the need for adequately powered, methodologically rigorous trials to definitively establish the comparative efficacy of these two analgesics in the pediatric population. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Ibuprofen and acetaminophen are the two most widely used non-opioid analgesics for acute mild-to-moderate pain in children, and both are recommended as first-line agents by major international guidelines. • Prior meta-analyses in mixed pediatric-adult populations have suggested a modest analgesic advantage of ibuprofen over acetaminophen, but pediatric-specific evidence has remained limited and methodologically heterogeneous. WHAT IS NEW: • This systematic review and meta-analysis, restricted to randomized controlled trials in pediatric populations, found that ibuprofen showed a small effect favoring pain reduction compared with acetaminophen (SMD - 0.28, p = 0.052), although this did not reach conventional statistical significance. • The analgesic advantage of ibuprofen may be more pronounced in pain etiologies with a significant inflammatory component (e.g., fractures). At the same time, both agents appear broadly equivalent in most other acute pediatric pain settings, supporting individualized analgesic selection based on clinical context and patient-specific factors.

Humans↗

PubMed1991

Immediate and delayed direct pulp capping with the use of a new visible light-cured calcium hydroxide preparation.

The pulpal response to mechanical exposure and capping either immediately or after 24 hours was investigated in 64 teeth of four cynomolgus monkeys with the use of Dycal, VLC Dycal, or Prisma-Bond. All overlying amalgam restorations were surface-sealed with zinc oxide-eugenol cement. After 2 months the teeth were removed and prepared for histologic examination; dentine bridges were present in almost all teeth filled with Dycal or VLC Dycal, and pulpal inflammation was observed in only one tooth that showed evidence of infection. Dentine bridges were usually incomplete when Prisma-Bond was used, although pulpal inflammation was only observed in 2 of 22 teeth. The success rate of pulp capping delayed for 24 hours was as high as that for immediate capping.

Animals↗

PubMed1993

Tissue reactions to endodontic materials implanted in the mandibles of guinea pigs.

Teflon, Intermediate Restorative Material, and Prisma VLC Dycal were implanted in the mandibles of 16 guinea pigs. After experimental periods of 4 and 12 weeks, the animals were killed and tissue sections were prepared. No severe inflammatory response was noted in any of the groups except for a persistence of moderate inflammation in the poorly condensed Teflon group. Bone apposition occurred in the Prisma VLC Dycal group; none-to-mild inflammation and a thin fibrous capsule characterized the IRM group; and the Teflon group had a thick fibrous encapsulation except for samples where the Teflon material appeared to be poorly condensed and dispersed into the bony tissue. In areas where the teflon was loosely condensed, chronic inflammation and active phagocytosis were seen along the surface of the material.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Comparison of wet and dry finishing of resin composites with aluminum oxide discs.

Samples of four composites (Herculite, Visio-Dispers, Silux, and Prisma-Fil) were finished with aluminum-oxide discs either wet or dry so that the effects of these two finishing procedures could be compared. The samples were evaluated for surface smoothness, color stability, and surface hardness. Surface smoothness was determined immediately after a sample was finished with a profilometer. Knoop hardness values were determined for each sample immediately after being finished and once a week for five weeks. Color stability was evaluated with a tristimulus colorimeter by the color of each sample being finished and once a week for five weeks. When surface smoothness was compared between the wet- and dry-finished samples, there was no significant difference between Prisma-Fil, Silux, or Herculite; however, the wet-finished Visio-Dispers was significantly rougher than the dry-finished. When surface hardness was compared, there was no significant difference in hardness values between the wet and dry samples when compared over time. When changes in color were evaluated, only Visio-Dispers had no significant change in color for both the wet- and dry-finished samples over the five-week evaluation period. Dry finishing of only one composite (Silux) produced a significant change in color. Dry finishing of composites was superior or equal to wet finishing in all tests except for the color change in Silux.

Aluminum Oxide↗

PubMed1994

Bond strength and microleakage of current dentin adhesives.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate shear bond strengths and microleakage of seven current-generation dentin adhesive systems. METHODS: Standard box-type Class V cavity preparations were made at the cemento-enamel junction on the buccal surfaces of eighty extracted human molars. These preparations were restored using a microfill composite following application of either All-Bond 2 (Bisco), Clearfil Liner Bond (Kuraray), Gluma 2000 (Miles), Imperva Bond (Shofu), OptiBond (Kerr), Prisma Universal Bond 3 (Caulk), Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (3M), or Scotchbond Dual-Cure (3M) (control). Lingual dentin of these same teeth was exposed and polished to 600-grit. Adhesives were applied and composite was bonded to the dentin using a gelatin capsule technique. Specimens were thermocycled 500 times. Shear bond strengths were determined using a universal testing machine, and microleakage was evaluated using a standard silver nitrate staining technique. RESULTS: Clearfill Liner Bond and OptiBond, adhesive systems that include low-viscosity, low-modulus intermediate resins, had the highest shear bond strengths (13.3 +/- 2.3 MPa and 12.9 +/- 1.5 MPa, respectively). Along with Prisma Universal Bond 3, they also had the least microleakage at dentin margins of Class V restorations. SIGNIFICANCE: No statistically significant correlation between shear bond strength and microleakage was observed in this study. Adhesive systems that include a low-viscosity intermediate resin produced the high bond strengths and low microleakage. Similarly, two materials with bond strengths in the intermediate range had significantly increased microleakage, and one material with a bond strength in the low end of the spectrum exhibited microleakage that was statistically greater. Thus, despite the lack of statistical correlation, there were observable trends.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed1995

Bacterial adhesion to dental amalgam and three resin composites.

OBJECTIVES: The ability of three oral bacteria to adhere to hydrophobic amalgam (water contact angle 60 degrees) and hydrophobic resin composites (Prisma-AP.H 56 degrees. Herculite XRV 82 degrees and Z100 89 degrees) was compared using an in vitro assay. METHODS AND RESULTS: Following preincubation of the materials with human saliva, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy showed the surfaces to adsorb carbon and nitrogen-containing compounds in a conditioning film that appeared to block the detection of Na and others in 2100 resin. Hg and Ag in amalgam, Si and Zn in Prisma AP.H resin and Ag and Na in Herculite resin. The precoating of the substrata by a proteinaceous conditioning film led to decreased binding of viable cells of Streptococcus sanguis CH3, Streptococcus salivarius HB and Actinomyces viscosus WG as compared with the adhesion to bare composites. With and without salivary coating, there was a correlation between increased bacterial hydrophobicity and increased retention on the substrata. However, there was no statistical difference in binding to the amalgam compared with the resin composites. In vitro studies showed that the bacteria autoaggregated in the presence of saliva. CONCLUSION: The results indicate the potential ability of normal oral flora to colonize resin composite.

Actinomyces viscosus↗

PubMed2026

Treatment of Established Groin Lymphatic Complications After Arterial Surgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of interventions for established groin lymphatic complications after arterial vascular surgery. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception to May 28, 2025. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251061708) and conducted according to PRISMA, PRISMA-S, and Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guidance. Eligible studies included adults with established groin lymphorrhea/lymphocutaneous fistula or seroma/lymphocele after arterial exposure in the common femoral or iliofemoral region. Prophylactic studies were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened studies and assessed full texts. Prespecified outcomes were resolution, time to resolution, length of stay, surgical site infection, wound complications, reintervention, and recurrence. Owing to substantial heterogeneity, meta-analysis was not performed. RESULTS: Eighteen retrospective single-center studies were included; no randomized trials were identified. Reported strategy-family totals were operative control (n = 240, including 55 dye-assisted cases), intranodal lymphangiography with glue embolization (n = 39), intracavitary or chemical instillation (n = 52), negative-pressure wound therapy (n = 20), radiotherapy (n = 206), and drainage or aspiration alone (n = 7). One additional cohort compared nonsurgical with surgical management. Definitions, follow-up windows, and statistical reporting were inconsistent, and arm-level denominators were frequently incomplete. Risk of bias was serious to critical across the evidence base, mainly because of retrospective design, confounding by indication, treatment-selection bias, inconsistent outcome definitions, and incomplete reporting. Using GRADE principles, certainty of evidence was very low across strategies and phenotypes. Across study arms, conduit-directed approaches for external leak and cavity-directed approaches for encapsulated collections often achieved control, but valid comparative inference was not possible. CONCLUSION: Evidence is limited to small retrospective series with heterogeneous definitions, serious to critical risk of bias, and very low certainty. Reliable comparisons between interventions cannot currently be made. Standardized phenotype-specific definitions and outcome reporting are needed to support prospective studies and future trials.

Humans↗

PubMed1991

Leakage of a light-activated base: effect of dentin bonding agents.

This study investigated the sealing properties of Cavalite light-activated base material in conjunction with various dentin bonding agents. Thirty extracted molars were selected and cleaned. Slot preparations with standard dimensions were made. The prepared cavities were filled with Cavalite material after application of the dentin bonding agents Gluma, Prisma Universal Bond, Scotchbond 2, and Tenure. Samples were thermocycled for 180 cycles between 3 degrees C and 60 degrees C, then immersed in 0.05% crystal violet solution for 2 hours. The samples were embedded in clear casting resin, sectioned, and examined with a light microscope. Results indicated that Cavalite material used alone, without a dentin bonding agent, allowed the greatest degree of dye penetration. Cavalite material with Tenure bonding agent had the lowest degree of leakage. Cavalite material used with Scotchbond 2, Gluma, or Prisma Universal Bond bonding agents allowed an intermediate degree of dye penetration. According to an analysis of variance, however, there was no statistical difference in the effects of Tenure, Scotchbond 2, and Gluma bonding agents.

Acrylic Resins↗