SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Procedural Pain”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed2006

Sedation with intravenous ketamine and midazolam for painful procedures in children.

BACKGROUND: Children often require relief of pain and anxiety when undergoing painful procedures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of painful pediatric procedures performed by pediatric intensivist, using the combination of intravenous ketamine and midazolam for sedation and analgesia. METHODS: The records of the patients who received intravenous ketamine-midazolam combination for painful procedures in the pediatric sedation unit of a university hospital over a 3 year period were retrospectively reviewed to determine indications, dosing, assessment of the level of sedation, adverse events, and recovery time for each procedural sedation and analgesia. RESULTS: A total of 227 children aged 4 months to 18 years were admitted to the pediatric sedation unit for a total of 356 procedures. The indications for procedural sedation and analgesia included bone marrow aspiration or biopsy (50.8%), central venous catheter insertion (27%), and others (22%). A total of 46 adverse events (12.9%) were observed. These adverse events included SpO2 below 85% without apnea (n = 14), apnea (n = 3), transient stridor (n = 2), hypertension and tachycardia (n = 8), hypersalivation (n = 6), vomiting (n = 5), hallucinatory emergence reaction (n = 4), and rash (n = 4). There were no adverse outcomes attributable to ketamine and midazolam combination. CONCLUSION: Skilled pediatric intensivists can safely and effectively administer ketamine and midazolam to facilitate painful procedures outside the operating room setting.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Oral sucrose for procedural pain in sick hospitalized infants: a randomized-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of 25% oral sucrose in the reduction of pain during a heel lance procedure in sick hospitalized infants. METHODOLOGY: In a blinded randomized- controlled trial, hospitalized infants were given either 1 mL 25% sucrose or 1 mL water 2 min prior to a heel lance procedure. Pain assessment comprised a four-point facial expression score, incidence and duration of crying, heart rate and oxygen saturation changes. RESULTS: A total of 128 infants were included. Facial scores immediately upon heel lance, and at 1 and 2 min in the recovery period were reduced in the treatment (sucrose) group compared to the placebo (water) group (P < 0.05). At other observation points, the differences in facial scores between the two groups of infants did not reach statistical significance. Neither incidence nor duration of crying whilst the blood collection was in progress was significantly reduced by sucrose. In the 3-min recovery period following completion of the blood collection, incidence and duration of crying were significantly less in the treatment group of infants (P < 0.05). Physiological responses of heart rate and oxygen saturation were not attenuated by sucrose at any time point during or following the blood collection. CONCLUSION: Oral sucrose was effective in reducing behavioural responses to pain upon heel lance and in the period following completion of a heel lance procedure in this group of sick hospitalized infants. This simple strategy can be promoted in institutions caring for sick babies, as a method of reducing behavioural responses to procedural pain.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2003

Do we still hurt newborn babies? A prospective study of procedural pain and analgesia in neonates.

BACKGROUND: Despite an increasing awareness regarding pain management in neonates and the availability of published guidelines for the treatment of procedural pain, preterm neonates experience pain leading to short- and long-term detrimental effects. OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of use of analgesics in invasive procedures in neonates and the associated pain burden in this population. METHODS: For 151 neonates, we prospectively recorded all painful procedures, including the number of attempts required, and analgesic therapy used during the first 14 days of neonatal intensive care unit admission. These data were linked to estimates of the pain of each procedure, obtained from the opinions of experienced clinicians. RESULTS: On average, each neonate was subjected to a mean +/- SD of 14 +/- 4 procedures per day. The highest exposure to painful procedures occurred during the first day of admission, and most procedures (63.6%) consisted of suctioning. Many procedures (26 of 31 listed on a questionnaire) were estimated to be painful (pain scores >4 on a 10-point scale). Preemptive analgesic therapy was provided to fewer than 35% of neonates per study day, while 39.7% of the neonates did not receive any analgesic therapy in the neonatal intensive care unit. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians estimated that most neonatal intensive care unit procedures are painful, but only a third of the neonates received appropriate analgesic therapy. Despite the accumulating evidence that neonatal procedural pain is harmful, analgesic treatment for painful procedures is limited. Systematic approaches are required to reduce the occurrence of pain and to improve the analgesic treatment of repetitive pain in neonates.

Analgesics↗

PubMed2002

Lidocaine-prilocaine cream versus tetracaine gel for procedural pain in children.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative efficacy of lidocaine-prilocaine and tetracaine for procedural pain in children. METHODS: Systematic review was performed (MEDLINE1990-June 2001) of all studies comparing the efficacy of these 2 modalities of pain relief in children undergoing painful cutaneous procedures. Search terms included lidocaine, prilocaine, tetracaine, and anesthesia. RESULTS: Eight studies compared lidocaine-prilocaine with tetracaine in children for 4 different procedures: intravenous cannulation, venipuncture, Port-a-Cath puncture, and laser therapy. When used as labeled (60 min for lidocaine-prilocaine, 30 min for tetracaine), the 2 modalities provided similar analgesic efficacy. When both anesthetics were applied for a similar duration of time (40 min, 60 min, 2 h), tetracaine provided superior anesthesia. Tetracaine was commonly associated with erythema, and lidocaine-prilocaine was associated with blanching of the skin. CONCLUSIONS: Lidocaine-prilocaine and tetracaine appear to be comparable for procedural pain relief when used as recommended. Tetracaine is more efficacious than lidocaine-prilocaine when both anesthetics are applied for the same amount of time.

Administration, Topical↗

PubMed1992

Midazolam versus fentanyl as premedication for painful procedures in children with cancer.

Premedication for painful procedures in children with cancer is not routinely used. Many medications used are only intermittently effective or require special equipment or anesthesia support. In a randomized, double-blind, crossover study, the safety and efficacy of midazolam, a short-acting benzodiazepine, were compared with the safety and efficacy of fentanyl, a short-acting narcotic analgesic. In 25 children studied, 100% of children and their parents preferred study drugs to any previous premedication. Seventy-two percent preferred midazolam to fentanyl. Preprocedural anxiety, adverse behavioral symptoms, and visual analog scales all improved and side effects were minimal. It is concluded that premedication for painful procedures should be used routinely in children with cancer. With proper monitoring, fentanyl and midazolam can be used safely in the outpatient clinic setting. Midazolam was found to be the drug of preference for the majority of patients.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Liposomal lidocaine to improve procedural success rates and reduce procedural pain among children: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Historically, children have been undertreated for their pain, and they continue to undergo painful cutaneous procedures without analgesics. A new topical anesthetic, liposomal lidocaine 4% cream (Maxilene, RGR Pharma, Windsor, Ont.), has become available. It has pharmacologic properties that are superior to other topical anesthetics, including an onset of action of only 30 minutes. We sought to determine the success rate of cannulation, analgesic effectiveness, procedure duration and rate of adverse skin reactions when liposomal lidocaine is used before intravenous cannulation of children. METHODS: In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, children aged 1 month to 17 years received liposomal lidocaine or placebo before cannulation. Success on first cannulation attempt was recorded, and, among children 5 years and older, pain was evaluated before and after the attempt by the child, parents and research assistant using a validated measure (Faces Pain Scale-Revised). For children younger than 5 years, pain was evaluated by the parents and research assistant only. The total duration of the procedure and adverse skin reactions were also recorded. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not differ (p > 0.05) between children who received liposomal lidocaine (n = 69) and those who received placebo (n = 73). Cannulation on the first attempt was achieved in 74% of children who received liposomal lidocaine compared with 55% of those who received placebo (p = 0.03). Among children 5 years of age and older (n = 67), lower mean pain scores during cannulation were reported by those receiving liposomal lidocaine (p = 0.01). Similarly, lower mean pain scores during cannulation were reported by the parents and research assistant for all children who received liposomal lidocaine than for all those who received placebo (p < 0.001). The mean total procedure duration was shorter with liposomal lidocaine (6.7 v. 8.5 minutes; p = 0.04). The incidence of transient dermal changes was 23% in both groups (p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Use of liposomal lidocaine was associated with a higher intravenous cannulation success rate, less pain, shorter total procedure time and minor dermal changes among children undergoing cannulation. Its routine use for painful cutaneous procedures should be considered whenever feasible.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

Diametral measurements of the upper spinal cord for stereotactic pain procedures: experimental and clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic percutaneous pain procedures, percutaneous cordotomy, trigeminal tractotomy, and extralemniscal myelotomy are routinely performed with computed tomography (CT) guidance. This new imaging technique enables one to measure the spinal cord diameters for each patient uniquely. Significant differences have been recognized between the measurements obtained with CT and the reference values given for such procedures. METHODS: To confirm the reliability of CT measurements, two experimental models were used. In the first stage, an artificial neck and spinal cord model was set up and diameters of the spinal cord were remeasured with CT. In the second stage, spinal cord diameters of the upper cervical region on 10 mongrel dogs were initially taken with CT, then standard laminectomy was performed and diameters of the same region were measured under the operating microscope. RESULTS: The experimental studies confirmed that CT measurements of the upper cervical cord are reliable. In clinical application, diametral measurements of the spinal cord at occiput C-1 level were carried out in 30 patients who underwent percutaneous trigeminal tractotomy and extralemniscal myelotomy. The anteroposterior diameter at this level was measured at 7.0-12.8 mm and the transverse diameter ranges between 9.3-14 mm. At the level of C-1-C-2, these measurements were performed over 63 patients who experienced percutaneous cordotomy. In this group the anteroposterior (A-P) diameter was measured as 7.0-11.4 mm, and the transverse diameter as 9.0-14.0 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Our clinical experiences and the results of the experimental measurements demonstrate that CT imaging gives accurate diametral values that would favorably influence the surgical procedures, and thus, with CT imaging it is possible to perform main stereotactic destructive pain procedures safely, effectively and selectively.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

The efficacy of sucrose for relieving procedural pain in neonates--a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The objective was to determine the efficacy and optimal dose of sucrose for relieving procedural pain in neonates. Data were obtained using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Reference Update and personal files and assessed for quality of the methods. Data from all randomized controlled trials where term and preterm neonates received a heelstick or venipuncture were examined for the efficacy of different sucrose doses (0.18 g, 0.24 g, 0.48 g or 0.50 g, 1.0 g) and water (placebo). The primary outcome was the proportion of time crying during 3 min after the painful stimulus. Data were combined across studies using a random effects model, adapted for use with single groups, producing a point estimate and 95% confidence interval (CI). Thirteen trials were identified; eight were rejected as data were inappropriate, non-extractable, or the primary outcome was not measured. Five studies provided data on 271 infants. The proportion of time crying did not differ between 0.18 g of sucrose and water (p > 0.05) but was significantly lower in all other sucrose groups. There were no differences in proportion of time crying between term and preterm neonates. Sucrose reduced the proportion of time crying during painful procedures in neonates. The 0.18 g dose of sucrose was ineffective. Doses of 0.24 g (2 ml of 12% sucrose solution) were most effective. A dose of 0.50 g provided no additional benefit.

Analgesics↗

PubMed1990

C.T.-guided pain procedures.

C.T.-guided stereotactic destructive pain procedures; percutaneous cordotomy, trigeminal tractotomy-nucleotomy and extralemniscal myelotomy are presented. All procedures were applied in 32 cases without any mispuncture or complication. Advantages of C.T. guidance are direct visualization of target electrode relations, measurements of spinal cord diameters at the lesion site, and demonstration of spinal cord displacement during the procedure.

Cordotomy↗

PubMed1998

Consequences of inadequate analgesia during painful procedures in children.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of inadequate analgesia for painful procedures (bone marrow aspiration, lumbar puncture, or both) on the pain of subsequent procedures. DESIGN: A cohort of patients with cancer who had participated in a placebo-controlled, randomized study that documented the efficacy of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for painful procedures rated the pain associated with subsequent procedures performed with open-label oral transmucosal fentanyl. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-one children undergoing diagnostic procedures who had been participants in previous study. INTERVENTION: All children were given oral transmucosal fentanyl, 15 to 20 microgram/kg, prior to the procedure; at its conclusion they were asked to rate the associated pain. RESULTS: In children younger than 8 years (n = 13), mean pain ratings during each subsequent procedure were consistently higher for those who had received placebo (n = 8) in the original study compared with those who had received the active drug (n = 5). A repeated-measures analysis of variance suggests that this difference is statistically significant (P = .04). Older children (n = 8) did not show this pattern. CONCLUSION: Inadequate analgesia for initial procedures in young children may diminish the effect of adequate analgesia in subsequent procedures.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1992

Use of ethyl chloride topical anesthetic to reduce procedural pain in pediatric oncology patients.

Pediatric cancer patients often become anxious, agitated, combative, and uncooperative due to the pain or fear of pain during invasive procedures. Generally, it is not the actual administration of medicines that produces this reaction, but the fear of the needle stick itself. Increased education and implementation of coping mechanisms is often not enough to allay this fear. The tangible solution of using ethyl chloride, an anesthetic spray, before port sticks, lumbar punctures, and bone marrow aspirations, was instituted by the hematology-oncology clinic to determine if the pain, emotional trauma, and fear of cancer treatments could be reduced in oncology patients. Survey results on 60 patients and 60 parents/caretakers showed that when given the choice to use the spray or to refuse its use, 68% of the parents thought that the patient had more of a sense of control and, thus, involvement in their treatment. Seventy-eight percent of the patients reported experiencing less pain associated with procedures. Staff noted an increase in cooperation, less combativeness, and more compliance with treatment. Perceiving the child's discomfort diminished, 87% of the parents/caretakers report feeling less anxious and, therefore, more capable of being supportive to each other and their child. These results verified the staff's perceptions of the advantages of using this noninvasive anesthetic. Ethyl chloride is an easy, effective, concrete approach to reducing procedural pain in pediatric oncology patients.

Administration, Topical↗

PubMed2004

Management of children undergoing painful procedures in the emergency department by non-anesthesiologists.

The treatment of acute pain and anxiety in children undergoing therapeutic and diagnostic procedures in the emergency department has improved dramatically in recent years. The availability of non-invasive monitoring devices and the use of short-acting sedative and analgesic medications enable physicians to conduct safe and effective sedation and analgesia treatment. In today's practice of pediatric emergency medicine, sedation and analgesia has been considered as the standard of care for procedural pain. In most pediatric emergency departments throughout North America, "procedural sedation and analgesia" treatment is being performed by non-anesthesiologists (qualified emergency physicians and nurses). In 2003, the Israel Ministry of Health published formal guidelines for pediatric sedation by non-anesthesiologists; this important document recognizes for the first time the need for pediatric sedation and analgesia outside the operating room. We describe the basic principles of procedural sedation and analgesia in children and urge physicians working in pediatric emergency rooms in Israel to expand their knowledge and be more involved in the treatment of pediatric procedural pain.

Analgesics↗

PubMed1999

[Using tools for pain perception assessment in hospitalized pre-school children undergoing painful procedures].

The aim of this study was evaluate the utilization of tools for pain perception assessment in 41 hospitalized pre-school children submitted to painful procedures: care of wounds or blood extraction. The utilized tools were the faces scale, behavioral indicators and words which describe the pain. Most of the pre-schoolers understood and correctly answered to the faces scale, which can be noticed by the crescent movement 0 (no pain) 4 (maximum pain) during the choice of faces before and after the painful procedure. Crying, immortality and forehead wrinkling were the predominant behavioral indicators, intensified during the procedure. Pre-schoolers verbalizations about their pain showed up to be concrete terms or evaluative-indicative nature, resulting in variable or weakly precise concepts.

Age Factors↗

PubMed1999

Conscious sedation with remifentanil and midazolam during brief painful procedures in children.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that remifentanil, because of its favorable pharmacokinetic properties, would be advantageous to use in combination with midazolam to provide analgesia and sedation during brief painful procedures. DESIGN: Prospective observation and data collection. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Seventeen children aged 2 to 12 years, who underwent 20 brief, painful procedures. INTERVENTIONS: Administration of intravenous midazolam hydrochloride, 0.05 mg/kg, and remifentanil hydrochloride, 1 microg/kg, followed by a remifentanil infusion at 0.1 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). The dose was titrated at 5-minute intervals to levels of sedation and analgesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Successful remifentanil doses, times to discharge readiness, side effects, complications, and requirement for additional medications. RESULTS: The technique was successful in 17 of 20 procedures. The mean +/- SD successful dose was 0.4 +/- 0.2 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). Four children developed hypoxemia that abated with mild stimulation; 1 child became unresponsive and required positive-pressure ventilation. The mean +/- SD time to reach discharge criteria was 9.5 +/- 4.3 minutes. Hypoxemia was avoided in 10 of 13 patients by continuous stimulation throughout the procedure. CONCLUSION: The use of remifentanil and midazolam during brief, painful procedures results in rapid times to discharge but is complicated by a high incidence of life-threatening respiratory depression at subtherapeutic levels.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

PubMed1997

Conscious sedation of pediatric oncology patients for painful procedures: development and implementation of a clinical practice protocol.

Pain during treatment procedures is often identified as the most distressing aspect of the entire cancer experience for a child with cancer. The use of conscious sedation may reduce this procedure-related pain and distress. A clinical practice protocol is necessary to maximize the efficacy and safety of conscious sedation use. In this article, the processes of developing and implementing a conscious sedation protocol for pediatric oncology patients undergoing painful procedures are presented. The protocol itself is included. A review of the literature on conscious sedation is presented, and implications for pediatric oncology nursing practice are discussed.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

Procedural pain in a paediatric surgical emergency unit.

Pain induced by various types of procedures was assessed in the Paediatric Surgical Emergency Department at St Göran's Children's Hospital in Stockholm. Assessments of pain were obtained from the nurse, the parent, and children over 10 years of age by means of a visual analogue scale. In children aged 3-9 years, the Smiley Five-Face Scale was used. The nurse and the parent also answered questionnaires about analgesic medication, the child's behaviour, and the parent's overall opinion of the pain management, etc. Irrigation of the glans penis because of balanitis, treatment of fractures and paronychia were considered to be the most painful procedures. Forty-four per cent of the children cried during the procedure and 16% fought against being restrained. In 24% of the cases, the child was judged to be in a state of "panic". In conclusion, we believe that the pain induced by procedures in the emergency rooms is unacceptably high. Children estimate higher pain scores than parents and nurses do. There was a poor correlation between the parent's and child's estimates of pain. Parents are not well informed about the possibilities for pain treatment. Infants and children attending emergency rooms must also benefit from recent advances in the treatment of pain.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

How effective is tetracaine 4% gel, before a peripherally inserted central catheter, in reducing procedural pain in infants: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial [ISRCTN75884221].

BACKGROUND: Procedural pain relief is sub-optimal in infants, especially small and vulnerable ones. Tetracaine gel 4% (Ametop, Smith-Nephew) provides pain relief in children and larger infants, but its efficacy in smaller infants and for peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) remains uncertain. The objective of this trial was to assess the safety and efficacy of tetracaine gel on the pain response of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants during insertion of a PICC. METHODS: Medically stable infants greater than or equal to 24 weeks gestation, requiring a non-urgent PICC, were included. Following randomization and double blinding, 1.1 g of tetracaine or placebo was applied to the skin for 30 minutes. The PICC was inserted according to a standard protocol. Pain was assessed using the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP). A 3-point change in the pain score was considered clinically significant, leading to a sample size of 54 infants, with 90% statistical power. Local skin reactions and immediate adverse cardiorespiratory events were noted. The primary outcome, PIPP score at 1 minute, was analysed using an independent Student's t-test. RESULTS: Fifty-four infants were included, 27 +/- 2 weeks gestation, 916 +/- 292 grams and 6.5 +/- 3.2 days of age. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The mean PIPP score in the first minute was 10.88 in the treatment group as compared to 11.74 in the placebo group (difference 0.86, 95% CI -1.86, 3.58). Median duration of crying in non-intubated infants was 181 seconds in the tetracaine group compared to 68 seconds in the placebo group (difference -78, 95% CI -539, 117). Local skin erythema was observed transiently in 4 infants (3 in the treatment and 1 in the placebo group). No serious harms were observed. CONCLUSION: Tetracaine 4% when applied for 30 minutes was not beneficial in decreasing procedural pain associated with a PICC in very small infants.

Administration, Topical↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Preparation of children for painful procedures.

Preparation of the child for a painful procedure is an intervention that requires the provision of sensory-procedural information and coping skills. These coping skills, such as relaxation, distraction, or imagery can be used by the child to reduce both quantitative and qualitative aspects of the pain experience.

Adaptation, Psychological↗