PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “SCLC”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Effective removal of SCLC cells from human bone marrow. Use of four monoclonal antibodies and immunomagnetic beads.

High dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) has shown promise in several types of cancer. There is, however, a risk of transfusing contaminating tumour cells with the bone marrow cells, e.g. in patients with small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). To eliminate SCLC cells from normal human bone marrow, four monoclonal antibodies reactive with SCLC cells were used with immunomagnetic beads in model experiments. With two cycles of immunomagnetic elimination the individual antibodies removed 2.5-4.4 log of H-146 tumour cells from a single cell suspension, as assessed in a highly reproducible soft agar assay. Different combinations of two antibodies were only marginally more effective than the individual MAbs, whereas 5-6 log removal was obtained with a combination of all four antibodies. The method was equally effective when the tumour cells were mixed with bone marrow cells at a ratio of 1:10. The immunomagnetic procedure did not significantly affect the survival of normal progenitor cells, assessed in CFU-GM and CFU-GEMM assays. The results indicate that the procedure safely and effectively can be used to eliminate tumour cells from the bone marrow in conjunction with ABMT in patients with SCLC.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Expression of the proto-oncogenes c-met and c-kit and their ligands, hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor and stem cell factor, in SCLC cell lines and xenografts.

We examined a panel of 25 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines and nude mouse xenografts for expression of the proto-oncogenes c-met and c-kit, and for expression of the corresponding ligands, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (also known as scatter factor (SF)), and stem cell factor (SCF), respectively. Expression of mRNA was detected by Northern blotting, and c-met and c-kit protein expression was detected by Western blotting and immunocytochemistry. c-met and c-kit mRNA was expressed in 22 of the examined cell lines or xenografts, and coexpression of the two proto-oncogenes was observed in 20 tumours. Expression of c-met and c-kit protein paralleled in the mRNA expression. HGF/SF mRNA was expressed in two of the examined tumours, and only one of these also expressed the c-met proto-oncogene. SCF mRNA was expressed in 19 of the examined tumours, and in 18 of these coexpression of c-kit and SCF was present. The high percentage of SCLC tumours expressing c-met and c-kit indicates that these proto-oncogenes may have an important function in this disease. The rare coexpression of c-met and HGF/SF is evidence that an autocrine regulatory pathway is not present for this receptor/ligand system in SCLC, while the frequent coexpression of c-kit and SCF indicates that this receptor/ligand system may have an autocrine function in SCLC.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Serum neuron-specific enolase (S-NSE) in progressive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Clinical decision making is based on results from qualitative and quantitative information. To provide quantitative data, various laboratory variables are widely used in the clinical evaluation of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The tumour marker serum neuron-specific enolase (S-NSE) and the routine laboratory parameter serum lactate dehydrogenase (S-LDH) have been investigated, mostly separately. Few studies have compared their importance in SCLC, especially in progressive disease (PD). The present investigation was undertaken to evaluate S-NSE for diagnostic efficacy in PD and compare it with S-LDH. In 27 patients in a treatment trial of SCLC, regular follow-up laboratory values were prospectively obtained. Chemotherapy was given according to trial protocols, and all clinical evaluation followed the WHO recommendations. At re-evaluation all but three values had normalised (two S-NSE, one S-LDH). S-NSE at progression was increased in 93% of the patients and S-LDH in 59%. The efficacy of S-NSE to discriminate between response and PD was superior to S-LDH (0.92 vs 0.70). There was no additive effect of the two parameters in prediction of PD, and the discriminating power was higher for S-NSE than for S-LDH (P < 0.0008). The disease status-related marker increments in relation to upper reference limits, i.e. the signal-noise relation, were higher for S-NSE than for S-LD. Both of the markers carry information on PD. S-NSE is, however, clearly superior to S-LDH in reflecting disease status during therapy. This prompts us to conclude that S-NSE should replace S-LDH as prognostic factor and disease activity monitor in SCLC.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

DT-diaphorase activity in NSCLC and SCLC cell lines: a role for fos/jun regulation.

To assess the potential differential lung tumour expression of NAD(P)H:quinone reductase (NQO1), the human (h) NQO1 promoter was characterized in gene transfer studies. A deletion panel of 5' flanking hNQO1 promoter constructs was made and tested in transient transfection assays in NSCLC and SCLC cell lines. The largest hNQO1 construct (-1539/+115) containing the antioxidant response element (ARE), exhibited robust levels of reporter activity in the NSCLC (H460, H520, and A549) cell lines and expression was over 12 to 77-fold higher than the minimal (-259/+115) promoter construct. In contrast, there was little difference in promoter activity between the largest and minimal promoter construct in the SCLC (H146, H82 and H187) cell lines. Deletion of the sites for NFkappaB and AP-2 and the XRE did not significantly affect hNQO1 promoter activity in either the NSCLC or SCLC cell lines. Robust promoter activity in NSCLC lines was mediated by a 359 bp segment of the proximal promoter that contained a canonical AP-1 binding site, TGACTCAG, within the ARE. Gel supershift assays with various specific Fos/Jun antibodies identified Fra1, Fra2 and Jun B binding activity in NSCLC cells to a promoter fragment (-477 to -438) spanning the AP-1 site, whereas SCLC do not appear to express functional Fra or Jun B. These results suggest a possible role for AP-1 activity in the differential expression of hNQO1 in NSCLC.

Antioxidants↗

Novel cross talk between MEK and S6K2 in FGF-2 induced proliferation of SCLC cells.

Here, we show that fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) induces proliferation of H-510 and H-69 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cells. However, the optimal response to FGF-2 was obtained at 10-fold lower concentrations in H-510 cells. This correlated with the selective activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) pathway in H-510, but not H-69 cells. Moreover, inhibition of MEK with PD098059 blocked FGF-2-induced proliferation in H-510 cells only. Similarly, ribosomal protein S6 kinase 2 (S6K2), a recently identified homologue of S6K1 was activated by FGF-2 in H-510, but not H-69 cells. This activation was independent of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase, but was sensitive to inhibition of the MEK pathway. These data suggest that S6K2 is a novel downstream target of MEK. The potency of FGF-2 in H-510 cells might reflect this additional MEK/S6K2 signalling. In contrast to S6K2, S6K1 was activated in both SCLC cell lines. Inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin with 10 ng/ml rapamycin blocked S6K1 activation and proliferation of both lines. However, even at 100 ng/ml, rapamycin only partially inhibited S6K2. Strikingly, this correlated with inhibition of MEK signalling. Our data indicate that S6K1, and possibly S6K2, are involved in FGF-2-induced SCLC cell growth, a notion supported by the overexpression and higher baseline activity of both isoforms in SCLC lines, as compared to normal human type-II pneumocytes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

G-CSF as prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in SCLC.

OBJECTIVES: In 1991, small cell lung cancer (SCLC) was reported as the first tumour type where colony stimulating factor (CSF) support was clinically effective. We reviewed 13 health services research studies that addressed CSF use as supportive care for SCLC. METHODS: Findings from American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) membership surveys, patterns of care studies, ASCO evidence-based guidelines and cost-effectiveness studies for CSF use were reviewed. RESULTS: For primary prophylaxis for SCLC, ASCO CSF clinical guidelines clearly do not support granulocyte (G)-CSF use. Cost-effectiveness models indicate that CSF use in this setting is associated with as much as US$1900 incremental patient care costs per cycle given an 18% febrile neutropenia rate. ASCO membership surveys found that < 10% of respondents supported CSF as primary prophylaxis while a patterns-of-care study found 55% use. In the secondary prophylaxis setting, ASCO CSF guidelines in 1994, 1996 and 1997 were equally supportive of CSF use versus dose reduction but dose-reduction was considered the preferred option in 2000. Over half of the ASCO member respondents in 1994 and in 1997 supported G-CSF use; cost-effectiveness models indicated that CSF use incurred an additional US$144 and 277 per cycle and the patterns of care study found 27% use of CSF in the community practice setting. CONCLUSIONS: In 2002, the findings of a decade of health services studies have shifted towards not being supportive of CSF use for primary or secondary prophylaxis for SCLC patients.

Carcinoma, Small Cell↗

[Phase II study of lung cancer--evaluation of new drug in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and phase II testing of analogues].

The purpose of this report is to review the problems in the evaluation of new drugs in SCLC and phase II testing of analogues in lung cancer. SCLC is one of the most chemotherapy-sensitive solid tumours and patients (pts) who relapse after their first-line treatment are likely to have resistant tumors, precluding the appropriate evaluation of new drugs, especially analogues. However, it is ethically difficult to evaluate new drugs in untreated pts with SCLC. Based on many issues, We recommended that new drugs should be evaluated in "good" pts with extensive-stage SCLC and that the trial design should include early stopping rules as well as a crossover to an active alternative regimen such as etoposide and cisplatin for non-responders. Also, I recommended that the endpoint for a positive phase II study with an analogue depends upon which of the following four ways the analogue's superiority is hope for; (1) superior efficacy in responsive tumors; (2) broader spectrum; (3) cross-over resistance to the parent structure; (4) diminished toxicity.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

[Bi-specific F(ab')2 enhances cytolytic activities of LAK cells against human small cell lung cancer (SCLC)].

In order to enhance cytolytic activity of lymphokine activated killer (LAK) cells against human small cell lung cancer (SCLC), bispecific F(ab')2 was used with human LAK cells and human SCLC cell lines (i.e. N231 and H69) as targets. For the construction of bispecific F(ab')2, LU246 monoclonal antibody (mAb) recognizing the antigen expressed on the surface of both SCLC cell lines, was employed. OKT3 or 3G8 mAbs recognizing CD3 on T cell and CD16 on NK cell functional molecules respectively, were chemically cross-linked to LU246 mAb using 5,5'-dithio-bis 2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB). Bispecific F(ab')2 adding to LAK cells increased the conjugation with target cells. The phenotypes of LAK cells change at their various culture times. Although cytolytic activity of LAK cells gradually decreases after one week of culture time, the enhanced cytotoxicity of LAK cell using bispecific F(ab')2 has been kept even after long culture. Furthermore, target cell lysis enhanced by bispecific F(ab')2 has been greater than that by classical ADCC using LU246 mAb. These bispecific antibodies should be effective reagents for adoptive immunotherapy in human SCLC patients.

Antibody Specificity↗

Rationale and Study Design of the GUIDANCE trial: A Multicenter Phase II Trial of Maintenance Durvalumab and Olaparib After Standard Fist Line Treatment (Carboplatin/Cisplatin, Etoposide, and Durvalumab) in HRD Positive Extensive Disease (ED) Small-cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) (AIO-TRK-0124/ass).

BACKGROUND: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic progress over recent decades. Although PD-L1 inhibitors have modestly improved survival, responses are not durable. There are no predictive biomarkers that would allow for a personalized treatment strategy. Targeting DNA damage repair deficiencies represents a promising treatment strategy in various solid tumors. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors such as olaparib have demonstrated efficacy in homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive tumors, and preclinical data suggest synergistic activity with immune checkpoint blockade. METHODS: GUIDANCE is a biomarker-driven, multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase II trial evaluating maintenance therapy with durvalumab and olaparib in patients with advanced or metastatic SCLC without progression after first-line therapy with platinum, etoposide and durvalumab. Patients are prospectively selected for HRD based on homologous recombination repair gene alterations and/or a genomic instability score. Following central prescreening, 29 patients will be enrolled. Patients receive durvalumab (1500 mg every 4 weeks) and olaparib (300 mg twice daily) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, safety and tolerability. Exploratory analyses include circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring of individual TP53 mutations, assessment of SLFN11 expression, and characterization of immune cell composition via multiplex immunohistochemistry. DISCUSSION: This trial investigates a chemotherapy-free, genomically stratified maintenance strategy targeting both DNA damage repair deficiency and immune evasion in SCLC. By integrating HRD-based patient selection with concurrent PARP and immune checkpoint inhibition, GUIDANCE aims to establish a more individualized therapeutic approach and to generate a signal for further evaluation in biomarker-defined patient populations. Trial registration number EuraCT 2024-512373-27-00.

DNA-damage repair↗

Does maintenance/consolidation chemotherapy have a role in the management of small cell lung cancer (SCLC)? A metaanalysis of the published controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The role of maintenance/consolidation chemotherapy was assessed in the management of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) via a metaanalytic approach. METHODS: The Medline and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant randomized clinical trials that compared maintenance chemotherapy with follow-up. Quality of trials was assessed by European Lung Cancer Working Party (ELCWP) score. Odds ratios and rate differences were used as the effect size. Mantel-Haenszel tests with fixed and random effect models were conducted for 1- and 2-year overall survival (OAS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Fourteen relevant randomized clinical trials to date, encompassing 2550 patients, with trial sizes ranging from 36 to 610, were identified. Both 1- and 2-year mortality were reduced with maintenance/consolidation chemotherapy. With the fixed model, odds ratios for 1- and 2-year OAS were 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.56-0.79), P < 0.001, and also 0.67 (95% CI = 0.53-0.86), P < 0.001. Likewise, 1- and 2-year PFS were better with maintenance/consolidation chemotherapy, with odds ratios of 0.49 (95% CI = 0.37-0.63), P < 0.001, and 0.64 (95% CI = 0.45-0.92), P < 0.015. The random model gave similar results. In accordance, maintenance chemotherapy improved 1- and 2-year OAS by 9% (from 30-39%) and 4% (from 10-14%), respectively. Similarly, 1- and 2-year PFS were also improved. CONCLUSION: Maintenance/consolidation chemotherapy improves survival in SCLC. New randomized clinical trials are needed to further refine the place of this approach in the management of SCLC.

Adult↗

Cell adhesion-mediated transformation of a human SCLC cell line is associated with the development of a normal phenotype.

Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is a highly metastatic disease with a poor prognosis due to its resistance to current modes of therapy. SCLC cells appear to arise by oncogenic transformation of self-renewing pulmonary neuroendocrine cells, which have the potential to differentiate into a variety of lung epithelial cell lineages. Epithelial-mesenchymal conversion involved in such cell type transitions leads to the acquisition of an invasive and metastatic phenotype and may be critical for neoplastic progression and its eventual resistance to therapy. In order to investigate mechanisms involved in such transitions, a SCLC cell line was exposed to 5-bromodeoxyuridine. This treatment induced a dramatic conversion from non-substrate-adherent aggregates to monolayers of cells exhibiting an epithelioid phenotype. The phenotypic transition was concomitant with downregulation of vimentin, upregulation of cytokeratins, and cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion molecules as well as redistribution of the actin cytoskeleton. The changes in the levels and organization of cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion molecules were correlated with an in vivo loss of tumorigenicity.

Animals↗

Somatostatin receptor imaging of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) by means of 111In-DTPA octreotide scintigraphy.

Somatostatin receptors have been described on the membrane of neoplastic cells derived from the APUD system and their expression has also been demonstrated on small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in vitro and in vivo. 21 patients with SCLC were studied using 111In-octreotide (111In-OCT) scintigraphy. Scintigraphic examinations were performed following intravenous (i.v.) injection of 111 MBq 111In-OCT with whole-body scintigraphy and planar scintigraphy of the thorax as well as the SPET technique. No short-term side effects were described following 111In-OCT administration. We studied the 111In-OCT biodistribution in 3 patients with serial scintigraphies at 1, 5 and 24 h. We used the 5 h as standard scanning time for the following 18 patients. The scintigraphic results were compared with those of other conventional diagnostic procedures. 111In-OCT detected 86% (48/56) of the lesions already known at the time of scintigraphy. It was positive in all 20 SCLC patients and negative in one lung adenocarcinoma. 111In-OCT showed high sensitivity for mediastinal metastases (94%) and good sensitivity for bone metastases (75%) and abdominal lymph node metastases (71%). 111In-OCT did not detect two liver metastases. 111In-OCT detected five unknown lesions which were confirmed by other diagnostic examinations. 111In-OCT was also effective in cancer patients with low levels of NSE. Our study shows that 111In-OCT scintigraphy is a reliable, non-invasive technique to detect primary SLCL and its locoregional or distant metastases. The clinical utility of receptor status characterisation obtained with 111In-OCT scintigraphy should be evaluated by means of an appropriate prospective study.

Aged↗

Differential expression of the antioxidant response element within the hNQO1 promoter in NSCLC versus SCLC.

To determine whether the human (h) NQO1 (NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase 1) gene contains DNA sequences that directly mediate its high and low expression in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC), respectively, a series of deletion constructs spanning up to -4kb of the 5(') flanking region of hNQO1 was used in transient transfection assays. The antioxidant response element (ARE) was found to be critical to the elevated expression of NQO1 in NSCLC. However, the ability of both heterologous and deletion promoter constructs to confer ARE responsiveness demonstrated that SCLC contains the necessary program/menu of transcription factors responsible to drive hNQO1 expression via the ARE. By examining the regulatory region of the hNQO1 gene, we identified a proximal repressor region between -259 and -131. These results provide the first evidence of a proximal repressor region exerting a negative role on the regulation of the hNQO1 promoter in SCLC.

Antioxidants↗

Randomized phase II study comparing topotecan/cisplatin administration for 5 days versus 3 days in the treatment of extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

BACKGROUND: Topotecan (T) is an active drug in SCLC. A combination of topotecan with cisplatin (DDP) was suggested to be highly synergistic. This phase II trial was initiated to assess the activity of T/DDP in chemotherapy-naive patients suffering from extensive disease small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and to compare the conventional 5-day regime with an experimental 3-day schedule. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 86 patients were included. Patients were randomized to receive either T 1.0 mg/m2 d 1-5 and DDP 75 mg/m2 d 5 (arm A) or T 1.5 mg/m2 d 1-3 and DDP 75 mg/m2 d 3 (arm B). Six cycles were given at a 3-week interval. RESULTS: Data of 84 evaluable patients (67 males and 17 females) were analysed. All patients had metastatic disease. The best response rate was 61.9% in arm A and 59.5% in arm B. Median overall survival was 8.7 months in arm A and 7.6 months in arm B (p=0.6809). CONCLUSIONS: Combination of T and DDP is active in ED SCLC. Toxicity and median survival were comparable in both arms. Three days treatment seems to be similar to the 5 days regime.

Adult↗

Cisplatin-etoposide alternating with topotecan in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). A multicenter phase II study.

PURPOSE: In order to investigate the feasibility of a potentially non-cross resistant drug regimen, we alternated cycles of cisplatin-etoposide with topotecan as front-line treatment in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six previously untreated patients with extensive stage SCLC received cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) IV on day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m(2) IV on days 1-3 on cycles one, three, five and seven and topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2) IV on days 1-5 on cycles two, four, six and eight. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Patients' median age was 60 years and performance status (WHO) was 0 for 13, 1 for 20 and 2 for three patients. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. RESULTS: Five (14%) patients achieved a complete response and 18 (50%) a partial response for an overall response rate of 64% (95% confidence interval: 48.2-79.6%). After a median follow up of 10 months, the median duration of response was 5.5 months, the time to tumor progression 8 months and the probability of 1-year survival 48.9%. A total of 126 cycles of cisplatin-etoposide and 117 cycles of topotecan were administered with a median number of 4 cycles/patient for each regimen. There were no toxic deaths. Treatment delays due to toxicity occurred in 13 (10%) cycles after cisplatin-etoposide and 16 (14%) cycles after topotecan while doses were reduced in seven (6%) and five (4%) cycles, respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and febrile neutropenia complicated 13, 1 and 3% of cisplatin-etoposide cycles and 28, 6 and 1% of topotecan, respectively. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild. The delivered dose intensity was 96% for cisplatin and etoposide and 98% for topotecan. CONCLUSIONS: The alternating administration of cisplatin-etoposide and topotecan is a feasible, active and well-tolerated regimen in patients with extensive stage SCLC.

Adult↗

Chromosomal alterations, biological features and in vitro chemosensitivity of SCLC-R1, a new cell line from human metastatic small cell lung carcinoma.

A new human cancer cell line was established from a metastatic lesion of a small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC-R1) and maintained in continuous culture with a doubling time of 62 h. The SCLC-R1 line, whose ultrastructural features are presented, showed a diploid DNA content, a translocation involving chromosome 16 [t(16;?)(q24;?)] and noticeable deletions in the FHIT (fragile histidine triad) region in the short arm of chromosome 3 [del(3)(p14)] and in the telomeric region of the short arm of chromosome 12 [del(12)(p13)]. The involvement of 12p in metastatic small cell lung cancer is reported here for the first time. No amplification or rearrangements were evident in the c-myc, L-myc, N-myc, int-2, c-erbB-2, H-ras, K-ras, c-mos, and hst-1 genes by Southern blot analysis. Wild-type p53, RB, K-ras and H-ras genes were evident by polymerase chain reaction-single-strand conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) analysis. The neuron specific enolase (NSE) level was much higher in the cell line's cytosol than in the patient's serum and the cell line also had high expression of chromogranin A and cytokeratin 19. SCLC-R1 cells were sensitive to cisplatin, carboplatin and doxorubicin. The clinical history of the patient from whom the cell line was derived is reported. The characteristics of this new cell line indicate it to be a useful experimental model to investigate lung cancer biology and anticancer drug response.

Aged↗

Long-term survivors of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC): a French multicenter study. Groupe d'Oncologie de Langue Française.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze SCLC patients beyond 30 months, particularly their outcome, their way of life, and factors which could influence relapses, second-primary cancers and death. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1986 and May 1995, 263 SCLC patients who survived longer than 30 months were included from 52 French institutions. The analysis was performed on the 155 cases confirmed by a pathologic review. RESULTS: Physical, mental and psychological states were considered as normal at 30 months in respectively 70.3%, 87.7% and 67.7% of patients, not influenced by prophylactic cranial irradiation, number of chemotherapy cycles, CCNU or cisplatin. Therapeutic sequelae were neurological impairment (13%), pulmonary fibrosis (18%) and cardiac disorders (11%) at 30 months. Return to work was possible for 40% of patients in the first two years following diagnosis. Among 43 relapsing patients, 33 benefited from a second-line treatment. Their median survival was 12 months since retreatment, and seven patients have survived again longer than 30 months. Age > 60 at the time of diagnosis was found as an independent factor increasing the risk of relapse beyond 30 months (OR = 2.46, IC 95% (1.16-5.26), P = 0.01). The risk of relapse became less than 10% beyond five years. Twenty patients (13%) developed a second primary cancer in a mean time of 58.6 months. The risk of second primary cancer was increased by a number of chemotherapy cycles > 6 (OR = 3.25, IC 95% (1.08-9.8) P = 0.02) and by an age > 60 (OR = 2.92, IC 95% (1.07-7.97), P = 0.03). Five- and 10-year survival rates were respectively 68% and 44%. In these patients having reached a 30-month survival, three independent factors were predictive of a survival longer than five years: age < or = 60 at the time of diagnosis (OR = 2.85, IC 95% (1.23-6.6), P = 0.01), chest radiotherapy (OR = 3.1, IC 95% (1.28-7.69), P = 0.006) and absence of relapse (OR = 4.5, IC 95% (1.75-12.5), P = 0.002). This study suggests that: 1) therapeutic sequelae are rather mild, allowing return to work in 40% of patients; 2) relapsing 30-month survivors can benefit from second-line treatment; 3) SCLC cure can be achieved with a 10-year follow-up.

Adult↗

Paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin as salvage treatment in refractory small-cell lung cancer (SCLC): a multicenter phase II study.

PURPOSE: The activity and toxicity of paclitaxel plus carboplatin combination in patients with disease progression after initial chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) was investigated in a multicenter phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients (twenty-seven men) with extensive stage refractory SCLC after EP or CAV front-line chemotherapy were treated with paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 on day 1 and carboplatin 6 AUC on day 2 in a four-week schedule. The patients' median age was 60 years and the performance status (WHO) was 0 for 9, 1 for 20 and 2 for 3 patients. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 29 for response. RESULTS: Complete response was observed in one (3%) and partial response in seven (22%) for an overall response rate of 25% (95% confidence interval (CI): 10%-40%). Seven (22%) patients had stable disease and seventeen (53%) progressive disease. All but one of the responders had been previously treated with EP combination and three of them had failed to respond. The median duration of response and the median TTP were 3 and 5.5 months, respectively. The median overall survival was seven months. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 12 (37%) patients and in 2 of these it was associated with infection. There were no toxic deaths. Grade 4 anaemia was observed in one (3%) patient and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in three (9.4%). Non-hematologic toxicity was very mild with grade 2-3 asthenia occurring in 10 (25%) patients; asthenia was the reason for treatment discontinuation in 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin is a relatively active and well-tolerated regimen as salvage treatment in patients with refractory SCLC.

Adult↗