PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “SEC Translocation Channels”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

In vitro studies with purified components reveal signal recognition particle (SRP) and SecA/SecB as constituents of two independent protein-targeting pathways of Escherichia coli.

The molecular requirements for the translocation of secretory proteins across, and the integration of membrane proteins into, the plasma membrane of Escherichia coli were compared. This was achieved in a novel cell-free system from E. coli which, by extensive subfractionation, was simultaneously rendered deficient in SecA/SecB and the signal recognition particle (SRP) components, Ffh (P48), 4. 5S RNA, and FtsY. The integration of two membrane proteins into inside-out plasma membrane vesicles of E. coli required all three SRP components and could not be driven by SecA, SecB, and DeltamicroH+. In contrast, these were the only components required for the translocation of secretory proteins into membrane vesicles, a process in which the SRP components were completely inactive. Our results, while confirming previous in vivo studies, provide the first in vitro evidence for the dependence of the integration of polytopic inner membrane proteins on SRP in E. coli. Furthermore, they suggest that SRP and SecA/SecB have different substrate specificities resulting in two separate targeting mechanisms for membrane and secretory proteins in E. coli. Both targeting pathways intersect at the translocation pore because they are equally affected by a blocked translocation channel.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Protein unfolding is not a prerequisite for endoplasmic reticulum-to-cytosol dislocation.

We examined the effects of protein folding on endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-to-cytosol transport (dislocation) by exploiting the well-characterized dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) domain. DHFR retains the capacity to bind folate analogues in the lumen of microsomes and in the ER of intact cells, upon which it acquires a conformation resistant to proteinase K digestion. Here we show that a Class I major histocompatibility complex heavy chain fused to DHFR is still recognized by the human cytomegalovirus-encoded glycoproteins US2 and US11, resulting in dislocation of the fusion protein from the ER in vitro and in vivo. A folded state of the DHFR domain does not impair dislocation of Class I MHC heavy chains in vitro or in living cells. In fact, a slight acceleration of the dislocation of DHFR heavy chain fusion was observed in vitro in the presence of a folate analogue. These results suggest that one or more of the channels used for dislocation can accommodate polypeptides that contain a tightly folded domain of considerable size. Our data raise the possibility that the Sec61 channel can be modified to accommodate a folded DHFR domain for dislocation, but not for translocation into the ER, or that a channel altogether distinct from Sec61 is used for dislocation.

Cytosol↗

Transport of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.

The biosynthesis of many eukaryotic proteins requires their transport across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. The process can be divided into two phases: (i) a targeting cycle, during which, by virtue of their signal sequences, nascent polypeptides are directed to translocation sites in the ER and (ii) the actual transfer of proteins across the membrane. The first phase has been well characterized, whereas the latter until recently was completely unresolved. Key components of the translocation apparatus have now been identified and it seems likely that they form a protein-conducting channel in the ER membrane. The transport process is similar to the process of protein export in bacteria.

Biological Transport↗

Identification and characterization of protease-resistant SecA fragments: secA has two membrane-integral forms.

We have identified and characterized the protease-resistant SecA fragments (X. Chen, H. Xu, and P. C. Tai, J. Biol. Chem. 271:29698-29706, 1996) through immunodetection with region-specific antibodies, chemical extraction, and sequencing analysis. The 66-, 36-, and 27-kDa proteolytic fragments in the membranes all start at Met1, whereas the 48-kDa fragment starts at Glu361. The overlapping of the sequences of the 66- and 48-kDa fragments indicates that they are derived from different SecA molecules. These two fragments were generated differently in response to ATP hydrolysis and protein translocation. Furthermore, the presence of membrane is required for the generation of the 48-kDa fragment but not for that of the 66-kDa fragment. These data suggest that there are two different integral forms of SecA in the membrane: SecA(S) and SecA(M). The combination of these two forms of SecA has several membrane-interacting domains. Both forms of SecA are integrated in the membrane, since both the 48- and 66-kDa fragments could be derived from urea- or Na2CO3-washed membranes. Moreover, all fragments are resistant to extraction with a high concentration of salt or with heparin, but the membrane-specific 48-kDa SecA domain is more sensitive to Na2CO3 or urea extraction. This suggests that this domain may interact with other membrane proteins in an aqueous microenvironment and therefore may form a part of the protein-conducting channel.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Evolutionarily conserved binding of ribosomes to the translocation channel via the large ribosomal RNA.

During early stages of cotranslational protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane the ribosome is targeted to the heterotrimeric Sec61p complex, the major component of the protein-conducting channel. We demonstrate that this interaction is mediated by the 28S rRNA of the eukaryotic large ribosomal subunit. Bacterial ribosomes also bind via their 23S rRNA to the bacterial homolog of the Sec61p complex, the SecYEG complex. Eukaryotic ribosomes bind to the SecYEG complex, and prokaryotic ribosomes to the Sec61p complex. These data indicate that rRNA-mediated interaction of ribosomes with the translocation channel occurred early in evolution and has been conserved.

Animals↗

Oligomeric rings of the Sec61p complex induced by ligands required for protein translocation.

The heterotrimeric Sec61p complex is a major component of the protein-conducting channel of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane, associating with either ribosomes or the Sec62/63 complex to perform co- and posttranslational transport, respectively. We show by electron microscopy that purified mammalian and yeast Sec61p complexes in detergent form cylindrical oligomers with a diameter of approximately 85 A and a central pore of approximately 20 A. Each oligomer contains 3-4 heterotrimers. Similar ring structures are seen in reconstituted proteoliposomes and native membranes. Oligomer formation by the reconstituted Sec61p complex is stimulated by its association with ribosomes or the Sec62/63p complex. We propose that these cylindrical oligomers represent protein-conducting channels of the ER, formed by ligands specific for co- and posttranslational transport.

Animals↗

The oligomeric distribution of SecYEG is altered by SecA and translocation ligands.

The multimeric membrane protein complex translocase mediates the transport of preproteins across and integration of membrane proteins into the inner membrane of Escherichia coli. The translocase consists of the peripheral membrane-associated ATPase SecA and the heterotrimeric channel-forming complex consisting of SecY, SecE and SecG. We have investigated the quaternary structure of the SecYEG complex in proteoliposomes. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer demonstrates that SecYEG forms oligomers when embedded in the membrane. Freeze-fracture techniques were used to examine the oligomeric composition under non-translocating and translocating conditions. Our data show that membrane-embedded SecYEG exists in a concentration-dependent equilibrium between monomers, dimers and tetramers, and that dynamic exchange of subunits between oligomers can occur. Remarkably, the formation of dimers and tetramers in the lipid environment is stimulated significantly by membrane insertion of SecA and by the interaction with translocation ligands SecA, preprotein and ATP, suggesting that the active translocation channel consists of multiple SecYEG complexes.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Signal sequence recognition in posttranslational protein transport across the yeast ER membrane.

We have analyzed how the signal sequence of prepro-alpha-factor is recognized during the first step of posttranslational protein transport into the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. Cross-linking studies indicate that the signal sequence interacts in a Kar2p- and ATP-independent reaction with Sec61p, the multispanning membrane component of the protein-conducting channel, by intercalation into transmembrane domains 2 and 7. While bound to Sec61p, the signal sequence forms a helix that is contacted on one side by Sec62p and Sec71p. The binding site is located at the interface of the protein channel and the lipid bilayer. Signal sequence recognition in cotranslational translocation in mammals appears to occur similarly. These results suggest a general mechanism by which the signal sequence could open the channel for polypeptide transport.

Biological Transport↗

The protein-conducting channel SecYEG.

In bacteria, the translocase mediates the translocation of proteins into or across the cytosolic membrane. It consists of a membrane embedded protein-conducting channel and a peripherally associated motor domain, the ATPase SecA. The channel is formed by SecYEG, a multimeric protein complex that assembles into oligomeric forms. The structure and subunit composition of this protein-conducting channel is evolutionary conserved and a similar system is found in the endoplasmic reticulum of eukaryotes and the cytoplasmic membrane of archaea. The ribosome and other membrane proteins can associate with the protein-conducting channel complex and affect its activity or functionality.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The protein translocation channel mediates glycopeptide export across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.

Peptides and misfolded secretory proteins are transported efficiently from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) lumen to the cytosol, where the proteins are degraded by proteasomes. Protein export depends on Sec61p, the ribosome-binding core component of the protein translocation channel in the ER membrane. We found that prebinding of ribosomes abolished export of a glycopeptide from yeast microsomes. Deletion of SSH1, which encodes a ribosome-binding Sec61p homologue in the ER, had no effect on glycopeptide export. A collection of cold-sensitive sec61 mutants displayed a variety of phenotypes: two mutants strongly defective in misfolded protein export from the ER, sec61-32 and sec61-41, displayed only minor peptide export defects. Glycopeptide export was severely impaired, however, in several sec61 mutants that were only marginally defective in misfolded protein export. In addition, a mutation in SEC63 strongly reduced peptide export from the ER. ER-luminal ATP was required for both misfolded protein and glycopeptide export. We conclude that the protein translocation channel in the ER membrane mediates glycopeptide transport across the ER membrane.

4,4'-Diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-Disulfonic Acid↗

Mapping the sites of interaction between SecY and SecE by cysteine scanning mutagenesis.

In Escherichia coli, the SecYEG complex mediates the translocation and membrane integration of proteins. Both genetic and biochemical data indicate interactions of several transmembrane segments (TMSs) of SecY with SecE. By means of cysteine scanning mutagenesis, we have identified intermolecular sites of contact between TMS7 of SecY and TMS3 of SecE. The cross-linking of SecY to SecE demonstrates that these subunits are present in a one-to-one stoichiometry within the SecYEG complex. Sites in TMS3 of SecE involved in SecE dimerization are confined to a specific alpha-helical interface and occur in an oligomeric SecYEG complex. Although cross-linking reversibly inactivates translocation, the contact between TMS7 of SecY and TMS3 of SecE remains unaltered upon insertion of the preprotein into the translocation channel. These data support a model for an oligomeric translocation channel in which pairs of SecYEG complexes contact each other via SecE.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Oligomeric states of the SecA and SecYEG core components of the bacterial Sec translocon.

Many proteins synthesized in the cytoplasm ultimately function in non-cytoplasmic locations. In Escherichia coli, the general secretory (Sec) pathway transports the vast majority of these proteins. Two fundamental components of the Sec transport pathway are the SecYEG heterotrimeric complex that forms the channel through the cytoplasmic membrane, and SecA, the ATPase that drives the preprotein to and across the membrane. This review focuses on what is known about the oligomeric states of these core Sec components and how the oligomeric state might change during the course of the translocation of a preprotein.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Cysteine-directed cross-linking demonstrates that helix 3 of SecE is close to helix 2 of SecY and helix 3 of a neighboring SecE.

Preprotein translocation in Escherichia coli is mediated by translocase, a multimeric membrane protein complex with SecA as the peripheral ATPase and SecYEG as the translocation pore. Unique cysteines were introduced into transmembrane segment (TMS) 2 of SecY and TMS 3 of SecE to probe possible sites of interaction between the integral membrane subunits. The SecY and SecE single-Cys mutants were cloned individually and in pairs into a secYEG expression vector and functionally overexpressed. Oxidation of the single-Cys pairs revealed periodic contacts between SecY and SecE that are confined to a specific alpha-helical face of TMS 2 and 3, respectively. A Cys at the opposite alpha-helical face of TMS 3 of SecE was found to interact with a neighboring SecE molecule. Formation of this SecE dimer did not affect the high-affinity binding of SecA to SecYEG and ATP hydrolysis, but blocked preprotein translocation and thus uncouples the SecA ATPase activity from translocation. Conditions that prevent membrane deinsertion of SecA markedly stimulated the interhelical contact between the SecE molecules. The latter demonstrates a SecA-mediated modulation of the protein translocation channel that is sensed by SecE.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Systematic probing of the environment of a translocating secretory protein during translocation through the ER membrane.

We have extended a previously developed photo-crosslinking approach to systematically probe the protein environment of the secretory protein preprolactin, trapped during its transfer through the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Single photoreactive groups were placed at various positions of nascent polypeptide chains of various length, corresponding to different stages of the transport process, and photo-crosslinks to membrane proteins were analyzed. In all cases, the polypeptide segment extending from the ribosome was found to be located in a membrane environment that is formed almost exclusively from Sec61 alpha, the multi-spanning subunit of the Sec61p complex that is essential for translocation. At early stages of the translocation process, before cleavage of the signal sequence, almost the entire nascent chain emerged from the ribosome contacts Sec61 alpha. The 'translocating chain-associating membrane' protein interacts mainly with the region of the signal sequence preceding its hydrophobic core. Our results suggest that the nascent chain is transferred directly from the ribosome into a protein-conducting channel, the major constituent of which is Sec61 alpha.

Affinity Labels↗

Signal sequence recognition in cotranslational translocation by protein components of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.

We have investigated the role of membrane proteins and lipids during early phases of the cotranslational insertion of secretory proteins into the translocation channel of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. We demonstrate that all steps, including the one during which signal sequence recognition occurs, can be reproduced with purified translocation components in detergent solution, in the absence of bulk lipids or a bilayer. Photocross-linking experiments with native membranes show that upon complete insertion into the channel signal sequences are both precisely positioned with respect to the protein components of the channel and contact lipids. Together, these results indicate that signal sequences are bound to a specific binding site at the interface between the channel and the surrounding lipids, and are recognized ultimately by protein-protein interactions. Our data also suggest that at least some signal sequences reach the binding site by transfer through the interior of the channel.

Animals↗

Chloroplast SecY is complexed to SecE and involved in the translocation of the 33-kDa but not the 23-kDa subunit of the oxygen-evolving complex.

SecY is a component of the protein-conducting channel for protein transport across the cytoplasmic membrane of prokaryotes. It is intimately associated with a second integral membrane protein, SecE, and together with SecA forms the minimal core of the preprotein translocase. A chloroplast homologue of SecY (cpSecY) has previously been identified and determined to be localized to the thylakoid membrane. In the present work, we demonstrate that a SecE homologue is localized to the thylakoid membrane, where it forms a complex with cpSecY. Digitonin solubilization of thylakoid membranes releases the SecY/E complex in a 180-kDa form, indicating that other components are present and/or the complex is a higher order oligomer of the cpSecY/E dimer. To test whether cpSecY forms the protein-conducting channel of the thylakoid membrane, translocation assays were conducted with the SecA-dependent substrate OE33 and the SecA-independent substrate OE23, in the presence and absence of antibodies raised against cpSecY. The antibodies inhibited translocation of OE33 but not OE23, indicating that cpSecY comprises the protein-conducting channel used in the SecA-dependent pathway, whereas a distinct protein conducting channel is used to translocate OE23.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The archaeal Sec-dependent protein translocation pathway.

Over the past three decades, transport of proteins across cellular membranes has been studied extensively in various model systems. One of the major transport routes, the so-called Sec pathway, is conserved in all domains of life. Very little is known about this pathway in the third domain of life, archaea. The core components of the archaeal, bacterial and eucaryal Sec machinery are similar, although the archaeal components appear more closely related to their eucaryal counterparts. Interestingly, the accessory factors of the translocation machinery are similar to bacterial components, which indicates a unique hybrid nature of the archaeal translocase complex. The mechanism of protein translocation in archaea is completely unknown. Based on genomic sequencing data, the most likely system for archaeal protein translocation is similar to the eucaryal co-translational translocation pathway for protein import into the endoplasmic reticulum, in which a protein is pushed across the translocation channel by the ribosome. However, other models can also be envisaged, such as a bacterial-like system in which a protein is translocated post-translationally with the aid of a motor protein analogous to the bacterial ATPase SecA. This review discusses the different models. Furthermore, an overview is given of some of the other components that may be involved in the protein translocation process, such as those required for protein targeting, folding and post-translational modification.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Topology of the integral membrane form of Escherichia coli SecA protein reveals multiple periplasmically exposed regions and modulation by ATP binding.

SecA insertion and integration into the Escherichia coli inner membrane is a critical step for the catalysis of protein translocation across this layer. To understand this step further, SecA topology was investigated. To determine which regions of SecA are periplasmically exposed, right-side out membrane vesicles were prepared from strains synthesizing monocysteine SecA variants produced by mutagenesis and probed with a membrane-impermeant sulfhydryl-labeling reagent. To determine which regions of SecA contain membrane-integration determinants, inverted inner membrane vesicles were subjected to proteolysis, and integral-membrane fragments of SecA were identified with region-specific antibodies. The membrane association properties of various truncated SecA species produced in vivo were also determined. Our analysis indicates that the membrane topology of SecA is complex with amino-terminal, central, and carboxyl-terminal regions of SecA integrated into the membrane where portions are periplasmically accessible. Furthermore, the insertion and penetration of the amino-terminal third of SecA, which includes the proposed preprotein-binding domain, is subject to modulation by ATP binding. The importance of these studies to the cycle of membrane insertion and de-insertion of SecA that promotes protein translocation and SecA's proximity to the preprotein channel are discussed.

ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters↗