Do all SINEs lead to LINEs?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Genes, Reporter↗
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Results for “Short Interspersed Nucleotide Elements”
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Identification of insertion hot spots for non-LTR retrotransposons: computational and biochemical application to Entamoeba histolytica.
The genome of the human pathogen Entamoeba histolytica contains non-long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons, the EhLINEs and EhSINEs, which lack targeted insertion. We investigated the importance of local DNA structure, and sequence preference of the element-encoded endonuclease (EN) in selecting target sites for retrotransposon insertion. Pre-insertion loci were tested computationally to detect unique features based on DNA structure, thermodynamic considerations and protein interaction measures. Target sites could readily be distinguished from other genomic sites based on these criteria. The contribution of the EhLINE1-encoded EN in target site selection was investigated biochemically. The sequence-specificity of the EN was tested in vitro with a variety of mutated substrates. It was possible to assign a consensus sequence, 5'-GCATT-3', which was efficiently nicked between A-T and T-T. The upstream G residue enhanced EN activity, possibly serving to limit retrotransposition in the A+T-rich E.histolytica genome. Mutated substrates with poor EN activity showed structural differences compared with normal substrates. Analysis of retrotransposon insertion sites from a variety of organisms showed that, in general, regions of favorable DNA structure were recognized for retrotransposition. A combination of favorable DNA structure and preferred EN nicking sequence in the vicinity of this structure may determine the genomic hotspots for retrotransposition.
Animals↗
Identity by descent and DNA sequence variation of human SINE and LINE elements.
To test the hypothesis that Alu and L1 elements are genetic characters that are essentially homoplasy-free, we sequenced a total of five human L1 elements and eleven recently integrated Alu elements from 160 chromosomes (80 individuals representing four diverse human populations). Analysis of worldwide samples at L1 loci revealed 292 segregating sites and a nucleotide diversity of 0.0050. For Ya5 Alu loci, there were 129 segregating sites and nucleotide diversity was estimated at 0.0045. The Alu and L1 sequence diversity varied element to element. No completely or partially deleted Alu or L1 alleles were identified during the analysis. These data suggest that mobile element insertions are identical by descent characters for the study of human population genetics.
Black or African American↗
i-Genome: a database to summarize oligonucleotide data in genomes.
BACKGROUND: Information on the occurrence of sequence features in genomes is crucial to comparative genomics, evolutionary analysis, the analyses of regulatory sequences and the quantitative evaluation of sequences. Computing the frequencies and the occurrences of a pattern in complete genomes is time-consuming. RESULTS: The proposed database provides information about sequence features generated by exhaustively computing the sequences of the complete genome. The repetitive elements in the eukaryotic genomes, such as LINEs, SINEs, Alu and LTR, are obtained from Repbase. The database supports various complete genomes including human, yeast, worm, and 128 microbial genomes. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation presents and implements an efficiently computational approach to accumulate the occurrences of the oligonucleotides or patterns in complete genomes. A database is established to maintain the information of the sequence features, including the distributions of oligonucleotide, the gene distribution, the distribution of repetitive elements in genomes and the occurrences of the oligonucleotides. The database can provide more effective and efficient way to access the repetitive features in genomes.
Alu Elements↗
[Non-LTR retrotransposons: LINEs and SINEs in plant genome].
Retrotransposons are one of the drivers of genome evolution. They include LTR (long terminal repeat) retrotransposons, which widespread in Eukaryotagenomes, show structural similarity to retroviruses. Non-LTR retrotransposons were first discovered in animal genomes and then identified as ubiquitous components of nuclear genomes in many species across the plant kingdom. They constitute a large fraction of the repetitive DNA. Non-LTR retrotransposons are divided into LINEs (long interspersed nuclear elements) and SINEs (short interspersed nuclear elements). Transposition of non-LTR retrotransposons is rarely observed in plants indicating that most of them are inactive and/or under regulation of the host genome. Transposition is poorly understood, but experimental evidence from other genetic systems shows that LINEs are able to transpose autonomously while non-autonomous SINEs depend on the reverse transcription machinery of other retrotransposons. Phylogenic analysis shows LINEs are probably the most ancient class of retrotransposons in plant genomes, while the origin of SINEs is unknown. This review sums up the above data and wants to show readers a clear picture of non-LTR retrotransposons.
Genome, Plant↗
Identification of non-autonomous non-LTR retrotransposons in the genome of Trypanosoma cruzi.
As observed for most eukaryotic cells, trypanosomatids contains non-LTR retrotransposons randomly inserted in the nuclear genome. Autonomous retroelements which, code for their own transposition, have been characterized in Trypanosoma brucei (ingi) and Trypanosoma cruzi (L1Tc), whereas non-autonomous retroelements have only been characterized in T. brucei (RIME). Here, we have characterized in the genome of Trypanosoma cruzi four complete copies of a non-autonomous non-LTR retrotransposon, called NARTc. This 0.26 kb NARTc element has the characteristics of non-LTR retrotransposons: the presence a poly(dA) tail and of a short flanking duplicated motif. Analysis of the Genome Survey Sequence databases indicated that the Trypanosoma cruzi haploid genome contains about 140 NARTc copies and about twice as many L1Tc copies. Interestingly, the NARTc and L1Tc retroelements share, with the Trypanosoma brucei ingi and RIME retrotransposons, a common sequence (the first 45 bp with 91% identity), whereas the remaining sequences are very divergent. This suggests that these four trypanosome non-LTR retrotransposons were derived from the same common ancester and the sequence of their 5'-extremity may have a functional role. In addition, the genome of Leishmania major contains the same conserved motif present in the trypanosome retroelements, whicle no transposable elements have been detected so far in Leishmania sp.
Animals↗
SINEs and LINEs: the art of biting the hand that feeds you.
SINEs and LINEs are short and long interspersed retrotransposable elements, respectively, that invade new genomic sites using RNA intermediates. SINEs and LINEs are found in almost all eukaryotes (although not in Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and together account for at least 34% of the human genome. The noncoding SINEs depend on reverse transcriptase and endonuclease functions encoded by partner LINEs. With the completion of many genome sequences, including our own, the database of SINEs and LINEs has taken a great leap forward. The new data pose new questions that can only be answered by detailed studies of the mechanism of retroposition. Current work ranges from the biochemistry of reverse transcription and integration invitro, target site selection in vivo, nucleocytoplasmic transport of the RNA and ribonucleoprotein intermediates, and mechanisms of genomic turnover. Two particularly exciting new ideas are that SINEs may help cells survive physiological stress, and that the evolution of SINEs and LINEs has been shaped by the forces of RNA interference. Taken together, these studies promise to explain the birth and death of SINEs and LINEs, and the contribution of these repetitive sequence families to the evolution of genomes.
Animals↗
DNA sequence of human chromosome 17 and analysis of rearrangement in the human lineage.
Chromosome 17 is unusual among the human chromosomes in many respects. It is the largest human autosome with orthology to only a single mouse chromosome, mapping entirely to the distal half of mouse chromosome 11. Chromosome 17 is rich in protein-coding genes, having the second highest gene density in the genome. It is also enriched in segmental duplications, ranking third in density among the autosomes. Here we report a finished sequence for human chromosome 17, as well as a structural comparison with the finished sequence for mouse chromosome 11, the first finished mouse chromosome. Comparison of the orthologous regions reveals striking differences. In contrast to the typical pattern seen in mammalian evolution, the human sequence has undergone extensive intrachromosomal rearrangement, whereas the mouse sequence has been remarkably stable. Moreover, although the human sequence has a high density of segmental duplication, the mouse sequence has a very low density. Notably, these segmental duplications correspond closely to the sites of structural rearrangement, demonstrating a link between duplication and rearrangement. Examination of the main classes of duplicated segments provides insight into the dynamics underlying expansion of chromosome-specific, low-copy repeats in the human genome.
Animals↗
Repair rates of R-band, G-band and C-band DNA in murine and human cultured cells.
Repair of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) in cultured neonatal human fibroblasts and in Mus spretus x M. castaneus F1 neonatal skin fibroblasts was analyzed after UVC-irradiation by cleavage with T4 endonuclease V cyclopyrimidine dimer glycosylase, alkaline-agarose gel electrophoresis, and Southern blotting. The blots were sequentially probed with 32P-labeled Alu, or B2, to preferentially illuminate R-band DNA, by L1 to preferentially illuminate G-band DNA, and by satellite DNA to illuminate C-band DNA. These three different DNA populations showed slightly different global nucleotide excision repair rates that are in the order of speed, R-band DNA > G-band DNA > C-band DNA. Fibroblasts from out-bred neonatal mice and humans showed similar band-specific repair rate ratios and the global repair rate of murine fibroblasts was almost as rapid as that of the human fibroblasts. The mass distribution of the human Alu-probed signal was further analyzed. Gel mobility data was fitted to a logistic equation to include all M(r) values. Hypothetical distributions of DNA randomly cleaved to a particular number-average molecular weight were fit to the logistic gel mobility function to determine how such a randomly cleaved distribution of a particular cleavage frequency would be displayed along the experimental gel. This revealed a rapidly repaired kinetic fraction that represented 17% of the Alu-probed signal (R-band DNA), almost none of the L1 probed signal (G-band DNA), and reflects transcription coupled repair of active genes. The remaining Alu-probed DNA showed a random distribution of UVC-induced CPDs throughout all stages of global nucleotide excision repair. The Alu-probed CPDs disappeared with an excellent fit to first order kinetics and with a half-life of seven hours.
Alu Elements↗
Nonmethylated transposable elements and methylated genes in a chordate genome.
The genome of the invertebrate chordate Ciona intestinalis was found to be a stable mosaic of methylated and nonmethylated domains. Multiple copies of an apparently active long terminal repeat retrotransposon and a long interspersed element are nonmethylated and a large fraction of abundant short interspersed elements are also methylation free. Genes, by contrast, are predominantly methylated. These data are incompatible with the genome defense model, which proposes that DNA methylation in animals is primarily targeted to endogenous transposable elements. Cytosine methylation in this urochordate may be preferentially directed to genes.
Animals↗
A survey of homozygous deletions in human cancer genomes.
Homozygous deletions of recessive cancer genes and fragile sites are known to occur in human cancers. We identified 281 homozygous deletions in 636 cancer cell lines. Of these deletions, 86 were homozygous deletions of known recessive cancer genes, 17 were of sequenced common fragile sites, and 178 were in genomic regions that do not overlap known recessive oncogenes or fragile sites ("unexplained" homozygous deletions). Some cancer cell lines have multiple homozygous deletions whereas others have none, suggesting intrinsic variation in the tendency to develop this type of genetic abnormality (P < 0.001). The 178 unexplained homozygous deletions clustered into 131 genomic regions, 27 of which exhibit homozygous deletions in more than one cancer cell line. This degree of clustering indicates that the genomic positions of the unexplained homozygous deletions are not randomly determined (P < 0.001). Many homozygous deletions, including those that are in multiple clusters, do not overlap known genes and appear to be in intergenic DNA. Therefore, to elucidate further the pathogenesis of homozygous deletions in cancer, we investigated the genome landscape within unexplained homozygous deletions. The gene count within homozygous deletions is low compared with the rest of the genome. There are also fewer short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs), long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs), and low-copy-number repeats (LCRs). However, DNA within homozygous deletions has higher flexibility. These features may signal the presence of currently unrecognized zones of susceptibility to DNA rearrangement. They may also reflect a tendency to reduce the adverse effects of homozygous deletions by minimizing the number of genes removed.
Cell Line, Tumor↗
Genealogy of families of SINEs in cetaceans and artiodactyls: the presence of a huge superfamily of tRNA(Glu)-derived families of SINEs.
Several novel (sub)families of SINEs were isolated from the genomes of cetaceans and artiodactyls, and their sequences were determined. From comparisons of diagnostic nucleotides among the short interspersed repetitive elements (SINEs) in these (sub)families, we were able to draw the following conclusions. (1) After the divergence of the suborder Tylopoda (camels), the CHRS family of SINEs was newly created from tRNA(Glu) in a common ancestor of the lineages of the Suina (pigs and peccaries), Ruminantia (cows and deer), and Cetacea (whales and dolphins). (2) After divergence of the Suina lineage, the CHR-1 SINE and the CHR-2 SINE were generated successively in a common ancestor of ruminants, hippopotamuses, and cetaceans. (3) In the Ruminantia lineage, the Bov-tA SINE was generated by recombination between the CHR-2 SINE and Bov-A. (4) In the Suina lineage, the CHRS-S SINE was generated from the CHRS SINE. (5) In this latter lineage, the PRE-1 family of SINEs was created by insertion of part of the gene for tRNA(Arg) into the 5' region of the CHRS-S family. The distribution of a particular family of SINEs among species of artiodactyls and cetaceans confirmed the most recent conclusion for paraphyly of the order Artiodactyla. The present study also revealed that a newly created tRNA(Glu)-derived family of SINEs was subjected both to recombination with different units and to duplication of an internal sequence within a SINE unit to generate, during evolution, a huge superfamily of tRNA(Glu)-related families of SINEs that are now found in the genomes of artiodactyls and cetaceans.
Animals↗
Retrotransposons rule in Carry-le-Rouet.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Alu Elements↗
[Diversification of genomes by SINEs and LINEs].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Animals↗
Retroelements and formation of chimeric retrogenes.
It is very likely that formation of new genes is the main pathway of molecular evolution in living organisms. Many such genes are products of preexisting reshuffling of genetic material. In these processes a very important role is played by mutations associated with the activity of transposable elements, mostly retroelements (REs) for higher eukaryotes. The life cycle of REs involves a stage of so-called reverse transcription of their RNA intermediates, i.e. synthesis of complementary DNA on an RNA template. Transcriptionally active sequences of RE origin are referred to as retrogenes. REs create chimeric genes by a variety of mechanisms: new RE insertions, recombinations between RE sequences, formation of functional gene active pseudogenes and template switches during reverse transcription of messenger RNA. The abovementioned events are also able to give rise to new RE families. These mechanisms are reviewed here along with the description of major RE groups.
Animals↗
DNA hypomethylation and human diseases.
Changes in human DNA methylation patterns are an important feature of cancer development and progression and a potential role in other conditions such as atherosclerosis and autoimmune diseases (e.g., multiple sclerosis and lupus) is being recognised. The cancer genome is frequently characterised by hypermethylation of specific genes concurrently with an overall decrease in the level of 5 methyl cytosine. This hypomethylation of the genome largely affects the intergenic and intronic regions of the DNA, particularly repeat sequences and transposable elements, and is believed to result in chromosomal instability and increased mutation events. This review examines our understanding of the patterns of cancer-associated hypomethylation, and how recent advances in understanding of chromatin biology may help elucidate the mechanisms underlying repeat sequence demethylation. It also considers how global demethylation of repeat sequences including transposable elements and the site-specific hypomethylation of certain genes might contribute to the deleterious effects that ultimately result in the initiation and progression of cancer and other diseases. The use of hypomethylation of interspersed repeat sequences and genes as potential biomarkers in the early detection of tumors and their prognostic use in monitoring disease progression are also examined.
CpG Islands↗
Repetitive sequence environment distinguishes housekeeping genes.
Housekeeping genes are expressed across a wide variety of tissues. Since repetitive sequences have been reported to influence the expression of individual genes, we employed a novel approach to determine whether housekeeping genes can be distinguished from tissue-specific genes by their repetitive sequence context. We show that Alu elements are more highly concentrated around housekeeping genes while various longer (>400-bp) repetitive sequences ("repeats"), including Long Interspersed Nuclear Element-1 (LINE-1) elements, are excluded from these regions. We further show that isochore membership does not distinguish housekeeping genes from tissue-specific genes and that repetitive sequence environment distinguishes housekeeping genes from tissue-specific genes in every isochore. The distinct repetitive sequence environment, in combination with other previously published sequence properties of housekeeping genes, was used to develop a method of predicting housekeeping genes on the basis of DNA sequence alone. Using expression across tissue types as a measure of success, we demonstrate that repetitive sequence environment is by far the most important sequence feature identified to date for distinguishing housekeeping genes.
3' Flanking Region↗
Fitness cost of LINE-1 (L1) activity in humans.
The self-replicating LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposon family is the dominant retrotransposon family in mammals and has generated 30-40% of their genomes. Active L1 families are present in modern mammals but the important question of whether these currently active families affect the genetic fitness of their hosts has not been addressed. This issue is of particular relevance to humans as Homo sapiens contains the active L1 Ta1 subfamily of the human specific Ta (L1Pa1) L1 family. Although DNA insertions generated by the Ta1 subfamily can cause genetic defects in current humans, these are relatively rare, and it is not known whether Ta1-generated inserts or any other property of Ta1 elements have been sufficiently deleterious to reduce the fitness of humans. Here we show that full-length (FL) Ta1 elements, but not the truncated Ta1 elements or SINE (Alu) insertions generated by Ta1 activity, were subject to negative selection. Thus, one or more properties unique to FL L1 elements constitute a genetic burden for modern humans. We also found that the FL Ta1 elements became more deleterious as the expansion of Ta1 has proceeded. Because this expansion is ongoing, the Ta1 subfamily almost certainly continues to decrease the fitness of modern humans.
Adaptation, Physiological↗